Scientists turn mammalian cells into complex biocomputers

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
User avatar
SolarpunkFan
Jedi Knight
Posts: 586
Joined: 2016-02-28 08:15am

Scientists turn mammalian cells into complex biocomputers

Post by SolarpunkFan »

Sciencemag.org
Computer hardware is getting a softer side. A research team has come up with a way of genetically engineering the DNA of mammalian cells to carry out complex computations, in effect turning the cells into biocomputers. The group hasn’t put those modified cells to work in useful ways yet, but down the road researchers hope the new programming techniques will help improve everything from cancer therapy to on-demand tissues that can replace worn-out body parts.

Engineering cells to function like minicomputers isn’t new. As part of the growing field of synthetic biology, research teams around the globe have been manipulating DNA for years to make cells perform simple actions like lighting up when oxygen levels drop. To date, most such experiments have been done in Escherichia coli and other bacteria, because their genes are relatively easy to manipulate. Researchers have also managed to link multiple genetic circuits together within a single cell to carry out more complex calculations in bacteria.

Scientists have tried to extend this to mammalian cells to create genetic circuitry that can help detect and treat human diseases. But efforts to construct large-scale genetic circuits in mammalian cells have largely failed: For complex circuits to work, the individual components—the turning on and off of different genes—must happen consistently. The most common way to turn a gene on or off is by using proteins called transcription factors that bind to and regulate the expression of a specific gene. The problem is these transcription factors “all behave slightly differently,” says Wilson Wong, a synthetic biologist at Boston University.

To upgrade their DNA “switches,” Wong and his colleagues steered clear of transcription factors and instead switched human kidney cell genes on and off using scissorlike enzymes that selectively cut out snippets of DNA. These enzymes, known as DNA recombinases, recognize two target stretches of DNA, each between 30 to 50 or more base pairs long. When a recombinase finds its target DNA stretches, it cuts out any DNA in between, and stitches the severed ends of the double helix back together.

To design genetic circuits, Wong and his colleagues use the conventional cellular machinery that reads out a cell’s DNA, transcribes its genes into RNA, and then translates the RNA into proteins. This normal gene-to-protein operation is initiated by another DNA snippet, a promoter, that sits just upstream of a gene. When a promoter is activated, a molecule called RNA polymerase gets to work, marching down the DNA strand and producing an RNA until it reaches another DNA snippet—a termination sequence—that tells it to stop.

To make one of their simplest circuits, Wong’s team inserted four extra snippets of DNA after a promoter. The main one produced green fluorescent protein (GFP), which lights up cells when it is produced. But in front of it was a termination sequence, flanked by two snippets that signaled the DNA recombinase. Wong and his team then inserted another gene in the same cell that made a modified recombinase, activated only when bound to a specific drug; without it, the recombinase wouldn’t cut the DNA.

When the promoter upstream of the GFP gene was activated, the RNA polymerase ran headfirst into the termination sequence, stopped reading the DNA, and didn’t produce the fluorescent protein. But when the drug was added, the recombinase switched on and spliced out the termination sequence that was preventing the RNA polymerase from initiating production of GFP. Voila, the cell lit up.

As if that Rube Goldbergian feat weren’t enough, Wong and his colleagues also showed that by adding additional recombinases together with different target strands, they could build a wide variety of circuits, each designed to carry out a different logical operation. The approach worked so well that the team built 113 different circuits, with a 96.5% success rate, they report today in Nature Biotechnology. As a further demonstration, they engineered human cells to produce a biological version of something called a Boolean logic lookup table. The circuit in this case has six different inputs, which can combine in different ways to execute one of 16 different logical operations.

“It’s exciting in that it represents another scale at which we can design mammalian genetic circuits,” says Timothy Lu, a synthetic biologist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge. Although the current circuits are a proof of concept, both Lu and Wong say synthetic biologists want to use them to create new medical therapies. For example, scientists could engineer T cells, sentinels of the immune system, with genetic circuits that initiate a response to wipe out tumors when they detect the presence of two or three “biomarkers” produced by cancer cells, Lu says. Another example being explored by Wong and others is to engineer stem cells so they develop into specific cell types when prompted by different signals. This could let synthetic biologists generate tissues on demand, such as insulin-producing β cells, or cartilage-producing chondrocytes.
Medicine seems to be getting interesting these days.
Seeing current events as they are is wrecking me emotionally. So I say 'farewell' to this forum. For anyone who wonders.
Reaver225
Redshirt
Posts: 18
Joined: 2013-11-12 11:17am

Re: Scientists turn mammalian cells into complex biocomputers

Post by Reaver225 »

I bet they'll emulate Pokemon on it next.

-Real talk, though, this isn't much more than a tech demo of producing circutry what we can already to with a very high success rate with silicon. How long do these biocircuts live for, and how much maintenance do they need? I doubt the support structure to keep them alive is in place.
User avatar
FireNexus
Cookie
Posts: 2130
Joined: 2002-07-04 05:10am

Re: Scientists turn mammalian cells into complex biocomputers

Post by FireNexus »

Reaver225 wrote:I bet they'll emulate Pokemon on it next.

-Real talk, though, this isn't much more than a tech demo of producing circutry what we can already to with a very high success rate with silicon. How long do these biocircuts live for, and how much maintenance do they need? I doubt the support structure to keep them alive is in place.
Why not? The computations wouldn't need to be mutually exclusive of survival traits. And while we can do this perfectly well in silicon, silicon isn't something we can use to modify the functionality of individual cells based on complex conditions.

Put this in gene therapy and you can create additional anti-oncologic features that would be harder to beat. You could enhance the functioning of the immune system, you could tell cells to produce therapeutic drugs under very specific conditions. The possibilities are sort of endless. Even a relatively dumb computer inside of a cell is a huge advantage.
I had a Bill Maher quote here. But fuck him for his white privelegy "joke".

All the rest? Too long.
User avatar
Starglider
Miles Dyson
Posts: 8709
Joined: 2007-04-05 09:44pm
Location: Isle of Dogs
Contact:

Re: Scientists turn mammalian cells into complex biocomputers

Post by Starglider »

'Circuits' is not a good choice of metaphor. There are no circuits in the sense of anything flowing or logic gates. What is happening is that the DNA transcription mechanism is being used as a universal Turing machine, i.e. executing programs the way a (very slow) computer would. Which we've known to be theoretically possible for decades but it's nice to see someone put it into practice. To be clear biocomputing is probably not going to replace electronic digital computing for anything we currently do with computers. The exciting applications are all to do with medical treatments and generally making biotechnology more programmable.
User avatar
Bedlam
Jedi Master
Posts: 1495
Joined: 2006-09-23 11:12am
Location: Edinburgh, UK

Re: Scientists turn mammalian cells into complex biocomputers

Post by Bedlam »

Aren't mammalian cells (or any cell really) already complex biocomputers?

They take in a input from the environment around them and their own internal conditions and produce an output of chemicals and alterations to their structure and they do it in parallel with thousands of factors at the same time.

This is just a crude way to put a bit of that power under human control.
Reaver225
Redshirt
Posts: 18
Joined: 2013-11-12 11:17am

Re: Scientists turn mammalian cells into complex biocomputers

Post by Reaver225 »

FireNexus wrote:Put this in gene therapy and you can create additional anti-oncologic features that would be harder to beat. You could enhance the functioning of the immune system, you could tell cells to produce therapeutic drugs under very specific conditions. The possibilities are sort of endless. Even a relatively dumb computer inside of a cell is a huge advantage.
Now that I hadn't thought about. What's more interesting is that they've managed to make them into programmable input-output machines, and that could theoretically be used to read and edit OTHER DNA, couldn't it? Meaning you'd be able to just inject some of this and have them spread through a whole lifeform to fully modify it.

Or would this DNA editing only work with pre-modified cells?
Post Reply