Would westeros be better off with a King or a Shogun (RAR!)

FAN: Discuss various fictional worlds that don't qualify for SF.

Moderator: Steve

Post Reply
User avatar
Zor
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5927
Joined: 2004-06-08 03:37am

Would westeros be better off with a King or a Shogun (RAR!)

Post by Zor »

In this scenario instead of Aegon the Conqueror coming to Westeros some 72,000 Late Sengoku Samurai and Ashigaru (a quarter of which being armed with matchlocks) on a large number of sailing ships that at the mouth of the Blackwater Rush led by Toyotomi Hideoyoshi. Said force came from a Tagaryen free Dragonstone and with them (either among the landing force or on the island to after the beachhead on the mainland) is some 144,000 japanese artisans, laborers, clerks, sailors, buddhist monks, shrine keepers and their families. Their intent is simple: conquer the seven kingdoms and once they do so impose a social order similar to that of the Tokugawa Shogunate. They are willing to accept some knights and lords who submit to their rule and fight alongside their army as new samurai and have some interpreters to overcome the language barrier.

Would this arrangement be better or worse for the people's of the Seven Kingdoms than Targaryen rule?

Zor
HAIL ZOR! WE'LL BLOW UP THE OCEAN!
Heros of Cybertron-HAB-Keeper of the Vicious pit of Allosauruses-King Leighton-I, United Kingdom of Zoria: SD.net World/Tsar Mikhail-I of the Red Tsardom: SD.net Kingdoms
WHEN ALL HELL BREAKS LOOSE ON EARTH, ALL EARTH BREAKS LOOSE ON HELL
Terran Sphere
The Art of Zor
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12212
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Re: Would westeros be better off with a King or a Shogun (RAR!)

Post by Lord Revan »

When you remove the divine emperor just how different was the Shogunate from the late medival feudal systems, from what I gathered good chunk of the stability of the shogunate came from the fact that the shogun got (in theory) his rank from the emperor who was divine (son of the sun goddess), so to oppose the shogun would mean to opposing the emperor (obviously it's not that simple in practice but that's the basic idea).

basically what does the shogunate bring that westeros doesn't already have in some form or another?
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 21559
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

Re: Would westeros be better off with a King or a Shogun (RAR!)

Post by The Romulan Republic »

Guns?

I don't know Game of Thrones that well, but I don't recall them having guns.
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12212
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Re: Would westeros be better off with a King or a Shogun (RAR!)

Post by Lord Revan »

The Romulan Republic wrote:Guns?

I don't know Game of Thrones that well, but I don't recall them having guns.
no guns as far as I know.

That said Firearms will be both a blessing and a curse as long you'll have to deal with logistics of them, there's no pre-established factories for gunpowder meaning you'll have to build those or accept that your reign will last only until you ran out of gunpowder, if Firearms are the only thing you bring to the table that isn't "just like every other lord"

Also I'm not seeing any seige weapons on the weapon breakdown, muskets are cool but they don't allow you conquer a castle you need siege weapons for that.
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
Zor
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5927
Joined: 2004-06-08 03:37am

Re: Would westeros be better off with a King or a Shogun (RAR!)

Post by Zor »

Lord Revan wrote:That said Firearms will be both a blessing and a curse as long you'll have to deal with logistics of them, there's no pre-established factories for gunpowder meaning you'll have to build those or accept that your reign will last only until you ran out of gunpowder, if Firearms are the only thing you bring to the table that isn't "just like every other lord"
To make gunpower you need three things: Carbon, Sulfur and Saltpeter. Carbon can be obtained from charcoal, dragonstone stinks with sulfur and rocky islands and coastlines where seabirds live and engage in all of life's biological processes shall meet their saltpeter needs. They have artisans who can set up powder mills.

Zor
HAIL ZOR! WE'LL BLOW UP THE OCEAN!
Heros of Cybertron-HAB-Keeper of the Vicious pit of Allosauruses-King Leighton-I, United Kingdom of Zoria: SD.net World/Tsar Mikhail-I of the Red Tsardom: SD.net Kingdoms
WHEN ALL HELL BREAKS LOOSE ON EARTH, ALL EARTH BREAKS LOOSE ON HELL
Terran Sphere
The Art of Zor
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: Would westeros be better off with a King or a Shogun (RAR!)

Post by Simon_Jester »

Honestly, this just results in a Japanese-themed Kingdom of Dragonstone or "of the Isles" or "of Blackwater" or whatever, subduing the 'historical' areas known as the Crownlands and probably some distance beyond, only to peter out eventually in the face of hostile opposition. Seventy-two thousand trained soldiers, some with muskets, is a powerful force, but they're not going to be able to pull off the kind of totally one-sided blowout conquests that Cortez did against the Aztecs.

Moreover, they don't have the dragons, which were such an outside context problem for Westerosi warfare that they did a lot to make the conquest possible. A dragon can defeat an army of several thousand men... but requires none of the logistical support of such an army, and is infinitely more mobile. Moreover, dragons can accomplish feats no army could ever realistically accomplish, such as:

"As other regions of Westeros fell to Aegon, Sharra amassed the Vale army at the Bloody Gate. However, Aegon sent Visenya to the Eyrie riding her dragon Vhagar. When Sharra returned to the Eyrie she found her son sitting on Visenya's lap and asking if he could ride the dragon with Visenya. Sharra bent the knee afterward. The Arryns were declared Wardens of the East and Defenders of the Vale.[2] "

It would be extremely difficult for the Japanese invasion force to conquer the Vale, because they are lacking in heavy artillery with which to force the Bloody Gate and have no means of bypassing the defenses of the Eyrie. About the best they could do would be to camp out at the bottom of the mountain and wait for winter to come. They'd have to do that after subduing enough of the rest of the Vale to be assured of safe winter quarters for their army, because only an idiot would try to march an army back through the mountains between the Vale and the rest of Westeros in winter.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
User avatar
General Zod
Never Shuts Up
Posts: 29205
Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
Location: The Clearance Rack
Contact:

Re: Would westeros be better off with a King or a Shogun (RAR!)

Post by General Zod »

Add a Shogun and you basically get Legend of Five Rings.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
Post Reply