Evidence mounts for planet 10x the size of Earth orbiting beyond Pluto

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

User avatar
Borgholio
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6297
Joined: 2010-09-03 09:31pm
Location: Southern California

Evidence mounts for planet 10x the size of Earth orbiting beyond Pluto

Post by Borgholio »

http://www.caltech.edu/news/caltech-res ... anet-49523
Caltech Researchers Find Evidence of a Real Ninth Planet

Caltech researchers have found evidence of a giant planet tracing a bizarre, highly elongated orbit in the outer solar system. The object, which the researchers have nicknamed Planet Nine, has a mass about 10 times that of Earth and orbits about 20 times farther from the sun on average than does Neptune (which orbits the sun at an average distance of 2.8 billion miles). In fact, it would take this new planet between 10,000 and 20,000 years to make just one full orbit around the sun.

The researchers, Konstantin Batygin and Mike Brown, discovered the planet's existence through mathematical modeling and computer simulations but have not yet observed the object directly.

"This would be a real ninth planet," says Brown, the Richard and Barbara Rosenberg Professor of Planetary Astronomy. "There have only been two true planets discovered since ancient times, and this would be a third. It's a pretty substantial chunk of our solar system that's still out there to be found, which is pretty exciting."

Brown notes that the putative ninth planet—at 5,000 times the mass of Pluto—is sufficiently large that there should be no debate about whether it is a true planet. Unlike the class of smaller objects now known as dwarf planets, Planet Nine gravitationally dominates its neighborhood of the solar system. In fact, it dominates a region larger than any of the other known planets—a fact that Brown says makes it "the most planet-y of the planets in the whole solar system."

Batygin and Brown describe their work in the current issue of the Astronomical Journal and show how Planet Nine helps explain a number of mysterious features of the field of icy objects and debris beyond Neptune known as the Kuiper Belt.

"Although we were initially quite skeptical that this planet could exist, as we continued to investigate its orbit and what it would mean for the outer solar system, we become increasingly convinced that it is out there," says Batygin, an assistant professor of planetary science. "For the first time in over 150 years, there is solid evidence that the solar system's planetary census is incomplete."

The road to the theoretical discovery was not straightforward. In 2014, a former postdoc of Brown's, Chad Trujillo, and his colleague Scott Shepherd published a paper noting that 13 of the most distant objects in the Kuiper Belt are similar with respect to an obscure orbital feature. To explain that similarity, they suggested the possible presence of a small planet. Brown thought the planet solution was unlikely, but his interest was piqued.

He took the problem down the hall to Batygin, and the two started what became a year-and-a-half-long collaboration to investigate the distant objects. As an observer and a theorist, respectively, the researchers approached the work from very different perspectives—Brown as someone who looks at the sky and tries to anchor everything in the context of what can be seen, and Batygin as someone who puts himself within the context of dynamics, considering how things might work from a physics standpoint. Those differences allowed the researchers to challenge each other's ideas and to consider new possibilities. "I would bring in some of these observational aspects; he would come back with arguments from theory, and we would push each other. I don't think the discovery would have happened without that back and forth," says Brown. " It was perhaps the most fun year of working on a problem in the solar system that I've ever had."

Fairly quickly Batygin and Brown realized that the six most distant objects from Trujillo and Shepherd's original collection all follow elliptical orbits that point in the same direction in physical space. That is particularly surprising because the outermost points of their orbits move around the solar system, and they travel at different rates.

"It's almost like having six hands on a clock all moving at different rates, and when you happen to look up, they're all in exactly the same place," says Brown. The odds of having that happen are something like 1 in 100, he says. But on top of that, the orbits of the six objects are also all tilted in the same way—pointing about 30 degrees downward in the same direction relative to the plane of the eight known planets. The probability of that happening is about 0.007 percent. "Basically it shouldn't happen randomly," Brown says. "So we thought something else must be shaping these orbits."

The first possibility they investigated was that perhaps there are enough distant Kuiper Belt objects—some of which have not yet been discovered—to exert the gravity needed to keep that subpopulation clustered together. The researchers quickly ruled this out when it turned out that such a scenario would require the Kuiper Belt to have about 100 times the mass it has today.

That left them with the idea of a planet. Their first instinct was to run simulations involving a planet in a distant orbit that encircled the orbits of the six Kuiper Belt objects, acting like a giant lasso to wrangle them into their alignment. Batygin says that almost works but does not provide the observed eccentricities precisely. "Close, but no cigar," he says.

Then, effectively by accident, Batygin and Brown noticed that if they ran their simulations with a massive planet in an anti-aligned orbit—an orbit in which the planet's closest approach to the sun, or perihelion, is 180 degrees across from the perihelion of all the other objects and known planets—the distant Kuiper Belt objects in the simulation assumed the alignment that is actually observed.

"Your natural response is 'This orbital geometry can't be right. This can't be stable over the long term because, after all, this would cause the planet and these objects to meet and eventually collide,'" says Batygin. But through a mechanism known as mean-motion resonance, the anti-aligned orbit of the ninth planet actually prevents the Kuiper Belt objects from colliding with it and keeps them aligned. As orbiting objects approach each other they exchange energy. So, for example, for every four orbits Planet Nine makes, a distant Kuiper Belt object might complete nine orbits. They never collide. Instead, like a parent maintaining the arc of a child on a swing with periodic pushes, Planet Nine nudges the orbits of distant Kuiper Belt objects such that their configuration with relation to the planet is preserved.

"Still, I was very skeptical," says Batygin. "I had never seen anything like this in celestial mechanics."

But little by little, as the researchers investigated additional features and consequences of the model, they became persuaded. "A good theory should not only explain things that you set out to explain. It should hopefully explain things that you didn't set out to explain and make predictions that are testable," says Batygin.

And indeed Planet Nine's existence helps explain more than just the alignment of the distant Kuiper Belt objects. It also provides an explanation for the mysterious orbits that two of them trace. The first of those objects, dubbed Sedna, was discovered by Brown in 2003. Unlike standard-variety Kuiper Belt objects, which get gravitationally "kicked out" by Neptune and then return back to it, Sedna never gets very close to Neptune. A second object like Sedna, known as 2012 VP113, was announced by Trujillo and Shepherd in 2014. Batygin and Brown found that the presence of Planet Nine in its proposed orbit naturally produces Sedna-like objects by taking a standard Kuiper Belt object and slowly pulling it away into an orbit less connected to Neptune.

A predicted consequence of Planet Nine is that a second set of confined objects should also exist. These objects are forced into positions at right angles to Planet Nine and into orbits that are perpendicular to the plane of the solar system. Five known objects (blue) fit this prediction precisely.
Credit: Caltech/R. Hurt (IPAC) [Diagram was created using WorldWide Telescope.]

But the real kicker for the researchers was the fact that their simulations also predicted that there would be objects in the Kuiper Belt on orbits inclined perpendicularly to the plane of the planets. Batygin kept finding evidence for these in his simulations and took them to Brown. "Suddenly I realized there are objects like that," recalls Brown. In the last three years, observers have identified four objects tracing orbits roughly along one perpendicular line from Neptune and one object along another. "We plotted up the positions of those objects and their orbits, and they matched the simulations exactly," says Brown. "When we found that, my jaw sort of hit the floor."

"When the simulation aligned the distant Kuiper Belt objects and created objects like Sedna, we thought this is kind of awesome—you kill two birds with one stone," says Batygin. "But with the existence of the planet also explaining these perpendicular orbits, not only do you kill two birds, you also take down a bird that you didn't realize was sitting in a nearby tree."

Where did Planet Nine come from and how did it end up in the outer solar system? Scientists have long believed that the early solar system began with four planetary cores that went on to grab all of the gas around them, forming the four gas planets—Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. Over time, collisions and ejections shaped them and moved them out to their present locations. "But there is no reason that there could not have been five cores, rather than four," says Brown. Planet Nine could represent that fifth core, and if it got too close to Jupiter or Saturn, it could have been ejected into its distant, eccentric orbit.

Batygin and Brown continue to refine their simulations and learn more about the planet's orbit and its influence on the distant solar system. Meanwhile, Brown and other colleagues have begun searching the skies for Planet Nine. Only the planet's rough orbit is known, not the precise location of the planet on that elliptical path. If the planet happens to be close to its perihelion, Brown says, astronomers should be able to spot it in images captured by previous surveys. If it is in the most distant part of its orbit, the world's largest telescopes—such as the twin 10-meter telescopes at the W. M. Keck Observatory and the Subaru Telescope, all on Mauna Kea in Hawaii—will be needed to see it. If, however, Planet Nine is now located anywhere in between, many telescopes have a shot at finding it.

"I would love to find it," says Brown. "But I'd also be perfectly happy if someone else found it. That is why we're publishing this paper. We hope that other people are going to get inspired and start searching."

In terms of understanding more about the solar system's context in the rest of the universe, Batygin says that in a couple of ways, this ninth planet that seems like such an oddball to us would actually make our solar system more similar to the other planetary systems that astronomers are finding around other stars. First, most of the planets around other sunlike stars have no single orbital range—that is, some orbit extremely close to their host stars while others follow exceptionally distant orbits. Second, the most common planets around other stars range between 1 and 10 Earth-masses.

"One of the most startling discoveries about other planetary systems has been that the most common type of planet out there has a mass between that of Earth and that of Neptune," says Batygin. "Until now, we've thought that the solar system was lacking in this most common type of planet. Maybe we're more normal after all."

Brown, well known for the significant role he played in the demotion of Pluto from a planet to a dwarf planet adds, "All those people who are mad that Pluto is no longer a planet can be thrilled to know that there is a real planet out there still to be found," he says. "Now we can go and find this planet and make the solar system have nine planets once again."

The paper is titled "Evidence for a Distant Giant Planet in the Solar System."
- See more at: http://www.caltech.edu/news/caltech-res ... 7VbgW.dpuf
TLDR - More and more Kuiper belt objects are being discovered that have orbital paths that can only be explained by a massive planet orbiting about 20 times farther out than Neptune.

This...is very cool. Here's hoping they can actually find and image the thing...
You will be assimilated...bunghole!
User avatar
Khaat
Jedi Master
Posts: 1034
Joined: 2008-11-04 11:42am

Re: Evidence mounts for planet 10x the size of Earth orbiting beyond Pluto

Post by Khaat »

Considering the number of planetoids that Jupiter must have kicked out of the inner system, it wouldn't surprise me to learn that this is just the tip of the iceberg for near-earth-sized planets in the Kuiper belt.
Rule #1: Believe the autocrat. He means what he says.
Rule #2: Do not be taken in by small signs of normality.
Rule #3: Institutions will not save you.
Rule #4: Be outraged.
Rule #5: Don’t make compromises.
User avatar
Elheru Aran
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13073
Joined: 2004-03-04 01:15am
Location: Georgia

Re: Evidence mounts for planet 10x the size of Earth orbiting beyond Pluto

Post by Elheru Aran »

Khaat wrote:Considering the number of planetoids that Jupiter must have kicked out of the inner system, it wouldn't surprise me to learn that this is just the tip of the iceberg for near-earth-sized planets in the Kuiper belt.
*checks title* "10x the size of Earth" isn't quite near-Earth-sized the last I looked...
It's a strange world. Let's keep it that way.
User avatar
Khaat
Jedi Master
Posts: 1034
Joined: 2008-11-04 11:42am

Re: Evidence mounts for planet 10x the size of Earth orbiting beyond Pluto

Post by Khaat »

Course, the article is discussing a gas-giant planet anyway. :oops:
Second, the most common planets around other stars range between 1 and 10 Earth-masses.
This bit got me stuck, I think.
Rule #1: Believe the autocrat. He means what he says.
Rule #2: Do not be taken in by small signs of normality.
Rule #3: Institutions will not save you.
Rule #4: Be outraged.
Rule #5: Don’t make compromises.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1750
Joined: 2008-10-10 11:52am
Location: Blighty

Re: Evidence mounts for planet 10x the size of Earth orbiting beyond Pluto

Post by Captain Seafort »

Khaat wrote:Course, the article is discussing a gas-giant planet anyway.
I don't think it is - my reading is that it's talking about a terrestrial planet that would have gone on to become the core of a gas giant if it hadn't been ejected from the main planetary zone.
User avatar
SpottedKitty
Jedi Master
Posts: 1004
Joined: 2014-08-22 08:24pm
Location: UK

Re: Evidence mounts for planet 10x the size of Earth orbiting beyond Pluto

Post by SpottedKitty »

Captain Seafort wrote:
Khaat wrote:Course, the article is discussing a gas-giant planet anyway.
I don't think it is - my reading is that it's talking about a terrestrial planet that would have gone on to become the core of a gas giant if it hadn't been ejected from the main planetary zone.
It could go either way, I think. It all depends on when this one object got ejected out of the zone of the other giant planets; before or after all the gas accretion had happened. It's a tricky question, because a lot of the circularisation of the current giants' orbits seems to have happened while there was still a lot of gas and ice to be hoovered up. After that, the normal gravitational pushme-pullyu of a whole bunch of planets carried on the orbit regularisation at a lower level. We might have a bare solid core out there, or we might have a small Neptune-like ice giant. We'll have to wait and see if anyone can spot it and get a proper mass estimate.
“Despite rumor, Death isn't cruel — merely terribly, terribly good at his job.”
Terry Pratchett, Sourcery
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: Evidence mounts for planet 10x the size of Earth orbiting beyond Pluto

Post by Simon_Jester »

This is not really a new theory; people have been proposing massive companion objects in the outer reaches of the solar system that perturb asteroids and/or comets for decades. However, it's interesting that they've been able to do statistical analysis of multiple orbits of a variety of celestial bodies that all point to the same thing.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
User avatar
Jub
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4396
Joined: 2012-08-06 07:58pm
Location: British Columbia, Canada

Re: Evidence mounts for planet 10x the size of Earth orbiting beyond Pluto

Post by Jub »

Simon_Jester wrote:This is not really a new theory; people have been proposing massive companion objects in the outer reaches of the solar system that perturb asteroids and/or comets for decades. However, it's interesting that they've been able to do statistical analysis of multiple orbits of a variety of celestial bodies that all point to the same thing.
I'd be surprised if these kinds of companion planets weren't common. Something in the class of Saturn or Jupiter is simply massive enough to mess with anything that gets close to them, either destroying them outright or bouncing them into a new orbit.
User avatar
Borgholio
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6297
Joined: 2010-09-03 09:31pm
Location: Southern California

Re: Evidence mounts for planet 10x the size of Earth orbiting beyond Pluto

Post by Borgholio »

Simon_Jester wrote:This is not really a new theory; people have been proposing massive companion objects in the outer reaches of the solar system that perturb asteroids and/or comets for decades. However, it's interesting that they've been able to do statistical analysis of multiple orbits of a variety of celestial bodies that all point to the same thing.
Exactly. I can remember theories about "Planet X" ever since I was a child, but now that we've monitored enough stuff in the Kuiper belt to find large-scale patterns that can't easily be explained any other way...it looks like there might actually be something to it this time.
You will be assimilated...bunghole!
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: Evidence mounts for planet 10x the size of Earth orbiting beyond Pluto

Post by Simon_Jester »

Should such a planet actually be found, I hope they give it a proper Greco-Roman deity name rather than disrupting the tradition and sequence...
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
User avatar
Jub
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4396
Joined: 2012-08-06 07:58pm
Location: British Columbia, Canada

Re: Evidence mounts for planet 10x the size of Earth orbiting beyond Pluto

Post by Jub »

I'm partial to Pluto II: Larger! Longer! Uncut! myself.
User avatar
Zeropoint
Jedi Knight
Posts: 581
Joined: 2013-09-14 01:49am

Re: Evidence mounts for planet 10x the size of Earth orbiting beyond Pluto

Post by Zeropoint »

Let's call it Pluto and rename Pluto to Yuggoth!

Edit: Upon two or three seconds' reflection, I realize that's a terrible idea.

Maybe "South Pluto" or something.
I'm a cis-het white male, and I oppose racism, sexism, homophobia, and transphobia. I support treating all humans equally.

When fascism came to America, it was wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.

That which will not bend must break and that which can be destroyed by truth should never be spared its demise.
User avatar
jwl
Jedi Master
Posts: 1137
Joined: 2013-01-02 04:31pm

Re: Evidence mounts for planet 10x the size of Earth orbiting beyond Pluto

Post by jwl »

Elheru Aran wrote:
Khaat wrote:Considering the number of planetoids that Jupiter must have kicked out of the inner system, it wouldn't surprise me to learn that this is just the tip of the iceberg for near-earth-sized planets in the Kuiper belt.
*checks title* "10x the size of Earth" isn't quite near-Earth-sized the last I looked...
It's also not in the Kuiper belt...
User avatar
jwl
Jedi Master
Posts: 1137
Joined: 2013-01-02 04:31pm

Re: Evidence mounts for planet 10x the size of Earth orbiting beyond Pluto

Post by jwl »

When it comes to names, the names they tend to call it apparently include George, Jehoshaphat, and most commonly Fatty. Note that these are the same people that called Eris Xena, called MakeMake Easterbunny, and called Haumea Santa when they first discovered them.
User avatar
Khaat
Jedi Master
Posts: 1034
Joined: 2008-11-04 11:42am

Re: Evidence mounts for planet 10x the size of Earth orbiting beyond Pluto

Post by Khaat »

To be fair, as the detection is based on gravitic disturbance, it's x10 the mass of Earth at this point, right? Once direct observations are/can be made, then actual dimensions and composition can be determined. A rocky earth-like body would be only just over twice the diameter of Earth to be x8 its mass.
jwl wrote:It's also not in the Kuiper belt...
... and show how Planet Nine helps explain a number of mysterious features of the field of icy objects and debris beyond Neptune known as the Kuiper Belt.
Good thing I'm not driving out there, my extra-Neptunian topography is off.
So it never comes into the inner system, stays beyond Neptune... isn't that the definition of the Kuiper Belt?
Kui·per belt
/ˈkīpər ˌbelt/
noun
a region of the solar system beyond the orbit of Neptune, believed to contain many comets, asteroids, and other small bodies made largely of ice.
I can see where I was led astray...?
Rule #1: Believe the autocrat. He means what he says.
Rule #2: Do not be taken in by small signs of normality.
Rule #3: Institutions will not save you.
Rule #4: Be outraged.
Rule #5: Don’t make compromises.
User avatar
Borgholio
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6297
Joined: 2010-09-03 09:31pm
Location: Southern California

Re: Evidence mounts for planet 10x the size of Earth orbiting beyond Pluto

Post by Borgholio »

So it never comes into the inner system, stays beyond Neptune... isn't that the definition of the Kuiper Belt?
No, the Kuiper belt is a specific ring of objects...not a generalized area beyond Neptune. It's like the asteroid belt, only much bigger. We have not found the outer edge yet but it's likely this new planet (if found) would mark it for us.
You will be assimilated...bunghole!
User avatar
jwl
Jedi Master
Posts: 1137
Joined: 2013-01-02 04:31pm

Re: Evidence mounts for planet 10x the size of Earth orbiting beyond Pluto

Post by jwl »

Khaat wrote:To be fair, as the detection is based on gravitic disturbance, it's x10 the mass of Earth at this point, right? Once direct observations are/can be made, then actual dimensions and composition can be determined. A rocky earth-like body would be only just over twice the diameter of Earth to be x8 its mass.
jwl wrote:It's also not in the Kuiper belt...
... and show how Planet Nine helps explain a number of mysterious features of the field of icy objects and debris beyond Neptune known as the Kuiper Belt.
Good thing I'm not driving out there, my extra-Neptunian topography is off.
So it never comes into the inner system, stays beyond Neptune... isn't that the definition of the Kuiper Belt?
Kui·per belt
/ˈkīpər ˌbelt/
noun
a region of the solar system beyond the orbit of Neptune, believed to contain many comets, asteroids, and other small bodies made largely of ice.
I can see where I was led astray...?
I see your point. I usually think of the Kuiper belt as coming closer to Neptune than that planet would be.
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: Evidence mounts for planet 10x the size of Earth orbiting beyond Pluto

Post by Simon_Jester »

They're figuring on an orbital radius for, oh... I dub the planet Janus, the Roman god of endings and boundaries... of around six hundred AU.

Formally the Kuiper Belt is defined to orbit between about thirty and fifty AU out. The bulk of them are objects in some sort of stable orbital resonance with Neptune (3:2 resonance, 2:1, or other options).

This is well outside the Kuiper Belt, and its effects on the Kuiper Belt would have to be extremely subtle, and cumulative, in a way I find hard to understand. But then, I know only the most rudimentary bits of information about orbital mechanics.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
Channel72
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2068
Joined: 2010-02-03 05:28pm
Location: New York

Re: Evidence mounts for planet 10x the size of Earth orbiting beyond Pluto

Post by Channel72 »

Simon_Jester wrote:Should such a planet actually be found, I hope they give it a proper Greco-Roman deity name rather than disrupting the tradition and sequence...
It seems after Jupiter they want to the Titans, (Saturn, Uranus) - but then reverted to Zeus/Jupiter's generation with Neptune and Pluto (both brothers of Jupiter), and then appropriately named Pluto's moons after infernal minor deities. Anything beyond Pluto should probably be named after another underworld deity or Titan. Rhea would be nice but it's not a Roman name, and the Roman name sucks.

Janus is okay, but there's no guarantee this really is the furthest planet. There may be others.
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: Evidence mounts for planet 10x the size of Earth orbiting beyond Pluto

Post by Simon_Jester »

Strictly true, I suppose, but then Janus was also a god of beginnings. ;)
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
User avatar
Iroscato
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2359
Joined: 2011-02-07 03:04pm
Location: Great Britain (It's great, honestly!)

Re: Evidence mounts for planet 10x the size of Earth orbiting beyond Pluto

Post by Iroscato »

Please, we have enough bum puns with Uranus. You want another planet with an easy-target name? :P
Yeah, I've always taken the subtext of the Birther movement to be, "The rules don't count here! This is different! HE'S BLACK! BLACK, I SAY! ARE YOU ALL BLIND!?

- Raw Shark

Destiny and fate are for those too weak to forge their own futures. Where we are 'supposed' to be is irrelevent.

- SirNitram (RIP)
User avatar
jwl
Jedi Master
Posts: 1137
Joined: 2013-01-02 04:31pm

Re: Evidence mounts for planet 10x the size of Earth orbiting beyond Pluto

Post by jwl »

You can't name it after a god of the underworld because that is reserved for objects in a 2:3 resonance with Neptune. You can't call it Janus because that's already a moon. You can't call it Rhea because that's also a moon. In fact there's really no point in going for any Greek/Roman god because the vast majority of them are taken. Can't we just keep calling it Fatty?

In all seriousness, I think a better name would be something from Inuit mythology to line up with Sedna.
User avatar
Eternal_Freedom
Castellan
Posts: 10370
Joined: 2010-03-09 02:16pm
Location: CIC, Battlestar Temeraire

Re: Evidence mounts for planet 10x the size of Earth orbiting beyond Pluto

Post by Eternal_Freedom »

An article I saw earlier (hopefully a joke) called it "Miami."

Hopefully it won't end up being found by an ardent Republican, otherwise we'd end up with Planet Reagan.
Baltar: "I don't want to miss a moment of the last Battlestar's destruction!"
Centurion: "Sir, I really think you should look at the other Battlestar."
Baltar: "What are you babbling about other...it's impossible!"
Centurion: "No. It is a Battlestar."

Corrax Entry 7:17: So you walk eternally through the shadow realms, standing against evil where all others falter. May your thirst for retribution never quench, may the blood on your sword never dry, and may we never need you again.
User avatar
SpottedKitty
Jedi Master
Posts: 1004
Joined: 2014-08-22 08:24pm
Location: UK

Re: Evidence mounts for planet 10x the size of Earth orbiting beyond Pluto

Post by SpottedKitty »

Khaat wrote:So it never comes into the inner system, stays beyond Neptune... isn't that the definition of the Kuiper Belt?
Remember, the Kuiper Belt isn't the only thing way out there past Neptune. Depending on what the orbit ends up looking like, Planet Wossname might turn out to be in the Scattered Disk, or even a Detached Object, which is even further out.

We need confirmed sightings and a nailed-down orbit; all we have so far are some logical consequences of a number of weirdnesses in existing Trans-Neptunian orbits. As the modern mangled version of the old saying goes, correlation doesn't imply causation, but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively.
“Despite rumor, Death isn't cruel — merely terribly, terribly good at his job.”
Terry Pratchett, Sourcery
User avatar
Guardsman Bass
Cowardly Codfish
Posts: 9281
Joined: 2002-07-07 12:01am
Location: Beneath the Deepest Sea

Re: Evidence mounts for planet 10x the size of Earth orbiting beyond Pluto

Post by Guardsman Bass »

How about calling it "Chione"? Chione was a greco-roman minor goddess of snow, which would be appropriate for a planet herding Kuiper Belt objects.
“It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life.”
-Jean-Luc Picard


"Men are afraid that women will laugh at them. Women are afraid that men will kill them."
-Margaret Atwood
Post Reply