The Dark Knight Rises (Spoilers)

FAN: Discuss various fictional worlds that don't qualify for SF.

Moderator: Steve

Post Reply
JLTucker
BANNED
Posts: 3043
Joined: 2006-02-26 01:58am

Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Spoilers)

Post by JLTucker »

Alyeska wrote:I am going to call bullshit. You are going to have to prove Nolan put that in deliberately as an anti-occupy message.

Screenshots of Bane standing in front of Blackgate prison were being shown on the internet last year. Well before OWS became public.
The script was finished before OWS sprang up and principle photography ended in November 2011, when OWS became really popular. There's no evidence that this is an Anti-OWS film, which is hilarious because Bane finished what the Joker started: he created anarchy within Gotham, something OWS is not about.
User avatar
InnerBrat
CLIT Commander
Posts: 7469
Joined: 2002-11-26 11:02am
Location: In my own mind.
Contact:

Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Spoilers)

Post by InnerBrat »

Grumman wrote:
The Cooler King wrote:
The Joker wrote:Let's wind the clocks back a year. These cops and lawyers wouldn't dare cross any of you. I mean what happened? Did... did your balls drop off? Hmm?
So at LEAST a year has passed.
Don't you mean at most a year? Assuming we take Batman's alliance with Gordon and incarceration of Falcone as the tipping point, this tipping point happened at some point in between the "present day" and "a year ago".
Those are some pretty fast aging kids, then.
"I fight with love, and I laugh with rage, you gotta live light enough to see the humour and long enough to see some change" - Ani DiFranco, Pick Yer Nose

"Life 's not a song, life isn't bliss, life is just this: it's living." - Spike, Once More with Feeling
User avatar
JME2
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12258
Joined: 2003-02-02 04:04pm

Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Spoilers)

Post by JME2 »

Yeah, the aging kids annoyed me too, but it's a minor continuity goof in the big scheme of things. I ignore it whenever I re-watch TDK.
User avatar
RogueIce
_______
Posts: 13385
Joined: 2003-01-05 01:36am
Location: Tampa Bay, Florida, USA
Contact:

Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Spoilers)

Post by RogueIce »

Grumman wrote:
The Cooler King wrote:
The Joker wrote:Let's wind the clocks back a year. These cops and lawyers wouldn't dare cross any of you. I mean what happened? Did... did your balls drop off? Hmm?
So at LEAST a year has passed.
Don't you mean at most a year? Assuming we take Batman's alliance with Gordon and incarceration of Falcone as the tipping point, this tipping point happened at some point in between the "present day" and "a year ago".
I'm not entirely sure that's true.

It could be more than a year. Gotham is still plenty corrupt at the start of TDK: only "certain" cops would respond to that mob bank robbery, Dent railing at Gordon about some of the members of his MCU and Gordon's reply that he doesn't have a lot of options, etc. "A year ago" could simply be when Harvey Dent was elected...or at least had made enough headway in the DA's office to matter.

As for what the Joker was doing in all that time until he made his Big Entrance in TDK I have no idea. Maybe it just took him that long until he got enough of a handle on the mob? IIRC he didn't really become the major threat until he started taking them over. Still dangerous, but not "terrorize the city" level.
Image
"How can I wait unknowing?
This is the price of war,
We rise with noble intentions,
And we risk all that is pure..." - Angela & Jeff van Dyck, Forever (Rome: Total War)

"On and on, through the years,
The war continues on..." - Angela & Jeff van Dyck, We Are All One (Medieval 2: Total War)
"Courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the judgment that something else is more important than fear." - Ambrose Redmoon
"You either die a hero, or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain." - Harvey Dent, The Dark Knight
JLTucker
BANNED
Posts: 3043
Joined: 2006-02-26 01:58am

Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Spoilers)

Post by JLTucker »

RogueIce wrote:As for what the Joker was doing in all that time until he made his Big Entrance in TDK I have no idea. Maybe it just took him that long until he got enough of a handle on the mob? IIRC he didn't really become the major threat until he started taking them over. Still dangerous, but not "terrorize the city" level.
He may have been gathering support for his various ventures to terrorize Gotham.
User avatar
JME2
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12258
Joined: 2003-02-02 04:04pm

Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Spoilers)

Post by JME2 »

JLTucker wrote:
RogueIce wrote:As for what the Joker was doing in all that time until he made his Big Entrance in TDK I have no idea. Maybe it just took him that long until he got enough of a handle on the mob? IIRC he didn't really become the major threat until he started taking them over. Still dangerous, but not "terrorize the city" level.
He may have been gathering support for his various ventures to terrorize Gotham.
Yeah, Gordon and Batman's dialogue in the bank vault indicated that Joker had pulled other jobs/stunts in the past year. They were low-level enough to continue making the mob their main priority -- much to everyone's eventual regret.
JLTucker
BANNED
Posts: 3043
Joined: 2006-02-26 01:58am

Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Spoilers)

Post by JLTucker »

JME2 wrote:Yeah, Gordon and Batman's dialogue in the bank vault indicated that Joker had pulled other jobs/stunts in the past year. They were low-level enough to continue making the mob their main priority -- much to everyone's eventual regret.
I'm also sure he was outlining his plans as well: the robbery, how to get Batman to unmask himself, starting to wonder how he'd corrupt Gotham's White Knight, etc.
User avatar
Civil War Man
NERRRRRDS!!!
Posts: 3790
Joined: 2005-01-28 03:54am

Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Spoilers)

Post by Civil War Man »

JLTucker wrote:There's no evidence that this is an Anti-OWS film, which is hilarious because Bane finished what the Joker started: he created anarchy within Gotham, something OWS is not about.
It's not what OWS is about, but it pretty closely matches the strawman OWS myths constructed by conservative groups that had a vested interest in discrediting it. And while it may not have been anti-OWS specifically, it does show an inherent distrust of progressive and social justice groups, which were being attacked with a lot of the same strawmen before OWS showed up.

The writers may not have consciously thought "I'm going to write a Batman screenplay with a lot of anti-OWS imagery", but that's what they ended up doing. Whenever you write a narrative of any kind, your biases and preconceptions will color that narrative.

If you write a story about OWS, you aren't going to depict all of its supporters as criminals unless a) you specifically set out to do that, or b) you have a reflexive distrust of that type of political movement.
JLTucker
BANNED
Posts: 3043
Joined: 2006-02-26 01:58am

Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Spoilers)

Post by JLTucker »

Civil War Man wrote:
JLTucker wrote:There's no evidence that this is an Anti-OWS film, which is hilarious because Bane finished what the Joker started: he created anarchy within Gotham, something OWS is not about.
It's not what OWS is about, but it pretty closely matches the strawman OWS myths constructed by conservative groups that had a vested interest in discrediting it. And while it may not have been anti-OWS specifically, it does show an inherent distrust of progressive and social justice groups, which were being attacked with a lot of the same strawmen before OWS showed up.

The writers may not have consciously thought "I'm going to write a Batman screenplay with a lot of anti-OWS imagery", but that's what they ended up doing. Whenever you write a narrative of any kind, your biases and preconceptions will color that narrative.

If you write a story about OWS, you aren't going to depict all of its supporters as criminals unless a) you specifically set out to do that, or b) you have a reflexive distrust of that type of political movement.
You're joking, right? You really think what we saw was a progressive movement in action in response to Bane's rhetoric? It was anarchy.
User avatar
Civil War Man
NERRRRRDS!!!
Posts: 3790
Joined: 2005-01-28 03:54am

Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Spoilers)

Post by Civil War Man »

JLTucker wrote:You're joking, right? You really think what we saw was a progressive movement in action in response to Bane's rhetoric? It was anarchy.
You either didn't bother reading my post, or you really aren't getting it. What we saw was a common strawman of progressive movements used by those movements' opponents. The fact that real progressive movements are not like that is irrelevant.

If you saw a movie where every black character was depicted as lazy, shiftless, and criminal, would you claim the movie is not racist because real black people do not act like that?
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Spoilers)

Post by Alyeska »

Civil War Man wrote:
JLTucker wrote:There's no evidence that this is an Anti-OWS film, which is hilarious because Bane finished what the Joker started: he created anarchy within Gotham, something OWS is not about.
It's not what OWS is about, but it pretty closely matches the strawman OWS myths constructed by conservative groups that had a vested interest in discrediting it. And while it may not have been anti-OWS specifically, it does show an inherent distrust of progressive and social justice groups, which were being attacked with a lot of the same strawmen before OWS showed up.

The writers may not have consciously thought "I'm going to write a Batman screenplay with a lot of anti-OWS imagery", but that's what they ended up doing. Whenever you write a narrative of any kind, your biases and preconceptions will color that narrative.

If you write a story about OWS, you aren't going to depict all of its supporters as criminals unless a) you specifically set out to do that, or b) you have a reflexive distrust of that type of political movement.
One little problem with your argument. The movie was filmed before the OWS protest movements were created.

How can TDKS be criticizing a movement that didn't even exist when the movie was written and filmed?
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Civil War Man
NERRRRRDS!!!
Posts: 3790
Joined: 2005-01-28 03:54am

Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Spoilers)

Post by Civil War Man »

Alyeska wrote:One little problem with your argument. The movie was filmed before the OWS protest movements were created.

How can TDKS be criticizing a movement that didn't even exist when the movie was written and filmed?
Because, as I said in the post you just quoted, those same strawmen are used against all sorts of progressive and social justice movements. OWS did not spring fully formed from the Hudson River. There was a lot of grumbling about the rich making their money off the misery of everyone else for years before OWS became a thing. Do you think nobody complained about bankers giving themselves six or seven figure bonuses the same year the US government had to bail them out to keep them solvent until after Nolan finished filming? That anger was there for years. People were angry about that before Nolan even started on the screenplay.

It's called anti-OWS because the Occupy movement has become a convenient shorthand. It's generally become a symbol of all of the non-Tea-Party-affiliated discontent over the past few years. The movement itself didn't exist when filming was finished, but the ideas and the attitudes that resulted in Occupy were very real and existed well before filming started. It doesn't vilify the movement because at the time it hadn't started. But it does vilify the attitudes that resulted in Occupy. And that's why I call it anti-OWS.
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Spoilers)

Post by Alyeska »

Civil War Man wrote:
Alyeska wrote:One little problem with your argument. The movie was filmed before the OWS protest movements were created.

How can TDKS be criticizing a movement that didn't even exist when the movie was written and filmed?
Because, as I said in the post you just quoted, those same strawmen are used against all sorts of progressive and social justice movements. OWS did not spring fully formed from the Hudson River. There was a lot of grumbling about the rich making their money off the misery of everyone else for years before OWS became a thing. Do you think nobody complained about bankers giving themselves six or seven figure bonuses the same year the US government had to bail them out to keep them solvent until after Nolan finished filming? That anger was there for years. People were angry about that before Nolan even started on the screenplay.

It's called anti-OWS because the Occupy movement has become a convenient shorthand. It's generally become a symbol of all of the non-Tea-Party-affiliated discontent over the past few years. The movement itself didn't exist when filming was finished, but the ideas and the attitudes that resulted in Occupy were very real and existed well before filming started. It doesn't vilify the movement because at the time it hadn't started. But it does vilify the attitudes that resulted in Occupy. And that's why I call it anti-OWS.
You're an idiot.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
JLTucker
BANNED
Posts: 3043
Joined: 2006-02-26 01:58am

Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Spoilers)

Post by JLTucker »

Alyeska wrote:You're an idiot.
Why is he an idiot?
User avatar
Steve
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 9762
Joined: 2002-07-03 01:09pm
Location: Florida USA
Contact:

Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Spoilers)

Post by Steve »

Aly, I think calling him an idiot is going a bit far. He believes the writers and producers were inherently biased against social justice groups in the way they depicted Bane's takeover.

Now I don't agree with him or with Fima, but I can understand his logic. I just think it's a stretch to insist the movie was smearing OWS and similar movements when the case in point was that Gotham was taken over by an army of criminals. Not "poor people put in jail for minor crimes by an unfair justice system". Actual career criminals, an army of organized crime thugs and capos and such who had been denied parole under the Dent Act. Honestly I think in-movie it was pretty clear that Bane was making a mockery of such groups, stealing its rhetoric and instigating class warfare simply to torment the city until the reactor went kaboom.
”A Radical is a man with both feet planted firmly in the air.” – Franklin Delano Roosevelt

"No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism." - Sir Winston L. S. Churchill, Princips Britannia

American Conservatism is about the exercise of personal responsibility without state interference in the lives of the citizenry..... unless, of course, it involves using the bludgeon of state power to suppress things Conservatives do not like.

DONALD J. TRUMP IS A SEDITIOUS TRAITOR AND MUST BE IMPEACHED
User avatar
Civil War Man
NERRRRRDS!!!
Posts: 3790
Joined: 2005-01-28 03:54am

Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Spoilers)

Post by Civil War Man »

Steve wrote:I just think it's a stretch to insist the movie was smearing OWS and similar movements when the case in point was that Gotham was taken over by an army of criminals. Not "poor people put in jail for minor crimes by an unfair justice system".
Opponents of OWS and similar movements do not view members of these movements as poor people being unfairly treated by the system. If you watched coverage of the protests on, for instance, Fox News, protesters were often depicted as being dangerous criminals, violent subversives, terrorists, and Soviet-style communists (when they weren't being depicted as lazy entitled kids). The actions of Bane and his army match up very closely to images and narratives that were deliberately constructed in an attempt to demonize liberal social justice movements like OWS.
Pelranius
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3539
Joined: 2006-10-24 11:35am
Location: Around and about the Beltway

Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Spoilers)

Post by Pelranius »

So apparently the novelization states that the Joker, the sole remaining inmate at Arkham, disappeared after the chaos of Banes's five months (IIRC).

So how well is John Blake going to be able to cope if the Joker is actually back on the streets?
Turns out that a five way cross over between It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia, the Ali G Show, Fargo, Idiocracy and Veep is a lot less funny when you're actually living in it.
User avatar
Lonestar
Keeper of the Schwartz
Posts: 13321
Joined: 2003-02-13 03:21pm
Location: The Bay Area

Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Spoilers)

Post by Lonestar »

Wait, Arkham was a big empty prison that only held the Joker?

Or was the Joker the only one Bane didn't let out?
"The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles."
User avatar
Skylon
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1657
Joined: 2005-01-12 04:55pm
Location: New York
Contact:

Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Spoilers)

Post by Skylon »

According to IGN, from the novel:
“The worst of the worst were sent here, except for the Joker, who, rumour had it, was locked away as Arkham’s sole remaining inmate. Or perhaps he had escaped. Nobody was really even sure. Not even Selina”
http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/07/26/ ... ises-novel

"Here" is Blackgate. Nothing about him escaping when Bane took control.
-A.L.
"Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence...Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan 'press on' has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race." - Calvin Coolidge

"If you're falling off a cliff you may as well try to fly, you've got nothing to lose." - John Sheridan (Babylon 5)

"Sometimes you got to roll the hard six." - William Adama (Battlestar Galactica)
User avatar
wautd
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7570
Joined: 2004-02-11 10:11am
Location: Intensive care

Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Spoilers)

Post by wautd »

Saw it last weekend. I liked it overall, and found it a better movie than TDK altough Batman Begins will remain my favorite by far. Good villain although Spoiler
(why inciting a revolution when your plan is to blow everything up anyway?)
and nice twist at the end.

Things that I learned in this movie is that missiles fly really slow, and that when running straight towards hostile militia with machine guns, its best to be in a large, closely packed group so the bad guys aim for ground*.


*This was a real anticlimax. When Bane blows up half of NY, holding millions hostage and trapping most of the NYPD in the sewers, I was like "wow". Then you expect a full blown street war when the cops escape, but instead we get a lame skirmish that's even tame compared with some real life riots or football hooligans.
JLTucker
BANNED
Posts: 3043
Joined: 2006-02-26 01:58am

Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Spoilers)

Post by JLTucker »

wautd wrote:Saw it last weekend. I liked it overall, and found it a better movie than TDK altough Batman Begins will remain my favorite by far. Good villain although Spoiler
(why inciting a revolution when your plan is to blow everything up anyway?)
and nice twist at the end.
Because Bane believes true despair happens when hope is in the mix. He said this when he takes Bruce to the pit.

"I learned that there can be no true despair without hope. So as I terrorize Gotham, I will feed its people hope to poison their souls."
User avatar
wautd
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7570
Joined: 2004-02-11 10:11am
Location: Intensive care

Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Spoilers)

Post by wautd »

Was there any reason why Bane had a particular hatred for Batman/Bruce Wayne? I didn't really understand his motivation why Batman deserved such punishment.
JLTucker
BANNED
Posts: 3043
Joined: 2006-02-26 01:58am

Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Spoilers)

Post by JLTucker »

wautd wrote:Was there any reason why Bane had a particular hatred for Batman/Bruce Wayne? I didn't really understand his motivation why Batman deserved such punishment.
He betrayed the League of Shadows.

"But we are initiated, aren’t we, Bruce? The League of Shadows. And you betrayed us..."
Scrib
Jedi Knight
Posts: 966
Joined: 2011-11-19 11:59pm

Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Spoilers)

Post by Scrib »

And he killed Talia's dad.I would think she had the hate for him and Bane was carrying out her revenge plan while pushing forward his ideological position. And Bruce blew up their base. With god only knows how many years worth of trainees and members. I wouldn't be surprised if they never quite recovered.

Which begs the question of why the fuck these people were ready to die when their charge is an endless watch.
User avatar
JME2
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12258
Joined: 2003-02-02 04:04pm

Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Spoilers)

Post by JME2 »

Scrib wrote:Which begs the question of why the fuck these people were ready to die when their charge is an endless watch.
That was bothering me, too.

It's possible any traditionalist voices were killed when Bruce destroyed their HQ or were purged when Talia took over.

Keep in mind, Talia personified Ra's warnings from the first film, about learning to control your rage and desire for vengeance lest it consume you. She cared less for the League and more about avenging her father.

If that meant dying -- and using a nuke as the League's final statement -- then she may have been fine with that.
Post Reply