(This comment isn't specifically directed at Elfdart. It's a general comment, but in response to something multiple people have said in this thread. I only chose Elfdart for being the latest person to talk about Jaime, not because I specifically disagree with him. That said…)Elfdart wrote: They did that last season with The Pimp. It had been almost a full season since he'd done anything heinous, then you see him gloating over letting Joffrey use Ros for crossbow practice. Sometimes they remind the viewers that a character is a major asshole. Jaime is a scumbag, pure and simple. The fact that he may have saved Kings Landing from being burned is an outlier, as is his relative kindness to Brienne.
It really bothers me that people insist on seeing Jaime (or any other character) through these rigid good/bad lines, when it is explicitly not the point being made by the show. It is strange that people insist on thinking of him as being good or bad, and that his various action tip the scales one way or the other. Yes, Jaime is a person who has done bad things (attempted child murder and rape, for starters) and good things (stopped the Mad King, helped Brienne, etc.). He is deserving both of scorn (not just for his bad actions, but his general air of doughiness) and sympathy (complicated relationship with his father, etc.).
It is possible to sympathize with a bad person, and it is possible to dislike a good person. Good and bad are not necessarily mutually exclusive. It is a point that both Martin and the show-runners have been pretty obvious about emphasizing. It's idiotic to say things like, "Well, now Jaime is BAD AGAIN! Derp de derp." It's an incredibly shallow way to view the show that only does it disservice.