New Vaccine method

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, SCRawl, Thanas

User avatar
mr friendly guy
The Doctor
Posts: 9594
Joined: 2004-12-12 10:55pm
Location: In a 1960s police telephone box somewhere in Australia

New Vaccine method

Postby mr friendly guy » 2016-12-03 08:23pm

Saw this on another board, but the initial article left me with more questions. However the ars technica article does a much nicer of job of explaining it. Read my summary at the bottom if you don't want to read the article

http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/12/ ... s-vaccine/

Virus engineered to rely on artificial amino acids, used as vaccine
You make the virus in cells with a weird amino acid, then use it as a vaccine.

JOHN TIMMER - 12/2/2016, 8:10 AM

Synthetic biology has become a catch-all term for attempts to engineer organisms to do things they normally wouldn't. Efforts so far have ranged from assembling logic circuits inside bacteria to replacing an entire bacterial genome with one synthesized from scratch. So far, however, the field has largely produced some extremely impressive proofs-of-concept. There haven't been a lot of advances with obvious practical uses.

That may be about to change. Researchers have taken a technique that's been used a number of times before—engineering cells to use an artificial amino acid—and applied it to make a flu virus that acts as a vaccine. The vaccine is highly effective and, because it depends on an amino acid our cells don't use, it can't cause infections in us. Best yet, if the vaccine gets into cells with a normal flu virus, it interferes with its ability to generate an infection.

All of our proteins are made with different combinations of the same 20 amino acids. While many additional amino acids exist, those 20 appear to be the standard toolkit that all life shares. There are a few exceptional organisms that use a 21st, but these oddball amino acids are usually close chemical relatives of existing ones.

Revising the genetic code

In recent years, researchers have figured out how to get cells to use some of those additional amino acids, which can be chemically distinct from the existing 20. These artificial amino acids open up the possibility of proteins with some dramatically different chemistry, ones that can catalyze different reactions or interact with chemicals that life normally doesn't deal with. So far, the results have been mostly potential.

A team from Peking University, however, has been working on a different use for artificial amino acids: creating viruses that don't work in normal cells. The idea is to turn these semi-artificial viruses into a vaccine.

The logic here is extremely clever. Many vaccines just contain one or a few proteins from an infectious agent. But these aren't always effective, since they lack the complexity and context of an intact virus or bacteria. The same can be true for a vaccine made from a deactivated virus. The alternative, to use a weakened virus, runs the risk that people with a weak immune system may experience a full infection.

How can artificial amino acids help with this? Well, if you make a virus that depends on them, then it can only reproduce in cells that will provide that amino acid. Since that would exclude all of our cells, using this virus as a vaccine poses no risk of creating an infection. To the immune system, it should look a lot like a normal virus, so it should be an effective vaccine.

Rather than focusing on an artificial amino acid that has a radically different chemistry, the people behind the new work decided to use one that's a close chemical relative to an existing one. And to make things convenient, they picked one that's already used by a microbe. This meant that all the genes needed to put the amino acid into proteins existed; they just had to be pulled out of the microbe and put into cells that a flu virus could infect.

(The artificial amino acid in question is Ne-2-azidoethyloxycarbonyl-L-lysine. It's closely related to the normal amino acid lysine, and chemically look similar to another normal amino acid. Technically, it's not artificial since it's naturally used by some microbes. But it's artificial in human cells, so we'll keep using that term.)

The system is also effective at making sure any genes that use the artificial amino acid won't work without it. The three-base code for the artificial one is UAG. Humans and most other organisms interpret that code as telling the cell to stop making the protein. Thus, any gene with UAG in the middle will be made into a protein normally by cells with the microbial genes, but will be stopped early and produce a severely truncated version in normal cells.

The genes from the microbe were placed into a human kidney cell line. Tests with a fluorescent protein indicated that, as long as it was supplied in the media used to feed these cells, the artificial amino acid would be incorporated into proteins.

Engineering the virus

The system was tested next using a flu virus. A single amino acid code in one of its genes was altered to UAG. When this version of the virus was placed in normal cells, they didn't produce any functional virus, because translation of that gene was terminated early. But when placed in the kidney cells that carried the microbial system, virus was produced normally. The resulting virus could infect other cells, but if those didn't have the microbial system too, the infection stopped there.

That is, for the most part. Mutations occur at a steady rate, and some of these changed the UAG so that it coded for some other amino acid. If that change didn't inactivate the virus, then it could infect normal cells again. The researchers saw precisely this happening: at a low frequency, normally infective viruses emerged during their tests.

The authors went back and tested 21 other different sites that they changed to UAG, targeting any amino acid that looked chemically similar to the artificial one. Some of these disabled the virus entirely; the artificial replacement was close, but not close enough. But seven of the changes produced a viable virus. And several of these could be combined, making the gene very resistant to this sort of evolutionary change. Gradually, they engineered UAGs into genes on every one of the eight different RNA segments that make up the flu virus.

This virus would grow just fine in the kidney cells engineered to carry the microbial system, and the resulting virus could infect other cells. But unless the cells that it infected also carried the microbial system, then the virus stalled there. No mature viruses were ever produced. And because so many different mutations would be needed to return the virus to its original state, the virus remained dependent upon the microbial genes to reproduce.

This was true when they tested it in animals. While a specific amount of normal virus would kill half the mice it was injected into, they found they could inject 100,000 times as much of the engineered virus and there wouldn't be any indication of any health issues. The mice, however, mounted a robust immune response against the virus, one that was broader than the one generated against a normal flu vaccine. The virus also worked as a vaccine in ferrets and guinea pigs.

The authors also tested what happened if cells were infected both with the engineered virus and a normal flu virus. It turned out the engineered version suppressed the infection of the normal one. Remember where we mentioned that the flu virus has a genome made from eight distinct RNA molecules? In cells infected with both viruses, the progeny were a mixture of segments taken from both sources at random. Thus, the vast majority of viruses produced contained at least one engineered segment and couldn't go on to successfully infect normal cells.

A lot of the promise of synthetic biology seems a bit hand-wavy—we can probably do something useful with this at some point. This has included the use of artificial amino acids. Yes, they could potentially expand life's chemistry, but it wasn't clear that doing so would allow us to do things that the normal amino acids couldn't. Still, this is clearly a case where the artificial ones are central to the biotechnology, and the applications are obvious.


Long story short, modified virus to rely on Amino acid not found in most life on earth aside from some types of bacteria, so cannot reproduce in humans, but still causes an immune response as it can still infect.

The code for the AA, will be read in most life as a stop codon, terminating the protein.

By engineering this stop codon in numerous locations (8 in the above example), it minimises the chance of a mutation rendering it infective again. This is because it will require several beneficial mutations instead of one, before the immune system hunts it down, making it less likely.

We can thus inject shit loads of the modified virus into someone to get a bigger immune response, then say a small amount of live virus.

It also suppresses the unaltered virus if people are infected with both the wild type virus and the altered vaccine virus. The reason is, viruses take genetic code from each other. This means the the unaltered virus can take the shitty genetic code from the modified virus. Even if the modified virus took some genetic code from the unaltered virus, it has to take it in 8 different locations to be able to reproduce again. Whereas if the wild virus took one of these 8 altered codes, it will stop. Thus it might be potentially used to treat someone suffering from the virus as well as a vaccine.

Science fuck yeah.
Never apologise for being a geek, because they won't apologise to you for being an arsehole. John Barrowman - 22 June 2014 Perth Supernova.

Countries I have been to.
Australia, Canada, China, Denmark, Ecuador, Finland, Germany, Malaysia, Netherlands, Norway, Singapore, Sweden, USA.
Always on the lookout for more nice places to visit.

User avatar
Elheru Aran
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11231
Joined: 2004-03-04 01:15am
Location: Georgia

Re: New Vaccine method

Postby Elheru Aran » 2016-12-03 08:39pm

mr friendly guy wrote:It also suppresses the unaltered virus if people are infected with both the wild type virus and the altered vaccine virus. The reason is, viruses take genetic code from each other. This means the the unaltered virus can take the shitty genetic code from the modified virus. Even if the modified virus took some genetic code from the unaltered virus, it has to take it in 8 different locations to be able to reproduce again. Whereas if the wild virus took one of these 8 altered codes, it will stop. Thus it might be potentially used to treat someone suffering from the virus as well as a vaccine.

Science fuck yeah.


So like... if someone already has the flu... you could give them a flu jab, and not only would that give them immunity to that strain of the flu, it would kill the existing flu in that person?
It's a strange world. Let's keep it that way.

User avatar
mr friendly guy
The Doctor
Posts: 9594
Joined: 2004-12-12 10:55pm
Location: In a 1960s police telephone box somewhere in Australia

Re: New Vaccine method

Postby mr friendly guy » 2016-12-03 10:42pm

They claim it would decrease the numbers of wild type flu reproduced, although I would imagine to be effective it depends on how much we decrease wild type flu reproduction by. This will certainly help your body kill the existing one, although its mainly been tested in animals so far. Its like two armies fighting where only one is replacing its losses adequately, but the other side (flu) finds it harder to do so.
Never apologise for being a geek, because they won't apologise to you for being an arsehole. John Barrowman - 22 June 2014 Perth Supernova.

Countries I have been to.
Australia, Canada, China, Denmark, Ecuador, Finland, Germany, Malaysia, Netherlands, Norway, Singapore, Sweden, USA.
Always on the lookout for more nice places to visit.

Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 28806
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: New Vaccine method

Postby Simon_Jester » 2016-12-04 03:50pm

So, these are basically flu viruses that are functionally sterile, but can still infect? And wild viruses will swap genes with them, and sterilize themselves in the process?

I'm sorry, I'm a bit rushed at the moment and out of coffee, so I'm not firing on all cylinders.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov

User avatar
Flagg
CUNTS FOR EYES!
Posts: 12199
Joined: 2005-06-09 09:56pm
Location: The Sanctuary Doing Some Ironing

Re: New Vaccine method

Postby Flagg » 2016-12-04 06:11pm

Ugh, that is awesome but I already have a headache because I'm thinking of how the anti-vaxxer and anti-GMO dickbags will react. I expect terms like "Franken-Virus".
We pissing our pants yet?
-Negan

Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 28806
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: New Vaccine method

Postby Simon_Jester » 2016-12-06 01:02am

It's more like "the Hunchback of Notre Virus-" a version of the virus that is severely crippled and can't cause nearly as much harm as the real one.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov

User avatar
Flagg
CUNTS FOR EYES!
Posts: 12199
Joined: 2005-06-09 09:56pm
Location: The Sanctuary Doing Some Ironing

Re: New Vaccine method

Postby Flagg » 2016-12-06 07:28am

Simon_Jester wrote:It's more like "the Hunchback of Notre Virus-" a version of the virus that is severely crippled and can't cause nearly as much harm as the real one.

I'm well aware, I read the article and understand what it does and what a great thing it will (hopefully) be. I'm just fully aware that the "find the one braincell between them" anti-science brigade will likely take issue despite it saving lives.
We pissing our pants yet?
-Negan


Return to “Science, Logic, And Morality”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests