Cameron crackdown on tax havens 'purely political gesture'

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Post Reply
User avatar
Irbis
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2262
Joined: 2011-07-15 05:31pm

Cameron crackdown on tax havens 'purely political gesture'

Post by Irbis »

Cameron crackdown on tax havens 'purely political gesture', says Tory peer

David Maclean, Baron Blencathra, wrote to Cayman Islands in 2014 that transparency push was to head off G8 pressure and EU’s financial transaction tax

A Conservative peer has described David Cameron’s flagship G8 anti-tax avoidance initiative as a “purely political gesture” designed to head off European attempts to curb the City of London.

Lord Blencathra, the former Tory home office minister David Maclean, who was ennobled by David Cameron in 2011, told the government of the Cayman Islands last year that the prime minister’s bid to increase transparency at offshore tax havens was an attempt to distract the G8 and EU.

The frank statement emerges from a submission made by Maclean to a consultation on tax transparency in the Cayman Islands, written in February 2014. The letter was initially held privately by the Cayman government, but has since been made public.

Maclean started by describing the political context in 2013: “In the early part of last year, the Germans and others were pushing hard for a financial transaction tax, which would have severely hurt the City of London,” he wrote. “It was and is a top UK government priority to head that off. The French were pushing for ‘blacklists’ of jurisdictions with any tax regime lower than theirs. It was also a UK government objective to head that off.”

The peer then described how the prime minister achieved that at the G8 summit in Enniskillen in June 2013, where the issue of offshore tax haven transparency was made a priority.

David Maclean, Baron Blencathra, acted as a lobbyist on behalf of the Cayman Islands.

He wrote: “However the UK government knew, from long experience, that it cannot chair a G8 summit nor negotiate in the EU by simply saying ‘no’ to what other member states are pushing,” he said. “It has to present either a genuine alternative or a false initiative which will divert other MSs [member states] from pursuing their agenda.

“The UK government had to head off the financial transaction tax and blacklists. The NGOs had put the UK government under pressure to make changes on beneficial ownership; the media and public were keen to criticise low tax jurisdictions as operating unfairly, and when Starbucks, Amazon and Apple profit-shifting became headline news, that was the perfect opportunity for the UK to exploit those issues and play down the FTT and blacklists.”

Cameron’s offshore crackdown of 2013 was one of the prime minister’s most visible measures to tackle corporate tax avoidance under mounting public anger. “When taxes are not collected, the poor suffer,” he said at the time.

The prime minister announced at the G8 summit in July 2013 that he had secured a commitment from the UK’s network of crown dependencies and overseas territories to consult on creating registers that would identify company owners. Many of the territories are tax havens often used by multinationals to reduce their tax liabilities or by criminals to hide assets.

David Cameron and Angela Merkel at the G8 Summit at Northern Ireland in 2013

At the time of submitting the document, Maclean was acting as a lobbyist on behalf of the Cayman Islands, but said his submission was made in a “personal capacity based on my knowledge of United Kingdom politics”. In his time as a minister, Maclean was known as a rightwing Thatcherite who once said the only thing he would give a beggar “is a piece of my mind”.

Maclean’s contract was terminated after its terms were revealed by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism in March 2014. In July that year, the Lords Standards Commissioner found he had breached the code of conduct for peers by signing an agreement to lobby parliament on behalf of the tax haven.

The Caymans are one of a group of British Overseas territories that are now resisting plans to implement Cameron’s transparency reforms. The islands in the Caribbean have become one of the world’s leading financial centres, and in particular have become a popular jurisdiction for the global hedge fund industry.

A number of the UK’s tax havens subsequently announced consultations on creating centralised registers of company ownership, prompting Cameron to tell parliament that he did not believe it was fair to continue to describe them as “tax havens”.

Most, including the Caymans, have since announced that they have no intention of introducing Cameron’s reforms.

David Cameron and world leaders at the G8 2013 meeting in Enniskillen, Northern Ireland.

At least eight donors to the Conservative party, who have together contributed more than £5.5m to Tory coffers, are fund managers or directors of hedge funds that have been represented by one of two trade groups that lobbied the Cayman Islands government against Cameron’s proposals.

The Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) and the Managed Funds Association (MFA) warned the Cayman Islands government that any reforms to compile a public register of beneficial ownership would damage the hedge fund industry.

PO boxes in the Cayman Islands.

AIMA, which states a membership of 1,500 firms that collectively manage $1.5tn in assets, said it was particularly opposed to making any company information available to the public. “If beneficial ownership information is made available to any member of the general public to access then it will be possible for private information on legitimate wealth to be accessed by competitors, family members with adverse interests, criminals and journalists,” it warned.

Aside from imposing no direct taxes of any kind, the Caymans impose no restrictions upon investment strategies, has no requirement for fund managers to locate themselves in the islands in order to carry on business, and lacks any exchange controls or currency restrictions.

The Conservative party dismissed the memo, though did not discuss its contents in any detail.

“This story is nonsense from start to finish,” a Tory spokesman said. “The PM led the world by putting tax and transparency at the top of the global political agenda, and was widely hailed by independent experts and commentators for securing significant progress, after Labour failed to act during its time in office. Our motivation was to secure a fairer deal for hardworking British families – and people around the world.”

Requests for additional comment made directly to Maclean were not returned by the Guardian’s deadline.

The anti-poverty charity Oxfam estimates that £12tn is being hidden in tax havens around the world. It believes that £4.7tn is hidden in the UK’s tax havens.

Some EU states have already pledged to implement a European financial transaction tax. The chancellor, George Osborne, has warned he will mount a legal challenge should it hold any implications for the City of London.

The disclosure about Blencathra came as David Cameron said that the charge that the Tories are the party of the rich makes him angrier than anything else.

In an interview with Evan Davis on BBC1, the prime minister said: “This makes me more angry than almost anything else … I believe there are rich people who should pay their taxes and should make a big contribution in terms of taxes to our country. But what infuriates me so much about this is I think of what we’ve done. We’ve taken three million of the lowest paid people out of tax.”

The prime minister added that people who fail to pay their taxes “damn well should” as he spoke of how the government has cracked down on tax avoidance measures.
Behold, the pay rise-getting, social-slashing Tory heroes hard at work. Between this and Luxembourg fund, it's a wonder anyone or anything rich still pays any taxes in EU. But I bet it's the fault of these lazy non-taxing Greeks somehow, eh? :roll:
User avatar
Starglider
Miles Dyson
Posts: 8709
Joined: 2007-04-05 09:44pm
Location: Isle of Dogs
Contact:

Re: Cameron crackdown on tax havens 'purely political gestur

Post by Starglider »

A transaction tax is a fundamentally bad idea if it isn't done simultaneously with equivalent US legislation. It will simply result in a massive volume shift out of the GMT timezone and into New York, Hong Kong and Tokyo. The US still has the level of global financial system control to make it effective, in concert with the EU, but as a unilateral action it will actually reduce tax take, because there will be less financial sector staff (and profits, where applicable) to tax. The UK would lose the most; e.g. HSBC would definitely relocate back to the far east; but Germany and France would take significant hits as well. I am not fundamentally against the idea of financial transaction taxes, but I would note that they are hard to implement and tend to be quite distorting, at a time when we really don't need even more market distorting government intervention. Generally when you think you want to tax complex financial instruments, you should work out who would actually be affected (or who you want to be affected) and tax them directly instead. Otherwise you are likely to try and tax algo trading hedge funds and end up taxing pensioners instead.

As for tax havens, this complaint is highly disingenuous and hypocritical. The UK has stated clearly that it would like to solve the problem, but the dependencies are separate countries with their own common law legal systems and elected legislature for domestic policy. If the UK government were to forcibly override internal legislation (e.g. governing limited companies) it would be exactly the kind of imperialism that the left likes to complain about (when it isn't serving socialist ends). The UK is limited to applying what pressure it can without pissing on the concept of self-determination (difficult concept for europhiles I know). Meanwhile Ireland and the Netherlands are continuing with extremely dubious corporate tax policies that perpetuate far worse tax dodging than the UK dependencies (e.g. Apple and Google's tax schemes). Those are EU countries that could directly and trivially change their corporate tax laws, yet they refuse to do so.
User avatar
fordlltwm
Padawan Learner
Posts: 216
Joined: 2012-01-17 12:22pm
Location: North Wales, UK

Re: Cameron crackdown on tax havens 'purely political gestur

Post by fordlltwm »

As much as that may be George Osbornes approach what with his offshore dealing through the Osborne beneficial trust, David Gauke the exchequer secretary seems to take a dim view on tax dodgers and has actually been managing to make a lot of progress in the past couple of years.
https://www.gov.uk/government/policies/ ... -avoidance



Ghetto edit:


This recent consultation being a good one.



https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/s ... vasion.pdf
User avatar
Irbis
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2262
Joined: 2011-07-15 05:31pm

Re: Cameron crackdown on tax havens 'purely political gestur

Post by Irbis »

Starglider wrote:As for tax havens, this complaint is highly disingenuous and hypocritical. The UK has stated clearly that it would like to solve the problem, but the dependencies are separate countries with their own common law legal systems and elected legislature for domestic policy. If the UK government were to forcibly override internal legislation (e.g. governing limited companies) it would be exactly the kind of imperialism that the left likes to complain about (when it isn't serving socialist ends).
What? From another Guardian article [link]:
In BOTs such as Bermuda and the Cayman Islands, executive authority is vested in the monarch and exercised on her behalf by the governor, who is appointed by the Queen on the advice of the British government. Defence and foreign affairs are carried out by the UK, which also has responsibility to ensure good government. UK governments have never hesitated to step in when necessary, and if any BOTs defy international order or the reasonable requirements of European governments, such intervention would clearly be justified.

The Channel Islands are crown dependencies, and the UK parliament has power to legislate for them. Again, British governments have stepped in where required for matters such as child protection – and tax avoidance by UK citizens must justify intervention if the local administration refuses transparency in its affairs.
This paints rather different picture of who exactly is in charge and who can legislate what.

As for Luxembourg, Ireland or Netherlands, yes, it would be nice if their Mafia-like loopholes were closed, but in immediate term, tax havens are far bigger problem and forcing money in them to be still subject to taxation would give far greater gains, not just to EU, also to weak, poor countries that can't afford combating complicated schemes of money laundering, extraction, and placing it beyond their reach.

By the way, that Double Irish arrangement you criticize so much? Last time I checked, it needed Apple subsidiary company located in Bermuda [link] (otherwise money stays in EU and is still subject to taxation). And Bermuda happens to be a British Overseas Territory. No UK culpability there, eh?
Post Reply