USA national security doctrine & the precautionary principle

Get advice, tips, or help with science or religion debates that you are currently participating in.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
[R_H]
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2894
Joined: 2007-08-24 08:51am
Location: Europe

USA national security doctrine & the precautionary principle

Post by [R_H] »

A classmate and I were talking about the precautionary principle after we had a lecture on it this week. She brought up American national security doctrine and said that if there was a clear threat to American security, the USA would preventatively intervene even without proof - and that this is an example of the precautionary principle (to clarifiy, "[T]he precautionary principle states that if an action or policy has a suspected risk of causing harm to the public or to the environment, in the absence of scientific consensus that the action or policy is harmful, the burden of proof that it is not harmful falls on those who advocate taking the action".).

Is this the case, was it ever the case?

All I could come up with was that she wasn't being very specific when she was talking about "national security doctrine", as it has changed over the years, but I didn't have any more concrete arguements, due in part to lack of familiarity with the doctrine (past and current).

Help would be greatly appreciated.
.
Samuel
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4750
Joined: 2008-10-23 11:36am

Re: USA national security doctrine & the precautionary princ

Post by Samuel »

Er, yes. It sounds like the standard "burden of proof"- those making a claim have to provide evidence that the claim is true.
User avatar
Straha
Lord of the Spam
Posts: 8198
Joined: 2002-07-21 11:59pm
Location: NYC

Re: USA national security doctrine & the precautionary princ

Post by Straha »

She's wrong. Look at the NPR/QDR, it's chock-full of the Military saying that they would never intervene into a situation without credible proof of a threat, and therefore the military MUST increase its threat-finding capabilities.
'After 9/11, it was "You're with us or your with the terrorists." Now its "You're with Straha or you support racism."' ' - The Romulan Republic

'You're a bully putting on an air of civility while saying that everything western and/or capitalistic must be bad, and a lot of other posters (loomer, Stas Bush, Gandalf) are also going along with it for their own personal reasons (Stas in particular is looking through rose colored glasses)' - Darth Yan
Post Reply