Sovereign class, rear torpedo launcher.

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Sovereign class, rear torpedo launcher.

Post by Alyeska »

One thing that always bugged me from Insurrection was that we see the E-E launch two photon torpedoes from a rear launcher. The thing that bugged me was the fact that no matter how hard a tried, I could not find this launcher. I sorta played with the idea that MAYBE they had the shuttle bay open and used the Venture scout to fire them. But then the Nemesis trailed came along and suddenly we see torpedoes come from the aft again. This time we see a much better position and low and behold the rear shuttlebay was closed.

So, just where is this rear launcher? I continued my efforts, and at last I found it. In the first Nemesis trailer we see the shuttle Argo launch from the Enterprise. It launchs from the same location as the shuttle from Insurrection. We have a nice view of the Enterprise from this angle, and there I noticed it. The Shuttle Bay is the "1st" tier on the Sovereign class saucer. Then there is a "2nd" tier with a clyndrical protrussion, the "3rd" and final tier is the bridge area. On the very top of the 2nd Tier is an odd looking device with two apparent black points to it. Looking at it, the launcher seems somewhat small, but then you notice its likely a side by side launcher, a double. And its not THAT small. The Quantum Torpedo turret fires from a VERY small area given it fights for room with the Captain Yacht.

So, there we have it. The rear torpedo launcher is actually two. This is supported by the Enterprise firing two seperate volleys of three torpedoes at the Romulan ship. This is also somewhat supported by the Enterprise firing two somewhat space apart torpedoes at the Sona ships.

So, whats the issue? Why is this really worth posting? Well, there is a SLIGHT problem. This launcher is only seen in the Nemesis trailer. It is not on the Enterprise in either First Contact or Insurrection.

Sooo. Was the Enterprise upgraded since we last saw it? I think not. We saw it fire from a rear launcher in the same aproximate location in Insurrection. I speculate that someone on the technical staff was smart enough to notice the Enterprise fired torpedoes from a place with no launcher in Insurrection. Yet we KNOW it fired from that place. Their solution for Nemesis is to place a launcher in the location. In other words, the Nemesis model of the Enterprise is the correct one and the Insurrection model is not. Simply put, its a VFX screw up that took two movies to be fixed.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
Howedar
Emperor's Thumb
Posts: 12472
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:06pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Post by Howedar »

Well, I need to see a picture first. Interesting, though.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

(mubbles)

My DVD player and Quck-Time do NOT like having screen shots taken of them.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Post by phongn »

If you use QuickTime, you can usually copy-paste a frame. You may not be able to do a conventional screenshot due to hardware overlay issues.
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

phongn wrote:If you use QuickTime, you can usually copy-paste a frame. You may not be able to do a conventional screenshot due to hardware overlay issues.
Yeah, I tried a screen shot and it went into paint, but then when I closed Quick-Time the damned picture disapeared and Paint was blank.

How do I copy and past a single frame?
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Crayz9000
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 7329
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:39pm
Location: Improbably superpositioned
Contact:

Post by Crayz9000 »

Alyeska wrote:How do I copy and past a single frame?
I might be able to do it; right now, I'm trying to see if I even have the trailer on my HD.
A Tribute to Stupidity: The Robert Scott Anderson Archive (currently offline)
John Hansen - Slightly Insane Bounty Hunter - ASVS Vets' Assoc. Class of 2000
HAB Cryptanalyst | WG - Intergalactic Alliance and Spoof Author | BotM | Cybertron | SCEF
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Crayz9000 wrote:
Alyeska wrote:How do I copy and past a single frame?
I might be able to do it; right now, I'm trying to see if I even have the trailer on my HD.
This is the trailer that starts off rather peacefully, has a shot of the Romulan city, and has Picard saying "It seems as if we trully are sailing off into the unknown" or something along those lines. Early in the clip you see the Argo launched from the Enterprise. That section is where you can spot the two torpedo launchers.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37389
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

I see what you mean. A tanish bulge with two small black box's just above it. Could very well be the launcher or launchers.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Sea Skimmer wrote:I see what you mean. A tanish bulge with two small black box's just above it. Could very well be the launcher or launchers.
Thats it exactly. And the thing I am pointing out is this bulge is not on the Enterprise in Insurrection.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Crayz9000
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 7329
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:39pm
Location: Improbably superpositioned
Contact:

Post by Crayz9000 »

Alyeska wrote:
Crayz9000 wrote:
Alyeska wrote:How do I copy and past a single frame?
I might be able to do it; right now, I'm trying to see if I even have the trailer on my HD.
This is the trailer that starts off rather peacefully, has a shot of the Romulan city, and has Picard saying "It seems as if we trully are sailing off into the unknown" or something along those lines. Early in the clip you see the Argo launched from the Enterprise. That section is where you can spot the two torpedo launchers.
OK, here's the image, 200% size for analysis.

Image

And on a marginally related note, here is concrete evidence of hull-conforming shields:
Image
Image
A Tribute to Stupidity: The Robert Scott Anderson Archive (currently offline)
John Hansen - Slightly Insane Bounty Hunter - ASVS Vets' Assoc. Class of 2000
HAB Cryptanalyst | WG - Intergalactic Alliance and Spoof Author | BotM | Cybertron | SCEF
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

http://community.webshots.com/storage/1 ... LDG_ph.jpg

Ok, that is the rear torpedo launcher that we didn't see in Insurrection. When you look at that section of the Enterprise when they launched the shuttle in the movie, that bulge wasn't there.

The reason I believe this is indeed the launcher is because when we saw the Enteprise engage the Romulan ship in the most recent trailer, we saw torpedoes comming from above the shuttle bay.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Crayz9000
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 7329
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:39pm
Location: Improbably superpositioned
Contact:

Post by Crayz9000 »

OK, that makes sense. BTW, here's the original studio model:
Image
A Tribute to Stupidity: The Robert Scott Anderson Archive (currently offline)
John Hansen - Slightly Insane Bounty Hunter - ASVS Vets' Assoc. Class of 2000
HAB Cryptanalyst | WG - Intergalactic Alliance and Spoof Author | BotM | Cybertron | SCEF
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Crayz9000 wrote:OK, that makes sense. BTW, here's the original studio model:
Image
Yep, you can see that bulge is not on the original model.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
Howedar
Emperor's Thumb
Posts: 12472
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:06pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Post by Howedar »

Fascinating.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29309
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by Vympel »

I can't see it on the 200% image posted and .... I can't follow that URL
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
User avatar
Andras
Jedi Knight
Posts: 575
Joined: 2002-07-08 10:27am
Location: Waldorf, MD

Post by Andras »

Can you tell what kind of Torpedos were fired from it? Quantum would make more sense, giving all quantums in the saucer and all photons in the secondary hull.

That would provide 4 aft tubes, 2 above, and 2 below.

Fore tubes would be the turret and the lower pair, with another pair possible in the saucer( more likely now with the aft pair making a showing)

Total- potentially 8 tubes plus the turret, 4Q and 4P in pairs fore and aft.
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Andras wrote:Can you tell what kind of Torpedos were fired from it? Quantum would make more sense, giving all quantums in the saucer and all photons in the secondary hull.

That would provide 4 aft tubes, 2 above, and 2 below.

Fore tubes would be the turret and the lower pair, with another pair possible in the saucer( more likely now with the aft pair making a showing)

Total- potentially 8 tubes plus the turret, 4Q and 4P in pairs fore and aft.
The Aft launcher featured in Insurrection and Nemesis fires Photon Torpedoes.

Canon wise we know the Sovereign class has a turreted Quantum Torpedo launcher just forward of the Captains Yacht and 2 rear Photon Torpedo launchers above and forward of the secondary shuttlebay.

Offically the Sovereign class has 2 more photon torpedo launchers below and behind the deflector dish aimed forward, then another 2 in the same area but further back aimed aft. That would put the Sovereign class with 3 forward launchers (1 QT, 2 Photon) with all three being biassed towards a downward angle. Then you would have 4 aft launchers (all Photon) with 2 biassed on a downward angle and 2 biassed on an upward angle. This puts the Sovereign class as having its forward top angle without torpedo coverage, though it does have heavy phaser coverage in that angle.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37389
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Alyeska wrote:
Sea Skimmer wrote:I see what you mean. A tanish bulge with two small black box's just above it. Could very well be the launcher or launchers.
Thats it exactly. And the thing I am pointing out is this bulge is not on the Enterprise in Insurrection.
Well the E-E did take significant damage, it might have been added on while she was in the yard under repairs.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Sea Skimmer wrote:
Alyeska wrote:
Sea Skimmer wrote:I see what you mean. A tanish bulge with two small black box's just above it. Could very well be the launcher or launchers.
Thats it exactly. And the thing I am pointing out is this bulge is not on the Enterprise in Insurrection.
Well the E-E did take significant damage, it might have been added on while she was in the yard under repairs.
Normally I agree, but there is actual Enterprise capability that mitigates against this. The Enterprise fired from this same location in Insurrection and the Scout was to big to bit in the shuttlebay right there. As I said, I think someone noted the Enterprise fired from a location where this is none on the model. So they fixed that for this movie. I prefer to use a little bit of logical anlysis rather then simply saying it was upgraded. Its partly the same line of reasoning that says the E-D can't fire phasers from its torpedo launcher regardless of a particular episode.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Crayz9000
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 7329
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:39pm
Location: Improbably superpositioned
Contact:

Post by Crayz9000 »

Vympel wrote:I can't see it on the 200% image posted and .... I can't follow that URL
Try reloading the page. My server isn't the fastest on the planet, since it's limited by a 128Kbit/sec upload speed.

I suppose it's suffering something like the Slashdot Effect because of the images I post here :)
A Tribute to Stupidity: The Robert Scott Anderson Archive (currently offline)
John Hansen - Slightly Insane Bounty Hunter - ASVS Vets' Assoc. Class of 2000
HAB Cryptanalyst | WG - Intergalactic Alliance and Spoof Author | BotM | Cybertron | SCEF
User avatar
Andras
Jedi Knight
Posts: 575
Joined: 2002-07-08 10:27am
Location: Waldorf, MD

Post by Andras »

Alyeska wrote: The Aft launcher featured in Insurrection and Nemesis fires Photon Torpedoes.

Canon wise we know the Sovereign class has a turreted Quantum Torpedo launcher just forward of the Captains Yacht and 2 rear Photon Torpedo launchers above and forward of the secondary shuttlebay.

Offically the Sovereign class has 2 more photon torpedo launchers below and behind the deflector dish aimed forward, then another 2 in the same area but further back aimed aft. That would put the Sovereign class with 3 forward launchers (1 QT, 2 Photon) with all three being biassed towards a downward angle. Then you would have 4 aft launchers (all Photon) with 2 biassed on a downward angle and 2 biassed on an upward angle. This puts the Sovereign class as having its forward top angle without torpedo coverage, though it does have heavy phaser coverage in that angle.
That works, the Fact File claims 2 Qtubes on the saucer foreward, straddling the secondary deflector mount. I can't find my model, is that on the top of the hull? They would provide fore and up coverage if so. Still has 8 tubes, 2Q, 6P, plus the turret.
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29309
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by Vympel »

Oh wait NOW I see it ... cool.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Andras wrote:
Alyeska wrote: The Aft launcher featured in Insurrection and Nemesis fires Photon Torpedoes.

Canon wise we know the Sovereign class has a turreted Quantum Torpedo launcher just forward of the Captains Yacht and 2 rear Photon Torpedo launchers above and forward of the secondary shuttlebay.

Offically the Sovereign class has 2 more photon torpedo launchers below and behind the deflector dish aimed forward, then another 2 in the same area but further back aimed aft. That would put the Sovereign class with 3 forward launchers (1 QT, 2 Photon) with all three being biassed towards a downward angle. Then you would have 4 aft launchers (all Photon) with 2 biassed on a downward angle and 2 biassed on an upward angle. This puts the Sovereign class as having its forward top angle without torpedo coverage, though it does have heavy phaser coverage in that angle.
That works, the Fact File claims 2 Qtubes on the saucer foreward, straddling the secondary deflector mount. I can't find my model, is that on the top of the hull? They would provide fore and up coverage if so. Still has 8 tubes, 2Q, 6P, plus the turret.
This is the Launcher you are referring to.

http://www.shiporama.org/images/sovereign/1701e-62.jpg

I disagree with the Fact Files on those being a Quantum Torpedo launchers. Also, they have a relatively forward biassed launching angle with it constricted in the top coverage because of the saucer leaving its best arc as a forward bottom fire angle.

Wait a second. In the saucer forward but stradling the deflector mount?

Yeah, I think these are the tubes your thinking. I find it more likely these are Photon Torpedo launchers because they more closely resemble the aft launchers.

That gives us 3 forward and 2 aft launchers. Only 1 Quantum launcher.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

I still want to know why homing weapons need a turet to launch them.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Ender wrote:I still want to know why homing weapons need a turet to launch them.
It allows for much more ease of firing the weapon. It can be aimed directly on the target at closer ranges and the weapon does not have to make major corrections and thus risk loosing its target.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
Post Reply