Verizon throttled fire department’s “unlimited” data during Calif. wildfire

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, SCRawl, Thanas, Edi, K. A. Pital

Post Reply
bilateralrope
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3854
Joined: 2005-06-25 06:50pm
Location: New Zealand

Verizon throttled fire department’s “unlimited” data during Calif. wildfire

Post by bilateralrope » 2018-08-22 12:47am

Ars Technica
Fire dep't had to pay twice as much to lift throttling during wildfire response.
JON BRODKIN - 8/22/2018, 7:49 AM

Verizon Wireless' throttling of a fire department that uses its data services has been submitted as evidence in a lawsuit that seeks to reinstate federal net neutrality rules.

"County Fire has experienced throttling by its ISP, Verizon," Santa Clara County Fire Chief Anthony Bowden wrote in a declaration. "This throttling has had a significant impact on our ability to provide emergency services. Verizon imposed these limitations despite being informed that throttling was actively impeding County Fire's ability to provide crisis-response and essential emergency services."

Bowden's declaration was submitted in an addendum to a brief filed by 22 state attorneys general, the District of Columbia, Santa Clara County, Santa Clara County Central Fire Protection District, and the California Public Utilities Commission. The government agencies are seeking to overturn the recent repeal of net neutrality rules in a lawsuit they filed against the Federal Communications Commission in the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Throttling affected response to wildfire

"The Internet has become an essential tool in providing fire and emergency response, particularly for events like large fires which require the rapid deployment and organization of thousands of personnel and hundreds of fire engines, aircraft, and bulldozers," Bowden wrote.

Santa Clara Fire paid Verizon for "unlimited" data but suffered from heavy throttling until the department paid Verizon more, according to Bowden's declaration and emails between the fire department and Verizon that were submitted as evidence.

The throttling recently affected "OES 5262," a fire department vehicle that is "deployed to large incidents as a command and control resource" and is used to "track, organize, and prioritize routing of resources from around the state and country to the sites where they are most needed," Bowden wrote.

"OES 5262 also coordinates all local government resources deployed to the Mendocino Complex Fire," an ongoing wildfire that is the largest in California's history, Bowden wrote.

The vehicle has a device that uses a Verizon SIM card for Internet access.

"In the midst of our response to the Mendocino Complex Fire, County Fire discovered the data connection for OES 5262 was being throttled by Verizon, and data rates had been reduced to 1/200, or less, than the previous speeds," Bowden wrote. "These reduced speeds severely interfered with the OES 5262's ability to function effectively. My Information Technology staff communicated directly with Verizon via email about the throttling, requesting it be immediately lifted for public safety purposes."

Verizon did not immediately restore full speeds to the device, however.

"Verizon representatives confirmed the throttling, but rather than restoring us to an essential data transfer speed, they indicated that County Fire would have to switch to a new data plan at more than twice the cost, and they would only remove throttling after we contacted the Department that handles billing and switched to the new data plan," Bowden wrote.

Verizon “risking harm to public safety”

Because the throttling continued until the department was able to upgrade its subscription, "County Fire personnel were forced to use other agencies' Internet Service Providers and their own personal devices to provide the necessary connectivity and data transfer capability required by OES 5262," Bowden wrote.

Verizon throttling also affected the department in a response to previous fires in December and June, emails show.

Bowden argued that Verizon is likely to keep taking advantage of emergencies in order to push public safety agencies onto more expensive plans.

"In light of our experience, County Fire believes it is likely that Verizon will continue to use the exigent nature of public safety emergencies and catastrophic events to coerce public agencies into higher-cost plans, ultimately paying significantly more for mission-critical service—even if that means risking harm to public safety during negotiations," Bowden wrote.

UPDATE: In a statement to Ars three hours after this article was published, Verizon acknowledged that it shouldn't have continued throttling the fire department's data service after the department asked Verizon to lift the throttling restrictions.

"Regardless of the plan emergency responders choose, we have a practice to remove data speed restrictions when contacted in emergency situations," Verizon's statement said. "We have done that many times, including for emergency personnel responding to these tragic fires. In this situation, we should have lifted the speed restriction when our customer reached out to us. This was a customer support mistake. We are reviewing the situation and will fix any issues going forward."

Verizon also noted that the fire department purchased a data service plan that is slowed down after a data usage threshold is reached. But Verizon said it "made a mistake" in communicating with the department about the terms of the plan.

"We made a mistake in how we communicated with our customer about the terms of its plan," Verizon said. "Like all customers, fire departments choose service plans that are best for them. This customer purchased a government contract plan for a high-speed wireless data allotment at a set monthly cost. Under this plan, users get an unlimited amount of data but speeds are reduced when they exceed their allotment until the next billing cycle."

Verizon also said that the Santa Clara "situation has nothing to do with net neutrality or the current proceeding in court."

Throttling happened after net neutrality repeal

Verizon's throttling was described in fire department emails beginning June 29 of this year, just weeks after the FCC's repeal of net neutrality rules took effect.

Even when net neutrality rules were in place, all major carriers imposed some form of throttling on unlimited plans when customers used more than a certain amount of data. They argued that it was allowed under the rules' exception for "reasonable network management." But while such throttling is generally applied only during times of network congestion, the Santa Clara Fire Department says it was throttled at all times once the device in question went over a 25GB monthly threshold.

Even if Verizon's throttling didn't technically violate the no-throttling rule, Santa Clara could have complained to the FCC under the now-removed net neutrality system, which allowed Internet users to file complaints about any unjust or unreasonable prices and practices. FCC Chairman Ajit Pai's decision to deregulate the broadband industry eliminated that complaint option and also limited consumers' rights to sue Internet providers over unjust or unreasonable behavior.

Emails between fire department and Verizon

On June 29, Fire Captain Justin Stockman wrote an email to Verizon, noting that download speeds for an essential device used during large disasters had been throttled from 50Mbps to about 30kbps.

A Verizon government accounts manager named Silas Buss responded, saying that the fire department would have to move from a $37.99 plan to a $39.99 plan "to get the data speeds restored on this device." Later, Buss suggested that the department switch to a plan that cost at least $99.99 a month.

Stockman didn't have authority to upgrade the plan, so he sent an email to Deputy Chief Steve Prziborowski that same day. Stockman wrote:
Verizon is currently throttling OES 5262 so severely that it's hampering operations for the assigned crew. This is not the first time we have had this issue. In December of 2017 while deployed to the Prado Mobilization Center supporting a series of large wildfires, we had the same device with the same SIM card also throttled. I was able to work through [Fire Department IT executive] Eric Prosser at the time to have service to the device restored, and Eric communicated that Verizon had properly re-categorized the device as truly "unlimited".
Prziborowski expressed concern about the throttling in an email to Buss. "Before I give you my approval to do the $2.00 a month upgrade, the bigger question is why our public safety data usage is getting throttled down?" Prziborowski wrote. "Our understanding from Eric Prosser, our former Information Technology Officer, was that he had received approval from Verizon that public safety should never be gated down because of our critical infrastructure need for these devices."

While fire department personnel thought they were already paying for "truly" unlimited data, Verizon said they weren't.

"The short of it is, public safety customers have access to plans that do not have data throughput limitations," Buss told Prziborowski. "However, the current plan set for all of SCCFD's lines does have data throttling limitations. We will need to talk about making some plan changes to all lines or a selection of lines to address the data throttling limitation of the current plan."

The emails started up again on July 5 and 6. "Can confirm that after using 25GB of data, our service drops to zero. This is unacceptable and needs to be fixed," fire department IT officer Daniel Farrelly wrote.

Buss clarified that "data throughput is limited to 200Kbps or 600Kbps" after 25GB of use. Buss also told fire officials that all Verizon plans have some sort of throttling and that the department would have to pay by the gigabyte to avoid throttling entirely.

Buss wrote:
Verizon has always reserved the right to limit data throughput on unlimited plans. All unlimited data plans offered by Verizon have some sort of data throttling built-in, including the $39.99 plan. Verizon does offer plans with no data throughput limitations; these plans require that the customer pay by the GB for use beyond a certain set allotment.
The Mendocino fire began on July 27. On the night of Sunday, July 29, Stockman sent an email to Bowden:
OES 5262 is deployed again, now to the Mendocino Complex, and is still experiencing the same throttling. As I understood it from our previous exchange regarding this device, the billing cycle was set to end July 23, which should have alleviated the throttling. In a side-by-side comparison, a crew member's personal phone using Verizon was seeing speeds of 20Mbps/7Mbps. The department Verizon device is experiencing speeds of 0.2Mbps/0.6Mbps, meaning it has no meaningful functionality.
Farrelly wrote a brief email to Buss that night, telling him to "Remove any data throttling on OES5262 effective immediately." Farrelly emailed Buss again the next morning, saying, "Please work with us. All we need is a plan that does not offer throttling or caps of any kind."

Buss responded that afternoon, suggesting a plan that costs $99.99 for the first 20GB and $8 per gigabyte thereafter. "To get the plan changed immediately, I would suggest calling in the plan change to our customer service team," Buss wrote.

That was the last email submitted in the court exhibit.

Santa Clara apparently switched to the $99.99 plan, more than doubling its bill. "While Verizon ultimately did lift the throttling, it was only after County Fire subscribed to a new, more expensive plan," Bowden wrote in his declaration.
Extorting the fire service during a major fire. Verizon clearly doesn't care about bad PR.

I'll admit, I wasn't expecting to be able to say "you need net neutrality to stop the country burning".

User avatar
Gandalf
SD.net White Wizard
Posts: 14558
Joined: 2002-09-16 11:13pm
Location: A video store in Sydney, Australia

Re: Verizon throttled fire department’s “unlimited” data during Calif. wildfire

Post by Gandalf » 2018-08-22 01:43am

Also, why does a fire department subscribe to a plan? Shouldn't government provide that on account of them being a public service?
"Oh no, oh yeah, tell me how can it be so fair
That we dying younger hiding from the police man over there
Just for breathing in the air they wanna leave me in the chair
Electric shocking body rocking beat streeting me to death"

- A.B. Original, Report to the Mist

"I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately."
- George Carlin

User avatar
TheFeniX
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4662
Joined: 2003-06-26 04:24pm
Location: Texas

Re: Verizon throttled fire department’s “unlimited” data during Calif. wildfire

Post by TheFeniX » 2018-08-22 12:30pm

Fire Departments have budgets and handle their own finances like a lot of local government entities. They get money from the government, among other places, but it's usually their discretion on where it's spent based on said budget.

User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37330
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
Contact:

Re: Verizon throttled fire department’s “unlimited” data during Calif. wildfire

Post by Sea Skimmer » 2018-08-22 12:45pm

Gandalf wrote:
2018-08-22 01:43am
Also, why does a fire department subscribe to a plan? Shouldn't government provide that on account of them being a public service?
???? What the government will just put the fire department vehicle on it's own cellphone towers network? That's not how life works. Fire departments are public agencies which contract for services provided by private companies, just like other government agencies contract with private companies for services.

This is also not really a net neutrality issue at all. Because all traffic above a specific data cap was being throttled. Which is exactly what's supposed to happen with net neutrality, all traffic was treated equally. That isn't the same as having a right to unlimited high speed data on any plan you happen to buy. That the provider also refused to treat one customer preferentially is also in line with net neutrality. Most of the article is just a huge misdirection and then it begins talking about relevant issues only in the last paragraph or two.

A consumer issue does exist with high speed data caps not being published, but this is absolutely nothing new to the wireless industry and wasn't forbidden previously. Nor is it clear that this cap wasn't actually known, the fact that a major command center was being run off the equivalent of one cellphone makes me wonder about more then a few things here. This is only going to be tangential to any lawsuits concerning FCC authority.

I really hate hit piece articles like this by nature. They just muddle what could be much more clear cut issues, and thus delay rational action. That's actually in the favor of the jackasses in Washington, not the consumer.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956

User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 15650
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

Re: Verizon throttled fire department’s “unlimited” data during Calif. wildfire

Post by The Romulan Republic » 2018-08-22 01:17pm

This should be a fucking felony.
"Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day, haven't we?"

"Yes. Lick 'em tomorrow though."

-Generals William T. Sherman and Ulysses S Grant, the Battle of Shiloh.


"You need to believe in things that aren't true. How else can they become?"-Terry Pratchett's DEATH.


I am a dual citizen of the United States and Canada.


Fuck Civility.

User avatar
Elheru Aran
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12472
Joined: 2004-03-04 01:15am
Location: Georgia

Re: Verizon throttled fire department’s “unlimited” data during Calif. wildfire

Post by Elheru Aran » 2018-08-22 01:27pm

Sea Skimmer wrote:
2018-08-22 12:45pm
Gandalf wrote:
2018-08-22 01:43am
Also, why does a fire department subscribe to a plan? Shouldn't government provide that on account of them being a public service?
???? What the government will just put the fire department vehicle on it's own cellphone towers network? That's not how life works. Fire departments are public agencies which contract for services provided by private companies, just like other government agencies contract with private companies for services.
On the other hand IMO it's a valid idea for the government to provide for its own services for, at the very least, essential emergency services. Fire departments certainly qualify. If nothing else, the government could write out some kind of exclusive agreement with the various private service providers, rather than obligating each individual department to work out its own contract and running afoul of commercial restrictions like this particular example. At the very least, there should be some kind of provision for not throttling service during responses to emergencies!
It's a strange world. Let's keep it that way.

User avatar
EnterpriseSovereign
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2265
Joined: 2006-05-12 12:19pm
Location: High orbit

Re: Verizon throttled fire department’s “unlimited” data during Calif. wildfire

Post by EnterpriseSovereign » 2018-08-24 01:05pm

I was inside such a mobile command center at an open day a couple of months ago, the guy who was telling us about it was saying because of what its capable of that several government agencies were able to make use of it. Because the guy was a paramedic the example he gave was that a medic could be treating a casualty and a doctor could be watching the bodycam footage on a monitor and giving him directions.

When you see that the vehicle has half a dozen or so such monitors you begin to appreciate the amount of data that must be involved. I can't believe that I didn't ask about what kinds of connection it had to the outside world.
It's no use debating a moron; they drag you down to their level then beat you with experience.

Just because you have the attention span of a fruit fly doesn't mean the rest of us are so encumbered.

"As you know science is not fact"- HuskerJay
"The Delta Fyler [sic] isn't even a shuttle craft" -HuskerJay69
"The Dominion War wasn't really all that bad"- Admiral Mercury

Post Reply