Hitler's Furies

HIST: Discussions about the last 4000 years of history, give or take a few days.

Moderator: K. A. Pital

Post Reply
User avatar
Posts: 110
Joined: 2007-09-21 11:12pm

Hitler's Furies

Post by Megabot » 2018-06-16 06:13pm

Some time ago I made a thread in which I compared alt-right neo-Nazi women to actual Nazis by citing an article about Hitler's Furies, a book detailing German women's involvement and atrocities in the Holocaust. I eventually figured the article itself is noteworthy enough to warrant its own history thread, so here it is again:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... l-men.html
The Nazi women who were every bit as evil as the men: From the mother who shot Jewish children in cold blood to the nurses who gave lethal injections in death camps

Chilling new book has unearthered thousands of complicit German women
At least half a million witnessed and contributed to Hitler's terror
Have been dubbed the ‘primary witnesses of the Holocaust’
Secretaries typed the orders to kill and filed the details of massacres
Only a small number of women were called to account for their crimes

By Tony Rennell for MailOnline

Published: 18:14 EDT, 25 September 2013 | Updated: 08:24 EDT, 26 September 2013

Blonde German housewife Erna Petri was returning home after a shopping trip in town when something caught her eye: six small, nearly naked boys huddled in terror by the side of the country road.

Married to a senior SS officer, the 23-year-old knew instantly who they were.

They must be the Jews she’d heard about — the ones who’d escaped from a train taking them to an extermination camp.

But she was a mother herself, with two children of her own. So she humanely took the starving, whimpering youngsters home, calmed them down and gave them food to eat.

Then she led the six of them — the youngest aged six, the oldest 12 — into the woods, lined them up on the edge of a pit and shot them methodically one by one with a pistol in the back of the neck.

This schizophrenic combination of warm-hearted mother one minute and cold-blooded killer the next is an enigma and one that — now revealed in a new book based on years of trawling through remote archives — puts a crueller than ever spin on the Third Reich.

Because Erna was by no means an aberration. In a book she tellingly calls ‘Hitler’s Furies’, Holocaust historian Professor Wendy Lower has unearthed the complicity of tens of thousands of German women — many more than previously imagined — in the sort of mass, monstrous, murderous activities that we would like to think the so-called gentler sex were incapable of.

The Holocaust has generally been seen as a crime perpetrated by men. The vast majority of those accused at Nuremberg and other war crimes trials were men.

The few women ever called to account were notorious concentration camp guards — the likes of Irma Grese and Ilse Koch — whose evil was so extreme they could be explained away as freaks and beasts, not really ‘women’ at all.

Ultra-macho Nazi Germany was a man’s world. The vast majority of women had, on Hitler’s orders, confined their activities to Kinder, Küche, Kirche — children, kitchen and church. Thus, when it came to responsibility for the Holocaust and other evils of the Third Reich, they were off the hook.

But that, argues Lower, is simplistic nonsense. Women were drawn into the morally bankrupt conspiracy that was Hitler’s Germany as thoroughly as men were — at a lower level, in most cases, when it came to direct action but guilty just the same.

Ironically, it was the professional carers who were the first to be caught in this evil web. From the moment the Nazis came to power and imposed policies of Aryan racial purity, countless nurses, their aprons filled with morphine vials and needles, routinely slaughtered the physically disabled and mentally defective.

Pauline Kneissler worked at Grafeneck Castle, a euthanasia ‘hospital’ in southern Germany, and toured mental institutions selecting 70 ‘patients’ a day. At the castle they were gassed, which she decided was not that bad because ‘death by gas doesn’t hurt’.

Meanwhile, midwives were betraying a whole generation of German women by reporting defects in unborns and newborns and recommending abortions and euthanasia, as well as sterilisation of mothers.

From the outset, Lower concludes, ‘women made cruel life-and-death decisions, eroding moral sensibilities’. A line had been crossed. It was no big step when the racial purification process turned to the Final Solution of exterminating millions of Jews.

That Jews were the enemy and their annihilation the answer was taken for granted by millions of women who would later deny knowing what was going on under their noses.

Lower, though, dubs them ‘primary witnesses of the Holocaust’.

The worst outrages took place in the ‘Wild East’, Hitler’s newly acquired (by military conquest) territories in Poland, Ukraine and other parts of overrun Russia. At least half a million young women joined in this colonisation process, and became accomplices to genocide on an unprecedented scale.

A mass of secretaries, for example, typed the orders to kill and filed the details of massacres. This placed them at the very centre of the Nazi murder machinery, but they, like so many others, chose to shut their eyes and benefit from their proximity to power.

But, picnicking in the country on their days off, how did they miss the mounds that hid mass graves, the gagging smell of rotting corpses? Whose clothes and possessions — plundered from ghettos or confiscated at camps and killing fields — did they think they were cataloguing for redistribution back home?

Trainloads of booty went back to Germany in what Lower calls ‘the biggest campaign of organised robbery in history’. And German women, she charges, were among its prime agents and beneficiaries.

Even more caught up in the criminal madness were administrators such as Liselotte Meier, who worked so closely with her strutting boss, an SS officer, that they were almost indistinguishable. She joined him on shooting parties in the snow, hunting and killing Jews for sport.

In the early phases of the Holocaust, massacres were generally by shooting. In her area of Belarus, she coordinated the arrangements with the executioners and even decided who lived and who died.

She spared the life of the Jewish woman who did her hair, while another secretary removed from a woman from the death line who hadn’t yet finished the sweater she was knitting for her.

Secretaries had another important role, too. After each operation, it was usual for the SS killers, many of them drunk on schnapps, to seek solace in the women’s quarters, whether for sexual release or a shoulder to cry on after the exertions of mass execution. In support of the men, women even manned refreshment tables during executions so the killers could take a break.

But much worse than these active accomplices were the women who killed — often the wives of SS officers. Erna Petri — callous dispatcher of those six Jewish boys — was one such Frau. She had followed her husband to Poland and lived in a mansion overseeing a vast estate for the Race and Resettlement Office of the SS, with ‘sub-human’ Slavs as slaves.

Another SS wife, Lisel Willhaus, wife of a camp commandant, used to sit on the balcony of their house and take pot shots at Jewish prisoners with her rifle.

Also in Poland was Vera Wohlauf, whose husband Julius commanded a police battalion ordered in 1942 to round up 11,000 Jewish inhabitants of a small town for transportation to Treblinka for liquidation.

She sat by her husband in the front seat of the lorry that led a convoy of killers to the town, and stood in the market square brandishing a whip as nearly a thousand who resisted the round-up or collapsed in the summer heat were beaten to death or shot.

She was pregnant at the time, a further incongruity.

In the Ukraine, 22-year-old secretary Johanna Altvater played an even more prominent role in a massacre while working for regional commissar Wilhelm Westerheide.

During the liquidation of a Jewish ghetto, Fräulein Hanna, as she was known, was seen in her riding breeches prodding men, women and children into a truck ‘like a cattle herder’.

She marched into a building being used as a makeshift hospital and through the children’s ward, eyeing each bed-ridden child. Then she stopped, picked one up, took it to the balcony and threw the child to the pavement three floors below. She did the same with other children. Some died, and even those who survived were seriously injured.

Her speciality — or, as one survivor put it, her ‘nasty habit’ — was killing children. One observer noted that Altvater often lured children with sweets. When they came to her and opened their mouths, she shot them in the mouth with the small pistol that she kept at her side.

On another occasion, she beckoned a toddler over, then grabbed him tightly by the legs and slammed his head against a wall as if she were banging the dust out of a mat.

She threw the lifeless child at the feet of his father, who later testified: ‘Such sadism from a woman I have never seen. I will never forget this.’

Close to the mass-shooting site where the ghetto inhabitants were herded to await their deaths, Westerheide and his deputies partied with some German women. Altvater was among the revellers, drinking and eating at a banqueting table amid the bloodshed.

Music playing in the background mixed with the sound of gunfire. From time to time, one of the Germans would get up, walk to the shooting site, kill a few people and then return to the party.

Violence to children was also the trademark of Gestapo wife and mother Josefine Block, who liked to carry a riding crop and lash out at prisoners waiting to be deported.

A little girl approached her, crying and begging for her life. ‘I will help you!’ Block declared, grabbed the girl by the hair, smashed her with her fists, then pushed her to the ground and stamped on her head until she was dead.

Desperate Jewish parents often approached Block to ask for help, assuming that, as a young woman and mother, she’d be sympathetic.

But she would use her pram to ram Jews whom she encountered on the streets and was said to have actually killed a small Jewish child with it. Such treatment is an affront to any sense of humanity, let alone womanhood — all the more so because most of these crimes went unpunished.

Erna Petri was the exception and spent more than 30 years in prison. But all the others mentioned here were either tried and acquitted or released after questioning.

Their defence was often to play the helpless woman card and blame the men. ‘I was just a secretary,’ pleaded Johanna Altvater. Meanwhile, the millions of other women who were complicit in these odious events got on with their lives after the war as best they could, as if the whole Hitler era had been a nightmare to be put aside and forgotten once everyone had woken up.

Yet the deep stain remains. Thirteen million women were actively engaged in the Nazi Party. Not all of these could have been innocent bystanders.

Lower says: ‘To assume that violence is not a feminine characteristic and that women are not capable of mass murder has obvious appeal: it allows for hope that at least half the human race will not devour the other, that it will protect children and so safeguard the future.

‘But minimising the violent behaviour of women creates a false shield.’

At least half a million women, she says, witnessed and contributed to the operations and terror of Hitler’s genocidal war. ‘The Nazi regime mobilised a generation of young women who were conditioned to accept violence, to incite it, and to commit it.

‘This fact has been suppressed and denied by the very women who were swept up in the regime and by those who perpetrated the violence with impunity.

‘But genocide is also women’s business. When given the “opportunity”, women too will engage in it, even its bloodiest aspects.’

For those tempted to think that things are different now, consider those shocking photographs earlier this month of a beheading in the Syrian bloodbath.

What was even more gut-wrenching than the gore was to see children looking on, unperturbed, drawn into a terrifying topsy-turvy morality, just as German mothers and children were 80 years ago.

Perhaps, too, the executioner wielding the sword went home to a wife who mopped his brow, in the same way as Hitler’s firing squads did. The lesson of the atrocities of the Holocaust is that they are not something of the past to be filed away and forgotten, but still very much with us.
More evidence that the Females Are More Innocent trope is Victorian nonsense, one that actually helped Nazi war criminals get off scot-free. According to Lower, female Nazis, in addition to not letting the "Kinder, Küche, Kirche" sexist restrictions placed on them get in the way of them committing atrocities, also apparently weren't bothered much by said restrictions, if not outright embracing them, much like the accounts of modern "alt-right" women who readily let their men take the lead in the movement while they provide support from the sidelines. An attitude which is best summed up by a quote in the book from Ilse Struwe, one of the many German Army secretaries who had a habit of picnicking in the bloodstained countryside of occupied Ukraine: "Men make war. Men kill. And they need women as handmaidens in their war.”

Of course there were exceptions to this, such as Annette Schücking, who tried to challenge the Nazi prohibition against women practicing law, only to fail...and then discovered her true calling as one of those Nazi nurses mentioned in the article above.

And therein lies the rub: While there's no denying that Nazism/Fascism, past and present, is a very misogynistic movement in addition to everything else it has going against it, it's a fallacy to cast a blanket assumption of (white) women as among its many victims. Just because women weren't the politicians and party leaders directing Hitler's murderous agenda or the military leaders commanding the invasions of other countries, like, say, this charming individual...


...or that women weren't even the common foot soldiers carrying out the invasions and killings (at least until the new Battlefield game starts adding female WWII soldiers :P), they still bear culpability for creating and upholding a genocidal society just as much as the men are, and to omit them from history is both fallacious and dangerous.

I'll conclude this with a couple of relevant blog posts I found when I went searching for what other people were saying about Hitler's Furies, one of which is a quote from end of the book's introduction, and the other is the reader making a comparison between the Nazis and House Lannister from Game of Thrones and the roles women played in both (bolding emphasis mine):

http://joannalannister.tumblr.com/post/ ... as-that-of
Among the myths of the postwar period was that of the apolitical woman. […] Female fascists – in Nazi Party headquarters in Kiev, in military and SS and police headquarters in Minsk, and in gated villas in Lublin – were not simply doing “women’s work.” As long as German women are consigned to another sphere or their political influence is minimized, half the population of a genocidal society is […] “endowed with innocence of the crimes of the modern state,” and they are placed “outside of history itself.” […]

A third of the female population, thirteen million women, were actively engaged in a Nazi Party organization, and female membership in the Nazi Party increased steadily until the end of the war. Just as the agency of women in history is underappreciated, here too […] the agency of women in the Third Reich has not been fully elaborated and explained. Vast numbers of ordinary German women were not victims, and routine forms of female participation in the Holocaust have not yet been disclosed. […]

The consensus in Holocaust and genocide studies is that the systems that make mass murder possible would not function without the broad participation of society, and yet nearly all histories of the Holocaust leave out half of those who populated that society, as if women’s history happens somewhere else. It is an illogical approach and puzzling omission.

--Wendy Lower, Hitler’s Furies: German Women in the Nazi Killing Fields

http://joannalannister.tumblr.com/post/ ... -furies-as
still reading Hitler’s Furies as mentioned in my previous posts and it’s talking about how German women’s groups were the biggest defenders fighting against “racial mixing” before the first world war before Nazis were even a thing and how they advanced the exploitation of people from “lower classes” and “degenerates” and how these women were the first to instill nationalist/racist ideology in their children on a personal level before it was done on an institutionalized level at schools

and I keep thinking about how on two (not just 1 but 2!!!!) occasions GRRM stressed “blood purity” as one of the reasons for Tywin and Joanna’s marriage (the other being that they loved each other ofc)

and I’m thinking about how like y’all talk about how Joanna would have tempered Tywin’s treatment of lowborn Tysha if she had lived but that’s never really resonated with me wrt a family that’s literally killing people in its basement (gold mines), like Joanna was there when the shit went down with Tytos’s mistress, like naaah man, I don’t see her being an advocate for ~~~“transgressive”~~~ women

it’s part of this bigger issue wrt Lannister women that i’ve spent years pushing back against, that people like Genna need to be “saved from Tywin” <—- phrases i have seen in fandom

like naaaah, genna in the text is like, “Do what Tywin would have done, show that our threats have teeth, y is edmure still alive, trebuchet the fucking baby, jaime, ofc i would never tell u how to run ur war but wtf r u waiting for, jaime, do it do it do it, gods, your dwarf brother tyrion is more tywin’s son than u, is that an incendiary enough statement to get u to go rains of castamere on the former owners of my new castle 4 me, jaime, gods damnit”

like the presumed innocence of lannister women by much of fandom is just !!!!!!!!!!!!! nope

like i hate putting lannister women up on that moral pedestal, and i haaaaaaaaaaaaate that idea of “joanna was tywin’s conscience, her death was his villain origin story” bs

like this book is mostly about how we need to place culpability on societies and social groups as a whole rather than just blaming men in positions of hard power (as opposed to soft power)

and it’s just really striking a chord with me and my approach to house lannister, and i intend to organize and expand upon these thoughts later but i just

i think people with soft power in house lannister like genna and joanna aren’t blameless when it comes to dehumanizing people

like that is

a really big deal 4 me

!!!!! 99.9% positive the lannisters r killing people in their basement on a daily basis and that this is standard operating procedure. this is a House culture where certain groups of people are worth “less” and are therefore disposable !!!!!! women are half of this culture, don’t excuse them !!!!

Post Reply