SpaceX Rocket Lands Perfectly

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
User avatar
Dalton
For Those About to Rock We Salute You
For Those About to Rock We Salute You
Posts: 22634
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:16pm
Location: New York, the Fuck You State
Contact:

SpaceX Rocket Lands Perfectly

Post by Dalton »

Live Video

The first stage of the rocket landed pretty close to dead-center on the drone landing barge. Amazing shot. It's the future!
Image
Image
To Absent Friends
Dalton | Admin Smash | Knight of the Order of SDN

"y = mx + bro" - Surlethe
"You try THAT shit again, kid, and I will mod you. I will
mod you so hard, you'll wish I were Dalton." - Lagmonster

May the way of the Hero lead to the Triforce.
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37389
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Re: SpaceX Rocket Lands Perfectly

Post by Sea Skimmer »

It's only the future if they can make the rest of the economics work out on a useful basis. Remember the cost of adding this stuff is a 40% reduction in first stage burnout velocity which turns into a tremendous reduction in payload to orbit for the overall rocket size. And meanwhile most of the recovered mass is just sheet Aluminum.

The alternative approach being taken by other companies of simply ejecting the engines and parachuting them back without any great complexity makes a lot more sense to me if you want a reusable rocket. Its not like any of these ideas are new, but earlier generations of rocket motors needed far too much work to even be worth trying to reuse. This is a big reason why the shuttle never worked out, most complex rocket engine ever was required to make the thing fly and then you had to tear it apart at the end.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Iroscato
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2359
Joined: 2011-02-07 03:04pm
Location: Great Britain (It's great, honestly!)

Re: SpaceX Rocket Lands Perfectly

Post by Iroscato »

How viable would something like Skylon be as a launch vehicle? I would link but I'm on the mobile and ever so lazy, but it looks amazing from where I'm standing...
Yeah, I've always taken the subtext of the Birther movement to be, "The rules don't count here! This is different! HE'S BLACK! BLACK, I SAY! ARE YOU ALL BLIND!?

- Raw Shark

Destiny and fate are for those too weak to forge their own futures. Where we are 'supposed' to be is irrelevent.

- SirNitram (RIP)
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37389
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Re: SpaceX Rocket Lands Perfectly

Post by Sea Skimmer »

If Skylon worked it would crush all conventional rocket boosters for payloads under 15 tons, though with some variance depending on the desired orbit. Last hard news I saw on Skylon though was the USAF saying they think its engine concept could work (not that it will but it doesn't violate anything they know) but that they in very friendly terms suggested it will burn off its own tail, and that the designers should reorient it to a two stage to orbit system.

The burn the tail off problem is why some of the same people originally designed HOTOL with the engines in the tail, but this led to a configuration that was completely unstable once the payload was launched. Which killed the project, but not until somehow they'd spent millions and millions of pounds on it. This is a factor in why I've always been very skeptical of Skylon. In any case the engine remains unproven with a radical new design, in the face of the most violent flight regime that can exist. As in at hypersonic speeds the air is basically decomposing and exploding...constantly, as you fly through it. It actually corrodes the skin off of your flight vehicle. Spacecraft face some of this on reentry, but for much shorter periods of time and with very heavy thermal protection systems. Skylong looks amazing because it's an absurdly absurdly ambitious program, and even if it does ultimately work it will first need to secure an enormous funding increase. That's not really on the horizon right now, though a successful flight demonstration of the engine might invite private money into the fray. The odds of the European governments funding it are low, particularly with Ariane 6 on the table.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Guardsman Bass
Cowardly Codfish
Posts: 9281
Joined: 2002-07-07 12:01am
Location: Beneath the Deepest Sea

Re: SpaceX Rocket Lands Perfectly

Post by Guardsman Bass »

I'll second Sea Skimmer - it's a good engineering feat, but it's not the future of launch vehicles unless Musk can affordably turn around the rockets and launch them against on a schedule. And he's over-promised before, like with the Falcon Heavy (which was promised back in 2013).
“It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life.”
-Jean-Luc Picard


"Men are afraid that women will laugh at them. Women are afraid that men will kill them."
-Margaret Atwood
User avatar
TimothyC
Of Sector 2814
Posts: 3793
Joined: 2005-03-23 05:31pm

Re: SpaceX Rocket Lands Perfectly

Post by TimothyC »

Sea Skimmer wrote:It's only the future if they can make the rest of the economics work out on a useful basis.
To elaborate, Musk is looking at a 10-20 reuse life, with possible refurbishment, which is actually at the floor for the economics. ULA's "Save the engine" plan has a projected payback of just 3-5 reuses, but falls behind full-reuse if Musk can get to the full life, as ULA doesn't plan on using the engines much more than 5-10 times.

I am not 100% sold on the planned reuse rates from either company, however I think competition can be a good thing, and at this point will help cut launch costs. Just so long as we don't end up with a situation where the production lines are built large enough for either line to handle all of the launches, while only being run at 1/3 to 1/2 capacity.
"I believe in the future. It is wonderful because it stands on what has been achieved." - Sergei Korolev
User avatar
matterbeam
Youngling
Posts: 80
Joined: 2016-04-04 08:52pm

Re: SpaceX Rocket Lands Perfectly

Post by matterbeam »

I'm not quite sure, but is that the first video recording of a launch from liftoff to orbit, direct?
Google + : matterbeamTSF

Hard SF blog: ToughSF

MetaSeed: Worldbuilding and Game Design discussion
Post Reply