[JerryL and KabequinnDoll] Poll

Post by **Ghost Rider** » 2006-03-14 01:36pm

This will be a combo platter, and the Senate gets to decide who stays or goes.

JerryL: One note wannabe who maintains a costant WoI, and a refusal to demonstrate his proof.

Thread of note: http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?t=87075

KabequinnDoll: Has made two...ratehr pointless threads that oh so dodge any sort of analysis or proof, and at the same time mocks those that have.

Threads of note:

http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?t=87107

http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?t=87160

So guys and gal of the Senate, your choices? Poll is up for two days.

Post by **Edi** » 2006-03-14 02:03pm

Ban both of these fucktards. No point having either useless idiot here for a moment longer.

JerryL has proven that he is completely beyond redemption, and while KabequinDoll hasn't got too many posts yet, there's no reason to assume that he'll get any better in the future. The asshole completely ignored two reminders of how to conduct himself here and has an annoying attitude to boot.

So the sooner they both get a big red bootprint on their arses, the better.

Edi

Post by **LadyTevar** » 2006-03-14 03:07pm

::thumb to her neck, Roman-style::

GrandMasterTerwynn · Post by **GrandMasterTerwynn** » 2006-03-14 03:07pm

Let's see, one tries to create a scenario which asks that we discard important laws of physics so that he can claim victory. He also repeatedly made the same damned points over and over, in spite of having them shoved up his ass over and over. You don't keep broken records, and that guy's no exception.

The other is a banal twit who tries way too hard to present himself as way too witty for this board. I say, hey, fine, he's a twit who's way too witty for this place. Fine with me. There's the door, hold him still while I lace up my steel-toed boots.

Ban / Ban.

Sonnenburg · Post by **Sonnenburg** » 2006-03-14 06:20pm

JerryL: Starts with the proposition "let's assume the laws of gravity are wrong" and finishes with a planet 200 feet in diameter.

KabequinnDoll: Manages to use so many words to say so very, very little.

Patrick Degan · Post by **Patrick Degan** » 2006-03-14 07:26pm

Publius · Post by **Publius** » 2006-03-14 09:22pm

Patrick, that was truly poetry that speaks to the soul.

RedImperator · Post by **RedImperator** » 2006-03-14 09:28pm

I think this is a little premature for Kabequinn Doll, though his "Phil the asteroid" schtick was embarassing. JerryL, however, can take a hike. Assuming mass and gravity are unrelated was precious, but his entertainment value is used up.

Connor MacLeod · Post by **Connor MacLeod** » 2006-03-14 11:46pm

Ban em both. I feel like bathing in blood tonight.

Connor MacLeod · Post by **Connor MacLeod** » 2006-03-14 11:47pm

Publius wrote:Patrick, that was truly poetry that speaks to the soul.

But they're missing the pope hats.

CmdrWilkens · Post by **CmdrWilkens** » 2006-03-16 12:00am

JerryL simply lacks anything resembling usefulness while simultaneously offering up what I now must believe is simply the most retard precondition EVER for a "debate."

Kabwhateverthell strikes me as a pretentious asshole but really harmless. I know we're often out for blood but does it really harm anything to laugh at the tales of Phil the asteroid every now and then? He's been pretentious but never really in a harmful way and I'm suddenly in a generous mood to give him a little more time to learn how to post EVIDENCE for shit.

Stuart Mackey · Post by **Stuart Mackey** » 2006-03-16 12:36am

I actually want to kep JerryL for a day or so. Because he said something silly and ignorant about NZ, and because I never get to have any fun with the trolls that show up here anymore due to timezone difference and working late.
Get rid of the other twit.

Post by **The Yosemite Bear** » 2006-03-16 03:38am

Not even worth my normal dissenting Devil's advocating.

yes, that's right the guy who thinks that Ray Cav should be given a second chance thinks they should go.

Post by **Coyote** » 2006-03-16 12:52pm

JerryL's first post asks for a free pass ("let's ignore actual science and pretend that my argument really works!") which is sort of like apologizing before a speech. Really bad form. He's starting at zero and, apparantly, staying there. JerryL, let's pretend the laws of hospitality don't exist and argue for your removal?

I am willing to keep KBkewpiedoll around but with a stern warning and perhaps a VI title. He's amusing and gives the wolves something to chew on. However, because of his repeated brush-offs of requests for evidence, he's skating thin ice. He can always be banned later in another glorious show trial should we have a slow news day.

Post by **Edi** » 2006-03-16 04:10pm

Coyote wrote:I am willing to keep KBkewpiedoll around but with a stern warning and perhaps a VI title. He's amusing and gives the wolves something to chew on. However, because of his repeated brush-offs of requests for evidence, he's skating thin ice. He can always be banned later in another glorious show trial should we have a slow news day.

He's already ignored two admonishments to abide by the rules and to conduct himself properly without so much as an acknowledgment that he even saw them, so I don't see any reason to expect that he is even interested in improving. His amusement value is close to zero and his attitude is grating. When you combine all those factors, it means that any threads of his that appear in the HoS (likely most of them) are going to get locked on sight after his first refusal to address a point simply because I can't be arsed to waste my time riding herd on the inevitable bullshit that will ensue otherwise.

Edi

Post by **Broomstick** » 2006-03-16 09:05pm

We're kiling the trolls off too quick - some of us aren't getting a chance to play with them before dispatch.

>sigh<

Yep, I'm probably due for another altitude adjustment....

Connor MacLeod · Post by **Connor MacLeod** » 2006-03-16 11:41pm

Mith just popped in to replace these two. I dont think we'll run out of trolls in the near future.

Post by **The Yosemite Bear** » 2006-03-17 03:14am

I thought mith was banned over a year ago.

Stuart Mackey · Post by **Stuart Mackey** » 2006-03-17 04:30am

The Yosemite Bear wrote:I thought mith was banned over a year ago.

It would seem not.

Post by **Ghost Rider** » 2006-03-17 08:28am

Stuart Mackey wrote:
The Yosemite Bear wrote:I thought mith was banned over a year ago.
It would seem not.

Mitth or Mitth`raw`nuruodo

While he should've learned why apologizing and stepping back is good, he was not the retarded fuck that this one is.

And Poe believes this moron may be someone else.

Post by **Ghost Rider** » 2006-03-17 09:30am

And poll is over.

Which admin wants to, the Senate has claimed, while a few wouldn't mind one dork left alive the majority has deemed them ban worthy.

Post by **AdmiralKanos** » 2006-03-17 09:34am

The decision has been made.

Another two bite the dust. To be quite honest, the "200 foot wide planet" thing is so goddamned stupid that it merits banning almost all by itself.

StarDestroyer.Net BBS

[JerryL and KabequinnDoll] Poll

Ban or keep

[JerryL and KabequinnDoll] Poll