"Rate my Rig" thread

GEC: Discuss gaming, computers and electronics and venture into the bizarre world of STGODs.

Moderator: Thanas

User avatar
TheFeniX
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3817
Joined: 2003-06-26 04:24pm
Location: Texas

Re: "Rate my Rig" thread

Postby TheFeniX » 2014-12-22 10:51am

Dillon wrote:For storage, I'll be transplanting a 240GB Intel SSD and a 3TB HDD from my current rig. Additionally, I'll be ordering a second 3TB HDD with the rig. Will the PSU be sufficient to power the listed components, as well as the aforementioned 2 HDDs and 1 SSD, along with a liquid cooling system and a blu-ray burner?
I can't think of a single GPU setup that would require more than 600Ws unless you were piling on HDDs or something to that effect. When in doubt, there are multiple Wattage calculators on the Internet.

I want to be able to play Total War: Rome 2 (and hopefully, the upcoming Total War: Attila) at max settings, while maintaining 30+FPS. I do not plan to game above 1080p on this rig, which is why I have chosen the GTX 970 over the R9 290 and the GTX 980. The seemingly absurd amount of HDD storage is for other, unrelated purposes.
On a related note, I also have a 970 (MSI) that is currently running FFXIV at 4K and maintaining 60FPS through disabling a few things like Ambient Occulsion, rending of hidden objects, and some of the shadows. Game still looks and runs great even if I now have to deal with some pop-in around the draw distance (which is pretty low for FFXIV anyways). I did, however, have to overclock the core by ~200Mhz, but I have had no issues with heat or performance.

HeavensThunderHammer
Redshirt
Posts: 36
Joined: 2009-12-04 06:18pm

Re: "Rate my Rig" thread

Postby HeavensThunderHammer » 2015-03-24 07:47pm

If you want to compare to steam users, here's a good link:

http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey

I was surprised that my 6 year old 3.0 dual core really isn't too shabby compared to what other people are using. Same goes for using a radeon 7750 graphics card.

User avatar
The Infidel
Padawan Learner
Posts: 446
Joined: 2009-05-07 01:32pm
Location: Norway

Re: "Rate my Rig" thread

Postby The Infidel » 2015-05-16 11:39am

Ohhh sweet hardware.

I had an old Core2Duo E8500 with 8 gigs of DDR2 memory and a GTX 260, that I managed to swap for a AMD 5970 last autuum. I badly needed an upgrade, but had other things to spend my money on. Memory was a bit corrupt, but I could still use it. Then, my SSD broke down and took a LOT of things I didn't have any backup of with it. That's a real shame, as I had decided to wait for Skylake and upgrade then.

Then I found someone selling slightly used MB/RAM/CPU/w/cooler and a nice SSD for a nice price. When I had just assembled my rig, a friend said I had inspired him to buy a new graphics card used, so I got his old for a very nice price, and behold: My new rig (with some older elements):

Fractal Design XL
Cooler Master V850 PSU
Intel i7 4790K w/Thermaltake Archon.
Gigabyte Z97X-UD5H-BK (Black Edition)
32Gb DDR3 RAM (1866Mhz Kingston HyperX)
Gigabyte nVidia GTX 680
2x1000Gb og 1x3000Gb HDD
Samsung 840 EVO (system)

Monitors: 2x Samsung 27", one HD and one 2560x1440.

I have 2x140mm Fractal Design + 1x120mm Noctua fans to draw air in from the front,
1x180mm Fractal Design + 1x120mm unknown (maybe Pabst) sucking hot air out from the back.
CPU fan is TR TY-140. There are 3 fans on the graphics card, but not sure of the size. PSU has its own intake and exit at the bottom of the case.

I have a bricked OCZ Vector that I've given up hope of getting my data from, so I will try to get a new one under warranty.

I bought a 4TB external drive for backup and have also started to have a backup at Jotta cloud. I don't want to lose any more data.

It was fun to try 3dmark01. Almost 100 000 score. :)

One question: What is best: To blow air trough the CPU cooler, or let it suck the air trough, as it does now? The 120mm fan at the rear of my case is now just a few centimeters away from the CPU fan. I'm not sure if my memory modules will hinder me from trying to have the fan in front of the cooler, but I might try it. At idle, my CPU reports lower temperature than the mobo, but when I tried y-cruncher calculating PI at all cores, CPU went up to 75c. I guess it is within limits, but I just don't like it.
It is very difficult to believe in a god when some people are never struck by lightning.

"The world language is English as spoken by foreigners." -Kristen Nygaard

User avatar
TheFeniX
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3817
Joined: 2003-06-26 04:24pm
Location: Texas

Re: "Rate my Rig" thread

Postby TheFeniX » 2015-08-10 12:15pm

I came to the realization that with the baby on the way, it's either get my computer into the condition I want it in for the next 5 years or get pissed as it craters out. The i7 I've got (4790) is 4.0Ghz on the clock. That combined with 16GBs of RAM should be more than enough hardware for the near future. The problem was a single GTX970 really can't handle 4K, nor can any single card solution. Maybe a Titan, but a single Titan is more than 2 970s. My original Mainboard also will not support multiple PCE-16x slots. So, I dug around newegg, found some good parts. Then decided to check Fry's since I needed a new monitor and some other stuff for the office. I found everything I wanted/needed at Frys and to be honest, the markup wasn't bad at all (the MSI 970 was $10 more at Fry's than on Newegg). Other parts were about the same. They have become very price competitive on PC parts. Don't know about anything else.

My new build is as follows:
ASUS Z-97 Deluxe
Intel i7 4790K
16GBs RAM
2 MSI GTX970
1 120GB SSD for the OS
1 240GB SSD for games I want to run fast
1 1TB HDD for games I don't care about (and porn).

The install went incredibly well. No bad parts, no failures to boot (except me thinking A2 was an error code when it turns out my test monitor was set to HDMI rather than DVI, so I got no video). Windows 8 just picked up the new Mainboard and I was setting up SLI in no time. But... I had to build the damn thing first. I don't remember the model case I bought, I do know it's fucking huge though and has easy support for SSD (2.5") trays. You can click on the pictures for a bigger version.
Image
First thing was pulling the back case fan off to make room for my liquid-cooler. They had a good price, like $50, and the recommended fan cooler was about the same. So I went with water.
Image
I maybe should have put the board in first, but that water block is heavy and I really didn't want to flailing around waiting to smack the shit out of my new board.
Image
Image
i7 came out. Whoever did the grease job was amateur hour. From what I could read, the old pea sized dot still works, but you can get a bit better coverage by using a bit more. So, I had about double pea sized and everything went on ok.
Image
Finding the right angle to install the block at was annoying. I remember when even high-end boards were just yellow/green circuit boards.
Image
Image
Old card and RAM went in with little issue. New card, same thing. Was going to put it down near the PSU (a new 1000W), but I decided against it (EDIT: Pretty sure that's the other 16x/8x slot. Swear I read the manual, whatever, check when I get home). Still don't if I should have mounted the PSU the way I did, but the fan's an intake. The case has a vent on the bottom, but these new bottom mounted PSU case weird me out. I might actually need to get another 1-2 fans for more inward airflow, since the CPU fans blow out. But I wanted to get this thing up and running first, worry about airflow later after I've checked temps under load.

FFXIV: Went from (at max everything 4K) 25FPS to 85FPS. Something about transparent lighting in that game craters my FPS. I don't know why, but it's the only thing disabled. I need to benchmark a few other games, but Jovial was on so we decided to rob banks in Payday2. I'm in about $2200 for the build now, that includes the old board, case, and PSU I don't know what to do with. Not cheap, but I think since I've gone back to PC this should keep me going for more than a few years. If push came to shove, I could even drop down to 2K. I'm considering benchmarking a few games at 1080p and 2K. I know my rig out of the box would do 90FPS at 2K. Or around there.

Oh well, it was fun and painless (except on the wallet), which is rare for a PC build. Guess hardware's come a long way since I poked at it with a magnetized screwdriver.

User avatar
The Infidel
Padawan Learner
Posts: 446
Joined: 2009-05-07 01:32pm
Location: Norway

Re: "Rate my Rig" thread

Postby The Infidel » 2015-08-22 04:14pm

Sweet rig, Fenix. :)
A little protip: If you have SATA-ports from both Intel and Marvell on your mobo, try to not use those by Marvell. I had an SSD on Marvell controller and it would not get past about 350Mb/s using Atto SSD Benchmark. Shifted to Intel and it went up to past 500Mb/s.

Well, I found out if push or pull is best for the CPU-fan.

I had this setup (pull):
back fan < cpu-fan < cooler < intake fan.

My new setup (push):
back fan < cooler < cpu-fan < intake fan

I stressed the cpu using y-cruncher to calculate PI on all cores.
It used to be between 75-81 celsius. Now, it maxed out on 64 degrees and with normal idling, cpu is about 22 degrees and cpu fan is at lazily 600 rpm (max is 1200).
It is very difficult to believe in a god when some people are never struck by lightning.

"The world language is English as spoken by foreigners." -Kristen Nygaard

User avatar
TheFeniX
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3817
Joined: 2003-06-26 04:24pm
Location: Texas

Re: "Rate my Rig" thread

Postby TheFeniX » 2015-08-24 12:06pm

The Infidel wrote:Sweet rig, Fenix. :)
Thanks.
A little protip: If you have SATA-ports from both Intel and Marvell on your mobo, try to not use those by Marvell. I had an SSD on Marvell controller and it would not get past about 350Mb/s using Atto SSD Benchmark. Shifted to Intel and it went up to past 500Mb/s.
From what I've read, this board only has Intel SATA and ASMedia, which is some technology that's supposed to break the 6GB/s cap (and doesn't actually seem to). I've got my drives in the Intel SATA setup, but there is support for SATA Express. I need to do some more research and fiddling. However, in every game I play where multiple people load into a single area (dungeons in FFXIV and Payday 2 mission, for just two examples), I beat everyone in by multiple seconds. Even faster loads on some of the new (and huge) maps in Payday, such as the casino, which precaches a lot in the planning phase. My crew has to wait while I'm already buying assets. It's why I always host, I hate waiting on their slow load times. Based on this, I've assumed I'm about capped out on whatever speed I could possibly get. Wouldn't hurt to dig more though.

I really should just benchmark the damn thing.

Well, I found out if push or pull is best for the CPU-fan.
Right now, I've got too much going out, but my airflow is good. There's two extra spots for fans on the case. So, I'm thinking about just popping to intakes on there and calling it a day.

User avatar
Zaune
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5462
Joined: 2010-06-21 11:05am
Location: In Transit
Contact:

Re: "Rate my Rig" thread

Postby Zaune » 2015-11-11 10:43am

I now have most of a somewhat-acceptable gaming rig assembled. Picked up a used Acer tower with a Core i5 650 and 4GB of DDR3 in it, already got a Geforce 480GTX knocking around, and a 600W power supply and another 4GB of RAM are on order. I'm not getting photorealistic nosehair rendering at 1080p out of this thing, but the most graphically intensive game I'm likely to be playing regularly is Kerbal Space Program so it'll do.

Is it worth dropping another fifty pounds on an SSD for this setup?
There are hardly any excesses of the most crazed psychopath that cannot easily be duplicated by a normal kindly family man who just comes in to work every day and has a job to do.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods)


Replace "ginger" with "n*gger," and suddenly it become a lot less funny, doesn't it?
-- fgalkin


Like my writing? Tip me on Patreon

User avatar
TheFeniX
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3817
Joined: 2003-06-26 04:24pm
Location: Texas

Re: "Rate my Rig" thread

Postby TheFeniX » 2015-11-11 12:37pm

Zaune wrote:I now have most of a somewhat-acceptable gaming rig assembled. Picked up a used Acer tower with a Core i5 650 and 4GB of DDR3 in it, already got a Geforce 480GTX knocking around, and a 600W power supply and another 4GB of RAM are on order. I'm not getting photorealistic nosehair rendering at 1080p out of this thing, but the most graphically intensive game I'm likely to be playing regularly is Kerbal Space Program so it'll do.
Your CPU is a bit older, but it has the clock-speed and the 480 is still a damn good card. I see no reason why that rig couldn't last you more than a few years if, like you said, you don't need ultra graphics settings. That said, it is an Acer. If you've got a semi-modern Quad-Core and 8GBs of RAM, your PC just isn't likely to reach end-of-life. They can't bloat OSs and programs up anymore and newer versions of Windows are faster on equivalent hardware. And Video cards are replaceable.

Is it worth dropping another fifty pounds on an SSD for this setup?
I say yes, depending on the SSD. But even the cheap POS ones are still much faster than a HDD. Reliability is their issue. Just from an OS stand-point, everything runs that much faster. Windows performance never seems to suffer for me even with 100% utilization on the SSD. Contrast to a 7200spin where the entire OS just crawls until the OS finally settles down. If you can install your games to an SSD, even better. Certain games load almost instantly, whereas I don't even want to know what Fallout 4 load times would be on an HDD when they are already in the 5-10 second range on an SSD.

User avatar
Zaune
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5462
Joined: 2010-06-21 11:05am
Location: In Transit
Contact:

Re: "Rate my Rig" thread

Postby Zaune » 2015-11-11 12:54pm

I say yes, depending on the SSD. But even the cheap POS ones are still much faster than a HDD. Reliability is their issue. Just from an OS stand-point, everything runs that much faster. Windows performance never seems to suffer for me even with 100% utilization on the SSD. Contrast to a 7200spin where the entire OS just crawls until the OS finally settles down. If you can install your games to an SSD, even better. Certain games load almost instantly, whereas I don't even want to know what Fallout 4 load times would be on an HDD when they are already in the 5-10 second range on an SSD.

I'm not really concerned with Windows performance at this juncture, but that's good to know.
There are hardly any excesses of the most crazed psychopath that cannot easily be duplicated by a normal kindly family man who just comes in to work every day and has a job to do.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods)


Replace "ginger" with "n*gger," and suddenly it become a lot less funny, doesn't it?
-- fgalkin


Like my writing? Tip me on Patreon

User avatar
TheFeniX
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3817
Joined: 2003-06-26 04:24pm
Location: Texas

Re: "Rate my Rig" thread

Postby TheFeniX » 2015-11-11 01:20pm

Well, poor windows performance generally leads to poor performance for whatever is running on top of it. If all you can spring for is a 120GB drive, then you probably would be better off just slapping it in there and putting some games on it. Since 50 pounds buys you a little more than Murrica bucks, you may be looking at a 240GB+ drive. In that case, depending on what programs you run and where you care to install them, you could fit Windows, your programs, and the few games you want to run on that drive. Then, as SSD prices bottom out, get another and move your games to it.

Obviously, if you don't feel like fucking with a Windows install, then ignore this. To quit ranting and just answer your original question: just using an SSD for games, you will see a marked improvement on any load times and data streaming. Just make sure to enable AHCI, if not already enabled. You may have to make some registry edits before-hand if you're on W7 though. Windows 8+ doesn't care.

User avatar
Zaune
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5462
Joined: 2010-06-21 11:05am
Location: In Transit
Contact:

Re: "Rate my Rig" thread

Postby Zaune » 2015-11-11 02:03pm

Heh. What I meant was that I plan on going Linux-only. That does commit me to a 250+GB hard drive, because Linux is a bit less flexible about where you can install stuff, but I can live with that. I'll add an SSD to my Christmas list, I think.
There are hardly any excesses of the most crazed psychopath that cannot easily be duplicated by a normal kindly family man who just comes in to work every day and has a job to do.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods)


Replace "ginger" with "n*gger," and suddenly it become a lot less funny, doesn't it?
-- fgalkin


Like my writing? Tip me on Patreon

User avatar
The Infidel
Padawan Learner
Posts: 446
Joined: 2009-05-07 01:32pm
Location: Norway

Re: "Rate my Rig" thread

Postby The Infidel » 2015-11-12 01:02pm

Zaune wrote:Heh. What I meant was that I plan on going Linux-only. That does commit me to a 250+GB hard drive, because Linux is a bit less flexible about where you can install stuff, but I can live with that. I'll add an SSD to my Christmas list, I think.

My old rig was set up with 2x500GB HDD in RAID0 to improve performance, but was still not too fast. When I threw out the RAID and installed an SSD, my computer was like a new one. WAY more responsive and faster, since the rest of the computer didn't have to wait for the HDD. An upgrade from HDD to SSD is simply the best investment you can do to your computer.

Have system and programs on the SSD and your porn movie collection and other stuff that demands a lot of space on a HDD.

If you've read my rants and complaints, you know that my former SSD died suddenly (as in the span of 2 seconds), and I lost a LOT of stuff I didn't want to lose, so besides getting a decent SSD, i urge you to have backup of all your important stuff and take regular backups. I've learnt my lession the hard way. I currently have a 4TB external HDD as in-house backup and use Jottacloud for continuous cloud backup and keeping archives of stuff that doesn't change too often. They are a Norwegian cloud service with unlimited backup for 7.5 euros pr. month. I currently have about 4TB there and a friend has 8TB, but you need a decent broadband connection. (Try the free one and see if the speed is OK.)
It is very difficult to believe in a god when some people are never struck by lightning.

"The world language is English as spoken by foreigners." -Kristen Nygaard

User avatar
Zaune
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5462
Joined: 2010-06-21 11:05am
Location: In Transit
Contact:

Re: "Rate my Rig" thread

Postby Zaune » 2015-11-12 01:51pm

The Infidel wrote:My old rig was set up with 2x500GB HDD in RAID0 to improve performance, but was still not too fast. When I threw out the RAID and installed an SSD, my computer was like a new one. WAY more responsive and faster, since the rest of the computer didn't have to wait for the HDD. An upgrade from HDD to SSD is simply the best investment you can do to your computer.

Have system and programs on the SSD and your porn movie collection and other stuff that demands a lot of space on a HDD.

If you've read my rants and complaints, you know that my former SSD died suddenly (as in the span of 2 seconds), and I lost a LOT of stuff I didn't want to lose, so besides getting a decent SSD, i urge you to have backup of all your important stuff and take regular backups.

That's the plan. I've got two 1TB hard drives, one SATA and one in a USB enclosure, as well as a free Dropbox account. If and when the promised broadband connection for the building arrives I'll look into expanding my cloud backups as well.
There are hardly any excesses of the most crazed psychopath that cannot easily be duplicated by a normal kindly family man who just comes in to work every day and has a job to do.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods)


Replace "ginger" with "n*gger," and suddenly it become a lot less funny, doesn't it?
-- fgalkin


Like my writing? Tip me on Patreon

User avatar
EnterpriseSovereign
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1685
Joined: 2006-05-12 12:19pm
Location: High orbit

Re: "Rate my Rig" thread

Postby EnterpriseSovereign » 2015-12-18 10:17am

Nice rig, Fenix- the inside of your PC looks much tidier than mine, given you have a similar number & positioning of fans as me. Though looking at the back of my rig I've noticed the rear case fan isn't turning despite the LED illumination still working- time for me to poke around and work out why :?

EDIT: Luckily all it took was for me to emulate Iron Man and reach in and push to kickstart it :mrgreen:
It's no use debating a moron; they drag you down to their level then beat you with experience.

Your claim of using a scientific equation is laughable when all you have done is butcher science to the point it makes 'The Core' look like a fucking documentary. Just because you have the attention span of a fruit fly doesn't mean the rest of us are so encumbered.

"As you know science is not fact"- HuskerJay
"The Delta Fyler [sic] isn't even a shuttle craft" -HuskerJay69
"The Dominion War wasn't really all that bad"- Admiral Mercury

User avatar
Starglider
Miles Dyson
Posts: 8567
Joined: 2007-04-05 09:44pm
Location: Isle of Dogs
Contact:

Re: "Rate my Rig" thread

Postby Starglider » 2016-01-25 10:29am

I am thinking about building a new workstation this summer. I have been working with 64-core servers so much recently that I am kind of pining for a quad-socket home machine; I have always been a dual-socket fan (yes I write highly threaded code) but a mere 16 cores is just not exciting me any more :) The Broadwell EP lineup recently leaked, it looks like the Xeon E5-4689 V4 would be a good fit in quad-socket configuration. I'm thinking similar to the Puget quad-socket workstation but watercooled. It's true that this would only be 48 CPU cores and the E5 v4s will go up to nearly twice that number (88 in quad config), but the base clock speed hit from 3.1 down to 2.2 is pretty punnishing. Then again, depends on the boost clock; max boost on the 22 core chips is 3.6 GHz, which makes sense as it is a 25W higher TDP than the 12 core chips. With watercooling thermal constraints are a non-issue so it's purely TDP, and I'm not using AVX on the CPU side (anything that vectorisable would be on GPU anyway). I admitt 88 cores on a single node is kind of tempting. 32GB DDR4 sticks are kinda mostly affordable now, so 1TB system memory is viable (only 2100 MHz but 16 channel so the aggregate bandwidth is goood). 64GB sticks are still in the 'only if money is no object' category and take a major latency hit.

Annoyingly I haven't found a quad E5 board that offers 4 PCIe x16 slots. Nearly all the E7 boards do, but E7s are just pointlessly more expensive for a workstation (and eight socket is not a great idea regardless of cost at the moment for fabric latency reasons). The best you get with quad E5s from Supermicro etc is 2 PCIe x16 and 9 PCIe x8. I ask you, how many people actually need nine half-speed slots vs the number of people who could use another 2 full-speed slots? Still, I'd probably put quad teslas in there anyway, it's not like I'm usually limited on PCIe bandwidth. Maybe the situation will be remedied by the product refresh for the v4 generation. Storage, probably eight or so half-terabyte SSDs in RAID 0+1. I'm really shying away from RAID 5 these days due to rebuild time and some controller issues I've had, and RAID6 is significant latency and still kinda excessively complicated for workstation use.

The wild card is AMD Zen coming late this year, which does actually stand a chance of retaking the high-end performance lead, certainly on cost/performance for multi-socket systems. I guess I can upgrade my current machine to 512GB via swapping the 16 GB DIMM for 32s and wait a bit longer if that is looking really promising; the DIMMs wouldn't be reusable though since my current machines are DDR3. It is of course perenially annoying that consumer CPUs are already on Skylake and about to go to Kaby Lake while the high end stuff is still just making it onto Broadwell, but that kind of sluggishness is what you get when the competition (AMD) dropped the ball so thoroughly at the high end.
Narrative Analysis : http://www.mylittleprogram.net (under construction)

User avatar
The Infidel
Padawan Learner
Posts: 446
Joined: 2009-05-07 01:32pm
Location: Norway

Re: "Rate my Rig" thread

Postby The Infidel » 2016-01-26 05:06pm

Will it blend?

I knew before I read your post that your system would make my 4790K look like a Z80. Nice rig. I've seen some storage consisting of a few m.2. intel 750(?) In raid having a lot of speed. What are you coding that needs that kind of hardware? Wonder what results y-cruncher can get on that kind of rig.

I wonder what Intels new memory can do.http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/architecture-and-technology/3d-xpoint-unveiled-video.html
It is very difficult to believe in a god when some people are never struck by lightning.

"The world language is English as spoken by foreigners." -Kristen Nygaard

User avatar
Starglider
Miles Dyson
Posts: 8567
Joined: 2007-04-05 09:44pm
Location: Isle of Dogs
Contact:

Re: "Rate my Rig" thread

Postby Starglider » 2016-01-26 05:44pm

The Infidel wrote:Will it blend?


Is that joke still going? It must be about 10 years now.

I knew before I read your post that your system would make my 4790K look like a Z80.


Not necessarily. Boost speed on the 4970K is 4.4 GHz, a GHz faster than any of the enterprise Xeons. Single threaded tasks may actually be faster on the 4970 than a top end Haswell-EX, if it's something bottlenecked on core instruction throughput that doesn't benefit from cache or memory bandwidth improvements. Certainly almost no games benefit from having more than four cores, and for high-end gaming you're better off with an overclocked single-socket machine than a multi-socket machine.

What are you coding that needs that kind of hardware?


Mostly prototyping machine learning and data mining algorithms. GPUs are generally faster but they're a bit of a pain to work with in the early prototyping phase.

I wonder what Intels new memory can do.


The Purley platform has a lot of nice stuff but it's 2.5 years out. I mean, Omnipath looks great in theory, but it'll probably be yet another proprietary Intel initiative that is so late and overpriced that it's not sufficiently better than commodity to be worth deploying. The final spec for 40GBase-T is out next month, and honestly unless you have an app that's genuinely very latency sensitive it's hard to resist the economics of just ganging lots of commodity ethernet lanes together. 100Gbase is already available on only-moderately-silly-CR4 for intra-rack interconnect, by the time Omnipath actually gets real availability we'll probably be close to 100GBase-T on Cat 8A.
Narrative Analysis : http://www.mylittleprogram.net (under construction)

User avatar
Starglider
Miles Dyson
Posts: 8567
Joined: 2007-04-05 09:44pm
Location: Isle of Dogs
Contact:

Re: "Rate my Rig" thread

Postby Starglider » 2016-02-04 05:22pm

Ok, couldn't resist, too much core count lust since I respecced the algo cluster (at work) to quads. Picked up this state-of-the-2011-art 32-core server to tide me over. I'll fill it up with spare DIMMs and SSDs to a decent spec. The sad thing is, this nearly five year old machine is still faster (for well-threaded workloads; although I turned down the top-end 40 core version for the 10% clock speed bump) than the fastest dual-socket workstations you can currently build, and it should be about 60% faster than (each of) my current pair of 16-core 3.2GHz workstations. Ironically the exact thing several banks are about to strip out for the DL 560 G9s (which have double the rack density over the old 580s; HP has been way behind the curve on quad socket packaging for oh a decade or so), including ones that I work with. Anyway, that should suffice until the end of the year, when we see if AMD are finally going to bring some competition back to the low-to-mid range server space.
Narrative Analysis : http://www.mylittleprogram.net (under construction)

User avatar
The Infidel
Padawan Learner
Posts: 446
Joined: 2009-05-07 01:32pm
Location: Norway

Re: "Rate my Rig" thread

Postby The Infidel » 2016-02-06 01:17pm

Oh, please, Starglider. I would love to see the results of y-cruncher on that rig. Calculate PI multi-threaded. It also eats a lot of memory. Just did a calculation of 2 500 000 000 decimals, and it took me about 5 minutes. (If you're running it from your user folder, remember to change that to not reveal your user/real name.)

Latest version for Linux/Windows can be found here:
http://www.numberworld.org/y-cruncher/#Download

Results:
Spoiler

Code: Select all

y-cruncher v0.6.9 Build 9462

Detecting Environment...

CPU Vendor:
    AMD         = No
    Intel       = Yes

OS Features:
  * 64-bit      = Yes
  * OS AVX      = Yes
  * OS AVX512   = No

Hardware Features:
    MMX         = Yes
  * x64         = Yes
  * ABM         = Yes
    RDRAND      = Yes
    BMI1        = Yes
  * BMI2        = Yes
    ADX         = No
    MPX         = No
    PREFETCHWT1 = No

SIMD: 128-bit
  * SSE         = Yes
  * SSE2        = Yes
  * SSE3        = Yes
  * SSSE3       = Yes
    SSE4a       = No
  * SSE4.1      = Yes
  * SSE4.2      = Yes
    AES-NI      = Yes
    SHA         = No

SIMD: 256-bit
  * AVX         = Yes
  * XOP         = No
  * FMA3        = Yes
  * FMA4        = No
  * AVX2        = Yes

SIMD: 512-bit
  * AVX512-F    = No
    AVX512-CD   = No
    AVX512-PF   = No
    AVX512-ER   = No
  * AVX512-VL   = No
  * AVX512-BW   = No
  * AVX512-DQ   = No
    AVX512-IFMA = No
    AVX512-VBMI = No


Auto-Selecting: x64 AVX2 ~ Airi

C:\CHANGE_HERE\y-cruncher v0.6.9.9462\Binaries\x64 AVX2 ~ Airi.exe


Launching y-cruncher...
================================================================


Checking processor/OS features...

Required Features:
    x64, ABM, BMI1, BMI2,
    SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2
    AVX, FMA3, AVX2



y-cruncher v0.6.9 Build 9462                ( http://www.numberworld.org )
Copyright 2008-2016 Alexander J. Yee      ( a-yee@u.northwestern.edu )

Distribute Freely - Please report any bugs.

Tuning:  Windows - x64 AVX2 ~ Airi


  0         Benchmark Pi  (all in ram)
  1         Component Stress Tester
  2         Run I/O Performance Analysis

  3         Custom Compute a Constant
                -   Compute other constants (e, Golden Ratio, etc...)
                -   Choose your own settings (use disk for large computations)

  4         BBP Digit Extractor for Pi
  5         Digit Viewer

  6         Advanced Options
  7         About


Enter your choice:
option: 0

Benchmark Pi:

Select a Benchmark Type:

  0     Single-Threaded
  1     Multi-Threaded

option: 1


Available Memory:   24.1 GiB

Option      Decimal Digits          Approx. Memory Needed

  1             25,000,000                 227 MiB
  2             50,000,000                 368 MiB
  3            100,000,000                 621 MiB
  4            250,000,000                1.29 GiB
  5            500,000,000                2.48 GiB
  6          1,000,000,000                4.86 GiB
  7          2,500,000,000                11.4 GiB
  8          5,000,000,000                23.1 GiB
  9         10,000,000,000                46.2 GiB
 10         25,000,000,000                 116 GiB
 11         50,000,000,000                 231 GiB
 12        100,000,000,000                 463 GiB
 13        250,000,000,000                1.16 TiB
 14        500,000,000,000                2.32 TiB
 15      1,000,000,000,000                4.72 TiB
 16      2,500,000,000,000                11.5 TiB

  0     I prefer SuperPi sizes... (1M, 2M, 4M...)

option: 7


Constant:   Pi
Algorithm:  Chudnovsky Formula

Decimal Digits:       2,500,000,000
Hexadecimal Digits:   Disabled

Thread Mode:    Windows Thread Pool  ->  ? / 8
Memory Mode:    Ram Only

Start Time: Sat Feb  6 19:01:15 2016

Reserving Working Memory...         11.3 GiB
Constructing Twiddle Tables...      77.1 MiB
Allocating I/O Buffers...           0 bytes

Begin Computation:

Summing Series...  176,284,177 terms
Time:    315.535 seconds  ( 0.088 hours )
Division...
Time:    12.054 seconds  ( 0.003 hours )
InvSqrt...
Time:    7.656 seconds  ( 0.002 hours )
Final Multiply...
Time:    5.233 seconds  ( 0.001 hours )

Pi:  340.485 seconds  ( 0.095 hours )

Base Converting:
Time:    21.803 seconds  ( 0.006 hours )

Writing Decimal Digits:   2,500,000,000  digits written

Verifying Base Conversion...
Time:    11.080 seconds  ( 0.003 hours )

Start Time: Sat Feb  6 19:01:15 2016
End Time:   Sat Feb  6 19:07:42 2016

Total Computation Time:             362.287 seconds  ( 0.101 hours )
Total Time (with output + verify):  386.647 seconds  ( 0.107 hours )

CPU Utilization:        722.93 %
Multi-core Efficiency:  90.3662 %

Last Digits:  Pi
0917027898 3554136437 7123165188 3528593128 0032489094  :  2,499,999,950
9228502005 4677489552 2459688725 5242233502 7255998083  :  2,500,000,000

Version:              0.6.9.9462 (Windows - x64 AVX2 ~ Airi)
Processor(s):         Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4790K CPU @ 4.00GHz
Logical Cores:        8
Physical Memory:      33,996,427,264 (31.7 GiB)
CPU Base Frequency:   3,990,754,175 Hz

Result File: Validation - Pi - 2,500,000,000.txt

Benchmark Successful. The digits appear to be OK.

Press any key to continue . .
.
It is very difficult to believe in a god when some people are never struck by lightning.

"The world language is English as spoken by foreigners." -Kristen Nygaard