Particles recorded moving faster than light

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

User avatar
starslayer
Jedi Knight
Posts: 731
Joined: 2008-04-04 08:40pm
Location: Columbus, OH

Re: Particles recorded moving faster than light

Post by starslayer »

They wouldn't be announcing this at all unless they had at least a 5-sigma detection, so I imagine they have a very statistically significant result. Given how ghostly neutrinos are, I'm not sure how they're able to get that kind of significance, but I'll wait for either a summary to be slapped up on the ArXiv or someone to come forward saying they found the (likely) systematic error.
User avatar
Anacronian
Padawan Learner
Posts: 430
Joined: 2011-09-04 11:47pm

Re: Particles recorded moving faster than light

Post by Anacronian »

Just a question from a layman here.

If we assume that the tested neutrinos actually moved faster than light could that be because neutrinos actually have rest mass(unlike photons) and that mass got accelerated by Earth's gravity instead of just blueshifting like photons??
Homo sapiens! What an inventive, invincible species! It's only been a few million years since they crawled up out of the mud and learned to walk. Puny, defenseless bipeds. They've survived flood, famine and plague. They've survived cosmic wars and holocausts. And now, here they are, out among the stars, waiting to begin a new life. Ready to outsit eternity. They're indomitable... indomitable. ~ Dr.Who
User avatar
Bakustra
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2822
Joined: 2005-05-12 07:56pm
Location: Neptune Violon Tide!

Re: Particles recorded moving faster than light

Post by Bakustra »

Anacronian wrote:Just a question from a layman here.

If we assume that the tested neutrinos actually moved faster than light could that be because neutrinos actually have rest mass(unlike photons) and that mass got accelerated by Earth's gravity instead of just blueshifting like photons??
No, because acceleration in relativity is asymptomatic at the speed of light. It takes infinite energy to accelerate to the speed of light, and so you cannot ever reach it through ordinary acceleration, let alone exceed it.
Invited by the new age, the elegant Sailor Neptune!
I mean, how often am I to enter a game of riddles with the author, where they challenge me with some strange and confusing and distracting device, and I'm supposed to unravel it and go "I SEE WHAT YOU DID THERE" and take great personal satisfaction and pride in our mutual cleverness?
- The Handle, from the TVTropes Forums
User avatar
Anacronian
Padawan Learner
Posts: 430
Joined: 2011-09-04 11:47pm

Re: Particles recorded moving faster than light

Post by Anacronian »

Bakustra wrote:
Anacronian wrote:Just a question from a layman here.

If we assume that the tested neutrinos actually moved faster than light could that be because neutrinos actually have rest mass(unlike photons) and that mass got accelerated by Earth's gravity instead of just blueshifting like photons??
No, because acceleration in relativity is asymptomatic at the speed of light. It takes infinite energy to accelerate to the speed of light, and so you cannot ever reach it through ordinary acceleration, let alone exceed it.
Oh well then i'll just stick to my first thought then..*They shouldn't have sent them to Italy, Nothing there ever sticks to the speed limits.*
Homo sapiens! What an inventive, invincible species! It's only been a few million years since they crawled up out of the mud and learned to walk. Puny, defenseless bipeds. They've survived flood, famine and plague. They've survived cosmic wars and holocausts. And now, here they are, out among the stars, waiting to begin a new life. Ready to outsit eternity. They're indomitable... indomitable. ~ Dr.Who
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16329
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Re: Particles recorded moving faster than light

Post by Batman »

Well there's laws of physics saying FTL travel is impossible.

And that's it-they're laws. Nobody enacts laws that forbid the impossible, there'd be no point. If it's impossible, it's impossible. I thereby posit that it is possible to travel faster than light, Nature just really doesn't want us to :P
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
SpaceMarine93
Jedi Knight
Posts: 585
Joined: 2011-05-03 05:15am
Location: Continent of Mu

Re: Particles recorded moving faster than light

Post by SpaceMarine93 »

When situations like this happens, there's usually either a human error, an unforeseen complication e.g. natural neutrinos going in at that random moment, or some new discovery.

The scientists probably needs to do more testing before they could confirm whether the discovery contradicts current model of physics. Even if it contradicts the current understanding of physics, big deal! This is good news in the fact that we probably just found the holy grail of telecommunication: if these FTL neutrinos could be applied to practical use, this would guarantee almost instantaneous communication across the planet.

But then again, it could just be some form of error. Let's wait for further news.
Life sucks and is probably meaningless, but that doesn't mean there's no reason to be good.

--- The Anti-Nihilist view in short.
User avatar
SilverWingedSeraph
Jedi Knight
Posts: 965
Joined: 2007-02-15 11:56am
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Contact:

Re: Particles recorded moving faster than light

Post by SilverWingedSeraph »

SpaceMarine93 wrote:When situations like this happens, there's usually either a human error, an unforeseen complication e.g. natural neutrinos going in at that random moment, or some new discovery.
Three years. 15,000 different tests. Hell yes there's totally a possibility for errors that might have turned up, most likely they'll be errors in methodology or technical ones, but I highly doubt natural neutrinos going through at a random moment are responsible. Random isn't that reliable. :lol:
The scientists probably needs to do more testing before they could confirm whether the discovery contradicts current model of physics. Even if it contradicts the current understanding of physics, big deal!
No, see, this is actually a big deal if it's true. Particles with non-zero mass traveling faster than c pretty much blows relativity to pieces. We'll need to invent completely new physics to explain how the fuck that happens. That's a major fucking deal.
This is good news in the fact that we probably just found the holy grail of telecommunication: if these FTL neutrinos could be applied to practical use, this would guarantee almost instantaneous communication across the planet.
1) No it wouldn't. For one, the neutrinos were only measured as nanoseconds faster than light in a vacuum. Even if that turns out to be correct, they'd be useless for telecomminications.

2) Our current communications systems are more or less light speed. They're constrained by technology, but radio waves, electical impulses, all that noice, all travel at the speed of light. Less than 0.001% faster than c would make no difference.

3) Using neutrinos for telecommunications would make a huge difference though, because it means you'd likely only get a tiny fraction of whatever was being sent to you, because detecting neutrinos is hard as fuck.
  /l、
゙(゚、 。 7
 l、゙ ~ヽ
 じしf_, )ノ
User avatar
Surlethe
HATES GRADING
Posts: 12267
Joined: 2004-12-29 03:41pm

Re: Particles recorded moving faster than light

Post by Surlethe »

starslayer wrote:They wouldn't be announcing this at all unless they had at least a 5-sigma detection, so I imagine they have a very statistically significant result.
I've heard it's a six-sigma result.
A Government founded upon justice, and recognizing the equal rights of all men; claiming higher authority for existence, or sanction for its laws, that nature, reason, and the regularly ascertained will of the people; steadily refusing to put its sword and purse in the service of any religious creed or family is a standing offense to most of the Governments of the world, and to some narrow and bigoted people among ourselves.
F. Douglass
User avatar
Kuroneko
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2469
Joined: 2003-03-13 03:10am
Location: Fréchet space
Contact:

Re: Particles recorded moving faster than light

Post by Kuroneko »

It is indeed a six-sigma result [arXiv:1109.4897].
"The fool saith in his heart that there is no empty set. But if that were so, then the set of all such sets would be empty, and hence it would be the empty set." -- Wesley Salmon
Lord Baal
Padawan Learner
Posts: 261
Joined: 2011-08-25 03:17pm
Location: Segmentun Solar, Sol system, Terra, America, South America, Venezuela, Lara, Barquisimeto, my office

Re: Particles recorded moving faster than light

Post by Lord Baal »

Another layman question. How can they be sure the neutrinos detected are the ones they emitted? I mean, they have to do it someway, how?
[signature]Insert cliche or funny statement here. [/signature]
User avatar
SilverWingedSeraph
Jedi Knight
Posts: 965
Joined: 2007-02-15 11:56am
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Contact:

Re: Particles recorded moving faster than light

Post by SilverWingedSeraph »

Lord Baal wrote:Another layman question. How can they be sure the neutrinos detected are the ones they emitted? I mean, they have to do it someway, how?
Well, repeating the test 15,000 times can effectively rule out any stray neutrinos and render them statistically irrelevant, and I'm sure they likely had other methods of ruling out stray neutrinos as well. Any stray neutrinos would be coming from the sun, and would have significantly different trajectories from the ones being shot at the detectors, which would probably be noticable. That's one possibility that comes to mind, anyway.
  /l、
゙(゚、 。 7
 l、゙ ~ヽ
 じしf_, )ノ
User avatar
VarrusTheEthical
Padawan Learner
Posts: 200
Joined: 2011-09-10 05:55pm
Location: The Cockpit of an X-wing

Re: Particles recorded moving faster than light

Post by VarrusTheEthical »

Assuming that the claim of neutrinos being slightly faster than light is true, would it therefore be prudent for other scientists to attempt the same experiment but over a longer distance so that the apparent gap between the speed of a neutrino and the speed of light are more apparent?
User avatar
Skgoa
Jedi Master
Posts: 1389
Joined: 2007-08-02 01:39pm
Location: Dresden, valley of the clueless

Re: Particles recorded moving faster than light

Post by Skgoa »

Intuition says its probably a) going to be harder to pull off and thus take more time/money and give less conclussive results or b) the exact distance doesn't even matter as much as the infrastructure at the two locations.
http://www.politicalcompass.org/test
Economic Left/Right: -7.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.74

This is pre-WWII. You can sort of tell from the sketch style, from thee way it refers to Japan (Japan in the 1950s was still rebuilding from WWII), the spelling of Tokyo, lots of details. Nothing obvious... except that the upper right hand corner of the page reads "November 1931." --- Simon_Jester
User avatar
VarrusTheEthical
Padawan Learner
Posts: 200
Joined: 2011-09-10 05:55pm
Location: The Cockpit of an X-wing

Re: Particles recorded moving faster than light

Post by VarrusTheEthical »

Yeah, I thought as much. Perhaps given enough time, if those results are replicated on a small scale, it may justify the cost of a large scale experiment. If it is concluded that the Neutrino is faster than light, and not just the result of faulty equipment or methodology, the next step would be to determine exactly how fast a neutrino is and if that speed is affected by medium.
User avatar
Ted C
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4486
Joined: 2002-07-07 11:00am
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:

Re: Particles recorded moving faster than light

Post by Ted C »

From what I heard about this in the news, the scientists published largely because they're skeptical of their own results, and they want to see if other researchers can duplicate them. They suspect there may be something wrong with the design of their test that is causing the discrepancy.
"This is supposed to be a happy occasion... Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who."
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail

"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776

"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
User avatar
Sriad
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3028
Joined: 2002-12-02 09:59pm
Location: Colorado

Re: Particles recorded moving faster than light

Post by Sriad »

Kuroneko wrote:It is indeed a six-sigma result [arXiv:1109.4897].
Glad we've finally got it, now we can talk more exactly. :)

The paper rules out all of our (frankly too obvious) objections. They've got the distance measurement exact with an error window of 20cm, timing measured at each end with matched atomic clocks with an error window that takes into account relativistic effects of transportation, and they use detectors at BOTH ends--the emitted neutrinos pass through a detector to start the timer, then travel 730.085 km to the second detector to get the actual travel time.
Lord Baal wrote:Another layman question. How can they be sure the neutrinos detected are the ones they emitted? I mean, they have to do it someway, how?
The neutrinos are emitted in pairs of pulsed bursts: burst one has several peaks 50 nanoseconds apart, then about 50 milliseconds later a second pulse in the same pattern is fired. There is a distinct waveform produced at detector 1 which is closely matched at detector 2, to the limits inherent in neutrino detection. The chances of even one pulse measurement being coincidental is about as likely as a marksmanship contest being misjudged because of stray shots from a different range. ;)
Skgoa wrote: b) the exact distance doesn't even matter as much as the infrastructure at the two locations.
This one. The error window in distance is small enough that the source of problems would be equipment related. 730 km is a happy medium between the logistical difficulty of setting up the experiment and measurable deviation from lightspeed.
User avatar
Sriad
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3028
Joined: 2002-12-02 09:59pm
Location: Colorado

Re: Particles recorded moving faster than light

Post by Sriad »

(and again please don't take anything I say as deliberately high-handed; I'm just enthusiastic whenever a subject where I'm relatively knowledgeable comes up.)
User avatar
Lord Zentei
Space Elf Psyker
Posts: 8742
Joined: 2004-11-22 02:49am
Location: Ulthwé Craftworld, plotting the downfall of the Imperium.

Re: Particles recorded moving faster than light

Post by Lord Zentei »

Kuroneko wrote:
Lord Zentei wrote:I can see how the time of emission is crucial given such short time intervals, but does the uncertainty in the distance within the 1 km emitter/receiver really make the experiment that inaccurate with such a huge distance (730 km) between the emitter and receiver?
Absolutely. If you detect a neutrino, you don't know exactly where it came from. What you actually want is the distance and duration from the emission event to the detection event; otherwise you can't calculate the speed. So it's not just when and where it was within the detector and emitter, but I think it's probably the largest contributor to error.
Of course, I managed to misread the article after all, and therefore the ~1/730 difference in distance seemed significantly greater than the relative difference in time intervals. But of course, 60 nanoseconds is 1/40000 of the expected interval.

Probably a systematic error.


PS: STFU Sriad!! :P
CotK <mew> | HAB | JL | MM | TTC | Cybertron

TAX THE CHURCHES! - Lord Zentei TTC Supreme Grand Prophet

And the LORD said, Let there be Bosons! Yea and let there be Bosoms too!
I'd rather be the great great grandson of a demon ninja than some jackass who grew potatos. -- Covenant
Dead cows don't fart. -- CJvR
...and I like strudel! :mrgreen: -- Asuka
Rassilon
Redshirt
Posts: 6
Joined: 2011-09-16 04:46pm

Re: Particles recorded moving faster than light

Post by Rassilon »

Yes this is almost certainly an error with the detector and timer.
For Gallifrey! For victory! For the End of Time!
Chirios
Jedi Knight
Posts: 502
Joined: 2010-07-09 12:27am

Re: Particles recorded moving faster than light

Post by Chirios »

Rassilon wrote:Yes this is almost certainly an error with the detector and timer.
Does anyone know how much it would cost to replace this stuff? Because if it turns out that CERN isn't working properly after they spent all those billions to build it that would be bad.
User avatar
Surlethe
HATES GRADING
Posts: 12267
Joined: 2004-12-29 03:41pm

Re: Particles recorded moving faster than light

Post by Surlethe »

I don't think you realize just how many different machines are working at CERN. This is not the same as the LHC, for example. But anyway, the detector is in Italy.

I think the problem's going to be in their data analysis. This isn't like an undergraduate lab; particle physics produces reams of data that require careful, precise statistical analysis. Even if the data are perfectly correct, the slightest misstep during analysis -- statistical or conceptual -- produces wild results.
A Government founded upon justice, and recognizing the equal rights of all men; claiming higher authority for existence, or sanction for its laws, that nature, reason, and the regularly ascertained will of the people; steadily refusing to put its sword and purse in the service of any religious creed or family is a standing offense to most of the Governments of the world, and to some narrow and bigoted people among ourselves.
F. Douglass
User avatar
starslayer
Jedi Knight
Posts: 731
Joined: 2008-04-04 08:40pm
Location: Columbus, OH

Re: Particles recorded moving faster than light

Post by starslayer »

The random error on these measurements is probably very well constrained (based on half-remembered papers rumbling around in my head, their error of 10 ns seems reasonable for this type of experiment), and I doubt they ran into any problems there; while error propagation can get be very complicated and fraught with algebra mistakes (among others), everyone on the team's almost certainly checked all that at least 10 times already. Systematic effects have got to be killer, though. I wouldn't be surprised if someone else comes in and they suddenly find that, oops, their clocks were off by 100 ns this whole time or something and nobody noticed.
weemadando
SMAKIBBFB
Posts: 19195
Joined: 2002-07-28 12:30pm
Contact:

Re: Particles recorded moving faster than light

Post by weemadando »

Then orders a beer. A neutrino walks into a bar.

Just saw that. Appreciated it.
Chirios
Jedi Knight
Posts: 502
Joined: 2010-07-09 12:27am

Re: Particles recorded moving faster than light

Post by Chirios »

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15034852

^ Brian Cox in the above link explains what the implications would be if it was true.
Lord Baal
Padawan Learner
Posts: 261
Joined: 2011-08-25 03:17pm
Location: Segmentun Solar, Sol system, Terra, America, South America, Venezuela, Lara, Barquisimeto, my office

Re: Particles recorded moving faster than light

Post by Lord Baal »

Thanks a lot my friend! I was looking for something like this!

Does anyone have a link or know something about the last Friday reunion they was going to have with peers?
[signature]Insert cliche or funny statement here. [/signature]
Post Reply