Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption

FAN: Discuss various fictional worlds that don't qualify for SF.

Moderator: Steve

User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16333
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption

Post by Batman »

Transporter pattern buffer. How else do you think I manage to fit all the stuff I routinely carry around into an utility belt that for most of my career didn't even have pockets? :P
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
TOSDOC
Padawan Learner
Posts: 419
Joined: 2010-09-30 02:52pm
Location: Rotating between Redshirt Hospital and the Stormtrooper School of Marksmanship.

Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption

Post by TOSDOC »

I believe every word you said.

What was the consensus for Stark losing power at the end of Avengers, then, that he used it up or that it simply wasn't designed to function in the vacuum of space? (I personally hold with the latter).
"In the long run, however, there can be no excuse for any individual not knowing what it is possible for him to know. Why shouldn't he?" --Elliot Grosvenor, Voyage of the Space Beagle
User avatar
Gandalf
SD.net White Wizard
Posts: 16290
Joined: 2002-09-16 11:13pm
Location: A video store in Australia

Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption

Post by Gandalf »

I just assumed he'd run out of power, using the last of it to push the missile into the portal. Though that's a bit odd, because earlier in the film they showed Thor seemingly being able to change the suit with his lightning.
"Oh no, oh yeah, tell me how can it be so fair
That we dying younger hiding from the police man over there
Just for breathing in the air they wanna leave me in the chair
Electric shocking body rocking beat streeting me to death"

- A.B. Original, Report to the Mist

"I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately."
- George Carlin
User avatar
InsaneTD
Jedi Knight
Posts: 667
Joined: 2010-07-13 12:10am
Location: South Australia

Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption

Post by InsaneTD »

That's also two different suits, it might not have taken power like the earlier suit and then they didn't have time for Thor to power up the suit. That begs the question though, how did the suit store all that extra energy? I can't see Tony putting in enough energy storage to hold that much extra power, and there aren't that many storage mediums that could be over charged like that either.
User avatar
Enigma
is a laughing fool.
Posts: 7777
Joined: 2003-04-30 10:24pm
Location: c nnyhjdyt yr 45

Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption

Post by Enigma »

InsaneTD wrote:That's also two different suits, it might not have taken power like the earlier suit and then they didn't have time for Thor to power up the suit. That begs the question though, how did the suit store all that extra energy? I can't see Tony putting in enough energy storage to hold that much extra power, and there aren't that many storage mediums that could be over charged like that either.
I don't think Tony knew it would hold the charge. It was a surprise to him. Maybe he just over builds his armors.
ASVS('97)/SDN('03)

"Whilst human alchemists refer to the combustion triangle, some of their orcish counterparts see it as more of a hexagon: heat, fuel, air, laughter, screaming, fun." Dawn of the Dragons

ASSCRAVATS!
Darmalus
Jedi Master
Posts: 1131
Joined: 2007-06-16 09:28am
Location: Mountain View, California

Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption

Post by Darmalus »

Maybe his suits have really big capacitors that the reactor is constantly charging, and Tony was surprised that it was successfully charged by an impromptu outside source?
User avatar
InsaneTD
Jedi Knight
Posts: 667
Joined: 2010-07-13 12:10am
Location: South Australia

Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption

Post by InsaneTD »

That could explain why it runs out of power. Though I've never heard of a capacitor that can take a four times overcharge.
sarevok2
Youngling
Posts: 57
Joined: 2013-07-29 07:33pm

Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption

Post by sarevok2 »

How did War Machine kept his suit running when Rhodes and Tony developed a rift in IM2 and Rhodes took the suit to the air force ? Would not the US government need Tonys help to keep the ARC reactor in the suit fuelled ?
User avatar
Elheru Aran
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13073
Joined: 2004-03-04 01:15am
Location: Georgia

Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption

Post by Elheru Aran »

sarevok2 wrote:How did War Machine kept his suit running when Rhodes and Tony developed a rift in IM2 and Rhodes took the suit to the air force ? Would not the US government need Tonys help to keep the ARC reactor in the suit fuelled ?
I believe Rhodes didn't do much with it other than just try to knock Tony around a bit and fly it to the AF base. That's not a whole lot of activity there, and it's quite possible Tony's managed to streamline creating arc reactors to the point that he can just stick a fully-loaded one into every suit he has, as you can see in IM3.

Which does raise the question of why the hell doesn't he decide to just open a factory for commercial production of arc reactors in that size to power everything on the planet, but that's a whole other story in and of its own along with 'why doesn't Reed Richards fix everything' or 'why doesn't Doctor Doom rule the planet yet'...
It's a strange world. Let's keep it that way.
User avatar
Terralthra
Requiescat in Pace
Posts: 4741
Joined: 2007-10-05 09:55pm
Location: San Francisco, California, United States

Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption

Post by Terralthra »

Elheru Aran wrote:
sarevok2 wrote:How did War Machine kept his suit running when Rhodes and Tony developed a rift in IM2 and Rhodes took the suit to the air force ? Would not the US government need Tonys help to keep the ARC reactor in the suit fuelled ?
I believe Rhodes didn't do much with it other than just try to knock Tony around a bit and fly it to the AF base.
And participate in the demonstration at the Stark Expo and the final battle, but Vanko knows how to build arc reactors too, so he can presumably refuel it. What the government does to refuel the suit after Vanko is dead, I couldn't tell you.
Elheru Aran wrote:Which does raise the question of why the hell doesn't he decide to just open a factory for commercial production of arc reactors in that size to power everything on the planet, but that's a whole other story in and of its own along with 'why doesn't Reed Richards fix everything' or 'why doesn't Doctor Doom rule the planet yet'...
Well, because he doesn't want that much power up for auction to the highest bidder. He's clear about that throughout the Iron Man movies: he built weapons that fell into "the wrong hands", thus he's keeping his new weapons (the Iron Man suit and its power source) in his own hands until and unless he can be sure they won't fall into the wrong ones.
User avatar
Elheru Aran
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13073
Joined: 2004-03-04 01:15am
Location: Georgia

Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption

Post by Elheru Aran »

Terralthra wrote:
Elheru Aran wrote:
sarevok2 wrote:How did War Machine kept his suit running when Rhodes and Tony developed a rift in IM2 and Rhodes took the suit to the air force ? Would not the US government need Tonys help to keep the ARC reactor in the suit fuelled ?
I believe Rhodes didn't do much with it other than just try to knock Tony around a bit and fly it to the AF base.
And participate in the demonstration at the Stark Expo and the final battle, but Vanko knows how to build arc reactors too, so he can presumably refuel it. What the government does to refuel the suit after Vanko is dead, I couldn't tell you.
My guess is that after IM2, whenever the War Machine suit needs gas, they call Tony or one of his guys and they show up with a fresh arc reactor for it to exchange for the old one.
Elheru Aran wrote:Which does raise the question of why the hell doesn't he decide to just open a factory for commercial production of arc reactors in that size to power everything on the planet, but that's a whole other story in and of its own along with 'why doesn't Reed Richards fix everything' or 'why doesn't Doctor Doom rule the planet yet'...
Well, because he doesn't want that much power up for auction to the highest bidder. He's clear about that throughout the Iron Man movies: he built weapons that fell into "the wrong hands", thus he's keeping his new weapons (the Iron Man suit and its power source) in his own hands until and unless he can be sure they won't fall into the wrong ones.
I had forgotten about that point.

It strikes me though that given he's the only one (supposedly) who understands the tech, he would be in a position to have a serious monopoly over it. Granted, if he made a Stark-Mobile or some such, the first buyers would probably be fronts for major corporations who would immediately start tearing them apart to try and figure them out... so there's that.

He doesn't seem shy about sharing with SHIELD though, didn't he supply repulsor techology for the next generation Helicarriers? So he has to have a production line somewhere that he's cranking out arc reactors. He definitely had a production line for Iron Man suits (ref IM3).
It's a strange world. Let's keep it that way.
User avatar
Gaidin
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2646
Joined: 2004-06-19 12:27am
Contact:

Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption

Post by Gaidin »

Elheru Aran wrote: He doesn't seem shy about sharing with SHIELD though, didn't he supply repulsor techology for the next generation Helicarriers? So he has to have a production line somewhere that he's cranking out arc reactors. He definitely had a production line for Iron Man suits (ref IM3).
A fairly large Arc Reactor was a publicity project at Stark's company. It's the small one that he very much wants to keep to himself. And a SHIELD agent was embedded into Stark's company for most of IM2. Why couldn't they just nab plans for an Arc Reactor and make it of the large size they needed to? Assuming they didn't just make a copy of the original sheet that was in Howard Stark's SHIELD box.
User avatar
InsaneTD
Jedi Knight
Posts: 667
Joined: 2010-07-13 12:10am
Location: South Australia

Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption

Post by InsaneTD »

The first big ARC reactor didn't actually work though, it used as much power as it provided, which was the reasons it was called a publicity stunt in the first movie. Tony did something that both miniaturized it, and upped it's efficiency. He then used that as the basis for bigger reactors.
User avatar
Gaidin
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2646
Joined: 2004-06-19 12:27am
Contact:

Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption

Post by Gaidin »

InsaneTD wrote:The first big ARC reactor didn't actually work though, it used as much power as it provided, which was the reasons it was called a publicity stunt in the first movie. Tony did something that both miniaturized it, and upped it's efficiency. He then used that as the basis for bigger reactors.
Tony might have had the Eureka moment, doesn't mean they can't do their own extended research once they raid his back yard of anything and everything even if it came from before the Eureka moment. Let's not limit the world's brilliance to Tony Stark and Mr. Fantastic now. Especially when the movie world itself demonstrate SHIELD doing their own extended research on many different projects.
User avatar
Havok
Miscreant
Posts: 13016
Joined: 2005-07-02 10:41pm
Location: Oakland CA
Contact:

Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption

Post by Havok »

Elheru Aran wrote:
sarevok2 wrote:How did War Machine kept his suit running when Rhodes and Tony developed a rift in IM2 and Rhodes took the suit to the air force ? Would not the US government need Tonys help to keep the ARC reactor in the suit fuelled ?
I believe Rhodes didn't do much with it other than just try to knock Tony around a bit and fly it to the AF base. That's not a whole lot of activity there, and it's quite possible Tony's managed to streamline creating arc reactors to the point that he can just stick a fully-loaded one into every suit he has, as you can see in IM3.
Uh... Rhodey used the suit to fight Iron Man then fly it to the Air Force base then fight alongside Iron Man against Vanko. That's not just something you can do running on a battery. It clearly had it's own reactor.
Image
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
"Mostly Harmless Nutcase"
User avatar
Ted C
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4486
Joined: 2002-07-07 11:00am
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:

Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption

Post by Ted C »

Gandalf wrote:
Ted C wrote:
Eternal_Freedom wrote:Isn't it supposed to run on palladium? I recall him saying he needed 1.6g for the first one he built, and he was changing over cartidges of palladium in IM2.
Palladium is a necessary component, but I don't think it's the fuel.
In IM2, he was apparently depleting the palladium cores from his reactor.
The palladium was degrading with use, but I still think it was more of a catalyst than a fuel.
"This is supposed to be a happy occasion... Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who."
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail

"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776

"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
User avatar
Ted C
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4486
Joined: 2002-07-07 11:00am
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:

Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption

Post by Ted C »

Havok wrote:It has it's own juice, which is why it ejects when it's own power is spent, otherwise it would just stay on his wrist.
The beam lasers on the Mark VI were "one shots" that ejected after use. The beams on the Mark VII are tied into the suit's main power, so they can be reused, and they don't eject.
"This is supposed to be a happy occasion... Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who."
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail

"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776

"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
User avatar
Ted C
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4486
Joined: 2002-07-07 11:00am
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:

Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption

Post by Ted C »

TOSDOC wrote:I believe every word you said.

What was the consensus for Stark losing power at the end of Avengers, then, that he used it up or that it simply wasn't designed to function in the vacuum of space? (I personally hold with the latter).
In his dialogue with JARVIS, it was pretty clear that the suit was running out of power.
"This is supposed to be a happy occasion... Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who."
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail

"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776

"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
User avatar
Ted C
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4486
Joined: 2002-07-07 11:00am
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:

Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption

Post by Ted C »

Gandalf wrote:I just assumed he'd run out of power, using the last of it to push the missile into the portal. Though that's a bit odd, because earlier in the film they showed Thor seemingly being able to change the suit with his lightning.
True, but that lightning strike also caused some noticeable damage. While that might be acceptable on a suit that's in good condition (early in Tony's fight with Thor), it might not be safe on one that's already sustained serious damage (prolonged battle with Chitauri).
"This is supposed to be a happy occasion... Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who."
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail

"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776

"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
Crazedwraith
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11871
Joined: 2003-04-10 03:45pm
Location: Cheshire, England

Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption

Post by Crazedwraith »

Geez man. You can combine your posts. Don't need to post four in a row.
Ted C wrote:
Gandalf wrote:
In IM2, he was apparently depleting the palladium cores from his reactor.
The palladium was degrading with use, but I still think it was more of a catalyst than a fuel.
It's weird. In IM1 it seemed like palladium was the stuff he used to create a ring for the arc reactor. That could have been a superconducting element or something but I always assumed it was fuel.

Then in IM2 the reactor had been redesign so it was just blocks of the stuff being used and that has a more fuel like connotation to me.
User avatar
TOSDOC
Padawan Learner
Posts: 419
Joined: 2010-09-30 02:52pm
Location: Rotating between Redshirt Hospital and the Stormtrooper School of Marksmanship.

Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption

Post by TOSDOC »

Ted C wrote:
TOSDOC wrote:I believe every word you said.

What was the consensus for Stark losing power at the end of Avengers, then, that he used it up or that it simply wasn't designed to function in the vacuum of space? (I personally hold with the latter).
In his dialogue with JARVIS, it was pretty clear that the suit was running out of power.
I watched the battle this morning, and it's not clear where it's pretty clear that was said. I followed where JARVIS said "We will run out of power before we cut through [that creature's] armor", but he doesn't mention suit power after that, just calling Pepper on the phone. Can you give me a time index?
"In the long run, however, there can be no excuse for any individual not knowing what it is possible for him to know. Why shouldn't he?" --Elliot Grosvenor, Voyage of the Space Beagle
Crazedwraith
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11871
Joined: 2003-04-10 03:45pm
Location: Cheshire, England

Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption

Post by Crazedwraith »

TOSDOC wrote:
Ted C wrote:
TOSDOC wrote:I believe every word you said.

What was the consensus for Stark losing power at the end of Avengers, then, that he used it up or that it simply wasn't designed to function in the vacuum of space? (I personally hold with the latter).
In his dialogue with JARVIS, it was pretty clear that the suit was running out of power.
I watched the battle this morning, and it's not clear where it's pretty clear that was said. I followed where JARVIS said "We will run out of power before we cut through [that creature's] armor", but he doesn't mention suit power after that, just calling Pepper on the phone. Can you give me a time index?
When He finds out there's a nuke incoming. He tells JARVIS something like 'put everything into the engines' to which JARVIS responds 'I just did' and he rockets off. And then later 'save everything we've got left for the turn' suggesting he was running low by that point.
User avatar
Elheru Aran
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13073
Joined: 2004-03-04 01:15am
Location: Georgia

Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption

Post by Elheru Aran »

Would there be any way to screen-cap the helmet-cam scenes to get some idea of any dials or gauges that may be in Tony's vision? Of course the problem with that is knowing what the dials actually indicate, they're generally shown from the back (our viewpoint) as they face Tony for obvious reasons...
It's a strange world. Let's keep it that way.
User avatar
TOSDOC
Padawan Learner
Posts: 419
Joined: 2010-09-30 02:52pm
Location: Rotating between Redshirt Hospital and the Stormtrooper School of Marksmanship.

Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption

Post by TOSDOC »

Crazedwraith wrote:When He finds out there's a nuke incoming. He tells JARVIS something like 'put everything into the engines' to which JARVIS responds 'I just did' and he rockets off. And then later 'save everything we've got left for the turn' suggesting he was running low by that point.
Ok, I caught the first line, but not the second. And the first only suggests to me he can't use the other systems such as weaponry, only propulsion. And steering. And sensors to track the nuke. And the exoskeleton to grab it and hold on. And comms to call Pepper.

So if he's out of fuel after clearing the portal, why does he wake up again? Doesn't he need the arcreactor to keep the shrapnel away from his heart?

And then he's standing when they confront Loki. Shouldn't the Hulk be carrying him over his shoulder? (That would have been awesome, by the way). Or did they replace the fuel on the way up to grab Loki? It seems to me he still had a little juice left in the suit at the end, it just stopped working in space. Or the reactor's got enough fuel to power the Mark VII enough to walk around, and it's got a separate fuel source onboard for flight, like when it caught up with him in his midair fall.
"In the long run, however, there can be no excuse for any individual not knowing what it is possible for him to know. Why shouldn't he?" --Elliot Grosvenor, Voyage of the Space Beagle
User avatar
Havok
Miscreant
Posts: 13016
Joined: 2005-07-02 10:41pm
Location: Oakland CA
Contact:

Re: Stark's Arc Reactor Fuel Consumption

Post by Havok »

There are two arc reactors. One in the suit, one in Tony's chest. I don't think Stark is the type of guy to make one not have enough power to power the suit.
Image
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
"Mostly Harmless Nutcase"
Post Reply