Star Wars 888 wrote:I was defending myself. You clearly got angry at me for comparing you to a slave owner, and I'm explaining that it wasn't intended to be that. If you want to, ignore the accusation of you using a strawman and focus on my point; that is, that making a claim and stating that it's "self evident" can be used for practically any absurd claim (and no, I'm not claiming that your point is absurd, simply that your evidence has been used to back up absurd claims).
Also, I sincerely don't want to troll, since I dislike people who troll. If you were to simply tell me what I'm doing that apparently makes me a troll in your eyes, then I can stop. I'm not trying to troll, but it's hard to stop trolling when you aren't told HOW you're trolling. For all I know I could be trolling because I'm using run on sentences (which I'm not), or because I'm posting too much, or making too much threads, or using improper grammar (which I'm not) or any other multitude of reasons.
You know, we've been telling you throughout your time here how you've been basically the poster boy for How Not To Debate, and you've done nothing but stick your fingers in your ears and go LALALALA. I'm sure Ghost Rider and Thanas both have a thing or two to note in that regard.
Star Wars 888 wrote:Posting Rules #5 says that the best way to counter a mean person is to have a better argument than them. I'm pretty much, with a few exceptions, the only poster in this thread (not forum, but this thread) that's actually made ANY argument, so I followed the rules.
Debating Rules #5 says to back up your claims. I did, you, at the risk of sounding rude, didn't. Again, not lawyering, I'm pointing out the facts that you're requesting me to.
Aministrative Rules #6 says that you can insult the staff during a debate, but not on their performance on their duties. This doesn't really apply since I haven't actually insulted you, but what I'm trying to say is that I haven't actually broken any of the rules.
I see. So basically, in your personal universe, that translates into "provide evidence to back up flames and insults". Nowhere does that state that this is the case. This is you looking for a loophole to try to pull a "gotcha", get your ass out of the deep, deep shit you are in and try to come out clean. Sorry, no dice. If you're saying that I haven't shown any proof of your jackassery, trolling, fuckwittery etc. (stop looking for semantics loopholes too), then you need to stop ignoring evidence.
Star Wars 888 wrote:Only one moderator called me out on that thread and then left the thread. You still haven't explained how I'm a troll. For other trolls like darkstar, people were super eager to call him out, point out every one of his logical fallacies, destroy his arguments, etc. Yet for me, my arguments haven't actually been challenged.
Again, since you've proven adept at ignoring things people have said, several moderators in the Moderator forum itself have noted your "highlights". In response to the rest of what you said...WOW, but that is one mile-high wall of ignorance. There are MULTIPLE posters in this thread ALONE busily challenging your arguments. Oh wait, I forgot, your arguments are perfect and flawless and that those who disagree simply haven't seen the light. Their paltry rebuttals and counterpoints are like throwing sand against the mighty castle of your impermeable defenses.
Star Wars 888 wrote:BTW, are you calling me a troll for this thread or the other thread?
You're a special kind of dumb.