Sadly, the occasion went largely unremarked and uncelebrated, since unlike "Star Trek" or "Doctor Who", for example, Buffy has nothing currently in theatres or on the air (though if you're a Buffy fan, or just an urban fantasy/superhero comics fan, some of the comics are worth checking out- particularly, in my opinion, the first season of "Angel and Faith").
Still, its interesting to reflect, twenty years in, upon the impact this franchise has had on television and popular culture, particularly in light of the ongoing controversies around the depiction of women and minorities in the media. Perhaps particularly noteworthy is its largely positive portrayal of homosexual relationships, at a time when things like gay marriage and the repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell were still somewhat fringe political positions. In addition, the series has had a notable impact on television- its been credited as an inspiration for the modern Doctor Who, and less positively, has likely been part of the impetus behind the flood of vampire romances of variable quality in recent years.
Ultimately, however, Buffy the Vampire Slayer is more than simply a "political message" show. This is not to say that the issues that it depicts are unimportant, or not worth discussing. They certainly are, and while I often disagreed with the series' apparent point of view, while it will doubtlessly be considered dated in some respects today, I appreciate that it honestly made me think more about issues surrounding feminism than I otherwise likely would have. However, the series is also, quite simply, a well-written, well-acted piece of television; one which interweaves humour, suspense, and tragedy to devastating emotional effect and builds characters and themes over the course of multiple seasons to achieve the most effective payoff, with seemingly minor events resurfacing, or even having a profound impact, seasons after they occurred. I also respect the writers' willingness to deviate from the show's own status quo, and experiment with their own formula, most notably perhaps in "Hush" (largely without dialog), "Restless" (which mostly takes place as a series of surreal dreams), "The Body" (which lacks a musical score and largely lacks supernatural elements), and "Once More With Feeling" (the musical episode).
And of course, I live in hope for a 25th. anniversary reunion special/mini-series (something like last year's resurrection of the X-Files, perhaps), though I know its probably not terribly likely.
That concludes my little mini-review. Over the next few days, I will probably post reviews of some of the first season episodes. But in the meantime, feel free to discuss any and all aspects of this franchise.
I'll also include this recent article from the Guardian, written by Anthony Stewart Head (Rupert Giles):
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... r-feminist
I’m lucky enough to have been attached to a few iconic shows – Merlin, Doctor Who, Little Britain – but 20 years on, Buffy the Vampire Slayer is still the one I get stopped in the street to talk about most. It deeply affected so many people – they tell me how it eased their growing pains, how without the show they wouldn’t have been able to cope. It gave them strength. The executives who commissioned it had no idea what they were unleashing, and the impact it would have.
The network kept wanting to change the name. “Nobody is going take it seriously if it’s called Buffy.” But that was the whole point. It’s somebody called Buffy who nobody really takes seriously, but who has the fate of the world in their hands. Joss Whedon’s original concept was to take the girl in the horror movies who falls over, twists her ankle – the victim – and make her the hero. It’s clearly a feminist parable. But it went so much further. It was this extraordinary allegorical tale that lasted seven years.
Of course, this was most apparent in the way it presented the difficulties of growing up. Take the story of Buffy’s boyfriend, Angel. He’s this wonderful, caring person, but only because he’s a vampire cursed by gypsies to have a conscience. That’s enough right there. But not for Whedon. As soon as Angel finds himself in a state of ecstasy – when he finally sleeps with Buffy – he loses his soul and becomes the one night stand from hell. It’s a situation women the world over can relate to, but presented through this horrific metaphor.
Anthony Head with Sarah Michelle Gellar.
Anthony Head with Sarah Michelle Gellar. Photograph: Allstar/20th Century Fox
And Whedon was able to almost sense what was coming in the world. The episode Earshot predicted a Columbine-style massacre before it happened and had to be moved in the schedules as a result. But in those 43 minutes, Whedon created a three-dimensional character for this would-be murderer. Jonathan was relatable, his problems and motivations felt clear – especially to that young teenage audience. Many have tried to replicate the nuance of that psychology in far grander settings, but with nowhere near the same level of success. That’s the thing – brilliant writing connects.
One is aware in this industry that executives, who are rarely creatives, feel the need to “contribute”. Notes come through, often purely about exposition, which means that the character stuff gets whittled away because, ultimately, they underestimate the audience. But it’s that stuff that people connect to, and it’s that stuff that makes entertainment cross over from the narrow demographics that executives too often focus on.
We were lucky was off the radar – nobody expected it to do anything, so we weren’t subject to their scrutiny. We did, however get a note, in season one, on Teacher’s Pet, because we weren’t allowed to show blood. We couldn’t show the green blood shooting from the severed neck of a beheaded praying mantis demon. We shot it in silhouette instead. Whedon was able to get Buffy up and running before the higher-ups took notice – and it got a huge response almost immediately. It was a lucky accident that it was at a time when online became a real voice. A community of fans built up.
And that was the real power of the show – it resonated. Not just with girls, or teenagers, but with everyone. It gave flesh, and horns, to the demons we all face in life. That was never more apparent than in the episode The Body. Whedon liked to play with the medium. An episode where nobody talks. A musical. But The Body was something else entirely. He had said a year previously that Joyce, Buffy’s mother, was going to die – serious stuff for a teenage comedy horror. He gave her a brain tumour – “here we go,” I thought. But then she recovered. He was planning much further ahead.
“She’ll have an aneurism at the end of a really light, frothy episode, and Buffy will come in and find her on the sofa,” he told me. When it finally aired, it was gut-wrenching stuff. He’d said he thought he might strip it of incidental music, to increase its intensity – and he did. It was a brilliant and extraordinarily bold choice on a mainstream, network show for “kids”. Buffy was presented with an enemy that she couldn’t fight, an enemy that everyone can relate to – the death of a loved one.
And that was the real power of the show – it resonated. Not just with girls, or teenagers, but with everyone.
I knew Buffy was special as soon as I read the first two scripts. I was on board from the beginning. I’d come close to doing another show about demons and poltergeists and things. But it was humourless, it had no empathy, it was just in-your-face horror. My agent was telling me to take it, but my partner said wait, that something else was coming. A month later, I was in a Tex-Mex restaurant in Santa Monica on my own, laughing out loud – much to the chagrin of all the people round me who thought I was some loony Englishman. Buffy isn’t just a horror – it’s a comedy, it’s a thriller, it’s a coming-of-age drama. Whedon proved that you can have sardonic humour alongside all the serious stuff, you can turn emotions on a dime, and people love it. A laugh-out-loud moment, followed by a death. He changed television.
That's why when a 40-year-old man comes up to me “confessing” to being a fan of the show, as if its a dirty secret, I tell him to stand proud. Buffy might have been a teenage girl, but the issues in the programme transcended age or gender. It’s undoubtedly a feminist story, about the empowerment of women, but Whedon managed to tell that story in a way that was inclusive.
He is an incredible, genius writer – so it’s hardly a surprise that few, if any, have managed to emulate that feat. Female protagonists are still thin on the ground. Executives still struggle to see how they can sell women’s stories to mixed audiences. But even if a televisual landscape filled with female heroes hasn’t followed on, there’s no doubting the impact Buffy had.
In the final season, Whedon started to build up this young group of “Slayerettes” around Buffy. I was confused. “Where is this going? Isn’t he diluting what makes the show special?” But after seven years, in the series’s final moments when Buffy handed over the mantle to all womenkind, he encapsulated the true message of the programme. And it’s that legacy that still resides in all of us, true, lifelong Buffy fans.
• Anthony Stewart Head is appearing in Love in Idleness at the Menier Chocolate Factory until 29 April
(Edited to remove extraneous crap unrelated to the article. )