Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption
Moderator: Steve
- Batman
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 16333
- Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
- Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks
Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption
Transporter pattern buffer. How else do you think I manage to fit all the stuff I routinely carry around into an utility belt that for most of my career didn't even have pockets?
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
- TOSDOC
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 419
- Joined: 2010-09-30 02:52pm
- Location: Rotating between Redshirt Hospital and the Stormtrooper School of Marksmanship.
Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption
I believe every word you said.
What was the consensus for Stark losing power at the end of Avengers, then, that he used it up or that it simply wasn't designed to function in the vacuum of space? (I personally hold with the latter).
What was the consensus for Stark losing power at the end of Avengers, then, that he used it up or that it simply wasn't designed to function in the vacuum of space? (I personally hold with the latter).
"In the long run, however, there can be no excuse for any individual not knowing what it is possible for him to know. Why shouldn't he?" --Elliot Grosvenor, Voyage of the Space Beagle
- Gandalf
- SD.net White Wizard
- Posts: 16290
- Joined: 2002-09-16 11:13pm
- Location: A video store in Australia
Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption
I just assumed he'd run out of power, using the last of it to push the missile into the portal. Though that's a bit odd, because earlier in the film they showed Thor seemingly being able to change the suit with his lightning.
"Oh no, oh yeah, tell me how can it be so fair
That we dying younger hiding from the police man over there
Just for breathing in the air they wanna leave me in the chair
Electric shocking body rocking beat streeting me to death"
- A.B. Original, Report to the Mist
"I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately."
- George Carlin
That we dying younger hiding from the police man over there
Just for breathing in the air they wanna leave me in the chair
Electric shocking body rocking beat streeting me to death"
- A.B. Original, Report to the Mist
"I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately."
- George Carlin
Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption
That's also two different suits, it might not have taken power like the earlier suit and then they didn't have time for Thor to power up the suit. That begs the question though, how did the suit store all that extra energy? I can't see Tony putting in enough energy storage to hold that much extra power, and there aren't that many storage mediums that could be over charged like that either.
Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption
I don't think Tony knew it would hold the charge. It was a surprise to him. Maybe he just over builds his armors.InsaneTD wrote:That's also two different suits, it might not have taken power like the earlier suit and then they didn't have time for Thor to power up the suit. That begs the question though, how did the suit store all that extra energy? I can't see Tony putting in enough energy storage to hold that much extra power, and there aren't that many storage mediums that could be over charged like that either.
ASVS('97)/SDN('03)
"Whilst human alchemists refer to the combustion triangle, some of their orcish counterparts see it as more of a hexagon: heat, fuel, air, laughter, screaming, fun." Dawn of the Dragons
ASSCRAVATS!
"Whilst human alchemists refer to the combustion triangle, some of their orcish counterparts see it as more of a hexagon: heat, fuel, air, laughter, screaming, fun." Dawn of the Dragons
ASSCRAVATS!
Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption
Maybe his suits have really big capacitors that the reactor is constantly charging, and Tony was surprised that it was successfully charged by an impromptu outside source?
Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption
That could explain why it runs out of power. Though I've never heard of a capacitor that can take a four times overcharge.
Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption
How did War Machine kept his suit running when Rhodes and Tony developed a rift in IM2 and Rhodes took the suit to the air force ? Would not the US government need Tonys help to keep the ARC reactor in the suit fuelled ?
- Elheru Aran
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 13073
- Joined: 2004-03-04 01:15am
- Location: Georgia
Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption
I believe Rhodes didn't do much with it other than just try to knock Tony around a bit and fly it to the AF base. That's not a whole lot of activity there, and it's quite possible Tony's managed to streamline creating arc reactors to the point that he can just stick a fully-loaded one into every suit he has, as you can see in IM3.sarevok2 wrote:How did War Machine kept his suit running when Rhodes and Tony developed a rift in IM2 and Rhodes took the suit to the air force ? Would not the US government need Tonys help to keep the ARC reactor in the suit fuelled ?
Which does raise the question of why the hell doesn't he decide to just open a factory for commercial production of arc reactors in that size to power everything on the planet, but that's a whole other story in and of its own along with 'why doesn't Reed Richards fix everything' or 'why doesn't Doctor Doom rule the planet yet'...
It's a strange world. Let's keep it that way.
- Terralthra
- Requiescat in Pace
- Posts: 4741
- Joined: 2007-10-05 09:55pm
- Location: San Francisco, California, United States
Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption
And participate in the demonstration at the Stark Expo and the final battle, but Vanko knows how to build arc reactors too, so he can presumably refuel it. What the government does to refuel the suit after Vanko is dead, I couldn't tell you.Elheru Aran wrote:I believe Rhodes didn't do much with it other than just try to knock Tony around a bit and fly it to the AF base.sarevok2 wrote:How did War Machine kept his suit running when Rhodes and Tony developed a rift in IM2 and Rhodes took the suit to the air force ? Would not the US government need Tonys help to keep the ARC reactor in the suit fuelled ?
Well, because he doesn't want that much power up for auction to the highest bidder. He's clear about that throughout the Iron Man movies: he built weapons that fell into "the wrong hands", thus he's keeping his new weapons (the Iron Man suit and its power source) in his own hands until and unless he can be sure they won't fall into the wrong ones.Elheru Aran wrote:Which does raise the question of why the hell doesn't he decide to just open a factory for commercial production of arc reactors in that size to power everything on the planet, but that's a whole other story in and of its own along with 'why doesn't Reed Richards fix everything' or 'why doesn't Doctor Doom rule the planet yet'...
- Elheru Aran
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 13073
- Joined: 2004-03-04 01:15am
- Location: Georgia
Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption
My guess is that after IM2, whenever the War Machine suit needs gas, they call Tony or one of his guys and they show up with a fresh arc reactor for it to exchange for the old one.Terralthra wrote:And participate in the demonstration at the Stark Expo and the final battle, but Vanko knows how to build arc reactors too, so he can presumably refuel it. What the government does to refuel the suit after Vanko is dead, I couldn't tell you.Elheru Aran wrote:I believe Rhodes didn't do much with it other than just try to knock Tony around a bit and fly it to the AF base.sarevok2 wrote:How did War Machine kept his suit running when Rhodes and Tony developed a rift in IM2 and Rhodes took the suit to the air force ? Would not the US government need Tonys help to keep the ARC reactor in the suit fuelled ?
I had forgotten about that point.Well, because he doesn't want that much power up for auction to the highest bidder. He's clear about that throughout the Iron Man movies: he built weapons that fell into "the wrong hands", thus he's keeping his new weapons (the Iron Man suit and its power source) in his own hands until and unless he can be sure they won't fall into the wrong ones.Elheru Aran wrote:Which does raise the question of why the hell doesn't he decide to just open a factory for commercial production of arc reactors in that size to power everything on the planet, but that's a whole other story in and of its own along with 'why doesn't Reed Richards fix everything' or 'why doesn't Doctor Doom rule the planet yet'...
It strikes me though that given he's the only one (supposedly) who understands the tech, he would be in a position to have a serious monopoly over it. Granted, if he made a Stark-Mobile or some such, the first buyers would probably be fronts for major corporations who would immediately start tearing them apart to try and figure them out... so there's that.
He doesn't seem shy about sharing with SHIELD though, didn't he supply repulsor techology for the next generation Helicarriers? So he has to have a production line somewhere that he's cranking out arc reactors. He definitely had a production line for Iron Man suits (ref IM3).
It's a strange world. Let's keep it that way.
Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption
A fairly large Arc Reactor was a publicity project at Stark's company. It's the small one that he very much wants to keep to himself. And a SHIELD agent was embedded into Stark's company for most of IM2. Why couldn't they just nab plans for an Arc Reactor and make it of the large size they needed to? Assuming they didn't just make a copy of the original sheet that was in Howard Stark's SHIELD box.Elheru Aran wrote: He doesn't seem shy about sharing with SHIELD though, didn't he supply repulsor techology for the next generation Helicarriers? So he has to have a production line somewhere that he's cranking out arc reactors. He definitely had a production line for Iron Man suits (ref IM3).
Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption
The first big ARC reactor didn't actually work though, it used as much power as it provided, which was the reasons it was called a publicity stunt in the first movie. Tony did something that both miniaturized it, and upped it's efficiency. He then used that as the basis for bigger reactors.
Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption
Tony might have had the Eureka moment, doesn't mean they can't do their own extended research once they raid his back yard of anything and everything even if it came from before the Eureka moment. Let's not limit the world's brilliance to Tony Stark and Mr. Fantastic now. Especially when the movie world itself demonstrate SHIELD doing their own extended research on many different projects.InsaneTD wrote:The first big ARC reactor didn't actually work though, it used as much power as it provided, which was the reasons it was called a publicity stunt in the first movie. Tony did something that both miniaturized it, and upped it's efficiency. He then used that as the basis for bigger reactors.
Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption
Uh... Rhodey used the suit to fight Iron Man then fly it to the Air Force base then fight alongside Iron Man against Vanko. That's not just something you can do running on a battery. It clearly had it's own reactor.Elheru Aran wrote:I believe Rhodes didn't do much with it other than just try to knock Tony around a bit and fly it to the AF base. That's not a whole lot of activity there, and it's quite possible Tony's managed to streamline creating arc reactors to the point that he can just stick a fully-loaded one into every suit he has, as you can see in IM3.sarevok2 wrote:How did War Machine kept his suit running when Rhodes and Tony developed a rift in IM2 and Rhodes took the suit to the air force ? Would not the US government need Tonys help to keep the ARC reactor in the suit fuelled ?
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
"Mostly Harmless Nutcase"
Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption
The palladium was degrading with use, but I still think it was more of a catalyst than a fuel.Gandalf wrote:In IM2, he was apparently depleting the palladium cores from his reactor.Ted C wrote:Palladium is a necessary component, but I don't think it's the fuel.Eternal_Freedom wrote:Isn't it supposed to run on palladium? I recall him saying he needed 1.6g for the first one he built, and he was changing over cartidges of palladium in IM2.
"This is supposed to be a happy occasion... Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who."
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail
"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776
"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail
"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776
"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption
The beam lasers on the Mark VI were "one shots" that ejected after use. The beams on the Mark VII are tied into the suit's main power, so they can be reused, and they don't eject.Havok wrote:It has it's own juice, which is why it ejects when it's own power is spent, otherwise it would just stay on his wrist.
"This is supposed to be a happy occasion... Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who."
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail
"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776
"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail
"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776
"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption
In his dialogue with JARVIS, it was pretty clear that the suit was running out of power.TOSDOC wrote:I believe every word you said.
What was the consensus for Stark losing power at the end of Avengers, then, that he used it up or that it simply wasn't designed to function in the vacuum of space? (I personally hold with the latter).
"This is supposed to be a happy occasion... Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who."
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail
"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776
"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail
"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776
"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption
True, but that lightning strike also caused some noticeable damage. While that might be acceptable on a suit that's in good condition (early in Tony's fight with Thor), it might not be safe on one that's already sustained serious damage (prolonged battle with Chitauri).Gandalf wrote:I just assumed he'd run out of power, using the last of it to push the missile into the portal. Though that's a bit odd, because earlier in the film they showed Thor seemingly being able to change the suit with his lightning.
"This is supposed to be a happy occasion... Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who."
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail
"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776
"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail
"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776
"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
-
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 11871
- Joined: 2003-04-10 03:45pm
- Location: Cheshire, England
Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption
Geez man. You can combine your posts. Don't need to post four in a row.
Then in IM2 the reactor had been redesign so it was just blocks of the stuff being used and that has a more fuel like connotation to me.
It's weird. In IM1 it seemed like palladium was the stuff he used to create a ring for the arc reactor. That could have been a superconducting element or something but I always assumed it was fuel.Ted C wrote:The palladium was degrading with use, but I still think it was more of a catalyst than a fuel.Gandalf wrote:
In IM2, he was apparently depleting the palladium cores from his reactor.
Then in IM2 the reactor had been redesign so it was just blocks of the stuff being used and that has a more fuel like connotation to me.
- TOSDOC
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 419
- Joined: 2010-09-30 02:52pm
- Location: Rotating between Redshirt Hospital and the Stormtrooper School of Marksmanship.
Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption
I watched the battle this morning, and it's not clear where it's pretty clear that was said. I followed where JARVIS said "We will run out of power before we cut through [that creature's] armor", but he doesn't mention suit power after that, just calling Pepper on the phone. Can you give me a time index?Ted C wrote:In his dialogue with JARVIS, it was pretty clear that the suit was running out of power.TOSDOC wrote:I believe every word you said.
What was the consensus for Stark losing power at the end of Avengers, then, that he used it up or that it simply wasn't designed to function in the vacuum of space? (I personally hold with the latter).
"In the long run, however, there can be no excuse for any individual not knowing what it is possible for him to know. Why shouldn't he?" --Elliot Grosvenor, Voyage of the Space Beagle
-
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 11871
- Joined: 2003-04-10 03:45pm
- Location: Cheshire, England
Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption
When He finds out there's a nuke incoming. He tells JARVIS something like 'put everything into the engines' to which JARVIS responds 'I just did' and he rockets off. And then later 'save everything we've got left for the turn' suggesting he was running low by that point.TOSDOC wrote:I watched the battle this morning, and it's not clear where it's pretty clear that was said. I followed where JARVIS said "We will run out of power before we cut through [that creature's] armor", but he doesn't mention suit power after that, just calling Pepper on the phone. Can you give me a time index?Ted C wrote:In his dialogue with JARVIS, it was pretty clear that the suit was running out of power.TOSDOC wrote:I believe every word you said.
What was the consensus for Stark losing power at the end of Avengers, then, that he used it up or that it simply wasn't designed to function in the vacuum of space? (I personally hold with the latter).
- Elheru Aran
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 13073
- Joined: 2004-03-04 01:15am
- Location: Georgia
Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption
Would there be any way to screen-cap the helmet-cam scenes to get some idea of any dials or gauges that may be in Tony's vision? Of course the problem with that is knowing what the dials actually indicate, they're generally shown from the back (our viewpoint) as they face Tony for obvious reasons...
It's a strange world. Let's keep it that way.
- TOSDOC
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 419
- Joined: 2010-09-30 02:52pm
- Location: Rotating between Redshirt Hospital and the Stormtrooper School of Marksmanship.
Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption
Ok, I caught the first line, but not the second. And the first only suggests to me he can't use the other systems such as weaponry, only propulsion. And steering. And sensors to track the nuke. And the exoskeleton to grab it and hold on. And comms to call Pepper.Crazedwraith wrote:When He finds out there's a nuke incoming. He tells JARVIS something like 'put everything into the engines' to which JARVIS responds 'I just did' and he rockets off. And then later 'save everything we've got left for the turn' suggesting he was running low by that point.
So if he's out of fuel after clearing the portal, why does he wake up again? Doesn't he need the arcreactor to keep the shrapnel away from his heart?
And then he's standing when they confront Loki. Shouldn't the Hulk be carrying him over his shoulder? (That would have been awesome, by the way). Or did they replace the fuel on the way up to grab Loki? It seems to me he still had a little juice left in the suit at the end, it just stopped working in space. Or the reactor's got enough fuel to power the Mark VII enough to walk around, and it's got a separate fuel source onboard for flight, like when it caught up with him in his midair fall.
"In the long run, however, there can be no excuse for any individual not knowing what it is possible for him to know. Why shouldn't he?" --Elliot Grosvenor, Voyage of the Space Beagle
Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption
There are two arc reactors. One in the suit, one in Tony's chest. I don't think Stark is the type of guy to make one not have enough power to power the suit.
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
"Mostly Harmless Nutcase"