Military Service as a requirement for U.S. President

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

User avatar
Defiant
Jedi Knight
Posts: 884
Joined: 2002-07-05 07:50am
Location: The Surface of the Sun.

Military Service as a requirement for U.S. President

Post by Defiant »

Below is a quote of the criteria a person must meet to become President of the United States (from Article II of the Constitution):

"No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States."

I have always thought that anyone who is going to be the Commander-in-Chief should also have served in the military in some capacity. Any thoughts?
Chris: "Way to go dad, fight the machine"
Stewie: "How do you know about the machine?"
--
"I object to you. I object to intellect without discipline. I object to power without constructive purpose."
-Spock, 'The Squire of Gothos'
--
"I'm only 56? Damn, I'll have to get a fake ID to rent ultra-porn".
-Professor Farnsworth, "Teenage Mutant Leela's Hurdles"
User avatar
Defiant
Jedi Knight
Posts: 884
Joined: 2002-07-05 07:50am
Location: The Surface of the Sun.

Post by Defiant »

I @%!@#'ed up. Please move to the Politics forum if necessary.
Chris: "Way to go dad, fight the machine"
Stewie: "How do you know about the machine?"
--
"I object to you. I object to intellect without discipline. I object to power without constructive purpose."
-Spock, 'The Squire of Gothos'
--
"I'm only 56? Damn, I'll have to get a fake ID to rent ultra-porn".
-Professor Farnsworth, "Teenage Mutant Leela's Hurdles"
User avatar
Einhander Sn0m4n
Insane Railgunner
Posts: 18630
Joined: 2002-10-01 05:51am
Location: Louisiana... or Dagobah. You know, where Yoda lives.

Post by Einhander Sn0m4n »

Why? the current system in place works just fine. If It Aint Broke, Don't 'Fix' It.
Image Image
User avatar
General Zod
Never Shuts Up
Posts: 29205
Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
Location: The Clearance Rack
Contact:

Post by General Zod »

requiring someone to serve in the military would limit the presidential candidates to exclusively military/ex military personnel. i don't imagine alot of citizens would be unhappy at the thought that joe average citizen would be unable to run for president without volunteering for military duty first.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
User avatar
Xenophobe3691
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4334
Joined: 2002-07-24 08:55am
Location: University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL
Contact:

Post by Xenophobe3691 »

Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:Why? the current system in place works just fine. If It Aint Broke, Don't 'Fix' It.
Or, instead of "Fixing" the system, add a small patch. Give em the opportunity to run for a third term if they have a non-negligible amount of Military Service under the belt. Kind of a "You've served your country, now reap the rewards" sort of deal...
Dark Heresy: Dance Macabre - Imperial Psyker Magnus Arterra

BoTM
Proud Decepticon

Post 666 Made on Fri Jul 04, 2003 @ 12:48 pm
Post 1337 made on Fri Aug 22, 2003 @ 9:18 am
Post 1492 Made on Fri Aug 29, 2003 @ 5:16 pm

Hail Xeno: Lord of Calculus -- Ace Pace
Image
User avatar
General Zod
Never Shuts Up
Posts: 29205
Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
Location: The Clearance Rack
Contact:

Post by General Zod »

EDIT: unhappy = happy. sodding typos.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
User avatar
Defiant
Jedi Knight
Posts: 884
Joined: 2002-07-05 07:50am
Location: The Surface of the Sun.

Post by Defiant »

Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:Why? the current system in place works just fine. If It Aint Broke, Don't 'Fix' It.
Having prior military experience of any type is better than going into the presidency and not knowing dick about the military. It has the potential of putting the president at the mercy of his military advisors.
Chris: "Way to go dad, fight the machine"
Stewie: "How do you know about the machine?"
--
"I object to you. I object to intellect without discipline. I object to power without constructive purpose."
-Spock, 'The Squire of Gothos'
--
"I'm only 56? Damn, I'll have to get a fake ID to rent ultra-porn".
-Professor Farnsworth, "Teenage Mutant Leela's Hurdles"
User avatar
EmperorChrostas the Cruel
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 1710
Joined: 2002-07-09 10:23pm
Location: N-space MWG AQ Sol3 USA CA SV

Post by EmperorChrostas the Cruel »

This would be a disaster, as only those fit for service could be president.
So Yosemite Bear couldn't be a president, because he is a diabetic.
Do you want people being disqualified from the presidency because they have bad eyes, flat feet, diabeties, or are deaf in one ear? (Tom Bailey* couldn't be president under THAT system, and what a great president he would be.)
The list of medical reasons you can't be in the military for having has NOTHING to do with judgement, or fitness to rule. They are made to weed out the "weak" one, not up to the riggours of combat.



*(It's a wonderful life)
Hmmmmmm.

"It is happening now, It has happened before, It will surely happen again."
Oldest member of SD.net, not most mature.
Brotherhood of the Monkey
User avatar
Seggybop
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1954
Joined: 2002-07-20 07:09pm
Location: USA

Post by Seggybop »

I don't know... although it's not fair, I would prefer not to have a disabled/sick/otherwise messed up president if at all possible. It doesn't look good. I'm sure that we could find someone who is both not physically messed up and not a moron to take the job.
my heart is a shell of depleted uranium
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16350
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Post by Batman »

Defiant wrote: Having prior military experience of any type is better than going into the presidency and not knowing dick about the military. It has the potential of putting the president at the mercy of his military advisors.
Doldrums. I have been in the military, and if I should someday find myself to be Bundeskanzler I'm reasonably certain I could draw much more useful information from my collection of Tom Clancy novels than from my military experience (and that's saying something).
The problem is that unless the Prez is required to be a former JCS member or some such he will not have any knowledge of military affairs at the scope he will be dealing with as POTUS.
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
Isolder74
Official SD.Net Ace of Cakes
Posts: 6762
Joined: 2002-07-10 01:16am
Location: Weber State of Construction University
Contact:

Post by Isolder74 »

EmperorChrostas the Cruel wrote:(Tom Bailey* couldn't be president under THAT system, and what a great president he would be.)*(It's a wonderful life)
Its George Bailey btw

And yes he would make a great president
Hapan Battle Dragons Rule!
When you want peace prepare for war! --Confusious
That was disapointing ..Should we show this Federation how to build a ship so we may have worthy foes? Typhonis 1
The Prince of The Writer's Guild|HAB Spacewolf Tank General| God Bless America!
User avatar
Joe
Space Cowboy
Posts: 17314
Joined: 2002-08-22 09:58pm
Location: Wishing I was in Athens, GA

Post by Joe »

Terrible idea.
Image

BoTM / JL / MM / HAB / VRWC / Horseman

I'm studying for the CPA exam. Have a nice summer, and if you're down just sit back and realize that Joe is off somewhere, doing much worse than you are.
User avatar
fgalkin
Carvin' Marvin
Posts: 14557
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:51pm
Location: Land of the Mountain Fascists
Contact:

Post by fgalkin »

Seggybop wrote:I don't know... although it's not fair, I would prefer not to have a disabled/sick/otherwise messed up president if at all possible. It doesn't look good. I'm sure that we could find someone who is both not physically messed up and not a moron to take the job.
Yeah, there was this wheelchair-bound presidant, and he fucked up tremendously. Made us lose a war, too.

Oh wait.... :roll:

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
User avatar
Pablo Sanchez
Commissar
Posts: 6998
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:41pm
Location: The Wasteland

Post by Pablo Sanchez »

Seggybop wrote:I don't know... although it's not fair, I would prefer not to have a disabled/sick/otherwise messed up president if at all possible. It doesn't look good. I'm sure that we could find someone who is both not physically messed up and not a moron to take the job.
That's makes sense. I mean, look at FDR! He was "physically messed up" and he was the worst president ever.

EDIT:
Curse you, Fgalkin... you beat me to it.
Image
"I am gravely disappointed. Again you have made me unleash my dogs of war."
--The Lord Humungus
User avatar
Einhander Sn0m4n
Insane Railgunner
Posts: 18630
Joined: 2002-10-01 05:51am
Location: Louisiana... or Dagobah. You know, where Yoda lives.

Post by Einhander Sn0m4n »

Xenophobe3691 wrote:
Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:Why? the current system in place works just fine. If It Aint Broke, Don't 'Fix' It.
Or, instead of "Fixing" the system, add a small patch. Give em the opportunity to run for a third term if they have a non-negligible amount of Military Service under the belt. Kind of a "You've served your country, now reap the rewards" sort of deal...
That's an okay compromise.

What would _REALLY_ fix this country is the total abolition of all campaign contributions at all whatsoever. Make these politicos realize who they really are working for. ;)
Image Image
User avatar
Andrew J.
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3508
Joined: 2002-08-18 03:07pm
Location: The Adirondacks

Post by Andrew J. »

This would also be religious discrimination, as people whose religions require them to be conscientious objectors, like Quakers and the Amish, would be disqualified.
Don't hate; appreciate!

RIP Eddie.
User avatar
fgalkin
Carvin' Marvin
Posts: 14557
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:51pm
Location: Land of the Mountain Fascists
Contact:

Post by fgalkin »

I would rather have a non-military president with smart advisors, that an idiot who thinks he knows everything becasue he served in the military.

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi
What Kind of Username is That?
Posts: 9254
Joined: 2002-07-10 08:53pm
Location: Back in PA

Post by Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi »

I think it's a bad idea simply because it would prevent otherwise great leaders from getting into office because they were incapable of serving in the military. Also, military service insn't a detertmining factor in how ethical and capable of leading a country a politician is.
BotM: Just another monkey|HAB
User avatar
Grand Admiral Thrawn
Ruthless Imperial Tyrant
Posts: 5755
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:11pm
Location: Canada

Post by Grand Admiral Thrawn »

Defiant wrote:
Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:Why? the current system in place works just fine. If It Aint Broke, Don't 'Fix' It.
Having prior military experience of any type is better than going into the presidency and not knowing dick about the military. It has the potential of putting the president at the mercy of his military advisors.
If the the US President was say a tank commander in the Army for several years, how could this give him any insight on how the Air Force's can maintain air dominance?
"You know, I was God once."
"Yes, I saw. You were doing well, until everyone died."
Bender and God, Futurama
User avatar
Mr Bean
Lord of Irony
Posts: 22442
Joined: 2002-07-04 08:36am

Post by Mr Bean »

If the the US President was say a tank commander in the Army for several years, how could this give him any insight on how the Air Force's can maintain air dominance?
Well as an officer likley he would have to have done a joint service tour and learned all about the other branchs of the military and how quickly the Air Force can or can't get Air domincance if based on nothing else then when airplanes stop trying to blow up his tank :P

"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
User avatar
Defiant
Jedi Knight
Posts: 884
Joined: 2002-07-05 07:50am
Location: The Surface of the Sun.

Post by Defiant »

EmperorChrostas the Cruel wrote:This would be a disaster, as only those fit for service could be president.
So Yosemite Bear couldn't be a president, because he is a diabetic.
Do you want people being disqualified from the presidency because they have bad eyes, flat feet, diabeties, or are deaf in one ear? (Tom Bailey* couldn't be president under THAT system, and what a great president he would be.)
The list of medical reasons you can't be in the military for having has NOTHING to do with judgement, or fitness to rule. They are made to weed out the "weak" one, not up to the riggours of combat.
This is a point that I hadn't considered. I guess I just have a problem with someone who may have no military training or exposure being the Commander-in-Chief. True, there's an entire apparatus setup to provide the President with military information, but it still seems like a bad idea to me. Just personal opinion.

Is everyone saying that the way things stand now is OK?
Chris: "Way to go dad, fight the machine"
Stewie: "How do you know about the machine?"
--
"I object to you. I object to intellect without discipline. I object to power without constructive purpose."
-Spock, 'The Squire of Gothos'
--
"I'm only 56? Damn, I'll have to get a fake ID to rent ultra-porn".
-Professor Farnsworth, "Teenage Mutant Leela's Hurdles"
User avatar
Durandal
Bile-Driven Hate Machine
Posts: 17927
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:26pm
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Contact:

Post by Durandal »

Why? What unvarying advantage does military service bring to the office?
Damien Sorresso

"Ever see what them computa bitchez do to numbas? It ain't natural. Numbas ain't supposed to be code, they supposed to quantify shit."
- The Onion
User avatar
Uraniun235
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13772
Joined: 2002-09-12 12:47am
Location: OREGON
Contact:

Post by Uraniun235 »

Mr Bean wrote:
If the the US President was say a tank commander in the Army for several years, how could this give him any insight on how the Air Force's can maintain air dominance?
Well as an officer likley he would have to have done a joint service tour and learned all about the other branchs of the military and how quickly the Air Force can or can't get Air domincance if based on nothing else then when airplanes stop trying to blow up his tank :P
Ah, so now it's not just serving in the military, but having been an officer in the military?
This is a point that I hadn't considered. I guess I just have a problem with someone who may have no military training or exposure being the Commander-in-Chief. True, there's an entire apparatus setup to provide the President with military information, but it still seems like a bad idea to me. Just personal opinion.
IIRC, the whole point of making the President CINC was to ensure that the military remained firmly in civilian control.

I really don't see a problem with it. The President shouldn't be wasting his valuable time planning war strategy and tactics; he should give the admirals and generals directives and objectives, and they go and formulate plans designed to accomplish those objectives, as well as advising him on the costs and feasibility of said objectives.

A smart President would (and should be able to) trust the years of knowledge and experience that his military advisors have. If you have to mandate service for any position, make military experience a requirement for service as Secretary of Defense.
User avatar
Isolder74
Official SD.Net Ace of Cakes
Posts: 6762
Joined: 2002-07-10 01:16am
Location: Weber State of Construction University
Contact:

Post by Isolder74 »

This would make Lincoln Inelegable as well. And who says a Military man will always make a good president

Ulysses S Grant comes to mind
Hapan Battle Dragons Rule!
When you want peace prepare for war! --Confusious
That was disapointing ..Should we show this Federation how to build a ship so we may have worthy foes? Typhonis 1
The Prince of The Writer's Guild|HAB Spacewolf Tank General| God Bless America!
User avatar
Wicked Pilot
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 8972
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm

Post by Wicked Pilot »

I see several huge problems with this:

1. Not everyone can be in the military. If someone wants to be president, but had childhood asthma, then too bad.

2. Not everyone wants to be in the military. There are some people who just wouldn't fit the lifestyle. There are some people who would rather serve their country in some other capacity such as police officer, fireman, teacher, etc. There are some people would better the country by going into business and creating new markets and jobs, etc.

3. Being in the military would not necessarily make one a good president. To even understand the military with a scope to make Secretary level decisions, one must have spent a large amount of time in the system, working multiple joint command jobs. These people are few. Moreover, a president needs to know more than just how the military runs. He/she should also understand how economics work, so perhaps that not only should a military career be required, but a career on Wall Street too.

There are other reasons obviousily, but these are the ones I'll bring up for now.
The most basic assumption about the world is that it does not contradict itself.
Post Reply