My problem with this is not so much that a spy was killed (any loss of life is regrettable to me, but that is, sadly, part of the business). My problem is with the fact that the assassination was carried out in a manner which breaks or at least bends a major taboo (against the use of chemical weapons such as nerve agents), that it was done in a manner and using a weapon that had a high risk of collateral damage, and that it appears to have specifically targeted an innocent (unless his daughter was also a spy).
Oh and in news that will not (or at least should not) surprise anyone, Britain's PM has confirmed that Russia is likely to blame.
Its a long article, but well worth reading as a comprehensive summary of this case:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/12/worl ... oning.html
LONDON - Britain's prime minister said on Monday that Moscow was "highly likely" to blame for the poisoning of a former Russian spy attacked with a nerve agent near his home in southern England, and warned of possible reprisals.
The remarks by Prime Minister Theresa May, delivered in an address to Parliament, were an unusually direct condemnation of a country that Britain has, in the past, been loath to blame for attacks on its soil. Critics say the British authorities took only modest countermeasures after Russian agents poisoned a former MI6 informant in 2006 with a rare isotope, polonium 210.
The prime minister, who as home secretary resisted an open inquiry into Russia's role in that case, was under pressure to show more resolve this time.
The March 4 nerve agent attack on Sergei V. Skripal, once an informant for Britain's foreign intelligence service, and his daughter, Yulia, occurred in and around public spaces in the city of Salisbury. Almost two dozen people, including emergency workers, were given medical treatment, and one police officer is still hospitalized. I
"It is now clear that Mr. Skripal and his daughter were poisoned with a military-grade nerve agent of a type developed by Russia," Mrs. May said in the House of Commons. "The government has concluded that it is highly likely that Russia was responsible for the act against Sergei and Yulia Skripal."
She said that either the poisoning was a "direct act of the Russian state against our country" or that Moscow had lost control of its nerve agent and had allowed it to get into the hands of others. The prime minister said that the government had summoned the Russian ambassador to demand an explanation, and that Britain expected a response from Russia by the end of the day on Tuesday. Russia has denied any responsibility.
"Should there be no credible response, we will conclude that this action amounts to an unlawful use of force by the Russian state against the United Kingdom, and I will come back to this House and set out the full range of measures we will take in response," Mrs. May said.
"We shall not tolerate such a braze act to murder innocent civilians on our soil."
The relationship between Russia and Britain under Prime Minister May has been punctuated by repeated confrontation over the annexation of Crimea and Russian interference in elections, among other issues.
But Britain has held back from aggressive retaliatory measures. Expelling Russian spies, for example, would mean a cutoff in Britain's own flow of information from Moscow if Russia retaliated. Restricting visas would hurt Russian businessmen, officials, and dissidents who have made Britain their home.
On Monday, the White House condemned the attack - but did not join Britain in pointing a finger a Russia.
"The use of a highly lethal nerve agent against U.K. citizens on U.K. soil is an outrage," Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the White House press secretary, said at her daily briefing. "The attack was reckless, indiscriminate and irresponsible. We offer the fullest condemnation."
Ms. Sanders brushed off several questions about weather the White House shared Britain's view that Russia was responsible. "Right now we are standing with our U.K. ally," she said. "I think they're still working through even some of the details of that and we're going to continue to work with the U.K."
Moscow has insisted that it played no role in the attack, and did so again on Monday.
"This is a circus show in the British Parliament, " the Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman, Maria Zakharova, told journalists in Moscow, according to the Interfax news agency.
Vladimir Dzhabarov, first deputy head of the Federation Council's foreign affairs committee, was equally dismissive. Whatever Mr. Skripal may have once done, he said, he posed no threat to Russia now.
"This already is not our issue," Mr. Dzhabarov told Interfax. "He had access neither to our secrets nor facilities. He was of no u se to us, to Russia in general."
Still, amid denials last week by Russia's foreign minister, Sergey V. Lavrov, an anchor on Russia's state-controlled news broadcast struck a different note, warning Russians not to betray their country. If they do, he said, "Don't choose Britain as a place to live."
In her address to Parliament, Mrs. May said the nerve agent was part of a group known as Novichock - the Russian term for "newcomer." The chemical was produced by the Soviet Union in the 1970s and 1980s, and, at the time, was believed to be far more lethal than anything in the United States arsenal.
After the breakup of the Soviet Union, Vil Mirzanyanov, a chemist who helped develop the agent, said that Soviet laboratories had developed enough of the substance to kill several hundred thousand people.
Dispersed in a powder, Novichock nerve agents blocked the breakdown of a neurotransmitter controlling muscular contractions, leading to respiratory and cardiac arrest, Mr. Mirzayanov told investigators at the time.
The use of a nerve agent drew the attention of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, the Hague-based group that policies the global treaty banning them. The group called it "a source of great concern."
Over the last week, chemical weapons experts fanned out through the sleepy cathedral city of Salisbury, and residents who may have been near Mr. Skripal and his daughter were told to wash their clothing and carefully wipe off other articles. Politicians have urged the government to respond.
"What it says to Russians living in the U.K. or those thinking of leaving the country is: Disloyalty is always punishable, you will never be free of us and you will never be safe, wherever you live," John Lough and James Sherr, Russian specialists at the British think-tank Chatham House, wrote. "What it says to the British government is: We believe you are weak, we have no respect for you."
Mr. Skripal is one of several opponents of President Vladimir V. Putin's government, in Britain and elsewhere, who have been the victims of murder or attempted murder. Western intelligence officials say that the Kremlin has frequently had its foes killed. The most notorious case involved another former Russian agent, Alexander Litvienenko, who was fatally poisoned in London in 2006 with a radioactive element, an assassination that a British inquiry later concluded was probably approved personally by Mr. Putin.
The British government has, however, been accused of dragging its feet in investigating previous suspicious deaths, for fear of losing its own intelligence flow from Moscow and sacrificing the Russian wealth that has flowed into London.
On Tuesday, Yvette Cooper, a lawmaker with the opposition Labour Party submitted a letter to Britain's home secretary, demanding a review of 14 deaths which "have not been treated as suspicious by the U.K. police but have - reportedly - been identified by United States intelligence sources as potentially connected to the Russian state."
But with the intense attention focussed on the poisoning of Mr. Skripal, 66, and his daughter, 33, the government response has been swifter.
Officials from across the British political spectrum have called for a wide range of retaliatory measures against Russia, including the expulsion of diplomats, new economic sanctions, tighter controls on wealthy Russians entering Britain, and the revocation of the broadcast license of RT, the Kremlin-controlled broadcaster.
Britain must ensure that Russia's oligarchs "realize that they can't spend their wealth in London, that they can't enjoy the luxuries of Harrods and whatever else, and that we're absolutely firm in making sure that they feel the pain of being denied entry into the West," Tom Tugendhat, chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee in the House of Commons, told BBC Radio on Monday.
But expelling Russian intelligence agents would mean that Britain would lose some of its own agents in Moscow, which would have steep costs for London, according to John Bayliss, who retired in 2010 from the Government Communications Headquarters, Britain's electronic intelligence agency.
"It will cut off a flow of intelligence you have had for years," he said. "That will stop you gaining intelligence in future years, which would be critical."
Mr. Skripal and his daughter remained in critical condition on Monday, more than a week after being poisoned in Salisbury, where Mr. Skripal had lived quietly for years. The pair were found incoherent on a park bench, and a police officer who made contact with the nerve agent when he tried to help the Skripals, Detective Sergeant Nick Bailey, was also hospitalized in serious condition.
While working for Russian military intelligence, Mr. Skripal became a double agent, selling secrets to Britain. He was found out, convicted and sent to a Russian prison in 2006. In 2010, he was freed and sent to Britain in a spy swap with the West.
On Sunday, British authorities warned that hundreds of people might have been exposed, particularly in an Italian restaurant and a pub that the Skripals had visited. Officials advised nearby residents to carefully wash any items - clothes, eyeglasses, cellphones - that might have minute traces of the nerve agent on them, and to bag those that could not be cleaned easily. That prompted angry responses from Salisbury residents, who asked why it had taken a week to issue the warning.
The restaurant, pub and surrounding parts of the shopping district known as the Maltings remained cordoned off as emergency workers in protective suits combed through it for evidence and sought to remove all traces of the nerve agent.
-The nerve agent is a military-grade agent created in Russia. Britain's PM contends that it could only have been used by the Russian government, or if the Russian government lost control of it.
-The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons describes the attack as "a source of great concern."
-Hundreds may have been exposed, and "Almost two dozen people, including emergency workers, were given medical treatment, and one police officer is still hospitalized."
-PM May has demanded an explanation from Russia's ambassador, and said that in the absence of a "credible response" from Moscow by Tuesday, this will be treated as "an unlawful use of force by the Russian state against the United Kingdom".
-Various forms of retaliation are being considered, including more sanctions, expelling Russian diplomats, visa restrictions, expelling Russian spies, and revoking RT's broadcasting license in the UK.
-The White House condemned the attack but evaded holding Russia responsible. I guess the White House has found a new country to have a "special relationship" with.