Rules for this forum

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Locked
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70027
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Rules for this forum

Post by Darth Wong » 2005-07-02 01:19am

In addition to the general board rules, the "Pure Star Trek" forum has a couple of specific rules of its own:
  1. If you are about to make a post whose entire content can be basically summarized as "Berman and Braga suck", don't bother. The horse is dead. Stop beating it. And certainly don't make any comments which could be construed as threats toward them.
  2. If you are about to make a post simply to laugh at the Federation for being incompetent or useless, don't bother. If you're going to attack them for being stupid, you should at least make a point of giving evidence and reasoning to show that they are stupid, rather than just ranting about it. This rule, like the previous rule, falls into the "stop beating the dead horse" category. A good example of the sort of post we want to discourage is someone who responds to a lengthy dissertation with a one-liner like "that's because warp cores explode when you sneeze on them :roll:"
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html

Locked