Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid people
* FAQ    * Search   * Register   * Login 
Want to support this site? Click

Quote of the Week: "Whereas some states possess an army, the Prussian army possesses a state" - Voltaire (real name: Francois-Marie Arouet), French writer and philosopher (1694-1778)


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: 5 Sigma [Higgs][Standard Model] PostPosted: 2012-07-04 04:05am
Offline
Padawan Learner
User avatar

Joined: 2009-06-08 08:23pm
Posts: 211
"These results are global and shared by all of mankind."

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2012/07/04/156221787/cern-says-its-detected-a-new-particle-likely-the-higgs-boson
Quote:
Teams of scientists using the Large Hadron Collider at the European Organization for Nuclear Research, or CERN, announced in Geneva this morning that they have detected evidence of a new subatomic particle that bears the hallmarks of the elusive and highly sought after Higgs boson. In layman's terms, the Higgs is referred to as the "God Particle" because the field it produces gives atoms its mass. Were it not for the Higgs, the world we know would be completely different — there would be no chemistry, no architecture, no us. It would be a massless mess of aimless particles running around at light speed.

CERN spokesman Joe Incandela said the scientists had observed a new particle, but he stopped short of saying it was indeed the Higgs boson. That is the likely conclusion.

"We have quite strong evidence that there's something there. Its properties are still going to take us a little bit of time," Incandela said in a video accidentally released on Tuesday by CERN. "This is the most massive such particle that exists, if we confirm all this, which I think we will ... It's something that may, in the end, be one of the biggest observations of any new phenomena in our field in the last 30 or 40 years, going way back to the discovery of quarks"

To make the observations, scientists at the LHC sent particles crashing at tremendous speeds to try to create Higgs. Then, because the particle only exists for a billionth of a billionth of a billionth of a second, scientists looked for its signature decay. The scientists said they had detected what are likely Higgs trails — a bump in their data — with a great degree of certainty.

The announcement is one of the biggest scientific breakthroughs in decades and could put the finishing touches on Standard Model particle physics.


So it decomposes into two photons and then four leptons, and it's at the predicted place... Very exciting. When I was watching the livecast, the applause was a little bit contagious.



Are you accusing me of not having a viable magnetic field? - Masaq' Hub, Look to Windward

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: 5 Sigma [Higgs][Standard Model] PostPosted: 2012-07-04 05:32am
Offline
Emperor's Hand
User avatar

Joined: 2002-07-18 06:08pm
Posts: 12998
Location: Poland
So...If we can find a way to FUCK with the Higgs Boson...



Image
JULY 20TH 1969 - The day the entire world was looking up

It suddenly struck me that that tiny pea, pretty and blue, was the Earth. I put up my thumb and shut one eye, and my thumb blotted out the planet Earth. I didn't feel like a giant. I felt very, very small.
- NEIL ARMSTRONG, MISSION COMMANDER, APOLLO 11

Signature dedicated to the greatest achievement of mankind.

MILDLY DERANGED PHYSICIST does not mind BREAKING the SOUND BARRIER, because it is INSURED. - Simon_Jester considering the problems of hypersonic flight for Team L.A.M.E.

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: 5 Sigma [Higgs][Standard Model] PostPosted: 2012-07-04 07:05am
Offline
Jedi Council Member
User avatar

Joined: 2010-04-20 08:31am
Posts: 1544
Location: In a purple cube orbiting this planet. Hijacking satellites for an internet connection.
PeZook wrote:
So...If we can find a way to FUCK with the Higgs Boson...

:roll: That's human kind for you. When a new discovery is made the first thing we do is find ways to have sex with it.



I am the Purple Cube from beyond. Seek not to understand me for thau shalt fail.

Warning: I am an amateur writer/roleplayer and as such my posts are liable to contain text that would fit better into a work of literature than a conversation. Hence (unless I am in debate mode) be sure to read my posts with care and not take everything I say at face value. It might be (and at times is) full of stylistic exaggeration for the sake of explaining my point. Thank you.

NOTIFICATION: From this point on all my posts are censored by the thought police.

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: 5 Sigma [Higgs][Standard Model] PostPosted: 2012-07-04 07:08am
Offline
Emperor's Hand
User avatar

Joined: 2002-07-18 06:08pm
Posts: 12998
Location: Poland
Well, otherwise, what's the point? :D

Yeah, yeah, I know - discovery and knowledge about the universe, but seriously. If mass is actually caused by particle interactions...then we can, potentially, maybe someday...mess with mass.



Image
JULY 20TH 1969 - The day the entire world was looking up

It suddenly struck me that that tiny pea, pretty and blue, was the Earth. I put up my thumb and shut one eye, and my thumb blotted out the planet Earth. I didn't feel like a giant. I felt very, very small.
- NEIL ARMSTRONG, MISSION COMMANDER, APOLLO 11

Signature dedicated to the greatest achievement of mankind.

MILDLY DERANGED PHYSICIST does not mind BREAKING the SOUND BARRIER, because it is INSURED. - Simon_Jester considering the problems of hypersonic flight for Team L.A.M.E.

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: 5 Sigma [Higgs][Standard Model] PostPosted: 2012-07-04 09:01am
Offline
Jedi Master
User avatar

Joined: 2010-05-03 06:19pm
Posts: 1176
Purple wrote:
PeZook wrote:
So...If we can find a way to FUCK with the Higgs Boson...

:roll: That's human kind for you. When a new discovery is made the first thing we do is find ways to have sex with it.


Science would be nothing without someone saying "Well, what kind of shit can we do with this?" A process we like to call engineering. :D



Visit my starship thread, make comments!
Image

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: 5 Sigma [Higgs][Standard Model] PostPosted: 2012-07-04 09:47am
Offline
Jedi Knight
User avatar

Joined: 2009-11-08 03:36pm
Posts: 611
Location: Christo-fundie Theofascist Dominion of Nebraskistan
PeZook wrote:
Well, otherwise, what's the point? :D

Yeah, yeah, I know - discovery and knowledge about the universe, but seriously. If mass is actually caused by particle interactions...then we can, potentially, maybe someday...mess with mass.


You mean..mass effect? You know someone was going to go there eventually.



Workers and writers, activists and artists, intellectuals, immigrants and everyday people who found one situation or another intolerable and decided to do something about it. No serious social or political change in this country, not independence, not abolition, not womens rights or the minimum wage or civil rights or the New Deal, came about without anger and protest and, often as not, violence.

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: 5 Sigma [Higgs][Standard Model] PostPosted: 2012-07-04 03:13pm
Offline
Sith Acolyte
User avatar

Joined: 2005-04-02 11:54pm
Posts: 5949
Location: South Cali... where life is cheap!
Now naturally, that fucking with it is out of the question, standard human question #2.

How can we stop the foreigners from having these elemental particles and turning them into a destructive new weapon? We cannot allow, a boson gap!

Joking aside, awesome. Glad they finally got it to work this time, since it was going to be a sort of last-chance at experimentally confirming the existence of the Higgs. Otherwise, their required power estimates would be off by so much, that it'd require a collider of 10 times the diameter, which is... well. Absurd, given the LHC's already massive size.



Image

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: 5 Sigma [Higgs][Standard Model] PostPosted: 2012-07-04 03:55pm
Offline
Jedi Knight

Joined: 2010-07-09 12:27am
Posts: 502
PeZook wrote:
So...If we can find a way to FUCK with the Higgs Boson...


Mass Erect?

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: 5 Sigma [Higgs][Standard Model] PostPosted: 2012-07-04 06:20pm
Offline
Padawan Learner

Joined: 2012-06-07 04:24pm
Posts: 467
Chirios wrote:
PeZook wrote:
So...If we can find a way to FUCK with the Higgs Boson...


Mass Erect?


I'd wager it's already a porn movie by now, with neon signs and a lot of blue paint, and concerns itself with the Higgs bosom and not the boson, but nice try.



Ποταμοῖσι τοῖσιν αὐτοῖσιν ἐμϐαίνουσιν, ἕτερα καὶ ἕτερα ὕδατα ἐπιρρεῖ. Δὶς ἐς τὸν αὐτὸν ποταμὸν οὐκ ἂν ἐμβαίης.

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: 5 Sigma [Higgs][Standard Model] PostPosted: 2012-07-05 02:56am
Offline
Padawan Learner
User avatar

Joined: 2009-06-08 08:23pm
Posts: 211
Nephtys wrote:
Joking aside, awesome. Glad they finally got it to work this time, since it was going to be a sort of last-chance at experimentally confirming the existence of the Higgs. Otherwise, their required power estimates would be off by so much, that it'd require a collider of 10 times the diameter, which is... well. Absurd, given the LHC's already massive size.


Too bad the SSC never got built...
I do wonder though, how much would the necessary computing infrastructure have cost in the 90s? Lots, probably.

As for what we can do with it -- well, hopefully it turns out weirder than we thought.

Dr. Trainwreck wrote:
Chirios wrote:
PeZook wrote:
So...If we can find a way to FUCK with the Higgs Boson...


Mass Erect?


I'd wager it's already a porn movie by now, with neon signs and a lot of blue paint, and concerns itself with the Higgs bosom and not the boson, but nice try.


What, no "element ten inches"?



Are you accusing me of not having a viable magnetic field? - Masaq' Hub, Look to Windward

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: 5 Sigma [Higgs][Standard Model] PostPosted: 2012-07-05 01:52pm
Offline
HATES GRADING
User avatar

Joined: 2004-12-29 04:41pm
Posts: 12093
Location: Hiding a pot of gold at the end of the Ricci flow
For the interested, there's a $1000000 prize for whomever can make sense of the "mathematics" they use.



"... alas, too many people think consistency the hobgoblin of little minds." -Publius

Daily Nugget of Wisdom from Goldman Sachs:
"I would agree with you, but then we'd both be fucking wrong."

"A space shuttle on the back of an aircraft carrier in New York City is perhaps the most American thing you could have without the help of a deep fryer. I'm surprised anyone in the US opposes it." - Gandalf

WARNING: May become overexcited by mathematics or monetary policy.

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: 5 Sigma [Higgs][Standard Model] PostPosted: 2012-07-05 04:41pm
Offline
Rebel Leader
User avatar

Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm
Posts: 18349
Location: Mountain View, CA / Chicago, IL
Memnon wrote:
Too bad the SSC never got built...
I do wonder though, how much would the necessary computing infrastructure have cost in the 90s? Lots, probably.

A lot, but SSC was designed for lower luminosity and might not haven needed quite as much compute power. LHC, designed in competition against the SSC and with a smaller tunnel, went for a lower-energy/higher-luminosity design.

Nephtys wrote:
Glad they finally got it to work this time, since it was going to be a sort of last-chance at experimentally confirming the existence of the Higgs. Otherwise, their required power estimates would be off by so much, that it'd require a collider of 10 times the diameter, which is... well. Absurd, given the LHC's already massive size.

I dont' see how it was a "last-chance" - Higgs is pretty much right where a bunch of people expected it (assuming it fit the Standard Model).



HAB | Rei Likes Pie | Vote Kynes! | SDN Senator | ASVS Great Old One c/o '98 | SB First One

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: 5 Sigma [Higgs][Standard Model] PostPosted: 2012-07-05 05:55pm
Offline
Emperor's Hand
User avatar

Joined: 2003-05-11 09:41pm
Posts: 7113
Question: If the Higgs Boson is confirmed, and is is what imparts most mass to the universe....

What would happen if we found a way to repel, or shield against them in matter? i.e

"Zap! This ship no longer has mass!"

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: 5 Sigma [Higgs][Standard Model] PostPosted: 2012-07-05 06:08pm
Offline
Emperor's Hand
User avatar

Joined: 2002-07-18 06:08pm
Posts: 12998
Location: Poland
The ship disintegrates into individual particles all moving at light speed in random directions?



Image
JULY 20TH 1969 - The day the entire world was looking up

It suddenly struck me that that tiny pea, pretty and blue, was the Earth. I put up my thumb and shut one eye, and my thumb blotted out the planet Earth. I didn't feel like a giant. I felt very, very small.
- NEIL ARMSTRONG, MISSION COMMANDER, APOLLO 11

Signature dedicated to the greatest achievement of mankind.

MILDLY DERANGED PHYSICIST does not mind BREAKING the SOUND BARRIER, because it is INSURED. - Simon_Jester considering the problems of hypersonic flight for Team L.A.M.E.

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: 5 Sigma [Higgs][Standard Model] PostPosted: 2012-07-05 06:50pm
Offline
Sith Marauder
User avatar

Joined: 2010-03-09 03:16pm
Posts: 3755
Location: Through the looking glass
Well if we managed that we'd never have to worry about alien invasions.



You are standing on a 4.5 billion year old complex, self-sustaining organic spacship, which is orbiting a power source a million times larger than your ship. There are 200 billion other power sources, many of them with ships like yours, in your fleet. There are 40 other fleets in the immediate neighbourhood and your entire neighbourhood is moving at two million miles per hour towards an object 150 million light years away. Welcome to life, it's a lot more exciting when you think on larger scales.

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: 5 Sigma [Higgs][Standard Model] PostPosted: 2012-07-05 08:03pm
Offline
The Fearless One
User avatar

Joined: 2002-12-24 08:29am
Posts: 10681
Location: The Covenants last and final line of defense
So what does it mean in terms of practical use ? Mass effect fields and FTL are possible ?



I have to tell you something everything I wrote above is a lie.

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: 5 Sigma [Higgs][Standard Model] PostPosted: 2012-07-05 09:12pm
Offline
Sith Devotee
User avatar

Joined: 2005-05-12 07:56pm
Posts: 2822
Location: Neptune Violon Tide!
Solauren wrote:
Question: If the Higgs Boson is confirmed, and is is what imparts most mass to the universe....

What would happen if we found a way to repel, or shield against them in matter? i.e

"Zap! This ship no longer has mass!"


That's not how bosons work, really. Bosons are the particles that mediate interactions with fields. Higgs bosons serve the same purpose as photons- they mediate the interaction between massive particles and the Higgs field. So if we found a way to decouple massive particles from the Higgs field, they would instantaneously accelerate to the speed of light while maintaining the same direction of velocity. Not particularly useful unless you have a fetish for strange and unusual explosions.

If we could alter coupling with the Higgs field, and thus affect the mass of fundamental particles- well, for one thing, we would probably end up messing with chemistry as the responsiveness of particles to electromagnetic forces would increase with less mass and decrease with more mass. So if we altered the coupling around a human body, it would probably end up dying and melting into a series of bizarre molecules as the very nature of electrochemical bonding was fundamentally altered. Again, not particularly useful, unless you have an even weirder set of fetishes.



Invited by the new age, the elegant Sailor Neptune!


I mean, how often am I to enter a game of riddles with the author, where they challenge me with some strange and confusing and distracting device, and I'm supposed to unravel it and go "I SEE WHAT YOU DID THERE" and take great personal satisfaction and pride in our mutual cleverness?

- The Handle, from the TVTropes Forums

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: 5 Sigma [Higgs][Standard Model] PostPosted: 2012-07-05 10:07pm
Offline
Emperor's Hand

Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm
Posts: 17645
phongn wrote:
Memnon wrote:
Too bad the SSC never got built...
I do wonder though, how much would the necessary computing infrastructure have cost in the 90s? Lots, probably.
A lot, but SSC was designed for lower luminosity and might not haven needed quite as much compute power. LHC, designed in competition against the SSC and with a smaller tunnel, went for a lower-energy/higher-luminosity design.
Plus, advancing technology makes increased luminosity easier- you can upgrade the same accelerator to run at higher luminosity if you're clever. So the SSC would probably be better now than it was designed to be in 1990.



Syme was not only dead, he was abolished, an unperson.

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: 5 Sigma [Higgs][Standard Model] PostPosted: 2012-07-06 02:28am
Offline
Emperor's Hand
User avatar

Joined: 2002-07-18 06:08pm
Posts: 12998
Location: Poland
Bakustra wrote:
If we could alter coupling with the Higgs field, and thus affect the mass of fundamental particles- well, for one thing, we would probably end up messing with chemistry as the responsiveness of particles to electromagnetic forces would increase with less mass and decrease with more mass. So if we altered the coupling around a human body, it would probably end up dying and melting into a series of bizarre molecules as the very nature of electrochemical bonding was fundamentally altered. Again, not particularly useful, unless you have an even weirder set of fetishes.


Or we could perhaps produce bizarre materials with as of yet unknown, but highly interesting properties :D



Image
JULY 20TH 1969 - The day the entire world was looking up

It suddenly struck me that that tiny pea, pretty and blue, was the Earth. I put up my thumb and shut one eye, and my thumb blotted out the planet Earth. I didn't feel like a giant. I felt very, very small.
- NEIL ARMSTRONG, MISSION COMMANDER, APOLLO 11

Signature dedicated to the greatest achievement of mankind.

MILDLY DERANGED PHYSICIST does not mind BREAKING the SOUND BARRIER, because it is INSURED. - Simon_Jester considering the problems of hypersonic flight for Team L.A.M.E.

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: 5 Sigma [Higgs][Standard Model] PostPosted: 2012-07-06 06:27am
Offline
Emperor's Hand
User avatar

Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Posts: 35943
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Sarevok wrote:
So what does it mean in terms of practical use ? Mass effect fields and FTL are possible ?


Is this a 'for real' question, or a 'whoa, I typed that' question?

They've been narrowing down the area this effect could be observed in for years, but its still good they're getting somewhere. Its a bit of a shame that media reporting is so ignorant and full of shit, though.



Elfdart wrote:
my first manager and I spent the better part of an hour in his office asking an insanely hot female employee to go through the "B" authors in the Lit section. Why? Because that would make her climb up on the ladder right where the security camera was and gave us a perfect view of her perfect gazongas
whatisprojectzohar.com

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: 5 Sigma [Higgs][Standard Model] PostPosted: 2012-07-06 09:15am
Offline
Jedi Knight
User avatar

Joined: 2010-02-24 06:32am
Posts: 825
Bakustra wrote:
So if we found a way to decouple massive particles from the Higgs field, they would instantaneously accelerate to the speed of light while maintaining the same direction of velocity. Not particularly useful unless you have a fetish for strange and unusual explosions.
Looks are unimportant. What would be the effects of this as a bomb? Yeld approximations (assuming you managed to decouple 100% particles)?

Yes, standard human question #3. How useful would this be to blow up something I hate?



I'm nobody. Nobody at all. But the secrets of the universe don't mind. They reveal themselves to nobodies who care.
--
Stereotypical spacecraft are pressurized.
Less realistic spacecraft are pressurized to hold breathing atmosphere.
Realistic spacecraft are pressurized because they are flying propellant tanks. -Isaac Kuo

--
Good art has function as well as form. I hesitate to spend more than $50 on decorations of any kind unless they can be used to pummel an intruder into submission. -Sriad

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: 5 Sigma [Higgs][Standard Model] PostPosted: 2012-07-06 10:15am
Offline
Sith Devotee
User avatar

Joined: 2005-05-12 07:56pm
Posts: 2822
Location: Neptune Violon Tide!
Go outside and get some fresh air. Meditate on the world for a little while, and I think that you will soon see the true answer to the question.



Invited by the new age, the elegant Sailor Neptune!


I mean, how often am I to enter a game of riddles with the author, where they challenge me with some strange and confusing and distracting device, and I'm supposed to unravel it and go "I SEE WHAT YOU DID THERE" and take great personal satisfaction and pride in our mutual cleverness?

- The Handle, from the TVTropes Forums

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: 5 Sigma [Higgs][Standard Model] PostPosted: 2012-07-06 11:16am
Offline
Rebel Leader
User avatar

Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm
Posts: 18349
Location: Mountain View, CA / Chicago, IL
Sarevok wrote:
So what does it mean in terms of practical use?

Nothing.

Quote:
Mass effect fields and FTL are possible ?

How did you think that?



HAB | Rei Likes Pie | Vote Kynes! | SDN Senator | ASVS Great Old One c/o '98 | SB First One

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: 5 Sigma [Higgs][Standard Model] PostPosted: 2012-07-06 01:32pm
Offline
The Fearless One
User avatar

Joined: 2002-12-24 08:29am
Posts: 10681
Location: The Covenants last and final line of defense
Quote:
How did you think that?


Other ME fans. Supposedly Higgs could allow mass manipulation or some such to achieve things they did in the game.



I have to tell you something everything I wrote above is a lie.

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: 5 Sigma [Higgs][Standard Model] PostPosted: 2012-07-06 01:50pm
Offline
Jedi Master
User avatar

Joined: 2010-05-03 06:19pm
Posts: 1176
As far as I am aware, the only thing you could possibly do is reduce or increase mass, and that's just judging it from the whole "gives mass" part. I have no idea if it is plausible (or even possible) to manipulate the Higgs boson in such a manner, but I'm betting it's extremely implausible.
No kinetic barriers or such things, just making things heavier or lighter (read: more or less mass), if it's possible at all and even if it is, then you'd have to find a way to prevent adverse reactions, such as those already mentioned in the thread.



Visit my starship thread, make comments!
Image

Top
 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group