Spiders sprayed with graphene or carbon nanotubes spin super

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
User avatar
jwl
Jedi Master
Posts: 1137
Joined: 2013-01-02 04:31pm

Spiders sprayed with graphene or carbon nanotubes spin super

Post by jwl »

Spider-Man would be so envious. Spiders have woven webs infused with carbon nanotubes and even graphene, raising the prospect of new materials with record-beating properties.

Graphene – sheets of carbon just one atom thick – is one of the strongest artificial materials, and spider silk is one of the strongest natural ones. So Nicola Pugno of the University of Trento, Italy, wondered what would happen if you combined them.

Pugno and his colleagues captured five spiders from the Pholcidae family and sprayed them with a mixture of water and graphene particles 200 to 300 nanometres wide. They also sprayed another 10 spiders with carbon nanotubes and water to compare the effects of the two materials.

Some spiders produced below-par silk, but others got a major boost. The best fibres came from a spider dosed with nanotubes: it was around 3.5 times as tough and strong as the best unaltered silk, spun by the giant riverine orb spider.



From spiders to silkworms

The only natural material that is stronger than orb spider silk is the material that the teeth of molluscs called limpets are made out of, Pugno and colleagues revealed earlier this year. The molluscs' teeth stretch more than the spider silk, but are much less tough, meaning they crack more easily.

The team isn't sure how the graphene and carbon nanotubes end up in the silk. One possibility is that the carbon coats the outside of the strands, but Pugno thinks that would not be enough to account for the increase in strength. Instead, he believes the spiders mop up materials in their environment and incorporate them into the silk as they spin. This comes at a cost, however – four of the spiders died soon after being sprayed.

At this early stage it's not clear how such a material will be used, but one possibility is a giant net capable of catching falling aircraft, suggests Pugno. The team also plans to investigate other ways of producing bionic materials, such as dosing silkworms with artificial substances. "This concept could become a way to obtain materials with superior characteristics," he says.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2 ... Uzz5vlViko
Original paper:
Abstract

The protein matrix and hard tissues of insects1,2,3,4, worms5,6,7, ants8 and spiders9,10 naturally incorporates metals, such as zinc1,2,3,5,8,9,10, manganese2,3,9and copper6,7. This leads to mechanical hardening of teeth9, jaws5,6,7, mandibles1,2,3,4,8,, ovipositors8 and to an enhancement of silk toughness10. Thus, the artificial incorporation of metals, or even insulating or semiconducting materials, into these protein structures could be exploited to obtain a reinforced matrix. A number of groups reported the introduction of metals, such as zinc1,2,3,5,8,9, titanium10, aluminium5, copper6,7 and lead6 in the protein structure of spider silk through multiple pulsed vapour-phase infiltrations10. This allowed to increase its toughness modulus from 131 MPa8 up to 1.5 GPa10. Biomaterials with increased mechanical or conductive properties could find innovative applications in garment textiles11 and medical nerve regeneration12. It was suggested to coat spider silks with amine-functionalized multiwall carbon nanotubes, to produce electrically conducting fibres9, or with cadmium telluride13, magnetite1 or gold1,2 nanoparticles, for fluorescent13 , magnetic13,14 and electronic applications13,15. However, to the best of our knowledge, the incorporation of materials in the inner protein structure of spider silk has not been achieved to date. Here, we report the production of silk incorporating graphene and carbon nanotubes directly by spider spinning, after spraying spiders with the corresponding aqueous dispersions. We observe a significant increment of the mechanical properties with respect to the pristine silk, in terms of fracture strength, Young’s and toughness moduli. We measure a fracture strength up to~5.4 GPa, a Young’s modulus up to~47.8 GPa and a toughness modulus up to ~2.1 GPa, or 1567 J/g, which, to the best of our knowledge, is the highest reported to date, even when compared to the current toughest knotted fibres8. This approach could be extended to other animals and plants and could lead to a new class of bionic materials for ultimate applications.
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1504/1504.06751.pdf
User avatar
Iroscato
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2359
Joined: 2011-02-07 03:04pm
Location: Great Britain (It's great, honestly!)

Re: Spiders sprayed with graphene or carbon nanotubes spin s

Post by Iroscato »

...A net for catching falling aircraft? Aside from cackling supervillainy potential, wouldn't such a net simply slice straight through any aircraft that bombs into it at christ knows what speed? Or perhaps they meant a carbon nanotube sheet of some kind. But still, wackiest idea I've seen in a while.
Yeah, I've always taken the subtext of the Birther movement to be, "The rules don't count here! This is different! HE'S BLACK! BLACK, I SAY! ARE YOU ALL BLIND!?

- Raw Shark

Destiny and fate are for those too weak to forge their own futures. Where we are 'supposed' to be is irrelevent.

- SirNitram (RIP)
User avatar
Zeropoint
Jedi Knight
Posts: 581
Joined: 2013-09-14 01:49am

Re: Spiders sprayed with graphene or carbon nanotubes spin s

Post by Zeropoint »

As wacky as the idea of lowering a nuclear-powered rover to the surface of Mars by winch from a spacecraft hovering on rockets?
I'm a cis-het white male, and I oppose racism, sexism, homophobia, and transphobia. I support treating all humans equally.

When fascism came to America, it was wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.

That which will not bend must break and that which can be destroyed by truth should never be spared its demise.
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37389
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Re: Spiders sprayed with graphene or carbon nanotubes spin s

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Chimaera wrote:...A net for catching falling aircraft? Aside from cackling supervillainy potential, wouldn't such a net simply slice straight through any aircraft that bombs into it at christ knows what speed? Or perhaps they meant a carbon nanotube sheet of some kind. But still, wackiest idea I've seen in a while.
Spider silk stretches a great deal before breaking. Something like 160% of original length IIRC. This is linked to its high tensile strength, but also means the peak shock it would impart on an item caught in a net would be considerably lessened. It also means its not really suitable for body armor, which is why nothing has come of that once very well publicized avenue of research. The armor might stop the bullet but it'd penetrate too far into human tissue in the process to be safe.

Meanwhile a problem with carbon nanotubes, which have much higher tensile strengths then spider silk, is that they are predicated towards catastrophic failure when they do fail. Which means a material made of them wont be durable in overmatching situations, but it could also bounce some projectiles without damage. A combination of these properties can be very desirable for certain applications. But it greatly depends on exactly what you want to do. So when you say things like 'christ knows what speed' your kinda of missing the issue at stake.

To improve materials we need more tailored approaches for specific applications. Particularly since until we have some radical change in how we produce them carbon nanotubes are very expensive, and its desirable to incorporate them into other cheaper materials, rather then trying to make 100% nanotube materials. The higher the percentage of nanotubes the higher the cost, but you get diminishing returns for the money. Nothing complex about that, but for the near term its a completely dominate consideration for practical applications. Spider silk is more expensive then say, fiberglass, but much cheaper then nanotubes or the vaunted M5 fiber, and produced in a manner which is highly scaleable so we have a lot of incentive to find ways to make it useful. Just because its not best doesn't mean it can't have a major future role. Durability over time great though, I'm not sure how well that's been dealt with. It actually gets stronger for some months, then begins loosing strength steadily. But it isn't the only high strength fiber with a simple time limited lifespan.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Iroscato
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2359
Joined: 2011-02-07 03:04pm
Location: Great Britain (It's great, honestly!)

Re: Spiders sprayed with graphene or carbon nanotubes spin s

Post by Iroscato »

Very interesting info Sea Skimmer, thanks. It's clear you know your shit ;)
Zeropoint wrote:As wacky as the idea of lowering a nuclear-powered rover to the surface of Mars by winch from a spacecraft hovering on rockets?
Like I said, 'in a while'. The landing method for Curiosity would be the last big whacky idea I'd seen. It did work rather beautifully though, so who knows...
Yeah, I've always taken the subtext of the Birther movement to be, "The rules don't count here! This is different! HE'S BLACK! BLACK, I SAY! ARE YOU ALL BLIND!?

- Raw Shark

Destiny and fate are for those too weak to forge their own futures. Where we are 'supposed' to be is irrelevent.

- SirNitram (RIP)
User avatar
cosmicalstorm
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1642
Joined: 2008-02-14 09:35am

Re: Spiders sprayed with graphene or carbon nanotubes spin s

Post by cosmicalstorm »

Graphene oxide appears to be a possible cancer medicine. I would consider it if I had incurable cancer.
Graphene oxide selectively targets cancer stem cells, across multiple tumor types: Implications for non-toxic cancer treatment, via “differentiation-based nano-therapy”



Abstract

Tumor-initiating cells (TICs), a.k.a. cancer stem cells (CSCs), are difficult to eradicate with conventional approaches to cancer treatment, such as chemo-therapy and radiation. As a consequence, the survival of residual CSCs is thought to drive the onset of tumor recurrence, distant metastasis, and drug-resistance, which is a significant clinical problem for the effective treatment of cancer. Thus, novel approaches to cancer therapy are needed urgently, to address this clinical need. Towards this end, here we have investigated the therapeutic potential of graphene oxide to target cancer stem cells. Graphene and its derivatives are well-known, relatively inert and potentially non-toxic nano-materials that form stable dispersions in a variety of solvents. Here, we show that graphene oxide (of both big and small flake sizes) can be used to selectively inhibit the proliferative expansion of cancer stem cells, across multiple tumor types. For this purpose, we employed the tumor-sphere assay, which functionally measures the clonal expansion of single cancer stem cells under anchorage-independent conditions. More specifically, we show that graphene oxide effectively inhibits tumor-sphere formation in multiple cell lines, across 6 different cancer types, including breast, ovarian, prostate, lung and pancreatic cancers, as well as glioblastoma (brain). In striking contrast, graphene oxide is non-toxic for “bulk” cancer cells (non-stem) and normal fibroblasts. Mechanistically, we present evidence that GO exerts its striking effects on CSCs by inhibiting several key signal transduction pathways (WNT, Notch and STAT-signaling) and thereby inducing CSC differentiation. Thus, graphene oxide may be an effective non-toxic therapeutic strategy for the eradication of cancer stem cells, via differentiation-based nano-therapy.
Post Reply