Search found 44 matches

by Danny
2011-09-20 03:37pm
Forum: Pure Star Trek
Topic: Yesterday's Enterpise: Why were the Klingons winning?
Replies: 160
Views: 32828

Re: Yesterday's Enterpise: Why were the Klingons winning?

I think what he means is if the federation sent ships to help gowron fight the house of duras during the Klingon civil war, then the romulans would have sent ships to help duras. This would have ended with a split in the empire between gowron and duras. An interesting hypothesis, but has nothing to ...
by Danny
2011-09-19 11:17pm
Forum: Pure Star Trek
Topic: Yesterday's Enterpise: Why were the Klingons winning?
Replies: 160
Views: 32828

Re: Yesterday's Enterpise: Why were the Klingons winning?

The term 'hogwash' comes to mind. Plenty of 'free loving society' forces have fought to the death...if and when there was something to be achieved by doing so. You 'warrior cultures' will fight to the death no matter what even when it makes no difference whatsoever. free loving liberal societies be...
by Danny
2011-09-19 07:06pm
Forum: Pure Star Trek
Topic: Yesterday's Enterpise: Why were the Klingons winning?
Replies: 160
Views: 32828

Re: Yesterday's Enterpise: Why were the Klingons winning?

In warrior cultures, or nations currently fighting for liberty- fighting to the death is a morale booster, whereas in our free loving society its the opposite. Your average klingon is like "holy shit, am i gonna die for reals? :P LETS GO!!!!" It is a rather intimidating prospect to be figh...
by Danny
2011-09-17 11:06pm
Forum: Pure Star Trek
Topic: Yesterday's Enterpise: Why were the Klingons winning?
Replies: 160
Views: 32828

Re: Yesterday's Enterpise: Why were the Klingons winning?

DO illuminate me. I would really like to know where always fighting to the death (you know the TNG Klingon way) has historically had advantages, because the first thing that comes to mind is WW2 Japan, where it essentially led to a lot of japanese and americans dieing in a war the japanese had no h...
by Danny
2011-09-17 12:32am
Forum: Pure Star Trek
Topic: Yesterday's Enterpise: Why were the Klingons winning?
Replies: 160
Views: 32828

Re: Yesterday's Enterpise: Why were the Klingons winning?

@Danny That'd be the part where you have yet to show a reason why they would. So far, all you've shown is a lot of baseless assumptions. Like them always fighting to the death actually being an advantage (when that can heavily backfire on them), you blithely assuming the Klingon Empire is considera...
by Danny
2011-09-16 08:44pm
Forum: Pure Star Trek
Topic: Yesterday's Enterpise: Why were the Klingons winning?
Replies: 160
Views: 32828

Re: Yesterday's Enterpise: Why were the Klingons winning?

Plus, why is it so hard to believe Klingons could win in a war against the federation? I would think it would be painfully obviously why. Over analyzing and Over thinking things can be as sad as Jason B's logic.
by Danny
2011-09-16 08:42pm
Forum: Pure Star Trek
Topic: Yesterday's Enterpise: Why were the Klingons winning?
Replies: 160
Views: 32828

Re: Yesterday's Enterpise: Why were the Klingons winning?

I do believe Starfleet is a military service, however have all of you noticed in many episodes in the star trek universe, they like to apply the word 'Federation' when humanitarian/diplomatic missions, and the word 'starfleet' when confrontation is imminent? " I am Captain Jean Luc Picard of th...
by Danny
2011-09-13 07:03pm
Forum: Pure Star Trek
Topic: Yesterday's Enterpise: Why were the Klingons winning?
Replies: 160
Views: 32828

Re: Yesterday's Enterpise: Why were the Klingons winning?

Yep. As to the greater topic at hand, I love the countless rationalizations and excuses Starfleet fanboys make. Why is it so hard to accept the simplest explanation -- the Klingons were militarily superior? Consider: *Even the smallest Klingon ships can put up a fight. Kruge's BoP probably didn't o...
by Danny
2011-08-31 04:38pm
Forum: Star Wars vs Star Trek
Topic: Can Federation destroy Death Stars
Replies: 207
Views: 68770

Re: Can Federation destroy Death Stars

May JJ Abrams burn in hell.
by Danny
2011-08-30 07:12pm
Forum: Pure Star Trek
Topic: Reasons for the Federation not including Marines/Army
Replies: 100
Views: 17812

Re: Reasons for the Federation not including Marines/Army

And where does AR-558 show that Starfleet has an actual ground forces branch? All I remember is the standard poor sods in Starfleet PJs, no evidence of them actually being specially trained ground troops (mind you, it's been eons since I saw that episode). Everyone wearing the combat uniform are es...
by Danny
2011-08-30 01:20pm
Forum: Pure Star Trek
Topic: Reasons for the Federation not including Marines/Army
Replies: 100
Views: 17812

Re: Reasons for the Federation not including Marines/Army

But apparently with you if I don't think it could win in a hypothetical fight, I dislike it? Just reading your posts and your douchebag signature makes me think you're the bastard lovechild of an Internet shut-in and one of those assholes from Jersey Shore. LOL @ the last comment. Based on the epis...
by Danny
2011-08-29 09:58pm
Forum: Pure Star Trek
Topic: Reasons for the Federation not including Marines/Army
Replies: 100
Views: 17812

Re: Reasons for the Federation not including Marines/Army

Indeed, as you'd have to admit you can't do it. I already did through visual and dialogue from a friggin stormtrooper LOL! You prove to me they arent dead? Soldiers dont leave their compatriots on the ground [even dead] like that. If what you say is true, then the stromtroopers are utter pieces of ...
by Danny
2011-08-29 08:00pm
Forum: Pure Star Trek
Topic: Reasons for the Federation not including Marines/Army
Replies: 100
Views: 17812

Re: Reasons for the Federation not including Marines/Army

I would go into great detail pointing out your fallacies, but there is no point. You ignore the complete obvious in an attempt to portray star wars as "superior". All the quotes i mentioned are canon [EU, which even SW lovers must admit is BS like ST novels]. Pics of troopers dying or just...
by Danny
2011-08-29 12:06am
Forum: Pure Star Trek
Topic: Reasons for the Federation not including Marines/Army
Replies: 100
Views: 17812

Re: Reasons for the Federation not including Marines/Army

Oh really. You no doubt have examples handy that disprove that. Because all I remember from the OT is blaster bolt hits stormie, sparkles and smoke, stormie drops. But since you obviously know a lot more about blaster operation/blaster bolt/armour interaction than I do DO feel free to elaborate. Th...
by Danny
2011-08-28 09:37pm
Forum: Star Wars vs Star Trek
Topic: Can Federation destroy Death Stars
Replies: 207
Views: 68770

Re: Can Federation destroy Death Stars

if those were shield generators, you'd think they'd be covered by their own shields sufficiently that it wouldn't take only fighter weapons to break through. And frankly, Starfleet ships would be blown to pieces before they could even get around to pummeling through the shields. An Executor-class v...
by Danny
2011-08-28 08:30pm
Forum: Pure Star Trek
Topic: Reasons for the Federation not including Marines/Army
Replies: 100
Views: 17812

Re: Reasons for the Federation not including Marines/Army

Stormtroopers drop after 1 hit. So do modern day troops wearing body armour. Stupid pieces of shit. For all we know, every stormtrooper dropped by blaster fire in the OT survived. Oh, and not only do we know from the EU that they can turn a direct blaster hit into something survivable, they serve a...
by Danny
2011-08-28 08:23pm
Forum: Star Wars vs Star Trek
Topic: Can Federation destroy Death Stars
Replies: 207
Views: 68770

Re: Can Federation destroy Death Stars

So how exactly is Starfleet going to reproduce the massive fleet bombardment that brought down Executors shields which was what made the A-wing's suicide run possible to begin with? (not that those being shield generators is all that well established to begin with, the EU can't seem to make up its ...
by Danny
2011-08-28 04:44pm
Forum: Pure Star Trek
Topic: Reasons for the Federation not including Marines/Army
Replies: 100
Views: 17812

Re: Reasons for the Federation not including Marines/Army

Keep in mind that episode the rigged com badge shield lasted for 15 seconds, and it was able to deflect 19th century ballistics. Im pretty sure an energy based weapon with more power woulda rendered worf's shields useless. Plus personal shields i would imagine would be bulky pieces. Also [painfully ...
by Danny
2011-08-27 10:25pm
Forum: Star Wars vs Star Trek
Topic: Can Federation destroy Death Stars
Replies: 207
Views: 68770

Re: Can Federation destroy Death Stars

A runabout more powerful than an ISD? LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL even as a trekkie i cry bullshit to that. Maybe if the runabout did a kamikaze run on the ISD bridge after it blew off its shield generators [which are clearly visibile as having testicles ontop of the brai----bridge]. Hey if an A-wing fighter ...
by Danny
2011-08-26 12:16am
Forum: Star Wars vs Star Trek
Topic: 31st Century UFP vs. Galactic Empire (A New Hope Era)
Replies: 131
Views: 47806

Re: 31st Century UFP vs. Galactic Empire (A New Hope Era)

Also, I thought the Cardassian metagenic weaponry thing was a ruse to capture Picard. Did any other episode show them possessing such weapons? It was a ruse, however the weapon itself was created in the past, but was outlawed by most species, including surprisingly the romulans. Since it was outlaw...
by Danny
2011-08-25 05:36pm
Forum: Star Wars vs Star Trek
Topic: 31st Century UFP vs. Galactic Empire (A New Hope Era)
Replies: 131
Views: 47806

Re: 31st Century UFP vs. Galactic Empire (A New Hope Era)

or better yet- a Cardassian metagenic weapon that kills all DNA on the planet, thereby making conquest of the planet easier. Why waste resources on time travel and accidently destroy more than that species your trying to kill by making a small mistake [VOY: Year of Hell] if you could just launch a l...
by Danny
2011-08-25 01:35pm
Forum: Fantasy
Topic: First picture of Anne Hathaway as Catwoman
Replies: 27
Views: 4349

Re: First picture of Anne Hathaway as Catwoman

I dont see WHY people associate sex symbol status with being a good choice. Need i remind these people Halley Berry's take on catwoman was so stupid it made me cringe in my seat. The movie was so stupid i stopped beating off to Halley. Anne Hathaway [which has always been regarded as an attractive, ...
by Danny
2011-08-25 01:29pm
Forum: History
Topic: Why is Richard Lionheart so adored in Britain?
Replies: 67
Views: 15180

Re: Why is Richard Lionheart so adored in Britain?

Misconceptions of history. Originally, Richard was not liked by his own people. He ruled the Angevin kingdom, and as part of the Plantagenet- ruled in a french fashion. He was called "the absent king" The fucking guy didnt even speak English, since he only spoke in French. According to his...
by Danny
2011-08-25 01:20pm
Forum: History
Topic: How Many of The German WWII Generals Were War Criminals
Replies: 46
Views: 12877

Re: How Many of The German WWII Generals Were War Criminals

I think any general on the losing side in the modern era would be tried for war crimes.