Page 4 of 12

Re: [Member] Perpetual Nomination Thread

Posted: 2009-01-04 12:17pm
by Mr. Coffee
Shroom Man 777 wrote:With all these decent members, I'll probably never have a shot at becoming a Senator. :(
Yeah, but nominating a few oddballs forces people to take notice and nominate people that really should have been senators already, dude. It's for the Greater Good or some shit, yo.

Re: [Member] Perpetual Nomination Thread

Posted: 2009-01-04 03:32pm
by Enigma
Shroom Man 777 wrote:With all these decent members, I'll probably never have a shot at becoming a Senator. :(
*blink*Shroomy can construct decent sentences without mashing them up? I must on something. :)

Don't worry Shroom-meister, I'm sure you'll get some votes.

Re: [Member] Perpetual Nomination Thread

Posted: 2009-01-05 02:27am
by Phantasee
Mr. Coffee wrote:
Shroom Man 777 wrote:With all these decent members, I'll probably never have a shot at becoming a Senator. :(
Yeah, but nominating a few oddballs forces people to take notice and nominate people that really should have been senators already, dude. It's for the Greater Good or some shit, yo.
We can always wait for a lull in the nominating, maybe in March or something, and put on a concerted effort to get Shroomy in as Senator from the PRFY in there. Regular folk can be douchebags Senators too!

Re: [Member] Perpetual Nomination Thread

Posted: 2009-01-05 10:31am
by Shroom Man 777
Incidentally, March is where mein birthday is at too! It'll be a perfect present! :D

Aw, shucks! I love you guys! ;)

Re: [Member] Perpetual Nomination Thread

Posted: 2009-01-05 12:35pm
by Schuyler Colfax
CmdrWilkens wrote:Current Nominations (that have been seconded) for January:

Colefax (by which I assume it was meant Schuyler Colfax)
Wow, I wonder how far this is gonna go.

Re: [Member] Perpetual Nomination Thread

Posted: 2009-01-05 05:05pm
by Mr. Coffee
Shroom Man 777 wrote:Incidentally, March is where mein birthday is at too! It'll be a perfect present! :D

Aw, shucks! I love you guys! ;)
We got ya covered, buddy.

Re: [Member] Perpetual Nomination Thread

Posted: 2009-01-05 08:08pm
by Havok
Schuyler Colfax wrote:
CmdrWilkens wrote:Current Nominations (that have been seconded) for January:

Colefax (by which I assume it was meant Schuyler Colfax)
Wow, I wonder how far this is gonna go.
Not far. If you keep improving though, and you really want to be in, then you have a goal to shoot for in the future.

Re: [Member] Perpetual Nomination Thread

Posted: 2009-01-23 07:47pm
by CmdrWilkens
Current Nominations (that have been seconded) for January:
The nomination period will close at 1200 GMT (or 700 EST) and the vote will run from whenever I wake up tomorrow morning through that time on January 31st.

Re: [Member] Perpetual Nomination Thread

Posted: 2009-02-04 06:19pm
by CmdrWilkens
Nominations are open for the month of February and will close in time for a vote on the 21st.

Re: [Member] Perpetual Nomination Thread

Posted: 2009-02-04 07:54pm
by Thanas
Do we have to renominate people who have been nominated in the past?

Re: [Member] Perpetual Nomination Thread

Posted: 2009-02-04 08:55pm
by Havok
I believe that is how it works.

Re: [Member] Perpetual Nomination Thread

Posted: 2009-02-04 09:00pm
by GrandMasterTerwynn
Thanas wrote:Do we have to renominate people who have been nominated in the past?
Yes, if someone was nominated in a previous round of elections, and wasn't elected to the Senate, they must be re-nominated for the current nomination period. Precedent.

Re: [Member] Perpetual Nomination Thread

Posted: 2009-02-04 09:44pm
by Starglider
Hmm, I'd nominate Stuart, his contributions to the board have been excellent and AFAIK he's done a good job of moderating the HPCA forum. However, I don't know if he actually wants the position. I'll PM him and ask.

Re: [Member] Perpetual Nomination Thread

Posted: 2009-02-04 10:53pm
by CmdrWilkens
General note, I'm gonna be bringing back the Chancellor's Discretion provision so if anybody doesn't bother to:

a) check to ensure their candidate actual wants the job
b) link to their profile in the initial nomination
c) actually provide some evidence of support

then the nominee is gonna be kicked.

Re: [Member] Perpetual Nomination Thread

Posted: 2009-02-05 12:10pm
by Flagg
I again nominate Bounty

A few of his many (so many that almost every thread has meaningful posts in them) contributions to the Pure Star Trek Forum:

Size of Borg Space

Size of the new Enterprise

Info on USS Kelvin

And those are just from the first 2 pages. The guy is a fucking font of Trek Knowledge and would be a worthy addition to the Senate.

Re: [Member] Perpetual Nomination Thread

Posted: 2009-02-05 12:14pm
by Crazedwraith
I'll second Bounty.

Re: [Member] Perpetual Nomination Thread

Posted: 2009-02-05 09:40pm
by Starglider
Stuart wrote:
Starglider wrote:Would you like to be nominated for the Senate? Your comments on dealing with miscreants are usually amusing (and sensible), and AFAIK the minimum participation is just voting on something twice a month or so.
I would be very pleased to serve should I be honored by nomination and election. Thank you for considering me for this position.
Right, if someone would like to second that, I will see about digging up some sample posts. (Stuart's user profile)

Re: [Member] Perpetual Nomination Thread

Posted: 2009-02-06 03:42am
by Guardsman Bass
I'll third that. I've wondered why Stuart wasn't put up for nomination a long time ago; my assumption was that he was too busy with work and life for it. I guess I was wrong, so definitely yes to nomination for Stuart.

Re: [Member] Perpetual Nomination Thread

Posted: 2009-02-06 11:14am
by Ace Pace
I feel obliged to post here, due to Skimmers posts in the senate and some questions. I am not nominatable for the near future. It's for IRL reasons and not for any "the senate is dumb lol" stuff.

Re: [Member] Perpetual Nomination Thread

Posted: 2009-02-06 05:15pm
by Hotfoot
Ace Pace wrote:I feel obliged to post here, due to Skimmers posts in the senate and some questions. I am not nominatable for the near future. It's for IRL reasons and not for any "the senate is dumb lol" stuff.
As Ace is clearly back from his hiatus, I nominated him for the Senate. :wink:

Seriously though, don't nominate Ace, he'll cry.

Re: [Member] Perpetual Nomination Thread

Posted: 2009-02-07 09:56pm
by GrandMasterTerwynn
Starglider wrote:
Stuart wrote:
Starglider wrote:Would you like to be nominated for the Senate? Your comments on dealing with miscreants are usually amusing (and sensible), and AFAIK the minimum participation is just voting on something twice a month or so.
I would be very pleased to serve should I be honored by nomination and election. Thank you for considering me for this position.
Right, if someone would like to second that, I will see about digging up some sample posts. (Stuart's user profile)
I shall take a stab at legitimizing this particular nomination.

Stuart on reverse engineering.

Stuart on nuclear war.

Stuart on the Chinese milk scandal.

Re: [Member] Perpetual Nomination Thread

Posted: 2009-02-08 06:22pm
by Surlethe
Don't forget Armageddon. :wink:

Re: [Member] Perpetual Nomination Thread

Posted: 2009-02-10 07:00am
by Thanas
Stuart and Bounty are good candidates and worthy to be seated. I would vote for them any time.

I do believe another member to be deserving as well. He was considered for senate membership in the past, and while not being one of the more active Posters, is certainly worthy of a Senate seat in my opinion: Balrog.

He has indicated that he is willing to serve in such a capacity via PM.

Anyone who has spent some time in the Fantasy section of the board must have noticed his contributions, especially regarding LotR.

A sample of his posts:

Bestiary of Middle-Earth, his magnum opus on this board.
Discussion on endurance feats in the LotR universe
The war in the North (fanfic)

Re: [Member] Perpetual Nomination Thread

Posted: 2009-02-10 09:00pm
by Simplicius
I read the entirety of the Bestiary and his OP for the endurance thread. I don't follow STGOD or fanfics, and his posting history otherwise is modest but didn't turn up any egregious examples. On the basis of the legwork for his long-term projects and staying out of trouble otherwise, I will second Balrog's nomination.

Re: [Member] Perpetual Nomination Thread

Posted: 2009-02-17 09:27pm
by CmdrWilkens
The following nominations are accepted pending the vote:

Bounty

Stuart

Balrog

Nominations close on the 21st.