buckshot would have crappy range and gas would be a waste.
simply examples. Other rounds included solid AP slugs and HE grenades, and incendiary devices. I was merely pointing out that they have a wide variety of projectiles available.
Still fired from the hip, placing a hard upper limit on the recoil.
the weapon is balanced by a robotic arm, which both aims the weapon and presumably acts to dampen recoil.
Incinerators are clearly not baths of hot napalm. They appear to be gasoline (or similar)-based flamethrowers.
Regardless, being coated in burning fluid would almost certainly kill a stormtrooper. It would get in between the joints, cooking the stormtrooper alive.
You don't fire crew served weapons while prone. That's because they're on friggin tripods, not butted up against your shoulder
Ridiculous. Mg-42? Crew served weapon, fired while prone. There are thousands of examples of modern MGs which one sets up on a low tripod or bipod.
Not really, no.
Explain.
They'd better be damned quick to recognize chemical agents
We've never seen USCMC troops deployed against armed enemies. It is likely that in a world where chemical weapons are so common that they are issued at the platoon level that countermeasures are radily available.
Their chests are the only areas that are armored, so shrapnel is going to get them regardless.
Their chests and their legs and their head all are armored, only their arms are exposed.