Ender wrote: Havok wrote: Ender wrote:
And as a counter, here
we have Havok claiming that the use of child soldiers is something we should be doing, that we don't use them because we "coddle our children into their 20s and think they are complete fucking idiots" and objects to the idea it is a war crime.
Care to quote where I actually
That was a word for word quote from you from the thread I linked to. So yes, I did quote where you actually said that.
WHOOSH!! Care to quote where is said "the use of child soldiers is something WE SHOULD BE DOING," "OBJECTS to the idea it is a war crime."
Please, post the relevant quotes. Show where I advocate child soldiers and object to the fact that it should be a war crime.
or are you just going to keep harping on this after a year... hey isn't that a vendetta?...
The topic brought up was your previous posting, making this directly relevant. So no, it is not a vendetta, it is me following the rules.
Uh, no dumbfuck. The nomination thread is for nominations. I was nominated, seconded with links to my posting. Those are the "rules" for that thread.
Here, since you can't read. I'll even highlight the relevant parts for you.
CmdrWilkens wrote:As the Updated Sentate ruleset has passed nomination duties have fallen to the House of Commons. Within that context please utilize this thread to nominate or second any board member you feel should be considered for Senate membership.
Nominations will close on the 24th of each month (21st in Feb) so for December the window is short but all subsequent months will have the full period (2nd-24th) available for nominations from the HoC.
Remember this thread is for nominating members to the Senate or seconding the motion, extraneous comment is discouraged.
So whatever "rules" you are following appear to just be made up in your empty little head.
because you are too fucking stupid to get the point that the Star Wars universe is NOT ours?
The full body of that sentence was stating that it was not like modern earth, with you implicitly condemning the fact that earth does not allow child soldiers.
Oh really. Again, please cite where I IMPLICITLY CONDEMN the fact that Earth does not allow child soldiers.
And correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't 18 the legal age, and in some cases 17, that teenagers can enter into military service?
You can sign up at that age but you are a ward of the service and will not see active duty until you are an adult.
Oh my bad. So they train for combat and killing for 12 months before going into combat and kill. Man, you really shot my point down there. Y'know because 17 to 18 is such a huge jump in maturity.
So my claim that we coddle children into their 20s actually has no bearing on your argument. Oops... my bad... you are already a Senator. Carry on with the vendetta.
Yes, how dare I review your posting history when we are charged with reviewing your posting history.
Review it all you want.
If this was the first time you brought it up since then, I probably wouldn't have said anything, but surprise, it isn't.
Hey look... http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic. ... &p=2843714
Ender wrote: havokeff wrote:Ender
It's interesting that your bullshit example just jams a whole lot of new characters in and your Schumacher example just jams a whole lot of new characters in.
And you object to Robin, but want The Ventriloquist and his puppet.
No, I cited other possibilities while focusing on overall themes as the key strength of the new ones. You are a fucking moron, so I understand why you don't understand the difference. In your mind it is the color and effects that matter, not the story. We've spent the past two movies establishing Batman's mentality of isolating himself and not spreading the danger to others. This isn't some interpretation - Nolan's characters flat out state their motivation and inner thoughts. Now you want him to do a complete reversal and have a kid in a brightly colored unarmored suit running around. And you see completely discarding all the character that has been previously established as on the same level as having a Son of Sam style paranoid schizophrenic on screen.
But hey, having Robin gives you another child soldier on screen. And we all know you are a sick fuck who is down with that.
We must have been talking about my posting history in that thread too. OOPS. Man, I know we have a word for that around here... dangit, what was it again? Ohhh that's right.
I would agree with this, as I was simply rising to the esteemed, well regarded, quality level of one of the Senate and ASVS members. Oh wait. I also answered all Poe points... repeatedly. He chose to ignore that, as apparently you do as well. Sorry you don't like the packaging. Need a tissue?
As I said at the time, that was a pathetic showing from all sides that should be regarded as an embarrassment to the board. Further, the statement for what we should seek was made after that thread.
Why, because I made fun of your fatty friend? Again, I answered all his points and arguments. Should I put a bow on it and write you a little love note next time so you don't get offended?
And just to quote Mike's opinion on flaming from the thread you linked to...
Darth Wong wrote:The other reason not to quick-draw is simple: the correct time to blast someone is when he makes a really stupid or dishonest argument to support an opinion. Simply stating that he has an opinion is not the correct time.
Yeah, I'm pretty sure Poe fell into that category in that thread.
I request that this be folded back into the nomination thread, as Havok attacking me for carrying out my duties is yet another example as to why he should not be a Senator.
That's an attack?
That's fine by me. Even though Wilkens wanted to avoid this, which is why I answered you here and not in the nominations thread, but hey, what does he know.
And just for the record, I say you are absolutely full of shit. If you really found Padawans, who are indeed child soldiers SOOO reprehensible, then how could you have possibly brought yourself to watch the two follow up prequel movies? You knew that George Lucas, who clearly advocates child soldiers, was making them and that there would be more evil Jedi who take kids into battle in them. For that matter, how can you even bring yourself to read Batman, let alone discuss him. He clearly advocates child soldiers. His comics must just be too repulsive to even read. I mean, really, all of DC comics must make you sick, since they publish Batman.
How can you STAND to read the EU, which is Jedi-centric and continually features child soldiers.
Indiana Jones, Paramount, Steven Speilberg.
Dumbledore, JK Rowling.
Captain Picard, Gene Rodenberry, Paramount.
Professor X, Marvel.
Man, it must suck not to be able to watch or read any of that stuff because of all the child soldier advocacy.
Or, maybe, just maybe, you realize that accepting something in a FICTIONAL world and not finding it reprehensible in that context, is not the same thing as advocating it in the REAL world.
Nah. Giving you to much credit.