SDNW5 Preliminary Discussion Thread

Create, read, or participate in text-based RPGs

Moderators: Thanas, Steve

User avatar
Panzersharkcat
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1705
Joined: 2011-02-28 05:36am

Re: SDNW5 Preliminary Discussion Thread

Post by Panzersharkcat »

I'm likely to do an all-battlestar arrangement, with my ships plucked from the Jedi Civil War era and pretending the turbolasers are big rail guns.
"I'm just reading through your formspring here, and your responses to many questions seem to indicate that you are ready and willing to sacrifice realism/believability for the sake of (sometimes) marginal increases in gameplay quality. Why is this?"
"Because until I see gamers sincerely demanding that if they get winged in the gut with a bullet that they spend the next three hours bleeding out on the ground before permanently dying, they probably are too." - J.E. Sawyer
User avatar
Fenreer
Redshirt
Posts: 23
Joined: 2012-04-26 10:31am

Re: SDNW5 Preliminary Discussion Thread

Post by Fenreer »

Thank you, gentlemen. I've been illuminated.

The explanation kicked the rules I've been reading into full clarity.
User avatar
Darkevilme
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1514
Joined: 2007-06-12 02:27pm
Location: London, england
Contact:

Re: SDNW5 Preliminary Discussion Thread

Post by Darkevilme »

Chamarrans have battlestar analogues as their heaviest warship class...and their lightest.

The Dominion is a massive ship of the line/carrier.

The Shadow is a tiny stealthed pocket carrier. Basically a way to sneakily move two squadrons of chamarran fighters anywhere they need to go that due to the general enthusiasm kitties have for weaponry just happens to be armed and dangerous in its own right.

The midweight ships are all solid warships.

The Hunter is a stealthed raiding cruiser.

The Predator is designed to back up Dominions in a fleet battle and to do some patrol work.

And the Carnivore is a long range missile ship that actually uses the human tech base of the republic of Makay. They had some serious supply issues regarding their own Chamarran tech parts towards the end of and after the initial crusade and so the Carnivore was built based on a "this is what we have" basis rather than a "this is what we want".
STGOD SDNW4 player. Chamarran Hierarchy Catgirls in space!
Image
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: SDNW5 Preliminary Discussion Thread

Post by Simon_Jester »

Descriptions of the roles and types of ships in my own fleet are already in the Nation Creation thread, down toward the bottom.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
User avatar
Crossroads Inc.
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 9233
Joined: 2005-03-20 06:26pm
Location: Defending Sparkeling Bishonen
Contact:

Re: SDNW5 Preliminary Discussion Thread

Post by Crossroads Inc. »

This is going to sound a silly question, but what are the ECM/ ECCM ships?
Which one is the "attacking jamming" one, and which is the one that defends against jamming?

Also A question on needing to spend points on ships... Is it considered "good form" to indeed spend points on every little service ship, and not just say "well those aren't really combat ships so no need to spend points?

As in, I should be working out allotments for:
troop transports, shuttles, mobile refueling ships, repair yards, resupply ships, etc?

EDIT:
Something I wanted to add to the ongoing conversation of "Points trump everything else"
I know this may seem a bit of a no braining, but don't be a "dick" with ship designs.
I would imagine that making a 500 point ship, and then saying it is the size of a golfball or something, wasn't there some problems with that in the last game?
Praying is another way of doing nothing helpful
"Congratulations, you get a cookie. You almost got a fundamental English word correct." Pick
"Outlaw star has spaceships that punch eachother" Joviwan
Read "Tales From The Crossroads"!
Read "One Wrong Turn"!
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: SDNW5 Preliminary Discussion Thread

Post by Simon_Jester »

Crossroads Inc. wrote:This is going to sound a silly question, but what are the ECM/ ECCM ships?
Which one is the "attacking jamming" one, and which is the one that defends against jamming?
Electronic Counter-Measures are you screwing with the enemy's communications and fire control and sensors. Electronic Counter-Counter-Measures are you doing things that make it harder for the enemy to screw with your stuff. You need both.
Also A question on needing to spend points on ships... Is it considered "good form" to indeed spend points on every little service ship, and not just say "well those aren't really combat ships so no need to spend points?

As in, I should be working out allotments for:
troop transports, shuttles, mobile refueling ships, repair yards, resupply ships, etc?
If bringing them along into a fight wouldn't actually make you more likely to win the space battle (say, because the ship is unarmed and effectively a giant hunk of victim in a serious battle), then no it should not be worth points in combat. Also because I don't actually care very much how many repair ships you have; common sense dictates that you have them but unless you have something wacky like a Total Annihilation-style ship that can fly into the middle of a war zone and repair broken stuff right on the battlefield, it doesn't impact the part of combat we really need rules to resolve.

Use of refueling, troop transports, supply ships... that's all narrative. It doesn't involve my stuff directly pounding on your stuff, so we don't need the point mechanic to resolve it.

Combat would be narrative too- should be narrative whenever people can come to an honorable agreement about outcomes. The point system is there to resolve "I do this!" "No you don't!" arguments of the sort that are most likely to arise during wartime, on account of us having a board full of SDNers to do all this with.
EDIT:
Something I wanted to add to the ongoing conversation of "Points trump everything else"
I know this may seem a bit of a no braining, but don't be a "dick" with ship designs.
I would imagine that making a 500 point ship, and then saying it is the size of a golfball or something, wasn't there some problems with that in the last game?
Huh? Eh, not really. The size of a golfball could make things pretty ridiculous, but I'm not too worried about that.

Now, really, what I think people should pay attention to is this: Try not to be too specific about size and armament.

Because that can make you look silly if your idea of a "battleship" is something that has gigawatt lasers and pops off the occasional nuclear-tipped missile, while my idea of a "battleship" is something that casually punches holes in small moons. And we'll both look silly if some third party's idea of a battleship is an ISD-clone.

Really, no one needs to know that your ship fires 20-kilogram ferrous slugs at 0.013c*. No one really wants to know, either. If you can't write space combat without obsessing over the numbers that you yourself made up, you probably shouldn't be writing it at all. Concentrate on the narrative flow, not on the "fifty thousand missiles at point nine cee."

*Although if you want to quote that Mass Effect sergeant that could actually be hilarious.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
User avatar
Skywalker_T-65
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2293
Joined: 2011-08-26 03:53pm
Location: Bridge of Battleship SDFS Missouri

Re: SDNW5 Preliminary Discussion Thread

Post by Skywalker_T-65 »

I love how the SPACE VIKINGS have become a training tool now. :P Especially considering that they were very much a spur of the moment idea.

But on the other discussion, I have one Battlestar design. The difference being that my Valkyrie is based off of Pegasus instead of Galactica. And my super-dred is based off of the O'Neill from Stargate which is smaller than just about any other design that could be a Super-Dred in other navies (though it is 'only' 600 points). 'Size matters not' after all.

(Unless you are a technobabble king who feels the need to describe everything to the smallest detail that is :P )
SDNW5: Republic of Arcadia...Sweden in SPAAACE
User avatar
Steve
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 9774
Joined: 2002-07-03 01:09pm
Location: Florida USA
Contact:

Re: SDNW5 Preliminary Discussion Thread

Post by Steve »

Well, you're over the page limit, so I'm closing the thread.
”A Radical is a man with both feet planted firmly in the air.” – Franklin Delano Roosevelt

"No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism." - Sir Winston L. S. Churchill, Princips Britannia

American Conservatism is about the exercise of personal responsibility without state interference in the lives of the citizenry..... unless, of course, it involves using the bludgeon of state power to suppress things Conservatives do not like.

DONALD J. TRUMP IS A SEDITIOUS TRAITOR AND MUST BE IMPEACHED
Locked