Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid people
* FAQ    * Search   * Register   * Login 
Want to support this site? Click

Quote of the Week: "A great civilization is not conquered from without until it has destroyed itself from within." - Will Durant, American historian (1885-1981)


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Trekkies are smart. PostPosted: 2012-04-27 04:16pm
Offline
Padawan Learner
User avatar

Joined: 2011-06-27 01:08am
Posts: 292
Meanwhile, at starfleet jedi.

Quote:
StarWarsStarTrek

Given that the Empire’s fusion powerplants magically explode upon being hit, with enough energy to mass scatter a moon sized battle station, I’d say the former.


Quote:
Picard

"Moon sized" can go from 9 to 9 000 kilometers, so...

--------------

Besides, Enterprise-E is also "moon-sized", depends on which moon you take... and we don't knwo how long it took to build Death Stars, and yes, personnel costs are ususally disproportionately large.




:banghead:

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: Trekkies are smart. PostPosted: 2012-04-27 09:55pm
Offline
Jedi Council Member
User avatar

Joined: 2011-02-28 06:36am
Posts: 1672
*shrug*
Who cares? Wankers gonna wank.



"I'm just reading through your formspring here, and your responses to many questions seem to indicate that you are ready and willing to sacrifice realism/believability for the sake of (sometimes) marginal increases in gameplay quality. Why is this?"
"Because until I see gamers sincerely demanding that if they get winged in the gut with a bullet that they spend the next three hours bleeding out on the ground before permanently dying, they probably are too." - J.E. Sawyer
Panzersharkcat.9706 | Jade Quarry; Battle.net: BigBug#1199

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: Trekkies are smart. PostPosted: 2012-04-27 10:08pm
Online
Emperor's Hand
User avatar

Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Posts: 13705
Location: Looking for another drawer
What is the official definition of moon-sized? Because if it's 'anything that orbits a planet' ,um-no? Earth would have a couple thousand moons by that. Let's just not get into planets with rings.
Every Enterprise in existence (possibly excepting the Ent-J from ENT) is significantly smaller than anything modern astronomy ever declared a moon.



'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kids with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: Trekkies are smart. PostPosted: 2012-04-28 01:12am
Offline
Sith Acolyte
User avatar

Joined: 2009-01-07 06:37pm
Posts: 5227
Location: Germany
Batman wrote:
What is the official definition of moon-sized? Because if it's 'anything that orbits a planet' ,um-no? Earth would have a couple thousand moons by that. Let's just not get into planets with rings.
Every Enterprise in existence (possibly excepting the Ent-J from ENT) is significantly smaller than anything modern astronomy ever declared a moon.
Some of the moons of Jupiter are smaller than 10km in diameter, so the statement "9 to 9000 kilometers" is actually (somewhat) correct. We don't actually have an official definition for moons/natural satellites other than the need to orbit a planet.

Of course a spherical body with a diameter of 9 kilometer is still way more massive than everything the Federation has built, ever.

Oh, and just for fun, we DO know something about the built time of the Death Stars, even if we go by dumb "movie only"-canon: We know roughly how much time has passed between ANH and ROTJ, so we can conclude something about the build time of the second Death Star. We can do the same for the first Death Star as well, since we know how much time has passed between ROTS and ANH, and the Death Star was clearly built within that timeframe. Both are, again, industrial feats far surpassing anything the Federation has ever done."



SoS:NBA GALE Force
"Destiny and fate are for those too weak to forge their own futures. Where we are 'supposed' to be is irrelevent." - Sir Nitram
"The world owes you nothing but painful lessons" - CaptainChewbacca
"The mark of the immature man is that he wants to die nobly for a cause, while the mark of a mature man is that he wants to live humbly for one." - Wilhelm Stekel
"In 1969 it was easier to send a man to the Moon than to have the public accept a homosexual" - Broomstick

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: Trekkies are smart. PostPosted: 2012-04-28 03:17am
Offline
Padawan Learner
User avatar

Joined: 2011-07-13 11:39am
Posts: 267
Heh, is this honestly the best material you could find from SFJ?



"Please allow me to introduce myself, I'm a man of wealth and taste..."

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: Trekkies are smart. PostPosted: 2012-04-28 03:25am
Offline
Jedi Knight
User avatar

Joined: 2008-03-20 05:54pm
Posts: 850
I like reading Starfleet Jedi forums. Few can be as paranoid and unintentionally hilarious as them.

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: Trekkies are smart. PostPosted: 2012-04-28 08:42am
Offline
Padawan Learner
User avatar

Joined: 2011-06-27 01:08am
Posts: 292
Quote:
It is more along the lines of building a hundred frigates or one DS. Apparently Economies of scale really love Death Stars.


-a member, arguing that the construction of the Death Star is an industrial feat roughly equivalent to building a hundred frigates. His source:

Quote:
ISB page 11

The Death Star Project is an example of a priority sector into which the Empire poured resources enough to have formed perhaps a score of Sector Groups


------------------------------

Quote:
Since Starfleet is not incompetent that is not a problem.




[Context there; SWST is me, attempting to question how imperial ships could use fusion reactors, when they explode whenever hit, a characteristic typically not attributed to a nuclear powerplant; Picard, responding by saying that atomizing the Death Star isn't impressive, because it's moon sized, and the Enterprise could be moon sized, depending on how you view it...

To be fair, English isn't his first language.]

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: Trekkies are smart. PostPosted: 2012-04-28 10:15am
Offline
Castellan
User avatar

Joined: 2010-03-09 03:16pm
Posts: 5894
Location: Bound in a nutshell
On the moon-sized thing. My astronomy lecturers tend to draw a definition between "moon" and "Natural satellite" where a moon has to be a planetoid, i.e. something big enough to pull itself into a rough sphere, about a 100 km diameter.

So, Mars has two satellites but no moons. Deimos is almost certainy a captured asteroid whilst Phobos was probably plasted off the surface by an impact. Jupiter has scores of the damn things (63 was the last count I saw) and most of them are captured asteroids.



"I could be bounded in a nutshell and count myself a king of infinite space, were it not that I have bad dreams" - Hamlet

"Bones' remedies for problems seems to revolve around giving his patients a prescription of heavy drugs, booze, or taking them to strip clubs. He is either insane, a drug addict, or the best damn Doctor in Starfleet!" - SFDebris

SDN World 6: The Kingdom of Orion

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: Trekkies are smart. PostPosted: 2012-05-06 02:59pm
Offline
is a laughing fool.
User avatar

Joined: 2003-04-30 10:24pm
Posts: 6971
Location: c nnyhjdyt yr 45
Luke Skywalker wrote:
Quote:
It is more along the lines of building a hundred frigates or one DS. Apparently Economies of scale really love Death Stars.


-a member, arguing that the construction of the Death Star is an industrial feat roughly equivalent to building a hundred frigates. His source:

Quote:
ISB page 11

The Death Star Project is an example of a priority sector into which the Empire poured resources enough to have formed perhaps a score of Sector Groups


------------------------------

Quote:
Since Starfleet is not incompetent that is not a problem.




[Context there; SWST is me, attempting to question how imperial ships could use fusion reactors, when they explode whenever hit, a characteristic typically not attributed to a nuclear powerplant; Picard, responding by saying that atomizing the Death Star isn't impressive, because it's moon sized, and the Enterprise could be moon sized, depending on how you view it...

To be fair, English isn't his first language.]


Well according to Wookieepedia (using the SW Tech Journal as the source) a Sector group consists of 24 ISDs (I do not know if smaller support ships are included). So a score of these groups would come out to something like 480 ISDs. Still seems small a number but definitely better than Picard's idea.



ASVS('97)/SDN('03)

"Peppercorn Tomatoes slathered in broken guacamole sauce. Put it in the microwave and press puree. 5 seconds in the dumpster and it is ready to be cooked in the freezer at -350 degrees for twenty minutes. Apply pressure in various hamster spots and scream like a psychotic banshee." My reply when asked what was on my mind.

"Whilst human alchemists refer to the combustion triangle, some of their orcish counterparts see it as more of a hexagon: heat, fuel, air, laughter, screaming, fun." - Dawn of the Dragons

Top
 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group