asedra wrote:I've already given you AT LEAST two such papers. That would be the NIST final report on WTC 7, and jim hoffmans on the energy requirements for driving the expansion of the WTCs pyroclastic flow of pulverised material (which would kill two birds with one stone at this point). Go ahead, look it up. Whats stopping you?
Asedra, a "pyroclastic flow" is an emanation from a volcano consisting of rock and gas at approximately 1,000 C, traveling at speeds of up 700 kph. Even a "cold" pyroclastic flow is around 250 C. People caught in such flows - which are generally impossible to outrun even in a ground vehicle - are killed more or less immediately, if not outright incinerated.
While the rolling dust clouds from the WTC collapse do, on video, share a certain visual resemblance to pyroclastic flows, they are NOT pyroclastic flows. Some people were able to outrun them on foot. People caught in the dust clouds were uncomfortable and frightened, but were not burned or killed.
In other words, this is yet another error of hyperbole on the part of your shit sources.
I've already proven that the pancake collapse is an impossibility
No you haven't. You've quoted hack nutjobs who claim
it is impossible, but you have provided no actual information on the strength of the various materials involved, or calculations of forces involved. You have proved nothing.
that the WTCs were designed to resist the impact of those planes (and that those impacts should have had no effect on their structural integrity, thus leaving the job of destroying them to THE FIRES ALONE),
Uh... you mean those GAPING HOLES in the sides of the buildings were a collective hallucination that somehow made it on to video tape?
Please explain to me how the GAPING HOLE in the side of this building is NOT structural damage:
that the fireproofing was not damaged by the impacts
I can put my fist through drywall, which is counted as part of a building's fireproofing as it can, indeed, resist fire when undamaged
. If little old me can damage drywall through impact with my dainty fist please explain to me how it would survive an impact with an airliner.
But oh no, its me whos on thin ice, and its me who has to do something drastic to prevent this hopeless farce of a thread (more like a kangaroo court) from being closed.
Banning you will not close this thread. The thread will remain open for our mocking of your stupidity after your delusional ass is kicked out the door.