Plus, the animation/action is gorgeous to the point of downright haunting at times. Especially in 2.22. Spoiler
Spoiler
Moderator: Steve
Have you heard thatDavis 51 wrote: Totally not proven in any way, but my personal opinion:
Spoiler
Depends on your definition of bastardization. The characters are essentially the same, just after some severe therapy. They still have issues, but they react to the issues in a slightly more stable way. I say slight, because they are still kinda fucked up.evilsoup wrote:Yeah I might watch the rebuild films, maybe in like a year when I have some emotional distance from the original. Because right now, from all the descriptions in this thread, it just sounds like a complete bastardisation of the characters. Though I think I can see why it would appeal to people.
LOL WUTDPDarkPrimus wrote:Davis 51 wrote:Spoiler
It's also been debated countless times on Evawiki's forums and while i'm not exactly a fan of that place nor do I post there, the general consensus was that the evidence for such a link is faulty at best. It's overall very unlikely.I subscribe to the fan hypothesis that the rebuilds are a continuation of a Groundhog Day-style Loop which began with Eva eps 1-26, first looped with Death/Rebirth/EoE, and are now in Rebuild, but only time will tell if this is correct.[/spoiler]
That's about as stupid as movie names get. Also why is this in a spoiler tag?Spoiler
You are aware that the first film is "You Are (Not) Alone" and the second "You Can (Not) Advance", right?Davis 51 wrote:LOL WUTDPDarkPrimus wrote:Davis 51 wrote:Spoiler
Of course I am, I just hadn't heard the name of the third one, and was shocked at how it so easily lends credence to the hypothesis I posted earlier.DPDarkPrimus wrote:You are aware that the first film is "You Are (Not) Alone" and the second "You Can (Not) Advance", right?
I'm not a huge Eva fan, so I don't frequent there either. Not sure how any of the 'evidence' was faulty though, since most of it (aka Kaworu) seemed to gear towards hinting towards (or at least teasing towards) this very idea.It's also been debated countless times on Evawiki's forums and while i'm not exactly a fan of that place nor do I post there, the general consensus was that the evidence for such a link is faulty at best. It's overall very unlikely.
But the parenthetical means that it could be the opposite! Such a dick move!Davis 51 wrote:Of course I am, I just hadn't heard the name of the third one, and was shocked at how it so easily lends credence to the hypothesis I posted earlier.DPDarkPrimus wrote:You are aware that the first film is "You Are (Not) Alone" and the second "You Can (Not) Advance", right?