Lord Poe wrote:
Lord Poe wrote:
I claim Rogaine jockey is purposely misrepresenting the scene, and that the pulsating plasma ball is on a straight course.
DarkStar wrote:
Man, that "Darth Mullet" thing really got to you.
Once again, nope. Like every other argument of yours that has been shot down in flames here and elsewhere, the hair to the left isn't a "mullet". The haircut I CURRENTLY have would definitely be considered a mullet, but that one is just long hair. I simply notice your obsession with my hair for what it is- envy to the "follicly challenged".
Actually, my hair is approaching the length of yours, but I freely admit (and take pride in the fact) that it isn't the bouffant coiffure (or any other faggy poodle terms which apply) that your megamullet represents. If you now have a less bouffant mullet, my congratulations. But, you are still Darth Mullet either way it goes.
Quote:
Quote:
It was fired from above the plane of the ship.
It was fired from direct center.
Oh, please... we can all see it, you lying whore. All you have to do is draw a damn X with lines from viewer corner to viewer corner, and see that the plasma weapon is not centered, even though the moving stars were.
Quote:
Quote:
When the ship started zipping backward at a speed faster than light, the object continued to follow them. Had it been a straight-shooting weapon, it would have continued on a downward trajectory. This is really simple. I don't understand how the concept eludes you.
Probably because its idiocy is immediately canceled. Not only do you assume incorrectly that it was "pointing down", but that the weapon is "fixed" and can't fire off-center. Rather, you stick to the more ludicrous assumption that the plasma ball adjusted its course for no reason against a target that wasn't maneuvering.
Your hair-care products have gone to your brain. Let me spell it out for you:
The Romulan ship was above the plane of the Enterprise. (The orientation or firing arc of the Romulan ship doesn't matter.) In order to hit the Enterprise, it would have to fire the weapon on a trajectory which, from the Enterprise's perspective, would be downward. The Enterprise reversed engines and flew backwards at high speed. Instead of continuing the downward trajectory, the object followed them from the front, on the same plane.
A plane change involves a turn. Therefore, the plasma weapon turned. If it turned, it must be capable of maneuvering.
The more you argue against this simple point, the dumber you look.
Quote:
Quote:
Even though, the ship that fired it allegedly can't even achieve warp.
Man, there's a bullshit story I never get tired of hearing. No, wait, I did get tired of it long ago.
Ah yes, another Trekkie that insists that Scotty MUST be wrong when he said the ship's power was "simple impulse".
Funny that the same class of ship pursued the Enterprise at warp speeds in "The Deadly Years". Funny that the moving blip we see of the Enterprise which is moving at maximum warp shows that the trip just to get to the Earth Outposts would have taken several lifetimes in a sublight vessel (
http://www.trek5.com/caps/tos/09_BOT/pa ... OT_030.htm). Funny that a society which supposedly doesn't have warp drive has no trouble using weapons that go FTL. And finally, it's funny that the ship's apparent engines would have little clear pieces in the front (
http://www.trek5.com/caps/tos/09_BOT/pa ... OT_090.htm) that put out a blue glow from a spot analogous to the ramscoops of the Enterprise (
http://www.trek5.com/caps/tos/09_BOT/pa ... OT_157.htm).
Quote:
Quote:
Not only that, but I don't believe we've ever seen an energy weapon home in on a target.
V'ger fired some,
V'ger's weapons never adjusted course after being fired. Didn't need to since not one of its targets even tried to evade.
The Enterprise pitched and yawed, and Spock specifically mentioned a guidance system (even if he didn't know what it was).
Quote:
Quote:
and the Defiant's phaser pulses were once seen to turn along with the ship.
Can you be any more vague?
Sure:
http://www.h4h.com/louis/trekmiss.htmlWhile you revel in your Benny Hill music, notice that at about 1:42 in the clip, we see a shot out of the Defiant's viewscreen. The Defiant fires her phaser cannons while engaging in a hard port turn. Notice that the phaser pulses stay in front of the ship, even while she's turning. Notice also that one of the shots which would have missed had it continued along its original course hits the Dominion ship due to whatever kept it directly in front of the Defiant.
FX screwup? Yeah, probably, but that is an invalid argument in most ST vs SW circles, and may even be invalidated by the fact that the shots were actually shown to hit after doing that.
Quote:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:thl ... %40h4h.comWhat, a pivot isn't a maneuver to you?
Quote:
Quote:
No, it wouldn't. We see the stars moving toward the ship, then Kirk learns the Romulans are decloaking. Kirk guesses their move, orders "full astern, emergency warp speed" (your second video begins there), and we see the Romulan ship fire. When the Romulans fire, the stars are already moving in reverse, and there are no further turning orders.
This doesn't mean they were already turned around. We've seen the speed of a "warp pivot", and its far from immediate.
Concession accepted. The Enterprise did not pivot, because she was not ordered to do so... she was ordered into reverse, and there was not even time for a warp pivot.
Quote:
Quote:
Those reversing stars are heading toward a point below the plasma weapon. By the next viewscreen shot, they are headed toward a point behind the plasma weapon.
Yup, when the Enterprise has already completed its turn.
Concession accepted. Your turning, maneuvering Enterprise requires (even moreso than before) a turning, maneuvering plasma weapon.
Quote:
Quote:
But, yes, it does appear to be about ten percent smaller... and in the center, instead of the upper left of the screen where it started out. Oh, right, I forgot that makes your theory look stupid. Sorry.
You're projecting again, since it fully supports my theory-- new camera angle.
New camera angle? The Enterprise would need a huge boom off to the side to be able to mount a camera like you are describing, and even then it wouldn't do all the magic tricks you would require of it.
Quote:
Quote:
The idea that you're missing isn't that the plasma weapon slowed... the Enterprise was speeding up.
No shit. Really? Your theory is the one that allows us idiotic assumptions like the plasma ball can course correct (for no reason)
Except for the fact that it was fired at a position which no longer contained the Enterprise.
Quote:
and therefore slow down (for no reason).
You're the one claiming it must have slowed down, ignoring the fact that the Enterprise was speeding up. If the plasma weapon was smaller (and therefore further away), yet continued to overtake the ship when the Enterprise had reached full power, this implies that the weapon also accelerated.
Quote:
My theory fits all the facts, without making up a theory so idiotic that even a spacebattles.com resident would laugh at it.
Ha! You just called simple geometry idiotic. Dumbass.
Quote:
Quote:
The most you can claim out of the smaller plasma weapon was that the magnification on the screen changed.
Incorrect. Anytime there is a screen magnification change, Kirk orders it. He didn't.
Fine, then. The plasma weapon accelerated. Also, since Kirk has ordered reverse angle on the viewscreen (which, by your logic, would mean that anytime there is an angle change, Kirk orders it), I accept your concession in regards to your stupid camera change argument.
Quote:
Quote:
But, changing magnification, or even entire cameras, isn't going to change the direction of the ship's travel, or the direction of travel of the plasma weapon.
It will if the object is being shot from a different perspective.
The Enterprise is only ~130 meters wide. For such a drastic perspective change, the plasma weapon would have had to have been fired at point blank range. Since you're probably going to argue with the acceleration argument, I'll go ahead and point out that if it didn't accelerate, the weapon must have been fired at warp. Point blank range... warp speed weapon... you do the math.
Quote:
Quote:
There is no evidence that the ship changed direction of travel (well, except for reversing), so the plasma ball must have.
Yes, that the most
logical explanation.
Your first truthful, valid statement... and it is sarcasm. So sad.
Quote:
Quote:
Are you still going to argue your stupid point, or face the facts?
Ok, I admit it. The fact is, you ARE an idiot.
You're the one who doesn't understand simple geometry, and
I am an idiot? Puh-leeze.