Page 16 of 18

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread III

Posted: 2010-05-15 10:51am
by Steve
I've considered writing a quick post from the Cascadian POV but aside from best wishes and condolences, official and private, to Natasha and to Germany as a whole, and a plea to the Hugenburg Government to maintain the peace of Europe and all that usual stuff, I'm bereft of ideas.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread III

Posted: 2010-05-15 11:50am
by Thanas
Heh. Well, so much for the game being inactive....

Anyway, I am writing both a large post with regards to German issues and NPC factions/allies. Please be patient a bit, it might take a few hours.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread III

Posted: 2010-05-15 01:11pm
by Fingolfin_Noldor
Byzantium finds the ultimatum distasteful and responds as such.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread III

Posted: 2010-05-15 01:27pm
by Akhlut
I don't know if I'll be able to reply until the 25th or after, as I'm going on vacation on the 18th. So, because Mongolia doesn't really have much of a vested interest in the upcoming potential war, it won't do anything.

So, Thanas, that means the actions of the Baron and the court are going to have to be in Unreal Time, if that's okay.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread III

Posted: 2010-05-15 01:29pm
by Thanas
Akhlut wrote:I don't know if I'll be able to reply until the 25th or after, as I'm going on vacation on the 18th. So, because Mongolia doesn't really have much of a vested interest in the upcoming potential war, it won't do anything.

So, Thanas, that means the actions of the Baron and the court are going to have to be in Unreal Time, if that's okay.
That is okay. However, the court does not have to be in unreal time, because pretty much it shall take a while before the case is even heard.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread III

Posted: 2010-05-15 01:31pm
by Akhlut
Thanas wrote:
Akhlut wrote:I don't know if I'll be able to reply until the 25th or after, as I'm going on vacation on the 18th. So, because Mongolia doesn't really have much of a vested interest in the upcoming potential war, it won't do anything.

So, Thanas, that means the actions of the Baron and the court are going to have to be in Unreal Time, if that's okay.
That is okay. However, the court does not have to be in unreal time, because pretty much it shall take a while before the case is even heard.
Yeah, I suppose a major terrorist attack that results in the grave injury of the current Chancellor and the appointment of a new one might, in addition to the deaths of dozens of people might, in fact, delay court proceedings against a foreign national. :P :lol:

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread III

Posted: 2010-05-15 01:35pm
by Thanas
Also, the German reaction post may be a bit delayed because I am waiting to hear from my ally with regards to the names of his armed forces leaders. So my post, which will detail events from August 8, may only be posted tomorrow. Sorry about that.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread III

Posted: 2010-05-15 02:35pm
by Lonestar
ALL: I am currently shooting PMs around(and in the case of Wilkens, a SMS) trying to get more nations on board on applying diplomatic pressure to Germany. I'm guessing that an additional 5 or so countries stepping in may give some pause.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread III

Posted: 2010-05-15 03:13pm
by Siege
Wait... Fin, Shady, me, and the MESS are actually on one side on an SDNW issue? Surely this is a sign the end times are really fucking nigh :D.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread III

Posted: 2010-05-15 03:16pm
by Lonestar
Siege wrote:Wait... Fin, Shady, me, and the MESS are actually on one side on an SDNW issue? Surely this is a sign the end times are really fucking nigh :D.
Image

Really though, it'll be up to Thanas. :D

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread III

Posted: 2010-05-15 05:48pm
by Master_Baerne
Well, we've got to do something to liven the game up. I'd say this counts. :D

Thanas, I PMed you my commander's names.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread III

Posted: 2010-05-15 07:59pm
by Thanas
Small post on the German situation is up. Sorry I could not write more about the politcal/military stuff, but I will do so tomorrow.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread III

Posted: 2010-05-15 08:24pm
by CmdrWilkens
Mexico has made her position known. For clarification no mobilization is ongoing with the messages posted but I am running my fleet through a quick fit-out just in case and filling up bunkers either way. The Army still has (this being August) probably 10-15% of its strength on furlough helping with harvest-season and related activities.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread III

Posted: 2010-05-15 08:36pm
by CmdrWilkens
Small additional note, I included this at the bottom of my build queue as well, I forgot that a few (50) of my ships are now in trials phase instead of build phase so my queue for Q4 1927 has updated slightly.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread III

Posted: 2010-05-16 02:13am
by RogueIce
So, in theory, those are updated (and accurate) build queues and OOB for Q3 1927. We haven't hit Q4 yet, have you?

As far as this World War (or potential for one) I still have to kinda do catch-up and figure out my general position.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread III

Posted: 2010-05-16 10:20am
by Thanas
Everyone: Siege and I have worked out how to resolve this. There'll be a short period of fighting before saner heads prevail.

For more detailed questions, feel free to PM me or Siege.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread III

Posted: 2010-05-16 03:04pm
by Thanas
So anyway, there are several Naval battles coming on. Is there any objection to basing my writing on the penetration tables of Navweaps when deciding results (aside from the dice rolls)?

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread III

Posted: 2010-05-16 08:23pm
by Agent Sorchus
So apparently Dijbouti was never claimed by Baerne but was colored in his color on the original map. So is there anyone out there who has a claim on it? Or should the map stand?

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread III

Posted: 2010-05-16 08:47pm
by Thanas
Agent Sorchus wrote:So apparently Dijbouti was never claimed by Baerne but was colored in his color on the original map. So is there anyone out there who has a claim on it? Or should the map stand?
It stands.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread III

Posted: 2010-05-16 08:55pm
by CmdrWilkens
Real quick note, that last bit on my IG post was about taking the two best trained and closest to ready crews and sending them aboard two of my four Majestuoso-class ships that would have finished trials in another 2-3 months IG.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread III

Posted: 2010-05-16 11:54pm
by CmdrWilkens
Thanas wrote:Everyone: Siege and I have worked out how to resolve this. There'll be a short period of fighting before saner heads prevail.

For more detailed questions, feel free to PM me or Siege.
Thanas (and Siege) it can't work that way. The whole point of STGODing is that everyone adds to the story. If this was just between your nations/alliances then fine. But now you've got Mexico, the GD, parts of Africa, possibly the Shepistanis, and who knows who else involved. Each of us has an equal right to add our 2 cents to the story and advance it. You can't resolve the GD-tension subset without Lonestar writing his say or the Mexican/Spanish standoff without me being able to add in.

Look I appreciate that folks talk off-line and have good story ideas but once an action trips over and adds participants all of those participants have the right to add their bit to the story. In this case Matt, Sorchus and I have a right to use the flow of the story to insert ourselves as it makes sense. Moreover a proper story flow should allow even more parties to insert themselves as the situation arises (such as how Portugal tripped in to the Dutch war). Asking us to sit back is basically asking everyone else to let this be an SDNWorld FanFic and not a STGOD.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread III

Posted: 2010-05-17 12:29am
by RogueIce
So, if y'all want to take the US up on their offer (hey, the Germans made it and someone picked up on it) feel free to let me know. I'll work with you guys.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread III

Posted: 2010-05-17 12:37am
by Agent Sorchus
RogueIce wrote:So, if y'all want to take the US up on their offer (hey, the Germans made it and someone picked up on it) feel free to let me know. I'll work with you guys.
Unfortunately the evidence is irrelevant to the incendiary claim of ownership of Gibraltar, despite a historic treaty to the contrary. It might reduce support a little, but doesn't actually calm Mexico's rationale for war.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread III

Posted: 2010-05-17 12:41am
by RogueIce
Agent Sorchus wrote:
RogueIce wrote:So, if y'all want to take the US up on their offer (hey, the Germans made it and someone picked up on it) feel free to let me know. I'll work with you guys.
Unfortunately the evidence is irrelevant to the incendiary claim of ownership of Gibraltar, despite a historic treaty to the contrary. It might reduce support a little, but doesn't actually calm Mexico's rationale for war.
Well yes, but we're going after the main thrust of the war itself: Britain. It is hoped that by defusing that element of it (maybe) we can get away from the claim on Gibraltar.

At any rate, as mentioned, that's really our best card (and only card) to play: we can't really do much else aside from picking sides. And nobody offered to allow a neutral party to examine the review of ownership vis-a-vis Gibraltar.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread III

Posted: 2010-05-17 05:24pm
by Thanas
...and Sänger has awakened.

Bad Hugenberg. No war for you.