Because one is the basis onto which the alterations of Flashpoint are put upon, and the other is a Hard Reset ignoring everything that came before and starting again from scratch.Havok wrote:So why the fuck does one version of Wonder Woman trump another?
I think it's quite clear that your 'generalities' are assumptions based on inexperience. And like many people, choose to speak with authority about something that you know dick about.The difference is that I am speaking in generalities based on the most basic principals of what WW is. Amazon Princess sent from an island of women that don't allow men any standing to make the world a better place with her XYZ. (Totally not arrogant and superior at all )
1) I actually like Azzarello's run.And your quotes don't "prove" shit, because they are just one writers version of how he thinks WW would act which you yourself pointed out has already been wiped from canon/continuity by the newer current version which you don't like and apparently fall in line with my "yeah, she would do this under the right circumstances" so saying that they are "facts"or "evidence" is pretty fucking stupid.
2) You never say WHY she would do this other than assumptions made without evidence.
3) These "Right Circumstances" generally happen OFF SCREEN.
1) It's not 70 that I'm working with, by the time of the reboot, it's 30It's like me saying "Well Frank Miller wrote her like this SO THERE!" When it comes to a character with 70 fucking plus years of versions, takes, stories it is best to use the broadest strokes when saying, yeah, this is within character instead of pointing to one specific story and saying "NO OMG THIS IS HOW SHE IS AND HAS TO BE 'CAUSE THIS ONE GUY WROTE HER LIKE THIS!!!"
2) Those writers set up the initial strokes to begin with and (along with a few others of note) account more than half her main series run.
"Possibly never left the Island"? Assumption on your part.This version, given the setting, context and facts (attempted assassination, in the midst of a war, home island possibly destroyed, possibly having never left the island, alliance between Atlantis and Themescyra possibly to stave off humanity and whatever threats they pose, no Superman) is well within WW's character.
Attempted Assassination, lost homeland, in war with larger power -- what in any gods name would cause them to waste resources on a gendercide on a nation they entered? That's stupid! They have things other countries want and need allies against that larger power. Why bother with the gendercide when it just makes more enemies for them?
Hell, I'm wondering how Poseidon managed to get around half the fucking Olympian Pantheon's protections to allow his merpeople access to Themyscira in the first place. Especially when Themyscira was set up so the rest of the entire pantheon could still have worshipers for the less 'base' dieties without secondary sources of worship (Athena, Aphrodite and Ares).
This is not like the Doctor Who episode "Inferno", where the Doctor finds himself in a UK with a Totalitarian Regime, altering the histories of everyone he knew. BUT EVEN THEN, several of the characters have the traits core to their original appearances shine through, and the ones that are altered are done so by the totalitarian regime's presence. It alters the way the characters enter the world and thus changed the choices they made in life. The flashpoint alterations add to the initial base, they do not change that base. THAT is the problem.
You assume that DC's Amazons are Marvel's Amazons.