Destructionator XIII wrote:
Jim Raynor wrote:
Yes, cherry pick one small (but completely factual) criticism out of a hundred pages and claim that I "missed the point."
miss the fucking point, you god damned retard. The movie was so god damned boring and didn't even introduce us to the protoghonast until after we already turned it the fuck off.
My, my, somebody's mad. What, you can't handle any criticism of your false idol?
If anything is the "religion" here it's the fanboy following of RLM.
No, you god damned retard, Jedism is actually a fucking religion.
Stay on topic. VF5SS claimed that Stoklasa was just parodying the "blind acceptance of the prequels by fanboys who have turned Star Wars into a literal religion" (which is an unsupported excuse that undercuts his validity as a logical review anyway). As if the prequels being defended too much
is some kind of problem. I responded by pointing out the near-religious treatment that RLM's fanboys treat his video. It was a little back-and-forth that had nothing to do with any of the actual points being discussed in this thread.
And here you come charging in, pretending to be all big and bad, calling me a "god damned retard"...because there's some nerds out there who write in "Jedi" as their religion on some census forms. Or whatever. Not like any of those people have any presence or influence on boards like this, where topics like RLM's hour long review actually come up.
Worshipping the most perfect internet videos known to mang is not.
I hope you're saracastic because if you really think that then it's really sad.
Who the hell is this Mike Stoklasa asshole? The reviews were by MISTER PLINKETT, you god damned retard.
Is this a total troll post, or are you really this weird? I'm not going to name a fictional character when I'm talking about a real person.
Heartfelt analysis like actually stating that Qui-Gon didn't have evidence that the Trade Fed was invading Naboo, after seeing it happen.
That's not even what he said, you lying, god damned retard. Stop the fucking dishonesty now you lying god damned retard.
That is what he said. Are you posting drunk, or are you just gripped by indignant rage over how I dared point out that the RLM review isn't the end-all, be-all of SW discussion? Because "god damned retard" got old after the first two times you used it.
He said they weren't going to attack the GUNDAMNS not that they weren't going to INVADE NABOO. Gin just fucking made shit up because the shitty so-called PLOT demaned a shitty progression.
No, Qui-Gon said that he wanted to stop the Trade Fed from attacking the Naboo. Stoklasa literally says "Qui-Gon is still talking about warning the Naboo that they're about to be attacked. When he really doesn't know that they are actually going to attack them"
Which is the height of denial and stupidity.
It's Obi-Wan who says that the Trade Fed would go after the Gungans after taking out the Naboo. Ooh, so what. That's basically the standard non-isolationist reasoning that's used to encourage numerous international interventions in real life. And oh yeah, Obi-Wan is on a mission
to help the Naboo. Not a minute later the Jedi use a mind trick to get Gungan assistance, after their pleas fail. Oh no, characters with an objective will say things to help them accomplish that objective. "Shitty progression."
Or that Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan should've Rambo'd their way through thousands of battledroids, after running from a mere two droids a minute earlier. Or getting extremely nitpicky about the visuals, claiming that the Royal ship was never hit by lasers while running the blockade, even as he shows clips with the ship being struck multiple times.
miss the fucking point, you god damned retard. The movie never put the characters in any believable trouble - they'd just superpower their way out of anything (LIKE THEY JUST DID WITH THE ONES THEY RAN AWAY FROM FUCKING HELL ASSHOLE DID YOU EVEN WATCH THE RETARDED MOVIE CHRIST JESUS). The shitty retard ass so-called "plot" drove things, not the so-called "Characters".
Yeah, a seconds-long burst of speed (that wore quickly wore off as we see the Jedi running at normal speeds on security cameras right after) means that they can survive any fight, no matter the number or positioning of the enemy troops. Why would they run at all if they didn't fear death? Don't apply your ridiculous black-and-white simpleton "logic" and then call someone else a "god damned retard" for the fifth or sixth time in the same post.
Stoklasa was not making some vague "point" about how the movie didn't create the level of tension or emotion behind the threat. I dealt with fanboys just like you in all those previous threads. You all use the same tired procedure: avoid dealing with anything that was actually said in the review. Either by trying to give everything a pass as "stupid comedy," or by trying to obscure everything, boiling it all down to some made-up "main point" which is unassailable because you've made it all seem so vague. Then trying to have your cake and eat it too by still
insisting that the 70 minute long marathon of specific points against the movie is still intelligent and thoughtful analysis.
No, Stoklasa was quite specific in this part of the review. Attempting to pick apart the Jedi's tactics, while suggesting several of his own alternatives that were in fact far dumber.
"They're not triangular, but they are more or less blade-shaped"
- Thrawn McEwok on the shape of Bakura
"Lovely. It's known as impugning character regarding statement of professional qualifications' in the legal world"
- Karen Traviss, crying libel because I said that no soldier she interviewed would claim that he can take on billion-to-one odds
"I've already laid out rules for this thread that we're not going to make these evidential demands"
- Dark Moose on supporting your claims