The 25 November Incident.

HIST: Discussions about the last 4000 years of history, give or take a few days.

Moderator: K. A. Pital

Post Reply
User avatar
The Duchess of Zeon
Gözde
Posts: 14566
Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.

The 25 November Incident.

Post by The Duchess of Zeon »

At the Ichigaya general headquarters of the Japanese Ground Self Defense Force on 25 November 1970, around 1100 hours a pre-arranged meeting took place between the commander of the garrison, General Mashita, and the famed author Mishima Yukio, head of the Tatenokai (楯の会) or "Shield Society" of some one hundred military-trained paramilitary volunteers, mostly ultra-nationalist college students, who were sworn to defend Japan against communist insurgency. Arriving with four of his close associates in the Tatenokai and dressed in the paramilitary uniforms of the group, Mishima and his men revealed their swords upon arriving at the general's office and took him hostage as well as a General Masuda (reports in western media are rarely clear on this subject). They demanded that the troops of the general headquarters be immediately assembled so that Mishima could address them, upon the life of General Masuda, and this demand was immediately met without hesitation.

As shown in this Japanese language news movie, Mishima harangued the assemble troops of the Ichigaya headquarters and encouraged them to rise up against the elected government, march on the Diet and overthrow the elected government, and reinstate the Emperor as the supreme authority in Japan. The reasons cited were primarily due to the cultural and spiritual enervation of Japan and its opening to western influences, including communism. The troops were unresponsive, in some cases jeering, and ignoring his traditionally written manifesto which was hung from the balcony. Consequently, Mishima returned inside, and a while later committed seppuku. The first of his followers designated as his second failed in three attempts to take the finishing blow to sever his head from his body; another had to take over and finish the job, and then also provided the task of second for the first of his seconds, who then also committed seppuku. The remaining three members of the Tatenokai on the site of Ichigaya then surrendered, and the incident, it appeared, was over.

Over time various attempts at explaining Mishima's action--from dismissing it as the neurotic, overblown melodrama of a 'homosexualist', to ascribing it to his guilt over being too sickly for service in WW2--have tried suggest his actions were ultimately the result of some form of psychological problems, without any actual serious attempt to overthrow the government. Recently, however, I have noticed evidence which calls this interpretation of events into light, and gives tantalizing hope of the release of further British government archival documents which may reveal the degree of GSDF complicitcy and involvement in the 25 November Incident. Before going on to this evidence it should be noted that it is already established fact that the Tatenokai was trained and equipped by the GSDF, on GSDF military facilities, with their full collaboration. They were in no sense an illegal group nor were they disapproved of by the heads of the Army.

Indeed, the British government did in fact have intelligence which seemed to suggest a more far-reaching intent on the part of the GSDF:

2001 Japan Times article covering the release of some of this information.
Wednesday, Jan. 3, 2001

Britain feared a revival of militarism after Mishima's suicide

By YASUSHI FUNATSU
Kyodo News

LONDON -- The dramatic suicide by Japanese writer and nationalist Yukio Mishima after his failed attempt to foment a coup in 1970 triggered British concern about a revival of militarism in Japan, according to 30-year-old declassified British documents released on New Year's Day.

The papers, dispatched by the British Embassy in Tokyo immediately after Mishima's death to the Foreign and Defense ministries in London, pointed to Mishima's appeal against the Nonproliferation Treaty, which took effect only eight months before his failed effort to stage a coup.

"The most interesting part of (Mishima's) appeal may be the reference to the Nonproliferation Treaty," the embassy wrote in one of the documents, suggesting a close watch be kept on how rightists reacted to the treaty.

The embassy noted that the NPT was perceived by some Japanese as being equivalent to a prewar treaty that had given the U.S. and British navies a fixed size advantage over Japan's.

In the afternoon of Nov. 25, 1970, Mishima -- heading a group of four followers -- committed ritual harakiri and was subsequently beheaded by one of his young colleagues, ending his life at 45 at the Ground Self-Defense Force Eastern Army Headquarters in Ichigaya, Tokyo.

Mishima killed himself after making an unsuccessful plea to the Self-Defense Forces to take action to shake off the constitutional constraints on the SDF and re-establish the prewar spiritual virtues of self-sacrifice for the Emperor and country.

Another document revealed that the commanding general of the GSDF in Kyushu had made "frank remarks about military frustration with civilian control" shortly before the Mishima incident in the presence of Lt. Gen. Kanetoshi Mashita, commanding general of the Eastern Army, who knew Mishima well.

Mashita was taken hostage when Mishima and his four young disciples of the Tate no Kai (Shield Society), a paramilitary organization he led, managed to enter the Eastern Army Headquarters.

Mishima established himself as a highly acclaimed novelist with the publication of highbrow novels such as "Confession of a Mask" and "The Golden Pavilion."

He was also a candidate for the Nobel Prize in literature, but failed to win because -- many believe -- he was too young.

In his ultranationalistic appeal, Mishima said, "Where is the samurai's soul? Where are you, a colossal arsenal without soul, going? There were some businessmen who called the government's politicians traitors after the textile negotiations (with the United States). However, since the NPT was related to the grand strategy for the nation and it was obviously the reproduction of the prewar unequal treaty (with Britain and the U.S.), there appeared no SDF general who committed ritual suicide in protest."

An embassy document dispatched Dec. 1, 1970, paid special attention to these remarks, saying, "It is not unusual for many Japanese in conversation to compare the NPT with the naval agreements of the interwar years as perpetuating Japanese inferiority."

The naval disarmament treaty signed at a conference in Washington in 1921 put the ratio for major warships for Britain, the U.S. and Japan at 5:5:3. The treaty caused frustration among Japanese naval officers committed to expansionism.
The commanding general of the GSDF in Kyushu had made frank remarks regaining frustration with civilian control of the military.

Note that carefully, because it ties into another buried fact of 25 November Incident. It is usually said that the rest of the Tatenokai except for Mishima's handpicked four men didn't even know about the attack; but this is a factual lie, something which is repeated in the western media but known to be false because Mishima's own manifesto on the banner he unfurled containing his demands directly contradicts it in the original Japanese.

It's just hard to find copies of it, but here a summary of the demands are kindly repeated:
1.

All personnel at the Ichigaya base should assemble in the courtyard to listen to Mishima's speech.
2.

Remaining members of the Tate-no-Kai, who had been waiting in reserve at nearby Ichigaya Hall, were to be called to the main building at the GSDF garrison.
3.

Any attack on the Mishima group was not to be launched before 1:10 P. M. (Thereby giving them at least two hours to incite the GSDP Force soldiers to joining Mishima in a coup d'etat.)
4.

No obstruction of any kind was to be made against the Society of the Shield forces before 1:10 p. m.
5.

Mishima promised to spare the life of General Masuda, even if the commandant wished to commit hara-kiri ritual suicide, if the first four demands were met.
6.

If the demands were not met, or there were indications that they would not be met, Mishima would immediately kill the general and himself.

The rest of the Tatenokai was in fact waiting in reserve to be trucked to the main headquarters at Ichigaya. So in fact the entirety of the paramilitary organization had been concentrated for this operation. The fact that they refused the manoeuvre does not imply as is commonly assumed that they were unaware of it; and they were certainly aware of something.

Now there are two final points which bears consideration, and brings the tantalizing possibility together in this little historical drama which has been so thoroughly papered-over:

The first of these is that the Japanese military involvement with Mishima was much more than is commonly thought, beyond just training:
The first book came out in 2001. A retired high-ranking intelligence officer wrote about his relationship with the late writer Yukio Mishima.

Written by a former high-ranking officer at the Ground SDF intelligence school in Kodaira, Tokyo, the memoir described how intelligence training was provided to Mishima and his private militia, Tate-no-kai (Shield Society). The retired officer wrote that Mishima confided in him about his plans to stage a coup d'etat on Nov. 25, 1970, a protest that ended with Mishima's ritual suicide by disembowelment and beheading at the headquarters of the Ground SDF eastern command in Tokyo's Ichigaya district.

Mishima's masterpieces include "Confessions of a Mask," "Temple of the Golden Pavilion" and "Patriotism."

The retired officer said he wrote his book because he wanted to convey Mishima's true thoughts about national defense.
In short, Mishima's intention to stage a coup was known by officers of the GSDF, and absolutely nothing was done to preempt him. If officers unconnected with his Tatenokai were aware, then the concentration of resources for a coup is already a rather more plausible thing. This was not an action confined to only five men. And there are good reasons for this. Let's go back to that general who commanded to the Western Army on Kyushu, shall we?

This article provides more, and relevant, detail about the actions of Lt. Gen. Masayasu Kohzuma, commander of the Western Army on Kyushu, and the fellow we have quoted above making "frank remarks about military frustration with civilian control" .
nother document sent by military attache Col. P.H. Hislop on the day after Mishima's suicide quoted remarks by Lt. Gen. Masayasu Kohzuma, commander of the Western Army, against civilian control.

Hislop also reported that Kohzuma had criticized Yasuhiro Nakasone, the then director general of the Defense Agency and later prime minister, and said that Japanese officers should be allowed to carry swords again as they had in the Imperial Japanese Army before the end of the war.

''Gen. Kohzuma must have felt confident that his views were shared, otherwise he would surely not have expressed them to me in the presence of Gen. Mashita and two of his own senior staff officers,'' Hislop wrote, suggesting he believed frustration was widespread in the SDF.

Hislop said he was interested in Gen. Kohzuma's remarks especially because he was a ''quiet, intelligent, aristocratic looking Japanese...one who appears to pick his words with care.''

In a telephone interview with Kyodo News in Tokyo, Kohzuma, now retired and 86 years old, admitted he had criticized civilian control in the presence of Gen. Mashita days before Mishima burst into the Eastern Army Headquarters but said he did not remember the British military attache.

Kohzuma added that Mishima's failed coup occurred while his troops were engaging in exercises and that he had consulted with other senior officers about whether he should rush to Tokyo or mobilize his forces to deal with the emergency.
So Kohzuma's troops were engaged in exercises on the exact day of the 25 November Incident, and the man, on the record as criticizing civilian control in the presence of General Mashita, said he consulted other senior officers on whether or not he should "rush to Tokyo or mobilize his forces to deal with the emergency". Note that he does not say suppress Mishima or respond to the coup but simply "deal with the emergency".

Let's go back to our prior source on Mishima's demands, and note one final component:
It happened while Prime Minister Eisaku Sato, a few blocks away, was addressing the opening of an extraordinary session of the Diet.
So the entirety of the cabinet and the Diet were assembled in an extraordinary session only several blocks away: The perfect target for a decapitation operation against the civilian Japanese government. And now we see that we have Lieutenant General Kohzuma leading his army on manoeuvres--his army on Kyushu which should have no business responding to an emergency in Eastern Army theatre of operations--and "discussing with his officers" whether or not to rush to the capitol and "intervene". And we know that officers in the JSDF military intelligence forces had advanced knowledge that Mishima intended to launch a coup attempt, and did nothing.

The result is a powerful concentration of circumstantial evidence that suggests that the 25 November Incident was far more than just the hysterics of one man, and indeed, Mishima may instead have played the role of a test case, if Mashita refused to join in Kohzuma and Mishima's plot, in this theory, then the assault in the Ishigaya Headquarters was an attempt to rally the GSDF to the banner of a militaristic coup, and assualt and decapitate the Diet and civilian leadership in one stroke during the extraordinary session held that day. The Western Army then on manoeuvres would be well-placed under Kohzuma to take advantage of the situation, and establish military government. So the circumstantial evidence seems to in fact raise as a possibility. But the failure of Mishima's attempt to rouse the garrison at Ishigaya to his side meant that Kohzuma backed down and instead masked his own preparations under the guise of army manoeuvres and a consideration of the prospect of an intervention thus intended for people to naturally assume it was to be an intervention against Mishima rather than the one that Kohzuma's own statements make seem more likely--that he might well have intended to intervene to support Mishima, and indeed that the 25 November Incident was an attempt at a militarist coup in Japan which collapsed when it became clear that the common soldiers in the GSDF would turn against their own officers rather than obey in the suppression of the Diet and ending of civilian government.
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.

In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
User avatar
Steve
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 9762
Joined: 2002-07-03 01:09pm
Location: Florida USA
Contact:

Re: The 25 November Incident.

Post by Steve »

An interesting, perhaps chilling possibility, with serious ramifications for Asia.
”A Radical is a man with both feet planted firmly in the air.” – Franklin Delano Roosevelt

"No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism." - Sir Winston L. S. Churchill, Princips Britannia

American Conservatism is about the exercise of personal responsibility without state interference in the lives of the citizenry..... unless, of course, it involves using the bludgeon of state power to suppress things Conservatives do not like.

DONALD J. TRUMP IS A SEDITIOUS TRAITOR AND MUST BE IMPEACHED
User avatar
The Duchess of Zeon
Gözde
Posts: 14566
Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.

Re: The 25 November Incident.

Post by The Duchess of Zeon »

Thank you.

It's an interesting scenario, and my thoughts on the matter came about from reflecting on this evidence, and on the fact that Mishima's second failed so thoroughly in three attempts to remove his head in seppuku, which is a very botched job and quite rare in Japanese history. For someone who supposedly rigorously planned the act for years, it makes little sense... Unless the main goal was never seppuku all along, but instead actually the coup succeeding, and it was strictly a backup, a gesture of honour and redemption, should the coup attempt fail as it did. That much more neatly explains the failure of Mishima's second, and then of course it congeals behind this quietly considerable body of circumstantial evidence which suggests that something greater than just a melodramatic stage suicide was actually taking place. The fact that the coup failed from the bottom, though, speaks a great deal to just how much Japanese society really had already changed.
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.

In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: The 25 November Incident.

Post by Simon_Jester »

I wonder. I don't seriously propose this, but:

What if the officers who knew (or strongly suspected) that Mishima was up to something decided not to interfere because they expected the outcome of his actions to come to nothing, as they actually wound up doing? Or if they simply respected Mishima's decision (and that of his immediate followers) to do what they felt was honorable (and melodramatic) enough that they chose not to interfere with something they expected to be irrelevant?
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: The 25 November Incident.

Post by Thanas »

Have you read any of the sources in Japanese? Because I know from first-hand experience how bad translations can be, so I would advise you to do so before making such a conclusion.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
The Duchess of Zeon
Gözde
Posts: 14566
Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.

Re: The 25 November Incident.

Post by The Duchess of Zeon »

No, which is why I make no claim to this being more than a short essay of some observations and facts about the incident. I don't particularly think any treatment in English has looked seriously beyond the accepted story though, so there seemed a use for the essay in making light to some of these details; certainly the British at the time took what they knew with some real concern. The Japanese also have considerable reason to brush over Mishima because the 25 November Incident ultimately shows that the connections between many of their social elite and the WW2 era are as blatant as the JSP of the era claimed all along.
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.

In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
Pelranius
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3539
Joined: 2006-10-24 11:35am
Location: Around and about the Beltway

Re: The 25 November Incident.

Post by Pelranius »

I always wondered how the plotters planned for an American response in the event of their success?

Overthrowing a democratic government would probably bring about heavy economic sanctions.
Turns out that a five way cross over between It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia, the Ali G Show, Fargo, Idiocracy and Veep is a lot less funny when you're actually living in it.
User avatar
Darksider
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5271
Joined: 2002-12-13 02:56pm
Location: America's decaying industrial armpit.

Re: The 25 November Incident.

Post by Darksider »

Pelranius wrote:I always wondered how the plotters planned for an American response in the event of their success?

Overthrowing a democratic government would probably bring about heavy economic sanctions.
Economic sanctions? Overthrowing a democratic government that's a staunch U.S. regional ally would probably cause military intervention. The U.S. has thousands of troops stationed in Japan. I'm guessing they wouldn't let someone overthrow the Japanese government without doing something about it.
And this is why you don't watch anything produced by Ronald D. Moore after he had his brain surgically removed and replaced with a bag of elephant semen.-Gramzamber, on why Caprica sucks
Pelranius
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3539
Joined: 2006-10-24 11:35am
Location: Around and about the Beltway

Re: The 25 November Incident.

Post by Pelranius »

Darksider wrote:
Pelranius wrote:I always wondered how the plotters planned for an American response in the event of their success?

Overthrowing a democratic government would probably bring about heavy economic sanctions.
Economic sanctions? Overthrowing a democratic government that's a staunch U.S. regional ally would probably cause military intervention. The U.S. has thousands of troops stationed in Japan. I'm guessing they wouldn't let someone overthrow the Japanese government without doing something about it.
It's possible the plotters might actually be dumb enough to declare war on America first.
Turns out that a five way cross over between It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia, the Ali G Show, Fargo, Idiocracy and Veep is a lot less funny when you're actually living in it.
User avatar
The Duchess of Zeon
Gözde
Posts: 14566
Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.

Re: The 25 November Incident.

Post by The Duchess of Zeon »

At the time, Nixon and Kissinger badly wanted Japan to rearm and take responsibility for East Asian security. Therefore the coup plotters, and Mishima certainly did, thought the main issue was the Japanese public and that Nixon and Kissinger would accept the rearmament of Japan as an anti-communist state.

Mishima, the year before he died, gave an intervene in English on these matters, which I'll link to here, for all of you to see.
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.

In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
User avatar
Sidewinder
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5466
Joined: 2005-05-18 10:23pm
Location: Feasting on those who fell in battle
Contact:

Re: The 25 November Incident.

Post by Sidewinder »

The Duchess of Zeon wrote:25 November Incident was an attempt at a militarist coup in Japan which collapsed when it became clear that the common soldiers in the GSDF would turn against their own officers rather than obey in the suppression of the Diet and ending of civilian government.
It's surprising how little the officers knew about the drafted/enlisted soldiers under their command. Was or there a class division, e.g., the officers were of samurai descent while the drafted/enlisted were middle-class?
At the time, Nixon and Kissinger badly wanted Japan to rearm and take responsibility for East Asian security. Therefore the coup plotters, and Mishima certainly did, thought the main issue was the Japanese public and that Nixon and Kissinger would accept the rearmament of Japan as an anti-communist state.
Considering Nixon's primary concern was to get the US out of the Vietnam War, and he was willing to court Communist China to do so, I doubt the Japanese militarists could count on extended American support.
Please do not make Americans fight giant monsters.

Those gun nuts do not understand the meaning of "overkill," and will simply use weapon after weapon of mass destruction (WMD) until the monster is dead, or until they run out of weapons.

They have more WMD than there are monsters for us to fight. (More insanity here.)
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37389
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Re: The 25 November Incident.

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Basing in Japan essential to support the US war effort in Vietnam, as well as oppose North Korea which was every bit as strong as the South and extremely active along the DMZ at the time. The US would pretty much have had to support a coup government, or else make a radical realignment of its posture in east Asia by leaving Japan. That’s a very unattractive prospect to the point that another war would be a serious threat. But of course the coup was never going to work if it was planned. Japans higher up officers were mostly Imperial Army leftovers, but the rank and file couldn't give a shit less.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
xerex
Jedi Knight
Posts: 849
Joined: 2005-06-17 08:02am

Re: The 25 November Incident.

Post by xerex »

Sidewinder wrote: Considering Nixon's primary concern was to get the US out of the Vietnam War, and he was willing to court Communist China to do so, I doubt the Japanese militarists could count on extended American support.

but the existence of an armed right wing Japan would mean that Nixon would not have to depend on Red China to accomplish his goals. I'm sure he would rather have allied with such a Japanese state instead .

Franco being a dictator didnt prevent from joining Nato after all.
Go back far enough and you'll end up blaming some germ for splitting in two - Col Tigh
User avatar
Shroom Man 777
FUCKING DICK-STABBER!
Posts: 21222
Joined: 2003-05-11 08:39am
Location: Bleeding breasts and stabbing dicks since 2003
Contact:

Re: The 25 November Incident.

Post by Shroom Man 777 »

America has never been above consorting with petty dictatorships and fascist regimes to meet its regional goals. But if these revolutionaries wanted to reinstate the Emperor, maybe they might not be quite pro-American?
Image "DO YOU WORSHIP HOMOSEXUALS?" - Curtis Saxton (source)
shroom is a lovely boy and i wont hear a bad word against him - LUSY-CHAN!
Shit! Man, I didn't think of that! It took Shroom to properly interpret the screams of dying people :D - PeZook
Shroom, I read out the stuff you write about us. You are an endless supply of morale down here. :p - an OWS street medic
Pink Sugar Heart Attack!
User avatar
Sidewinder
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5466
Joined: 2005-05-18 10:23pm
Location: Feasting on those who fell in battle
Contact:

Re: The 25 November Incident.

Post by Sidewinder »

xerex wrote:
Sidewinder wrote: Considering Nixon's primary concern was to get the US out of the Vietnam War, and he was willing to court Communist China to do so, I doubt the Japanese militarists could count on extended American support.
but the existence of an armed right wing Japan would mean that Nixon would not have to depend on Red China to accomplish his goals. I'm sure he would rather have allied with such a Japanese state instead
Communist China provided huge amounts of material aid to the North Vietnamese during the war. Nixon probably assumed this gave China some influence over North Vietnam, and wanted to tell Hanoi (via Beijing) to leave Saigon alone so he could get US forces out of that hellhole right the fuck then. A right-wing Japan couldn't hope to match this unless it committed combat units there, e.g., JASDF aircraft bombing the Yunnan-Vietnam Railway. If Japan did so, you could guarantee China would try to counter with the People's Liberation Army- I doubt that would help Nixon achieve his goal of "Get Americans out of Vietnam."
Please do not make Americans fight giant monsters.

Those gun nuts do not understand the meaning of "overkill," and will simply use weapon after weapon of mass destruction (WMD) until the monster is dead, or until they run out of weapons.

They have more WMD than there are monsters for us to fight. (More insanity here.)
Pelranius
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3539
Joined: 2006-10-24 11:35am
Location: Around and about the Beltway

Re: The 25 November Incident.

Post by Pelranius »

xerex wrote:
Sidewinder wrote: Considering Nixon's primary concern was to get the US out of the Vietnam War, and he was willing to court Communist China to do so, I doubt the Japanese militarists could count on extended American support.

but the existence of an armed right wing Japan would mean that Nixon would not have to depend on Red China to accomplish his goals. I'm sure he would rather have allied with such a Japanese state instead .

Franco being a dictator didnt prevent from joining Nato after all.
It would probably be political dynamite for Nixon and Kissinger to support a illegitimate regime that overthrew a democratic government with an ideology that was inspired by Japanese militarism. It would be almost like supporting a Neo Nazi government in West Germany. And Beijing, Seoul and Taipei would not be happy.
Turns out that a five way cross over between It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia, the Ali G Show, Fargo, Idiocracy and Veep is a lot less funny when you're actually living in it.
Post Reply