Devin Nunes accused of illegally altering Memo

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Post Reply
User avatar
Crossroads Inc.
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 9233
Joined: 2005-03-20 06:26pm
Location: Defending Sparkeling Bishonen
Contact:

Devin Nunes accused of illegally altering Memo

Post by Crossroads Inc. »

You know, the memo that started off being hand made by cherry picking things to suggest the Muller investigation WAS a political witchhunt as opposed to the FBI just doing their job? The memo that even BEFORE this came out, the FBI said they had grave doubts about the legitimacy of?
Yeah, THAT memo. Seems Nunes couldn’t just leave it alone and may have illegaly altered it.
Huff Post
WASHINGTON — The chairman of the House Intelligence Committee made “material changes” to a secret memo he shared with lawmakers before sending it to the president to approve for final release, the top Democrat on the committee said Wednesday night.

Adam Schiff (Calif.), the committee’s ranking Democrat, called on Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) to withdraw the version of the classified memo he sent to the White House on Monday, arguing that a prior vote in favor or releasing the memo was invalidated by Nunes’ changes.

The memo, drafted by Nunes’ staff, reportedly accuses the Justice Department and the FBI of abusing the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) in the fall of 2016 to spy on Carter Page, a Trump campaign adviser.

Earlier this month, members of the House Intelligence Committee voted along party lines to allow all members of the House to read the memo. Several Republicans hyped the document as evidence of a cabal of law enforcement officials determined to block President Donald Trump from entering office and to undermine his presidency. Democrats dismissed the memo as an inaccurate and misleading attempt to impugn law enforcement officials and undermine special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into ties between the Trump campaign and Russia. Schiff, one of two members of the committee who has seen the underlying intelligence on which the memo is based, accused Nunes and Republicans who backed the memo of politicizing intelligence to protect Trump.

On Monday, committee members voted again along party lines to send Nunes’ memo to Trump, giving him five days to decide whether to block it from being released publicly. During the same meeting, Republicans on the committee prevented Democrats from simultaneously releasing their own memo, drafted as a rebuttal to the Nunes document. Republicans also voted down a motion to delay the release of either memo until they had been reviewed by the Justice Department and FBI.

In an unusual public statement, the FBI warned Wednesday that it has “grave concerns” about the accuracy of the Republicans’ memo. Nunes, who recently voted to reauthorize and expand the part of FISA that allows intelligence agencies to collect information on U.S. citizens, accused the FBI of issuing “spurious objections to allowing the American people to see information related to surveillance abuses.”

By Wednesday, the release of the Republicans’ memo seemed imminent. Trump, who has attacked the credibility of the law enforcement agencies tasked with investigating him, assured a lawmaker on Monday evening that he “100%” plans to release the memo.

But on Wednesday night, Schiff announced a discovery he hopes will block, or at least delay, its release. The memo Nunes sent to the White House was a different version of the memo that was shared with lawmakers, Schiff wrote in a letter to Nunes on Wednesday.

“While the Majority’s changes do not correct the profound distortions and inaccuracies in your document, they are nonetheless substantive,” Schiff wrote in the letter.

The changes “try to water down” some of the Republicans’ assertions, a Democratic committee source, who requested anonymity to frankly discuss internal committee processes, told HuffPost. The changes were made ahead of the Monday vote but without the knowledge of all committee members, the source said.

When the committee voted on Monday to send the memo to Trump to approve for release, Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.) specifically asked Nunes if the memo shared with members of the House would “word for word” be made public, according to a transcript of the meeting.

“Well, as the gentleman knows, we will send the content over to the White House, and the President has five days to either agree with us that it should be made public, or the President could say that he does not want it made public,” Nunes responded on Monday.


That response “was deliberately misleading,” Schiff wrote in his letter to Nunes. Because Nunes changed the document before sending it to the White House, without notifying other members of the committee, its Monday vote is irrelevant, Schiff argued. He called on Nunes to withdraw the version sent to the White House and hold a new committee vote on releasing the document.

A spokesman for Nunes indicated that the chairman has no plans to withdraw his memo. “In its increasingly strange attempt to thwart publication of the memo, the Committee Minority is now complaining about minor edits to the memo, including grammatical fixes and two edits requested by the FBI and by the Minority themselves,” Jack Langer, wrote in an email. “The vote to release the memo was absolutely procedurally sound, and in accordance with House and Committee rules. To suggest otherwise is a bizarre distraction from the abuses detailed in the memo, which the public will hopefully soon be able to read for themselves.”

The Democratic committee source disputed Langer’s description of the changes. “While the Minority has continually pointed out flaws in the Majority document, we have not requested any changes because we feel the whole document is fundamentally flawed,” the source wrote in an email. “It is clear that the Majority is no longer fully comfortable with what it has represented to House members. The Majority has no choice but to restart the process in a transparent manner.”

Regardless of the nature of the edits to the Nunes memo, Schiff’s effort to delay the Republicans’ memo could be a strategically sound move. If he succeeds, he might be able to push his own rebuttal memo through the committee voting process in time so that it can be released alongside Nunes’ memo.

Praying is another way of doing nothing helpful
"Congratulations, you get a cookie. You almost got a fundamental English word correct." Pick
"Outlaw star has spaceships that punch eachother" Joviwan
Read "Tales From The Crossroads"!
Read "One Wrong Turn"!
User avatar
SCRawl
Has a bad feeling about this.
Posts: 4191
Joined: 2002-12-24 03:11pm
Location: Burlington, Canada

Re: Devin Nunes accused of illegally altering Memo

Post by SCRawl »

I'm going to assume you meant "accused" instead of "accursed". If I'm wrong I'll switch it back.
73% of all statistics are made up, including this one.

I'm waiting as fast as I can.
User avatar
Crossroads Inc.
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 9233
Joined: 2005-03-20 06:26pm
Location: Defending Sparkeling Bishonen
Contact:

Re: Devin Nunes accused of illegally altering Memo

Post by Crossroads Inc. »

Lol thank you.
Yes you are correct, although calling certain individuals “accursed” would apply as well.
Praying is another way of doing nothing helpful
"Congratulations, you get a cookie. You almost got a fundamental English word correct." Pick
"Outlaw star has spaceships that punch eachother" Joviwan
Read "Tales From The Crossroads"!
Read "One Wrong Turn"!
User avatar
Khaat
Jedi Master
Posts: 1034
Joined: 2008-11-04 11:42am

Re: Devin Nunes accused of illegally altering Memo

Post by Khaat »

Simple: the White House staff didn't think it had enough spin, so Nunes' staff altered it under orders (since he was careful to say he didn't work with the White House on it, but declined to answer if his staff did.)
Rule #1: Believe the autocrat. He means what he says.
Rule #2: Do not be taken in by small signs of normality.
Rule #3: Institutions will not save you.
Rule #4: Be outraged.
Rule #5: Don’t make compromises.
User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 21559
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

Re: Devin Nunes accused of illegally altering Memo

Post by The Romulan Republic »

Remember when Nunes "recused" himself?

At this point, I honestly am starting to wonder what Trump/Putin has on him, or if he really is just that much of a fanatical Trumper.

I hope Mueller bags him for obstruction of justice as well as the Orange Cock himself.
"I know its easy to be defeatist here because nothing has seemingly reigned Trump in so far. But I will say this: every asshole succeeds until finally, they don't. Again, 18 months before he resigned, Nixon had a sky-high approval rating of 67%. Harvey Weinstein was winning Oscars until one day, he definitely wasn't."-John Oliver

"The greatest enemy of a good plan is the dream of a perfect plan."-General Von Clauswitz, describing my opinion of Bernie or Busters and third partiers in a nutshell.

I SUPPORT A NATIONAL GENERAL STRIKE TO REMOVE TRUMP FROM OFFICE.
User avatar
Gaidin
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2646
Joined: 2004-06-19 12:27am
Contact:

Re: Devin Nunes accused of illegally altering Memo

Post by Gaidin »

That memo is a bit uselessly ballsy and Nunes can cry me a river if that's what he wants to whine about after extending Section 702. The irony is quite biting if he wants to act this paranoid about the FBI but do that first.

This is pure politics and about all but mostly names that have either retired, appointed to different positions, or been relegated to HR. Only one name is still working in a relevant position. This isn't a memo that is designed to do anything but stir up BS.
Post Reply