A Lightsaber Varient I'd Like To See

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
Chris Parr
Padawan Learner
Posts: 221
Joined: 2007-11-18 08:54am

A Lightsaber Varient I'd Like To See

Post by Chris Parr »

Well, aside from the classic lightsaber, we've got the "lightstaff", "lightchucks", "lightwhip", "light tonfa" and even a lightsaber pistol built by young Ezra Bridger.

However, there is one lightsaber type weapon I have yet to see—one based upon this bad boy.

Image

That's right, I want to see a bayonet lightsaber. The rifle and stock part could be equipped with an integrity field to stop lightsaber strikes, so you could attack or defend from either end, bashing with the butt or slashing with the blade. Also, since it is a rifle, you could take down targets from a distance if you have to giving you a further advantage over traditional lightsabers. At least that's my opinion on the matter.
User avatar
Knife
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 15769
Joined: 2002-08-30 02:40pm
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain

Re: A Lightsaber Varient I'd Like To See

Post by Knife »

Not a lot of utility in that though. There was a reason people started using their E tool for melee combat instead of the bayonet.
They say, "the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots." I suppose it never occurred to them that they are the tyrants, not the patriots. Those weapons are not being used to fight some kind of tyranny; they are bringing them to an event where people are getting together to talk. -Mike Wong

But as far as board culture in general, I do think that young male overaggression is a contributing factor to the general atmosphere of hostility. It's not SOS and the Mess throwing hand grenades all over the forum- Red
Chris Parr
Padawan Learner
Posts: 221
Joined: 2007-11-18 08:54am

Re: A Lightsaber Varient I'd Like To See

Post by Chris Parr »

Yeah, you're probably right.

On the other hand, how practical are "lightchucks"?
User avatar
Alyrium Denryle
Minister of Sin
Posts: 22224
Joined: 2002-07-11 08:34pm
Location: The Deep Desert
Contact:

Re: A Lightsaber Varient I'd Like To See

Post by Alyrium Denryle »

Bayonets are a shitty shitty weapon if your enemy is actually willing to fight you on foot. They were a compromise between the gun and the pike. Bayonet charges were terrifying and most enemy infantry subjected to them broke before contact.

In situations where combat was mandatory (like a trench), the shovel was a better weapon. Let that sink in.

Against a proper lightsaber, all you have with a lightbayonet is a clunky unbalanced weapon with inferior reach. The rifle offers no advantage either, because anyone using a lightsaber can accomplish the same goals of a rifle using the force, or by reflecting the bolts back.

You dont get anything out of it but modern Milwank.

As for lightchucks, they are not. But the EU is gone now.
GALE Force Biological Agent/
BOTM/Great Dolphin Conspiracy/
Entomology and Evolutionary Biology Subdirector:SD.net Dept. of Biological Sciences


There is Grandeur in the View of Life; it fills me with a Deep Wonder, and Intense Cynicism.

Factio republicanum delenda est
Chris Parr
Padawan Learner
Posts: 221
Joined: 2007-11-18 08:54am

Re: A Lightsaber Varient I'd Like To See

Post by Chris Parr »

A shitty yet terrifying weapon. Got it.

Just one little question, though. How likely do you suppose it would be for a Force sensitive warrior to carry a shovel around with him? I mean, I can see one carrying a rifle on his back with a strap if he had to, but why carry a shovel? Especially when he can just use the Force to excavate trenches or foxholes when he needs to. That or use some kind of "mole droid".

Also, there is the martial art of Jukendo, or Japanese bayonet fighting, so a skilled Force sensitive could be a threat with one. Remember the United States Marine Corps Martial Arts motto: "One mind, any weapon". Even a shitty one if you have no other option. Also, the lightbayonet could be easily well balanced if made right, and its reach would actually be the entire weapon, since the integrity field would protect it from lightsaber strikes, so you could block or strike from either end as I said before.

BTW, I'm not trying to come across as a smartass, since I have to admit I have no military experience. If you do I'll gladly take any correction from you on this matter.
User avatar
Alyrium Denryle
Minister of Sin
Posts: 22224
Joined: 2002-07-11 08:34pm
Location: The Deep Desert
Contact:

Re: A Lightsaber Varient I'd Like To See

Post by Alyrium Denryle »

A shitty yet terrifying weapon. Got it.
It is terrifying for factors unrelated to the weapon, but more the nature of the training of soldiers (or lack thereof) and their willingness to kill or risk death.

There is a psychological barrier to killing. It is easier to breach with mechanical and physical distance, pure rage, cultural or class hatred, obscured faces, and distributed responsibility. You can get a few hundred guys together in a line to shoot at another line of dudes, but only a few percent are actually shooting to kill. Most ended up either dry-firing their weapons, loading their weapons eight times and not firing, or firing over their enemies heads. When the bayonets come out, the soldiers break.

Most of the actual casualties post gunpowder have been from artillery and other crew-served weapons.

In the ancient and medieval world, things were a bit different because there were massive amounts of ethnic, class, and religious hatred, and faces were often obscured (so you dont take as much pity on the dude begging for his life, or obviously terrified).

Hell, in WWII, only 2% of infantry in combat (as in, front line, not logistics dudes) actually shot to kill when in a position to do so.

Those numbers are WAY up now because we figured out how to train soldiers to defeat that psychological barrier. But that is the context when bayonets were actually in use.

What they were effective at as actual weapons was stopping cavalry charges because horses wont suicide into a block of pointy sticks.
Also, there is the martial art of Jukendo, or Japanese bayonet fighting, so a skilled Force sensitive could be a threat with one. Remember the United States Marine Corps Martial Arts motto: "One mind, any weapon". Even a shitty one if you have no other option. Also, the lightbayonet could be easily well balanced if made right, and its reach would actually be the entire weapon, since the integrity field would protect it from lightsaber strikes, so you could block or strike from either end as I said before.
You are still holding something shorter than a quarter staff in two hands. That means the reach is inferior to an actual sword. It is also heavy. After the hilt, lightsabers are either massless or effectively massless. A lightbayonet would not be, and as a result will be MUCH slower to use.

Lastly, why the fuck would I carry a shitty heavy weapon when I have the option of a good weapon that weighs at most a few hundred grams?
BTW, I'm not trying to come across as a smartass, since I have to admit I have no military experience. If you do I'll gladly take any correction from you on this matter.
Knife has. I have used actual melee weapons.
GALE Force Biological Agent/
BOTM/Great Dolphin Conspiracy/
Entomology and Evolutionary Biology Subdirector:SD.net Dept. of Biological Sciences


There is Grandeur in the View of Life; it fills me with a Deep Wonder, and Intense Cynicism.

Factio republicanum delenda est
Chris Parr
Padawan Learner
Posts: 221
Joined: 2007-11-18 08:54am

Re: A Lightsaber Varient I'd Like To See

Post by Chris Parr »

In that case I bow to your superior experience.
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12211
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Re: A Lightsaber Varient I'd Like To See

Post by Lord Revan »

Chris Parr wrote:A shitty yet terrifying weapon. Got it.

Just one little question, though. How likely do you suppose it would be for a Force sensitive warrior to carry a shovel around with him? I mean, I can see one carrying a rifle on his back with a strap if he had to, but why carry a shovel? Especially when he can just use the Force to excavate trenches or foxholes when he needs to. That or use some kind of "mole droid".

Also, there is the martial art of Jukendo, or Japanese bayonet fighting, so a skilled Force sensitive could be a threat with one. Remember the United States Marine Corps Martial Arts motto: "One mind, any weapon". Even a shitty one if you have no other option. Also, the lightbayonet could be easily well balanced if made right, and its reach would actually be the entire weapon, since the integrity field would protect it from lightsaber strikes, so you could block or strike from either end as I said before.

BTW, I'm not trying to come across as a smartass, since I have to admit I have no military experience. If you do I'll gladly take any correction from you on this matter.
Well you're coming of as a smartass. Alyrium Denryle explain why it's nothing but Milwank. As for that Japanese term I would assume it's just the JSDF/pre-1945 imperial military term for Bayonet Drill or what ever is the US term for it and nothing special really, it shouldn't be odd that japanese military uses japanese terms for their training regimens

the thing is the Bayonet will always be unbalanced as the rilfe (which would account most of the mass anyway) will be balanced as first and foremost as rifle as that is its primary purpose.

As for carrying a shovel I can't belive I'll have to explain this shovel is simple (both to use and repair), practical and multiple uses. For using the Force it's like asking why modern soldiers don't just use their hands and a "mole droid" would add the complexity of repairing the thing and supplying the spare parts.

Also in the Legendaries (I dunno if it is still in current canon) the impracticality of the Lightsabre was part of the reason it was used, different justifications for Jedi and Sith but basic princible remained, carrying a blaster rifle would defeat that purpose. You got to remember that neither Jedi nor Sith are soldiers as their primary purpose. Jedi were high end police/diplomatic force, while the Sith seemed to be the "nobility" of the Sith empire with Lightsabre as much a sign of status for both as it was a weapon.
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
Chris Parr
Padawan Learner
Posts: 221
Joined: 2007-11-18 08:54am

Re: A Lightsaber Varient I'd Like To See

Post by Chris Parr »

Well, I've already bowed to his superior wisdom and experience on this subject. Don't know what else I can do here.
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12211
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Re: A Lightsaber Varient I'd Like To See

Post by Lord Revan »

Nothing really but you posted your consession while I was writing my post, consider it a clarification rather then an additional argument.
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
Chris Parr
Padawan Learner
Posts: 221
Joined: 2007-11-18 08:54am

Re: A Lightsaber Varient I'd Like To See

Post by Chris Parr »

All right.
User avatar
Zwinmar
Jedi Master
Posts: 1085
Joined: 2005-03-24 11:55am
Location: nunyadamnbusiness

Re: A Lightsaber Varient I'd Like To See

Post by Zwinmar »

A shovel is really just a modified Axe when used in melee.

I have had to do bayonet drills, they suck donkey balls and the bayonet itself is a shit knife, so it stayed in the buttpack. That said, I could easily see some dickhead NCO or Officer ordering fix (lightsaber)bayonets if they actually had them. However, the impression I have always had is that Lightsabers are actually extremely difficult to produce compared to a vibroblade, and as such not economical.
Chris Parr
Padawan Learner
Posts: 221
Joined: 2007-11-18 08:54am

Re: A Lightsaber Varient I'd Like To See

Post by Chris Parr »

Yeah, I can see your point because while I'm busy trying to attach my blade to my rifle you've already moved in with your Ka-Bar or whatever and started stabbing. At least that's what I think would happen, but what do I know?
User avatar
PREDATOR490
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1790
Joined: 2006-03-13 08:04am
Location: Scotland

Re: A Lightsaber Varient I'd Like To See

Post by PREDATOR490 »

A lightsaber that combined the functions of... Andromeda Force Lance's would be a nasty weapon in the hands of a force user or a mundane trooper. Star Wars should have the capability to produce such a weapon, though not with the insane gimmicks Andromeda had. A lightsaber with a blaster function should be feasible.
bilateralrope
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5937
Joined: 2005-06-25 06:50pm
Location: New Zealand

Re: A Lightsaber Varient I'd Like To See

Post by bilateralrope »

A blaster is a questionable addition to a lightsaber. A lightsaber is a defensive weapon, with limited capability to harm someone at a distance unless they start shooting at the wielder. Add on a blaster and the combination is now an offensive weapon. Which affects how others will perceive the person carrying it.

Then there is the problem of engaging in a lightsaber duel. Adding on a blaster will probably mess with the lightsabers balance, while being a bad idea in a lightsaber duel because the opponent will be able to deflect the blaster bolts back . The stun device on Ezra's lightsaber works because stun blasts can't be deflected, though I question how useful it would be among more skilled combatants.

How often have situations come up where a blaster on a lightsaber carried by a force user would have been useful ?
User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 21559
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

Re: A Lightsaber Varient I'd Like To See

Post by The Romulan Republic »

Kanan used Ezra's saber gun quite effectively against the Inquisitor in the season one finale of Rebels.
"I know its easy to be defeatist here because nothing has seemingly reigned Trump in so far. But I will say this: every asshole succeeds until finally, they don't. Again, 18 months before he resigned, Nixon had a sky-high approval rating of 67%. Harvey Weinstein was winning Oscars until one day, he definitely wasn't."-John Oliver

"The greatest enemy of a good plan is the dream of a perfect plan."-General Von Clauswitz, describing my opinion of Bernie or Busters and third partiers in a nutshell.

I SUPPORT A NATIONAL GENERAL STRIKE TO REMOVE TRUMP FROM OFFICE.
User avatar
hunter5
Padawan Learner
Posts: 377
Joined: 2010-01-25 09:34pm

Re: A Lightsaber Varient I'd Like To See

Post by hunter5 »

Didn't one of the Gundam shows do a beam bayonet and have it be completely useless and only used if the pilot didn't have time draw the beam saber?
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12211
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Re: A Lightsaber Varient I'd Like To See

Post by Lord Revan »

I've only seen a handful of Gundam series so I can't say for sure but it seems logical, bayonets were always a compromise between having your ranged forces have a melee back up, while not forcing them to carry too much useless crap. Thus Bayonets aren't really that good as melee weapons, at best they're a combat knife that can be attached to your rifle, at worst they're an overly long spike that only works as poorly balanced spear when attached to the rifle.
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
Shroom Man 777
FUCKING DICK-STABBER!
Posts: 21222
Joined: 2003-05-11 08:39am
Location: Bleeding breasts and stabbing dicks since 2003
Contact:

Re: A Lightsaber Varient I'd Like To See

Post by Shroom Man 777 »

It depends on what the other guy has. A guy with a pocket knife would probably get shanked by a guy with a bayonet.
Image "DO YOU WORSHIP HOMOSEXUALS?" - Curtis Saxton (source)
shroom is a lovely boy and i wont hear a bad word against him - LUSY-CHAN!
Shit! Man, I didn't think of that! It took Shroom to properly interpret the screams of dying people :D - PeZook
Shroom, I read out the stuff you write about us. You are an endless supply of morale down here. :p - an OWS street medic
Pink Sugar Heart Attack!
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12211
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Re: A Lightsaber Varient I'd Like To See

Post by Lord Revan »

Obviously but typically if someone would attack anyone in melee during combat they wouldn't use a pocket knife.
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
Zeropoint
Jedi Knight
Posts: 581
Joined: 2013-09-14 01:49am

Re: A Lightsaber Varient I'd Like To See

Post by Zeropoint »

So . . . rifle with attached bayonet used as a poor spear vs. rifle flipped around to serve as a poor two-handed club?
I'm a cis-het white male, and I oppose racism, sexism, homophobia, and transphobia. I support treating all humans equally.

When fascism came to America, it was wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.

That which will not bend must break and that which can be destroyed by truth should never be spared its demise.
User avatar
Zwinmar
Jedi Master
Posts: 1085
Joined: 2005-03-24 11:55am
Location: nunyadamnbusiness

Re: A Lightsaber Varient I'd Like To See

Post by Zwinmar »

In Bayonet drills both sides of the weapon are used, point and butt, though admittedly not like you are imagining.

Here you go, an old training film
Post Reply