Battle Horn or Neutron Star?

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Battle Horn or Neutron Star?

Post by Ender »

There are 2 big "Bulk Cruisers" used by the Rebels.

The problem is, they both have the exact same stats

Length: 600 meters
Crew: 2,090
Troops: 200
Cargo: 5,000 tons
Supplies: 1 year
FTL Drive: Hyperdrive x 2, Backup Hyperdrive x12
N-Space Drive: Ion Engines
Power: Unknown
Hull: Unknown amount of Durasteel and Quadanium steel armor plating
Shielding: Particle and Energy
Weapons:
30 Quad Heavy Laser Cannons
Other:
2 Tractor Beams
Fighters:
36 Starfighters

So what is the proper class?
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
Smalleyjedi
Youngling
Posts: 77
Joined: 2002-07-10 09:51pm
Location: The GFFA

Post by Smalleyjedi »

Neutron star seems to be the more common name. I think Battle Horn may have been one of this class.
User avatar
RayCav of ASVS
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1546
Joined: 2002-07-20 02:34am
Location: Either ISD Nemesis, DSD Demeter or outside Coronet, Corellia, take your pick
Contact:

Post by RayCav of ASVS »

Neutron Star is actually an improved Battle Horn. It should be more resilient with greater endurance at the expense of firepower
::sig removed because it STILL offended Kelly. Hey, it's not my fault that I thing Wedge is a::

Kelly: SHUT UP ALREADY!
LordChaos
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 419
Joined: 2002-07-04 03:20am
Location: Minnesota

Post by LordChaos »

There's nothing that says there can't be too different classes of ships with similar (identical on paper) stats. Similar things have happened in RL.
There is no problem to dificult for a signifigantly large enough quantity of C-4 to handle.
Image
If you're leaving scorch marks, you aren't using a big enough gun.
Post Reply