StarDestroyer.Net BBS

No, more like you're bringing up irrelevant stuff dipshit. I brought up Western incompetence when dealing with the coronavirus to compare to the Chinese response, and your first instinct is to bring up Tiananmen which has nothing to do with how the Chinese responded to the pandemic. :lol: Citing pr...

Okay
So people that I didn't defend did things wrong that I also didn't defend

You've refuted absolutely nothing so concession accepted I guess? :^)

Ah yes, the government that has a stance on political dissent that can be summed up as 'your subscription to life has been terminated.' I know what it comes to 'people that I trust' they're right up there near the top. I mean hey, other governments do bad things too so that means that the one that t...

So maybe this is me putting my pants on my head but is there a logic in a Biden/Sanders ticket? Assuming they can find common enough ground on policy and more importantly at least try to retain party solidarity...

I've played through the whole thing and I like it quite a bit, most of it anyway. Some of the fighty can be a pain in the ass. I don't think putting elemental on a weapon helps stagger at all and highly mobile enemies will just not get hit with Ice. And the ending is uh. I'm really not sure what to ...

Pretty sure that scenario two results in The Doctor turning his considerable intellect into destroying Thanos without much in the way of mercy or pity. Consider that one time that the villains only went as far as kidnapping Amy and he took out a fleet of Cyberman ships just as collateral... but then...

Their POWER exists, its just that the stones are no longer stones (or angry red sludge, whatever.)

There's also the implication that he didn't stop doing the shadowy puppermaster thing until Odin and probably Hel were both out of the way.

The stones being 'destroyed' means just as Thanos said: They've been reduced to atoms. So they're still THERE but utilizing them in the same way that he had done is more or less impossible, or so the theory goes. I think that one was even confirmed by the Russo brothers. I really wonder how differen...

My assumption for weirdness with timelines and alternate universes and whatever has become 'just because Banner says he knows what he's talking about doesn't mean that he does.' Basically its Doctor Who rules, where it works EXACTLY like its explained except for all the parts that are wrong with the...

"Russia is a bit player on the world stage. Everyone and their dog is criticizing Russia... its a bit boring, isn't it?"
-Julian Assange, 2016

I don't know if I would even call that 100% clear evidence, because correlation is not causation, but I can see the point. And this is a question of curiosity, at one point does one stop scrutinizing Trump's actions in office against his business holdings? Even if he had put his business into a trus...

I believe not de-vesting himself of his business interests is a serious crime for the POTUS. Businesses he is/was associated with directly benefiting from his actions or decisions would also be a serious problem. IANAL, but what I've read on the subject suggests thats not actually the case. POTUS d...

I mean, Avenatti DOES represent one of the single best cases for 'the left makes shit up' a lot and calling that out is entirely fair game But his faking an affidavit for his client should be taken with the understanding that he himself is a glory hound and overall kind of a doucebag. It should also...

Mueller Claus came annnnnnd he brought coal

As a side point - no matter the cost, the alternative is destruction, right? Idiots who keep applying capitalist logic to a fundamental problem will inevitably fail to grasp that this is not a matter of „costs“. Perhaps its a notion of 'If we CAN achieve this Christmas List of wants and ideals, wil...

Besides, "Make America Great Again" wasn't even a good slogan, if you put five seconds' thought into what it meant. When was America greater than it is now? How did it become Not Great? Hint: What your answer is will likely depend greatly on whether you are a white man who feels threatene...

1. Repeatedly describing how the EC works is not an argument for why things should work that way, any more than repeating "Slavery is protected by the Constitution'" was a valid argument against Abolitionism. Outlining how it works (or even how it works) and how that method of working is ...

Many of Trump's actions, allies and policy goals are fascistic. Therefore, if someone votes for Donald Trump, they are either a) a fascist, b) they have no objection to putting fascists in high office and enabling fascist policy in order to achieve whatever it is they hope to get out of Trump's pre...

Though yeah, I do consider 40% of the population being fascists a problem. Because the only reason to vote for Trump is that someone is a facist, sure. How are those Soros checks treating you anyway? Also on the subject of the Electoral College I would just like to say 'tyranny of the majority.' Th...

To be fair, the GND DOES seem a little wishy-washy and the 'how' of it is something that should be questioned because I think thats a big thing thats going to be on everyone's minds. If there's one bit of policy thats going to hurt democrats going into 2020 its probably how much you can pick into th...

I explained the reasons for my concern above- namely that his background and policies will appeal more to moderate Democrats than to Republicans, and that he's a big enough name to run a substantial independent bid. And a split over policy, or an ugly primary, could be exacerbated by Schultz, as I ...

What makes you think Schultz out of anyone would be the one to split the democratic vote? I'm almost more worried about a split developing just in the name of policy alone or a rocky campaign on the same. A lot of it is going to shake down on whether or not the GND ends up being a complete shitshow ...

So in other words, yes, your view is "if one woman can be shown to have lied about something, the default assumption should be that all accusers are liars". Because apparently presumption of innocence, not just in a courtroom but in all aspects of life, is a privilege you only believe sho...

Elfdart wrote: ↑2019-02-10 11:43am And? Does that mean they're all lying?

I mean, if the shoe fits?
But eh, more or less 'accusations shouldn't be an end-all be-all.'