If you magically removed the mantle and core...

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
User avatar
Rye
To Mega Therion
Posts: 12493
Joined: 2003-03-08 07:48am
Location: Uighur, please!

If you magically removed the mantle and core...

Post by Rye »

...what would happen? The crust and atmosphere are left behind, but the mantle and core have been teleported god knows where. How long would people survive? What would the effects be?
EBC|Fucking Metal|Artist|Androgynous Sexfiend|Gozer Kvltist|
Listen to my music! http://www.soundclick.com/nihilanth
"America is, now, the most powerful and economically prosperous nation in the country." - Master of Ossus
User avatar
Kuroneko
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2469
Joined: 2003-03-13 03:10am
Location: Fréchet space
Contact:

Re: If you magically removed the mantle and core...

Post by Kuroneko »

So basically you're left with a ~25 km thick crust and hydrosphere, so you get about 0.6% of Earth's mass left, in a spherical shell. By Newton's law, gravity scales appropriately, and you lose the atmosphere pretty fast, since the escape velocity is now only slightly higher than the rms speed of air molecules.

I'm not sure how well the crust can keep together, but living in a microgravity environment with a rapidly depleting atmopshere makes that the least of one's worries anyway.
"The fool saith in his heart that there is no empty set. But if that were so, then the set of all such sets would be empty, and hence it would be the empty set." -- Wesley Salmon
User avatar
Rye
To Mega Therion
Posts: 12493
Joined: 2003-03-08 07:48am
Location: Uighur, please!

Re: If you magically removed the mantle and core...

Post by Rye »

How long would the air last, minutes? What would the oceans do? Flash vaporise? Spread out into weird blobs? It's a mad idea I had for a short story, so yeah, perfunctory research is the aim of the game, here. :)
EBC|Fucking Metal|Artist|Androgynous Sexfiend|Gozer Kvltist|
Listen to my music! http://www.soundclick.com/nihilanth
"America is, now, the most powerful and economically prosperous nation in the country." - Master of Ossus
User avatar
Dave
Jedi Knight
Posts: 901
Joined: 2004-02-06 11:55pm
Location: Kansas City, MO

Re: If you magically removed the mantle and core...

Post by Dave »

If the earth is still spinning at the same speed, won't the crust fly apart without any gravity to hold it down? I mean the centrifugal 'forces' would probably be more than the rock of the crust could take.
User avatar
D.Turtle
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1909
Joined: 2002-07-26 08:08am
Location: Bochum, Germany

Re: If you magically removed the mantle and core...

Post by D.Turtle »

Wouldn't the crust either collapse together or simply split into pieces and drift apart? After all, currently the Earth is being held together by its own gravity, with the crust "floating/sitting" on top of the mantle. It doesn't seem likely that the crust would stay in a single piece unmoving in its current position.
User avatar
LaCroix
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5193
Joined: 2004-12-21 12:14pm
Location: Sopron District, Hungary, Europe, Terra

Re: If you magically removed the mantle and core...

Post by LaCroix »

The crust isn't one piece. It's a couple of big pieces rubbing and pushing each other while they float along. Loosing gravitational pull to keep them on their (now non-existent) magma-lake means that they are instantly flung off and into each other. That will result in them getting shredded and turned into an asteroid field orbiting the sun.
A minute's thought suggests that the very idea of this is stupid. A more detailed examination raises the possibility that it might be an answer to the question "how could the Germans win the war after the US gets involved?" - Captain Seafort, in a thread proposing a 1942 'D-Day' in Quiberon Bay

I do archery skeet. With a Trebuchet.
User avatar
Feil
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1944
Joined: 2006-05-17 05:05pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: If you magically removed the mantle and core...

Post by Feil »

It does what blobs of unattached matter do: the middle smears out, the top and bottom fall slowly towards one another. The atmosphere just goes 'fwish' and vanishes in very short order - there is, after all, an atmosphere of pressure trying to push it off the planet at all times, only restrained by gravity. Everybody dies within minutes, except a few people in sealed environments, who get enough time to figure out exactly how well and truly dead the human species is before they, too, die. The ISS gets a pretty cool show before they all starve and/or commit suicide and/or die of easily preventable accidents - they are, after all, completely safe, unless through some ridiculously unlikely bad luck they end up on a collision course with the moon.

As for the remaining bits: the moon drifts off and finds a new orbit, depending on which direction it was traveling when the cataclysm happened, trailing bits and pieces of us. The rest of us smears out eventually into an thin, insignificant asteroid belt, which the moon might eventually sweep clear.

At first I thought that dived submarines might do okay, but I'm pretty sure they'd just rupture from the sudden pressure change, since the only pressure in the water blobs would be surface tension.
Pinjar
Redshirt
Posts: 46
Joined: 2009-01-08 03:52pm

Re: If you magically removed the mantle and core...

Post by Pinjar »

It is just a guess but if we take Kuroneko's 0.6% of Earth's mass left as correct then if the crust is disturbed by the moon I would suggest that there should still be enough mass close enough together for the remains to form into a dwarf planet rather than an asteroid belt.
User avatar
LaCroix
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5193
Joined: 2004-12-21 12:14pm
Location: Sopron District, Hungary, Europe, Terra

Re: If you magically removed the mantle and core...

Post by LaCroix »

You dismiss the fact that the Moon is flung off by this, as well... Just like severing a cord that it spun on...

It will pull a part of the debris with it, but a lot of the remains will be scattered on a long 'tail' and form a belt.

In the next orbital periods, the moon might gather some of these fragments, but there is little hope that they will form a stable satellite body for the moon, rather than hitting it.
A minute's thought suggests that the very idea of this is stupid. A more detailed examination raises the possibility that it might be an answer to the question "how could the Germans win the war after the US gets involved?" - Captain Seafort, in a thread proposing a 1942 'D-Day' in Quiberon Bay

I do archery skeet. With a Trebuchet.
User avatar
Sriad
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3028
Joined: 2002-12-02 09:59pm
Location: Colorado

Re: If you magically removed the mantle and core...

Post by Sriad »

The moon would stay on more-or-less Earth's orbit, but with a hunk more eccentricity. The moon's orbital speed WRT Earth is 1.0 km/h; Earth:Sun is 29.8. So at any time Luna's whizzing around the sun at 28.8-30.8km/s.
User avatar
Cykeisme
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2416
Joined: 2004-12-25 01:47pm
Contact:

Re: If you magically removed the mantle and core...

Post by Cykeisme »

Based on what has been said here, it's near-immediate dissociation of the remaining sub-1% mass due to lack of gravitational binding?
That sounds almost as devastating as Earth being hit by the Death Star.
"..history has shown the best defense against heavy cavalry are pikemen, so aircraft should mount lances on their noses and fly in tight squares to fend off bombers". - RedImperator

"ha ha, raping puppies is FUN!" - Johonebesus

"It would just be Unicron with pew pew instead of nom nom". - Vendetta, explaining his justified disinterest in the idea of the movie Allspark affecting the Death Star
User avatar
Feil
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1944
Joined: 2006-05-17 05:05pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: If you magically removed the mantle and core...

Post by Feil »

Cykeisme wrote:Based on what has been said here, it's near-immediate dissociation of the remaining sub-1% mass due to lack of gravitational binding?
That is correct.
Post Reply