Military Service as a requirement for U.S. President
Moderator: Alyrium Denryle
- Darth Wong
- Sith Lord
- Posts: 70028
- Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
Separate civilian/military leadership is one of the hallmarks of modern, open democratic societies. There's a reason for that.
![Image](http://www.stardestroyer.net/BoardPics/Avatars/500.jpg)
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
Actually, Lincoln served in some of the Indian wars, I think.Isolder74 wrote:This would make Lincoln Inelegable as well. And who says a Military man will always make a good president
Ulysses S Grant comes to mind
![Image](http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a46/JoeE_09/murdock.jpg)
BoTM / JL / MM / HAB / VRWC / Horseman
I'm studying for the CPA exam. Have a nice summer, and if you're down just sit back and realize that Joe is off somewhere, doing much worse than you are.
- Isolder74
- Official SD.Net Ace of Cakes
- Posts: 6762
- Joined: 2002-07-10 01:16am
- Location: Weber State of Construction University
- Contact:
And was a terrible failer and was dishonorably discharged, and thus not able to use it as a reference even if he wanted toJoe wrote:Actually, Lincoln served in some of the Indian wars, I think.Isolder74 wrote:This would make Lincoln Inelegable as well. And who says a Military man will always make a good president
Ulysses S Grant comes to mind
Hapan Battle Dragons Rule!
When you want peace prepare for war! --Confusious
That was disapointing ..Should we show this Federation how to build a ship so we may have worthy foes? Typhonis 1
The Prince of The Writer's Guild|HAB Spacewolf Tank General| God Bless America!
When you want peace prepare for war! --Confusious
That was disapointing ..Should we show this Federation how to build a ship so we may have worthy foes? Typhonis 1
The Prince of The Writer's Guild|HAB Spacewolf Tank General| God Bless America!
I think I remeber some materials that shows that Grant was not a bad president but was hamstrung by his congress. I coudl be wrong thoughIsolder74 wrote:This would make Lincoln Inelegable as well. And who says a Military man will always make a good president
Ulysses S Grant comes to mind
"He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself."
Thomas Paine
"For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten."
Ecclesiastes 9:5 (KJV)
Thomas Paine
"For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten."
Ecclesiastes 9:5 (KJV)
Are you suggesting the direct opposite, that peoiple with military abckground should be ineligible for military service?Darth Wong wrote:Separate civilian/military leadership is one of the hallmarks of modern, open democratic societies. There's a reason for that.
"He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself."
Thomas Paine
"For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten."
Ecclesiastes 9:5 (KJV)
Thomas Paine
"For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten."
Ecclesiastes 9:5 (KJV)
- Darth Wong
- Sith Lord
- Posts: 70028
- Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
No, I'm suggesting that people currently in the military should be ineglible for public service, and that restriction of civilian leadership roles to ex-military types is ridiculous.Kitsune wrote:Are you suggesting the direct opposite, that peoiple with military abckground should be ineligible for military service?Darth Wong wrote:Separate civilian/military leadership is one of the hallmarks of modern, open democratic societies. There's a reason for that.
The military has its own leadership which is quite capable of getting the job done, and of correcting any military misconceptions the President might have. Only an imbecile with no experience whatsoever in leadership would think that a leader of a very large organization must know how to do everything done by every person under his command. Do you think the CEO of Ford needs to know how to do arc-welding? There is this concept called "delegation" which people seem to have forgotten.
No offense to Wicked Pilot and the other fine men and women serving in the US Air Force, but I would much rather have an economist in charge than an ex-pilot.
![Image](http://www.stardestroyer.net/BoardPics/Avatars/500.jpg)
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
Nah, it'd turn this country into one giant warrior culture wank.
"Right now we can tell you a report was filed by the family of a 12 year old boy yesterday afternoon alleging Mr. Michael Jackson of criminal activity. A search warrant has been filed and that search is currently taking place. Mr. Jackson has not been charged with any crime. We cannot specifically address the content of the police report as it is confidential information at the present time, however, we can confirm that Mr. Jackson forced the boy to listen to the Howard Stern show and watch the movie Private Parts over and over again."
Just as having a General in charge who knows dick about business will leave them at the mercy of their economic advisers, as the lack of a distinguished scientific career will leave them at eh mercy of scientific advisors. Perhaps until you breed an omnipotent super being you should settle for an intelligent, well rounded individual with the ability to choose and listen to their advisors wisely in preference to an arbitrary ‘must have been shot at’ or ‘must have won the noble prize for physics’ clause. The current pool for US presidents seems to be limited to rich, white guys with good hair I see no reason to restrict it further.Defiant wrote:Having prior military experience of any type is better than going into the presidency and not knowing dick about the military. It has the potential of putting the president at the mercy of his military advisors.
Why give military experience precedence over any other kind of experience? Whilst seeing the current draft dodging hypocrite strutting around in military garb is upsetting insisting upon military service is an over reaction. After all technically Bush would qualify whereas Clinton wouldn’t I can’t stand either of them but I know which one I preferred in the Whitehouse.Xenophobe3691 wrote:Or, instead of "Fixing" the system, add a small patch. Give em the opportunity to run for a third term if they have a non-negligible amount of Military Service under the belt. Kind of a "You've served your country, now reap the rewards" sort of deal...
Is military service really the only contribution to society you value? Some people for example my mother (school leaver, care home worker, nursery nurse, teacher) dedicate their entire lives to public service in a non-military capacity, is her life worth nothing because she never learnt how to kill foreigners?
The military is an essential safeguard of any society that doesn’t mean that we should let it dominate society, it should be a servant not the master, don’t let a reaction to Bush’s sickening hypocrisy sway you too far in a militaristic direction.
- Wicked Pilot
- Moderator Emeritus
- Posts: 8972
- Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
So I take it you've never seen Independence Day?Darth Wong wrote:No offense to Wicked Pilot and the other fine men and women serving in the US Air Force, but I would much rather have an economist in charge than an ex-pilot.
The most basic assumption about the world is that it does not contradict itself.
I give this proposal a big thumbs down. I think military experience can be a good thing when looking for a president, but we've had some fine presidents that never served in the military.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
- Grand Admiral Thrawn
- Ruthless Imperial Tyrant
- Posts: 5755
- Joined: 2002-07-03 06:11pm
- Location: Canada
Xenophobe3691 wrote:Or, instead of "Fixing" the system, add a small patch. Give em the opportunity to run for a third term if they have a non-negligible amount of Military Service under the belt. Kind of a "You've served your country, now reap the rewards" sort of deal...Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:Why? the current system in place works just fine. If It Aint Broke, Don't 'Fix' It.
Since when is being in the military the only way you can serve your country? There are many of other jobs that help the country just as much. Hell, during peacetime, jobs like a cop or a firefighter might be more dangerous.
"You know, I was God once."
"Yes, I saw. You were doing well, until everyone died."
Bender and God, Futurama
"Yes, I saw. You were doing well, until everyone died."
Bender and God, Futurama
- Ghost Rider
- Spirit of Vengeance
- Posts: 27779
- Joined: 2002-09-24 01:48pm
- Location: DC...looking up from the gutters to the stars
No, because like WP pointed out, not everyone can be in the military and not everyone wants to be. And if this person is a capable president...we limit him/her because of this?
I mean this is why we have advisors because honestly the president cannot and will not be able to keep abreast of everything by themselves. To say Military service will enhance their militayr capacity, people far more knowledgeable them myself have answered very succiently...just because you led a tank division doesn't mean you can lead the entire military forces.
I mean this is why we have advisors because honestly the president cannot and will not be able to keep abreast of everything by themselves. To say Military service will enhance their militayr capacity, people far more knowledgeable them myself have answered very succiently...just because you led a tank division doesn't mean you can lead the entire military forces.
MM /CF/WG/BOTM/JL/Original Warsie/ACPATHNTDWATGODW FOREVER!!
Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all
Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all
Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
Those two jobs woudl probably be considered 'Military' jobs especially the policeGrand Admiral Thrawn wrote: Since when is being in the military the only way you can serve your country? There are many of other jobs that help the country just as much. Hell, during peacetime, jobs like a cop or a firefighter might be more dangerous.
"He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself."
Thomas Paine
"For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten."
Ecclesiastes 9:5 (KJV)
Thomas Paine
"For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten."
Ecclesiastes 9:5 (KJV)
- Ghost Rider
- Spirit of Vengeance
- Posts: 27779
- Joined: 2002-09-24 01:48pm
- Location: DC...looking up from the gutters to the stars
But they aren't in any relation to the military or aany sort of military service/Kitsune wrote:Those two jobs woudl probably be considered 'Military' jobs especially the policeGrand Admiral Thrawn wrote: Since when is being in the military the only way you can serve your country? There are many of other jobs that help the country just as much. Hell, during peacetime, jobs like a cop or a firefighter might be more dangerous.
And how is being a fire fighter anywhere near being a military personnel aside from risking one's life?
MM /CF/WG/BOTM/JL/Original Warsie/ACPATHNTDWATGODW FOREVER!!
Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all
Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all
Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
-
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1090
- Joined: 2002-07-08 02:25pm
- Location: NJ, USA
- Contact:
and how is bieng an ex army guy going to allow you to make proepr judgements bout the navy or the airforce?
How is being in the military going to give you a proper idea of economics (far more important that military knowledge for a president)
How is being in the military going to give you a proper idea of economics (far more important that military knowledge for a president)
Festina Lente
My shoes are too tight and I've forgotten how to dance
My shoes are too tight and I've forgotten how to dance
- Xisiqomelir
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1757
- Joined: 2003-01-16 09:27am
- Location: Valuetown
- Contact:
Re: Military Service as a requirement for U.S. President
Not strictly necessary, I would say. All he really needs to do is set defense goals (which are completely political), and the actual soldiering for those goals is done by professionals.Defiant wrote:I have always thought that anyone who is going to be the Commander-in-Chief should also have served in the military in some capacity. Any thoughts?
- Patrick Degan
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 14847
- Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
- Location: Orleanian in exile
This idea strikes at the roots of civilian supremacy over the military, which is the bedrock of the American concept of free democratic government. This is not a military state nor was it ever intended to be so. Furthermore, military service is not a guarantor of competence as a Commander-in-Chief, and as likely to result in a very poor individual who doesn't understand that the Presidency entails a far greater sphere of responsibilities than war leadership.
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln
People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House
Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
—Abraham Lincoln
People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House
Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
The problem is that he is narrowing-down the fuction of a president (and any world leader actually) to the militar function and it is not true. The president must do economic leadership as well, so all presidents must be a PhD in Economy ? In times of peace , only hippies ? Only doctors when dealing with health ? This short of president is impossible, it is like asking Batman to be the president...
Muffin is food. Food is good. I am a Muffin. I am good.
- Darth Wong
- Sith Lord
- Posts: 70028
- Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
One more problem with this hare-brained scheme: it is undemocratic. If the people think that military service is important, here's an innovative idea: let them vote that way. There is no intelligible reason to take options off the voters' menus.
![Image](http://www.stardestroyer.net/BoardPics/Avatars/500.jpg)
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
President Batman. I like it!lgot wrote:The problem is that he is narrowing-down the fuction of a president (and any world leader actually) to the militar function and it is not true. The president must do economic leadership as well, so all presidents must be a PhD in Economy ? In times of peace , only hippies ? Only doctors when dealing with health ? This short of president is impossible, it is like asking Batman to be the president...
KILL BILL and The Punisher coming APRIL 16!
KILL BILL and The Punisher coming APRIL 16!
KILL BILL and The Punisher coming APRIL 16!
KILL BILL and The Punisher coming APRIL 16!
KILL BILL and The Punisher coming APRIL 16!
You are risking your own life in the service of the state, that is how it is like being in a military.Ghost Rider wrote: But they aren't in any relation to the military or aany sort of military service/
And how is being a fire fighter anywhere near being a military personnel aside from risking one's life?
"He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself."
Thomas Paine
"For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten."
Ecclesiastes 9:5 (KJV)
Thomas Paine
"For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten."
Ecclesiastes 9:5 (KJV)
- Ghost Rider
- Spirit of Vengeance
- Posts: 27779
- Joined: 2002-09-24 01:48pm
- Location: DC...looking up from the gutters to the stars
Using that logic, a postal worker working in SE DC falls under this same category.Kitsune wrote:You are risking your own life in the service of the state, that is how it is like being in a military.Ghost Rider wrote: But they aren't in any relation to the military or aany sort of military service/
And how is being a fire fighter anywhere near being a military personnel aside from risking one's life?
That is a bad tangent given that said groups are not trained in similar fashions nor have even a similar outlook or ideas of handling situations.
MM /CF/WG/BOTM/JL/Original Warsie/ACPATHNTDWATGODW FOREVER!!
Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all
Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all
Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
- Darth Wong
- Sith Lord
- Posts: 70028
- Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
I take it you will vote for John Kerry then, since he clearly risked his live more than George W. Bush?Kitsune wrote:You are risking your own life in the service of the state, that is how it is like being in a military.Ghost Rider wrote: But they aren't in any relation to the military or aany sort of military service/
And how is being a fire fighter anywhere near being a military personnel aside from risking one's life?
![Image](http://www.stardestroyer.net/BoardPics/Avatars/500.jpg)
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
No doubt.One more problem with this hare-brained scheme: it is undemocratic.
It is also like, ignore the history. The democracy and moderm institutions are exactly developments to deal with the problem of a leader to represent more and more of a society and not be specialist. We do not have great kings because they are great Generals, Great Saints and that change already happened long time ago. Our moderm institutions are exactly build to sustain a leader for every sittuation.
They may fall, but that is not because of the system, rather because the human factor inside, human factor inside in a militar system as well. I do not see - Coming from the experience that a country was FUBAR by militar interventions over the last 2 centuries and from two decades of criminal militar dictadorship - how can the simple fact to be militar will make anything good. You just had to look the history of Latin America that is not something you can take for granted even in the Militar power area, no country in SA have really a strong Militar power despite having generals in the power for years.
Muffin is food. Food is good. I am a Muffin. I am good.
Point conceded.
Chris: "Way to go dad, fight the machine"
Stewie: "How do you know about the machine?"
--
"I object to you. I object to intellect without discipline. I object to power without constructive purpose."
-Spock, 'The Squire of Gothos'
--
"I'm only 56? Damn, I'll have to get a fake ID to rent ultra-porn".
-Professor Farnsworth, "Teenage Mutant Leela's Hurdles"
Stewie: "How do you know about the machine?"
--
"I object to you. I object to intellect without discipline. I object to power without constructive purpose."
-Spock, 'The Squire of Gothos'
--
"I'm only 56? Damn, I'll have to get a fake ID to rent ultra-porn".
-Professor Farnsworth, "Teenage Mutant Leela's Hurdles"