Morality of duel wielding Facebook.

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

User avatar
madd0ct0r
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6259
Joined: 2008-03-14 07:47am

Morality of duel wielding Facebook.

Post by madd0ct0r »

Like many of my friends who were in the early wave of Facebook, I have two accounts. One is my young professional account that recruiters find and people at work friend me on. The other is my original account that was easier to change the name for then figure out the privacy setting of all thousand photos associated with it. It has all my old friends on, and a bunch of stuff in the news feed I do not need to be accidentally seen at work. Around graduation a bunch of us got together, created parallel accounts and had them friend each other.

The thing is, a lot of the work friends who are adding me do so to their genuine account. I use both accounts a lot, and I feel marginally uneasy about the information assymetry. I can imagine people being a bit hurt if they found out. Is it ethically/morally dubious?
"Aid, trade, green technology and peace." - Hans Rosling.
"Welcome to SDN, where we can't see the forest because walking into trees repeatedly feels good, bro." - Mr Coffee
User avatar
Elheru Aran
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13073
Joined: 2004-03-04 01:15am
Location: Georgia

Re: Morality of duel wielding Facebook.

Post by Elheru Aran »

I don't have a huge issue with two separate accounts for your personal and 'work' lives. If you have a work friend who becomes close enough that you consider them a 'personal' friend, send them a PM that you have a personal FB account if they want to be added to it. If they ask why the separate accounts, explain in short and sweet terms ("this account I made a long time ago when I was in school, it's not very professional, my work account is a little safer along those lines" whatever). If it offends them that you have two accounts... well that's not your problem. Now if your work found out that you have a separate account and it became an issue, then that would be a different matter on a professional level.

It's a bit of a odd thing because Facebook doesn't allow more than one account per person now (in theory). In practice as long as you can knock off a bunch of emails you can make a bunch of different accounts, but they get pissy about it if they find out. But that was kosher back in the day. So you can use the "it was grandfathered in" excuse, maybe. Your coworkers may not have that excuse as they may not have created their FB accounts until after that point, so there's no real separation between 'work' and 'personal' on their accounts.

This is all IMO though. More professional people than me may have a different opinion.
It's a strange world. Let's keep it that way.
User avatar
Iroscato
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2359
Joined: 2011-02-07 03:04pm
Location: Great Britain (It's great, honestly!)

Re: Morality of duel wielding Facebook.

Post by Iroscato »

It's your Facebook, therefore I personally see it as entirely under your jurisdiction. Anyone who would be miffed or put out by a polite explanation probably isn't worth bothering about. But I am drunk, so terms and conditions apply towhatver I sasy.
Yeah, I've always taken the subtext of the Birther movement to be, "The rules don't count here! This is different! HE'S BLACK! BLACK, I SAY! ARE YOU ALL BLIND!?

- Raw Shark

Destiny and fate are for those too weak to forge their own futures. Where we are 'supposed' to be is irrelevent.

- SirNitram (RIP)
User avatar
biostem
Jedi Master
Posts: 1488
Joined: 2012-11-15 01:48pm

Re: Morality of duel wielding Facebook.

Post by biostem »

In a world where people will try and dox you just because you disagree with them and/or try to rat you out to your employer, I see no problem with taking extensive measures to protect yourself.

Until such time as laws are put in place to protect people from the aforementioned types of attacks, you *should* do whatever you feel is necessary to protect yourself and your livelihood.
User avatar
Terralthra
Requiescat in Pace
Posts: 4741
Joined: 2007-10-05 09:55pm
Location: San Francisco, California, United States

Re: Morality of duel wielding Facebook.

Post by Terralthra »

I also have two FB accounts, professional and personal. If there's a coworker I particularly trust, I may add them to the personal one, but those are few/far between.
User avatar
Tribble
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3082
Joined: 2008-11-18 11:28am
Location: stardestroyer.net

Re: Morality of duel wielding Facebook.

Post by Tribble »

I just use facebook as a glorified MSN messenger - no posts on my wall or other people's walls, no likes, no pictures etc. If I want to talk to someone, I just use the chat function or email them directly. Quite frankly I'd rather not use Facebook at all, but since most of the people I know use it for communication I'm kind of stuck at the moment.
"I reject your reality and substitute my own!" - The official Troll motto, as stated by Adam Savage
User avatar
Ziggy Stardust
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3114
Joined: 2006-09-10 10:16pm
Location: Research Triangle, NC

Re: Morality of duel wielding Facebook.

Post by Ziggy Stardust »

I didn't realize it was so common for people to have two accounts. It's never come up as an issue for me. My account is set to private so only my friends can see it, and if I end up friends with certain people who I don't want to see everything I just add them to a "restricted" list (easily customizable in Facebook settings) that can only see a small portion of my profile (like, just my profile picture, basic information, and a handle of public posts on my newsfeed).
User avatar
Soontir C'boath
SG-14: Fuck the Medic!
Posts: 6810
Joined: 2002-07-06 12:15am
Location: Queens, NYC I DON'T FUCKING CARE IF MANHATTEN IS CONSIDERED NYC!! I'M IN IT ASSHOLE!!!
Contact:

Re: Morality of duel wielding Facebook.

Post by Soontir C'boath »

Nothing wrong with two accounts even with FB being a bitchy little China about it. I'm on the same line with Ziggy though I just put them in "acquaintance". Ha.
I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who constantly says: "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action"; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a "more convenient season."
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12212
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Re: Morality of duel wielding Facebook.

Post by Lord Revan »

I would see it the same way some people have different phones for work and personal use or different e-mails. After there's things you might not want in your work related page even if you're not trying to hide those things simply because you need to focus on work and news about a game you've been waiting would be distracting even if you don't make the fact you're waiting for that game a secret in and of itself (for example).

That said I don't use Facebook or Twitter at all (I don't even have an account at either).
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
Zeropoint
Jedi Knight
Posts: 581
Joined: 2013-09-14 01:49am

Re: Morality of duel wielding Facebook.

Post by Zeropoint »

The only reason I have a Facebook account at all is so I can use Tinder. I don't intend to ever do anything with it.
I'm a cis-het white male, and I oppose racism, sexism, homophobia, and transphobia. I support treating all humans equally.

When fascism came to America, it was wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.

That which will not bend must break and that which can be destroyed by truth should never be spared its demise.
User avatar
K. A. Pital
Glamorous Commie
Posts: 20813
Joined: 2003-02-26 11:39am
Location: Elysium

Re: Morality of duel wielding Facebook.

Post by K. A. Pital »

I expected the thread to be about the morality of wielding duels... :shock:
Lì ci sono chiese, macerie, moschee e questure, lì frontiere, prezzi inaccessibile e freddure
Lì paludi, minacce, cecchini coi fucili, documenti, file notturne e clandestini
Qui incontri, lotte, passi sincronizzati, colori, capannelli non autorizzati,
Uccelli migratori, reti, informazioni, piazze di Tutti i like pazze di passioni...

...La tranquillità è importante ma la libertà è tutto!
Assalti Frontali
bilateralrope
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5957
Joined: 2005-06-25 06:50pm
Location: New Zealand

Re: Morality of duel wielding Facebook.

Post by bilateralrope »

Having two accounts and keeping the work one strictly work related is going to be a lot easier than adjusting the privacy settings so that stuff your work doesn't want linked with them stays private.
User avatar
Lagmonster
Master Control Program
Master Control Program
Posts: 7719
Joined: 2002-07-04 09:53am
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Re: Morality of duel wielding Facebook.

Post by Lagmonster »

Here's my system for dealing with Facebook: I genuinely assume that every single Facebook page is a lie - even the private between-friends versions - and heavily doctored to show the best possible version of that person. So if ANY Facebook page is unpleasant, I assume I'm dealing with a sincere moron and probable liability.
User avatar
General Zod
Never Shuts Up
Posts: 29205
Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
Location: The Clearance Rack
Contact:

Re: Morality of duel wielding Facebook.

Post by General Zod »

I don't add people from work on my FB. It's pretty much that simple. I want SOMEWHERE to bitch about my job and I can't do that if I have coworkers snooping on my posts. It's also a lot simpler than trying to juggle more than one account and having to remember what I said in one or the other.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
User avatar
Borgholio
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6297
Joined: 2010-09-03 09:31pm
Location: Southern California

Re: Morality of duel wielding Facebook.

Post by Borgholio »

General Zod wrote:I don't add people from work on my FB. It's pretty much that simple. I want SOMEWHERE to bitch about my job and I can't do that if I have coworkers snooping on my posts. It's also a lot simpler than trying to juggle more than one account and having to remember what I said in one or the other.
I have a couple of close co-workers on my FB and that's fine since we all bitch about work together. :) But I refuse to add my boss or anybody above me to my friends list. They're all nice people, but I'd rather keep them out of vent range.
You will be assimilated...bunghole!
Adam Reynolds
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2354
Joined: 2004-03-27 04:51am

Re: Morality of duel wielding Facebook.

Post by Adam Reynolds »

K. A. Pital wrote:I expected the thread to be about the morality of wielding duels... :shock:
So did I. It should be dual rather than duel.

Anyway, I don't see a problem, even with using a different identity. It's not any different than what any of us do here. Unless you have a reason to rather strongly dislike your parents for their choice in name.
User avatar
Ziggy Stardust
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3114
Joined: 2006-09-10 10:16pm
Location: Research Triangle, NC

Re: Morality of duel wielding Facebook.

Post by Ziggy Stardust »

bilateralrope wrote:Having two accounts and keeping the work one strictly work related is going to be a lot easier than adjusting the privacy settings so that stuff your work doesn't want linked with them stays private.
Meh, to each their own, but I disagree. I think it's a lot easier for me to simply set the privacy setting on the posts as I am making them rather than switching back and forth between accounts. I guess it's fairly moot because I'm not super active on Facebook, anyway, and most of my activity there is in private messages.
User avatar
U.P. Cinnabar
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3845
Joined: 2016-02-05 08:11pm
Location: Aboard the RCS Princess Cecile

Re: Morality of duel wielding Facebook.

Post by U.P. Cinnabar »

K. A. Pital wrote:I expected the thread to be about the morality of wielding duels... :shock:
Duelling Facefuck accounts?
"Beware the Beast, Man, for he is the Devil's pawn. Alone amongst God's primates, he kills for sport, for lust, for greed. Yea, he will murder his brother to possess his brother's land. Let him not breed in great numbers, for he will make a desert of his home and yours. Shun him, drive him back into his jungle lair, for he is the harbinger of Death.."
—29th Scroll, 6th Verse of Ape Law
"Indelible in the hippocampus is the laughter. The uproarious laughter between the two, and their having fun at my expense.”
---Doctor Christine Blasey-Ford
User avatar
madd0ct0r
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6259
Joined: 2008-03-14 07:47am

Re: Morality of duel wielding Facebook.

Post by madd0ct0r »

Adam Reynolds wrote:
K. A. Pital wrote:I expected the thread to be about the morality of wielding duels... :shock:
So did I. It should be dual rather than duel.
Crap, thanks.
"Aid, trade, green technology and peace." - Hans Rosling.
"Welcome to SDN, where we can't see the forest because walking into trees repeatedly feels good, bro." - Mr Coffee
User avatar
Lagmonster
Master Control Program
Master Control Program
Posts: 7719
Joined: 2002-07-04 09:53am
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Re: Morality of duel wielding Facebook.

Post by Lagmonster »

biostem wrote:In a world where people will try and dox you just because you disagree with them and/or try to rat you out to your employer, I see no problem with taking extensive measures to protect yourself.

Until such time as laws are put in place to protect people from the aforementioned types of attacks, you *should* do whatever you feel is necessary to protect yourself and your livelihood.
Helpful hint: Instead of saying dumb shit in a public and permanent manner about your employer, shut the fuck up. If you must say dumb shit about your employer, say it in private, to a person you trust. People you trust have a much lower chance of remembering you saying dumb shit than the Internet! Or get a dog, and say dumb shit to the dog. Dogs do not care if you say dumb shit, and they are statistically unlikely to record you saying dumb shit and preserve it for the remainder of human civilization. If you're afraid that you may forget about the dumb shit you said, and would like to record it, try writing it in a diary. As long as you do not give the diary to your employer, they will not learn that you said dumb shit.

Again, your individual experience may differ, but I grew up in a world where shutting the fuck up was the fool-proof preventative measure against saying dumb shit. Granted, saying dumb shit feels like the kind of right people might want to have, but in the end, shutting the fuck up results in far fewer unemployment opportunities.
bilateralrope
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5957
Joined: 2005-06-25 06:50pm
Location: New Zealand

Re: Morality of duel wielding Facebook.

Post by bilateralrope »

Ziggy Stardust wrote:
bilateralrope wrote:Having two accounts and keeping the work one strictly work related is going to be a lot easier than adjusting the privacy settings so that stuff your work doesn't want linked with them stays private.
Meh, to each their own, but I disagree. I think it's a lot easier for me to simply set the privacy setting on the posts as I am making them rather than switching back and forth between accounts. I guess it's fairly moot because I'm not super active on Facebook, anyway, and most of my activity there is in private messages.
I remember a while back that Facebook was changing their privacy options, which caused a lot of privacy settings to be reset to default. So I don't trust Facebook's privacy settings to be permanent.
User avatar
Elheru Aran
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13073
Joined: 2004-03-04 01:15am
Location: Georgia

Re: Morality of duel wielding Facebook.

Post by Elheru Aran »

Lagmonster wrote:
biostem wrote:In a world where people will try and dox you just because you disagree with them and/or try to rat you out to your employer, I see no problem with taking extensive measures to protect yourself.

Until such time as laws are put in place to protect people from the aforementioned types of attacks, you *should* do whatever you feel is necessary to protect yourself and your livelihood.
Helpful hint: Instead of saying dumb shit in a public and permanent manner about your employer, shut the fuck up. If you must say dumb shit about your employer, say it in private, to a person you trust. People you trust have a much lower chance of remembering you saying dumb shit than the Internet! Or get a dog, and say dumb shit to the dog. Dogs do not care if you say dumb shit, and they are statistically unlikely to record you saying dumb shit and preserve it for the remainder of human civilization. If you're afraid that you may forget about the dumb shit you said, and would like to record it, try writing it in a diary. As long as you do not give the diary to your employer, they will not learn that you said dumb shit.

Again, your individual experience may differ, but I grew up in a world where shutting the fuck up was the fool-proof preventative measure against saying dumb shit. Granted, saying dumb shit feels like the kind of right people might want to have, but in the end, shutting the fuck up results in far fewer unemployment opportunities.
I will strongly second this. You put something on the Internet, even if you delete it five minutes later, it's possible someone may have screenshotted or saved it. You say shit about your work on Facebook, Twitter, whatever... it's your neck.

One of your friends fucks up? Some relative of a relative that for some random reason you're friends with on FB posts racist shit? Your cousin posts a pro-Donald Trump meme? By all means call them out on it, have a big knock-down-drag-out brawl, whatever. But don't say shit about your work.

OK, something like "My day at work sucked" or "work was boring", that's one thing, I'll grant... but "My employer [Brand] SUCKS, they don't pay their employees enough, I'm going to start a union" is just asking for it. Easier to just not say anything and if someone asks directly if it's about work, PM them.
It's a strange world. Let's keep it that way.
User avatar
biostem
Jedi Master
Posts: 1488
Joined: 2012-11-15 01:48pm

Re: Morality of duel wielding Facebook.

Post by biostem »

Lagmonster wrote:
biostem wrote:In a world where people will try and dox you just because you disagree with them and/or try to rat you out to your employer, I see no problem with taking extensive measures to protect yourself.

Until such time as laws are put in place to protect people from the aforementioned types of attacks, you *should* do whatever you feel is necessary to protect yourself and your livelihood.
Helpful hint: Instead of saying dumb shit in a public and permanent manner about your employer, shut the fuck up. If you must say dumb shit about your employer, say it in private, to a person you trust. People you trust have a much lower chance of remembering you saying dumb shit than the Internet! Or get a dog, and say dumb shit to the dog. Dogs do not care if you say dumb shit, and they are statistically unlikely to record you saying dumb shit and preserve it for the remainder of human civilization. If you're afraid that you may forget about the dumb shit you said, and would like to record it, try writing it in a diary. As long as you do not give the diary to your employer, they will not learn that you said dumb shit.

Again, your individual experience may differ, but I grew up in a world where shutting the fuck up was the fool-proof preventative measure against saying dumb shit. Granted, saying dumb shit feels like the kind of right people might want to have, but in the end, shutting the fuck up results in far fewer unemployment opportunities.

No, you missed my point. Let's say I happened to have my place of employment listed on the FB page. Now, let's say I get into an argument with some person on, well, any topic. They don't like the points I bring up, or they can't rebut the ones I bring up - so they instead contact my employer with some made-up story - "oh so-and-so is a misogynist" or "biostem is a fascist" - stupid stuff like that. And if this person happens to have some twitter followers or has a decent-sized youtube channel, they tell their audience to start a letter writing campaign.

I'm not talking about the obvious "I work for ABC corp and they suck!" type of stuff.
User avatar
General Zod
Never Shuts Up
Posts: 29205
Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
Location: The Clearance Rack
Contact:

Re: Morality of duel wielding Facebook.

Post by General Zod »

Don't list your current place of employment on FB. Problem solved.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
User avatar
Alferd Packer
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3699
Joined: 2002-07-19 09:22pm
Location: Slumgullion Pass
Contact:

Re: Morality of duel wielding Facebook.

Post by Alferd Packer »

General Zod wrote:Don't list your current place of employment on FB. Problem solved.
Taking it a step further, I'd humbly suggest to consider stop using Facebook. I did so about two and a half years ago--but I freely admit that, as a user, I was an edge case. I read my newsfeed sporadically, had less than 100 friends, and posted things a handful of times a year. Point is, it was nearly impossible for my employer to glean much information about what I was doing, because I was barely engaged with the system in the first place.

As for dual-wielding Facebook accounts, I would simply ask how much utility one would gain from having one. In the internet age, it's important to remember that if you are not paying for a service, you are the product. So, one should at least attempt to estimate if the money Facebook makes off of you using their service(and the knowledge about you they are able to derive from that use) is worth the convenience it provides. In my case, having a single account ultimately wasn't worth it, so I stopped. In others' cases, it may be an acceptable tradeoff to have a personal account to engage with friends and family, and a professional account to have a distinct presence on the internet.

One final thing I will add, which has been touched on by numerous other posters in one form or another: the internet is, legally, no longer anonymous. If you check with the HR department at your place of employment, I'm sure they'll point out that almost every electronic form of communication you make is legally discoverable, be on on company email, via text between employees, posting on a sci-fi message board, or arguing with someone on Facebook. Most of the time, no one will ever care what you say, but there is nontrivial risk that someone might take issue, and at that point you're basically at the mercy of everything you've ever said on the internet.
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance--that principle is contempt prior to investigation." -Herbert Spencer

"Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain." - Schiller, Die Jungfrau von Orleans, III vi.
Post Reply